The Soul of Pope St. John Paul II

We do not grasp John Paul II “from inside” unless we begin from the understanding that he was first and foremost a radically converted Christian disciple.

Editor’s note: The month marks the 100th anniversary of the birth of Pope John Paul II, born Karol Józef Wojtyła on May 18, 1920, in the Polish town of Wadowice. Throughout this month, CWR will be publishing several essays on various aspects of the life and thought of John Paul II. This essay, the first of those pieces, is adapted from the Preface to the 20th anniversary edition of George Weigel’s Witness to Hope: The Biography of Pope John Paul II, published by Harper Perennial.


Shortly after the death of Pope John Paul II on April 2, 2005, Henry Kissinger told NBC News that it would be difficult to imagine anyone having had a greater impact on the twentieth century than the Polish priest and bishop who, on the night of his election in 1978, had described himself as a man called to Rome “from a far country.” Kissinger’s assessment was all the more striking in that the former U.S. secretary of state – himself a consequential figure in modern history – had no religious or philosophical stake in the life, thought, and action of Karol Józef Wojtyła. A decade and a half later, it is still worth pondering just what Kissinger’s extraordinary tribute might mean. If John Paul II was indeed the emblematic human personality of the twentieth century, why was that the case? And what was the relationship between the achievement of the Polish pope – for both the Church and the world – and the heroic virtue the Catholic Church formally recognized in him when he was canonized as Saint John Paul II on April 2, 2014?

In a conversation in the papal apartment in March 1996, John Paul II said, of previous biographers’ efforts to tell his life story, “They try to understand me from outside. But I can only be understood from inside.” He knew by then that he was a figure a historic consequence. Yet his story, he insisted, was one that could only be read from the inside out through the prism of his soul, if those who sought to understand him and his accomplishment were to truly grasp what made him tick. So on this twentieth anniversary of the publication of Witness to Hope, revisiting the soul of St. John Paul II will set the story of his life through the year 2000 in its appropriate frame.

Karol Wojtyła, the man who became John Paul II, had an intensely Polish soul: not only in the sense of a personality formed by a particular ethnic experience, but in the larger sense of a soul formed by a distinctive history and culture. Born in 1920, he was a member of the first generation of Poles born in an independent Polish state since the late eighteenth century; but it was the Polish national experience between the elimination of Poland from the map of Europe in 1795 and the restoration of its national independence in 1918 that was decisive for forming the soul of John Paul II. For during those 123 years in the wilderness – years when “Poland” did not appear on any map of Europe – Poland-the-nation survived the vivisection of Poland-the-state through its culture: its language, its literature, and its Catholic faith.

That century and a quarter of culturally-based national resistance to political subjugation, during which the Catholic Church was the safe deposit box of Polish identity, left a profound impress on Wojtyła’s soul, and was decisive in shaping the thought and action of John Paul II. From that experience, he discerned that the real driver of history over time is neither politics nor economics, but culture: and at the heart of any culture, as at the beginning of the word “culture,” is cult: what a people cherishes and worships. Thus far from being a non-factor in modernity, religious conviction, and the truths Christianity teaches about the inalienable dignity of every human life, can be a dynamic, creative force, bending history in a more humane direction. When Wojtyła was elected pope on October 16, 1978, much of the Catholic Church in the West found itself in a defensive crouch. The man who became John Paul II could summon the Church to a new evangelical and public dynamism because his soul had been formed by a different experience: an experience of the Church as the bearer of the most potent vision of human possibility on offer.

Karol Wojtyła also had a Carmelite soul. His youthful attempts to enter monastic life as a Carmelite had been rebuffed, but his spiritual life – and indeed his entire view of the human condition – was profoundly shaped by his encounter as a young man with the spiritual writings of the classic Carmelite reformers of the sixteenth century, St. John of the Cross and St. Teresa of Avila. From those Carmelite mystics, he learned that the central truth of human history is found at the Cross of Christ: human beings come to fulfillment (or, if you will, beatitude), not through the assertion of self but through the gift of self in obedience to God’s will. In his mature philosophical work at the Catholic University of Lublin, Wojtyła would refine this conviction intellectually and would put the “Law of the Gift,” or the law-of-self-giving, at the very foundation of his ethics – as each of our lives is a gift to us, so we must make our lives into gifts for others. That refinement was only possible, however, because of the original perception. Rather than being a hideous cruelty or an absurdity, the self-sacrificing death of Jesus Christ – which was then vindicated by his resurrection from the dead into a new and superabundant form of life – is the axial point of human history. Here, in the death and resurrection of Christ, the deepest truths about human destiny were and are revealed. Here, in the embrace of obedience to God’s will, human beings are truly liberated. Here, in the demonstration that death does not have the final word in either our individual stories or in the story of humanity, is the source of a courage than can overcome fear and match, even conquer, worldly power.

The Carmelite dimension of John Paul’s richly textured soul was amplified by what might be called the Marian dimension of his interior life: that deep part of his personality formed by his self-understanding as a spiritual son of the Virgin Mary, under whose protection he placed his life and his pontificate. Polish devotion to the Virgin Mary, embodied in the Black Madonna of Częstochowa, is well-known. This Marian dimension of Wojtyła’s soul was not, however, simply the absorption of a traditional, emotionally vibrant form of Polish piety. For during the Second World War, under the influence of the lay mystic Jan Tyranowski and the theological writings of St. Louis Grignon de Montfort, young Karol Wojtyła began to understand that all true Christian devotion to Mary is Christocentric and Trinitarian: Mary’s role in the history of salvation is not as some sort of independent, feminine “principle” but as the first witness to Christ, her son – “Do whatever he tells you,” as she instructs the waiters at the wedding feast in Cana in the second chapter of John’s gospel. Mary always points to her son, and because Jesus is both son of Mary and Son of God, by pointing us to her son Mary points us into the great mystery of the Trinity, the God who is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

During his pontificate, John Paul II would draw on this Marian dimension of his soul to deepen Catholicism’s traditional Marian piety, constantly pointing to Mary as the paradigm of all Christian discipleship. Mary’s articulated “yes” to the angelic invitation to be the God-bearer (Luke 1.38) sets the pattern; Mary’s silent “yes” at the foot of the Cross, memorably captured in Michelangelo’s Pietà, confirms that obedience to God’s will, even in the most profound suffering, is ultimately liberating.

And here, as in his cruciform or Carmelite soul, John Paul II lived a profound challenge to the late-modern and post-modern insistence that radical personal autonomy is the royal road to happiness and human flourishing.

Then there was the dramatic dimension of Karol Wojtyła’s soul. As a young man “obsessed” (as he once put it) with the theater, Wojtyła acquired skills that would serve him well as a public personality, both as archbishop of Kraków and as pope. More importantly, however, his theatrical experience as both actor and playwright formed a soul with a distinctive view of the human condition. Each of us, he came to understand, lives in a dramatic situation, for we live each day in the gap between the person-I-am and the person-I-ought-to-be. Understanding that, we come to grasp that life is never dull or repetitive; living in such a way as to close the gap between who I am now and what I aspire to be is inherently dramatic, adventurous, and dynamic. What we sometimes call “the human drama” is not just the story of those large-scale figures who dominate the history books. The “human drama” is in fact the spiritual and moral life of every human person. And the task of the Church and its ministers, Pope John Paul II would insist, is to accompany men and women in the drama of their lives, exploring each life’s uniquely dramatic circumstances while offering the mercy and forgiveness of Christ when the drama takes a bad turn.

This conviction that all of life is dramatically structured, and that the ultimate playwright of the human drama is none other than God, helps explain the otherwise inexplicable magnetism that John Paul II had for young people all over the world. At a cultural moment when pandering to the young was the order of the day, John Paul II did not pander: he challenged. But because he also made clear that he, too, lived in that dramatic “gap” that is everyone’s human circumstance, his challenge had the ring of authenticity. He was not asking young people to accept any challenge he had not accepted, take any risk he had not taken, or bear any burden he had not borne; he was, instead, asking them to pursue, with courage, the instinct for the heroic and the noble that was their human birthright, even in a world of sin and evil. Never, ever settle, he would say in many variations on a common theme, for anything less than the spiritual and moral greatness that the grace of God makes possible in your life. And when you fail – as we all do – don’t lower the bar of expectation. Get up, seek forgiveness, be reconciled to God and others, and then continue the great dramatic adventure of “life in the gap.” Live in those terms, he suggested, and you will never, ever find life anything other than exhilarating, no matter how hard it becomes.

The priestly soul of John Paul II, and his understanding of priestly ministry as the clarifying, challenging, and grace-bestowing accompaniment of others through the drama of life, has been noted; Karol Wojtyła also had what can be accurately described as a “lay” soul. He was the first pope in centuries who, until he was a young adult, had intended to live out his Catholic life as a layman. Two decades before the Second Vatican Council taught the Church about the universal call to holiness, Wojtyła already knew (not least from his father, the dominant influence on his young life) that sanctity was not a matter for the church sanctuary only; sanctity was every Christian’s baptismal vocation, and sanctity was to be sought and lived in the world, not in an ecclesiastical bunker. Thus, for John Paul II, Catholicism could not be understood as a life-style or recreational choice to be indulged for an hour or so on Sunday and then put aside in order to return to the “real world;” rather, Catholic faith embraced and illuminated all of life, and everything the believer does (be it in the family, the workplace, as a consumer, or as a citizen) is to be sanctified by Catholic lives and by God’s grace working through those lives. Thus John Paul II, who loved the gift of his priesthood and inspired priestly vocations in tens of thousands of young men, was concurrently the least clerical of high ecclesiastics, for he knew and lived his priestly vocation as a servant of the sanctity, happiness, and ultimately beatitude of others.

Finally, there was what might be called the “humanistic” layer of Karol Wojtyła’s soul: that deep part “inside” him that was formed by his experience what what he believed to be the great crisis of his time – the crisis in the very idea of the human person. That ideas have consequences was more than a philosopher’s slogan for Wojtyła; he knew the truth of that maxim in his bones, as he had experienced it both in the Second World War and in the communist usurpation of Poland’s post-war liberties. But if wicked ideas could be death-dealing in their consequences, a proper idea of the dignity and value of every human life – the idea that anti-communist dissidents in the 1980s would call “living in the truth” – could be liberating: first, in individual lives shaped by aroused consciences; later, in great public movements of cultural, social, and political renewal.

And the great role of the Church in the late-modern and post-modern worlds, he believed, was to rescue the idea of the human person from the doldrums (and worse) into which it had fallen. The “twentieth century” as a historical epoch rather than a calendrical calculation – the years between onset of World War I in 1914 and the collapse of European communism in 1989-1991 – had torn the moral fabric of humanity, leaving profound cultural and spiritual scars. In the face of that undeniable reality, the Church’s task was to insist, in and out of season, that a different way was possible; that humanity did not have to live in despair, caught in traps and blind alleys of its own making; that the great aspirations of modernity to freedom and dignity could be realized and lived nobly if men and women rediscovered Jesus Christ as the answer to the question that is every human life – if the men and women of the third millennium could see in the face of Christ, crucified and risen, the deepest truth of their humanity. To display that face was the mission of the Church, and the mission of the Church’s most visible witness, the successor of St. Peter as Bishop of Rome

At the centenary of his birth, it is clear that the pivotal period in Karol Wojtyła’s life – the period when this multilayered soul began to take its mature form – was the Second World War. The Polish experience of that civilizational cataclysm was striking for its harshness. Life in either those parts of Poland absorbed into Hitler’s Third Reich or those under Nazi Occupation was akin to life under constant, intense, fiery pressure: rather like what happens, constantly, beneath the visible crust of the Earth. Those massive geological forces at work below the visible layers of our planet can burst forth in violent and destructive ways: they cause earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tsunamis. But under those same pressures something else forms: diamonds, the hardest, clearest substance known to our science.

The pressures of the Second World War – the relentless degradation, the back-breaking physical work, the death of friends and relatives, the brutalization of every aspect of life – formed a kind of diamond out of Karol Wojtyła. And as diamonds both cut through the seemingly impermeable even as they reflect light in a dazzling way, Wojtyła found it possible to cut through political realities that seemed intractable, while focusing light into what often seemed the darkest corners of the human condition.

On John Paul II’s election in 1978, knowledgeable analysts of world affairs (including the mandarins in the Vatican’s foreign ministry) believed that the division of Europe embodied by the Berlin Wall was a permanent feature of the international scene. Europe, and indeed the world, was divided into two ideologically opposed and hostile camps, and the best that could be done was to try to ameliorate tensions between the two in the hope that, over decades (if not centuries) they might come to some sort of convergence. That was just the way things were, and the ways things would be; prudent leaders accommodated themselves to that reality.

John Paul II held a different view. He refused to submit to the tyranny of the way things are. And because of that, he could ignite a revolution of conscience throughout central and eastern Europe that would eventually cut through the seemingly permanent and impermeable Berlin Wall. His pivotal role in the collapse of European communism has been recognized by historians of the Cold War, but that facet of his papal accomplishment was not the only way in which he demonstrated his faith-driven capacity to take the course of history in an unexpected but better direction. He did the same for his Church.

Catholicism in October 1978 was reeling from two decades of internal strife over the proper interpretation of the Second Vatican Council, which met from 1962 through 1965. By giving the Council an authoritative interpretation over the twenty-six and a half years of his pontificate, John Paul II (who as a young bishop had played an important role at the Council) inspired the living parts of the Catholic Church in the late-twentieth and early-twenty-first centuries to take up again the mission that Pope John XXIII had envisioned in summoning Vatican II: the mission of converting the world while putting the great human aspiration to freedom on a firmer spiritual and moral foundation. John Paul II’s interpretation of the Council through his papal magisterium – the extensive body of teaching that includes his encyclicals, apostolic letters, apostolic exhortations, and other writings – was contested in his time and remains contested a decade and a half after his death. What is not contestable is that the parts of the Catholic Church that are living, vibrant, evangelically dynamic, and culturally consequential in the early twenty-first century are those that have embraced John Paul II’s interpretation of Vatican II’s purpose and teaching, while the moribund parts of the world Church are those that were in opposition to John Paul II during his life and remain so today.

If the first half of the drama that was the epic pontificate of John Paul II found its center of gravity in his crucial role in what history now knows as the Revolution of 1989 in central and eastern Europe, the second half of the drama found its focus in what the Pope came to call “the New Evangelization:” the revolutionary transformation of the Church from a Catholicism of institutional maintenance to a Church of missionary discipleship and evangelism.

In its third millennium, John Paul II insisted, the Catholic Church must once again become the missionary enterprise it was at its very beginnings. And in that sense, the single most insightful line ever written about Karol Wojtyła remains that of Andre Frossard, a French journalist. After hearing the newly elected John Paul II preach a powerful sermon at his inaugural Mass on October 22, 1978, summoning the Church to a new fearlessness and challenging the world to open its doors to Christ, and after sensing the evangelical energy John Paul had ignited in a vast crowd in St. Peter’s Square, Frossard wrote this for his Paris-based newspaper: “This is not a pope from Poland. This is a pope from Galilee.”

John Paul II believed that every generation of Christians is given the same Great Commission that was given to the first Christian disciples: “Go…and make disciples of all nations…” (Matthew 28.19). And in offering all nations the possibility of friendship with Jesus Christ and incorporation into the community of Christ’s friends that is the Church, twenty-first century Catholicism would also be offering the world a path beyond the cultural and political dead-ends that had turned the twentieth century into the greatest slaughterhouse in human history. For under the leadership of John Paul II, the Catholic Church developed a social doctrine – a way of thinking about late-modern and post-modern cultural, social, political, and economic life – that offered an alternative to the two great dangers that bestrode the first decades of the third millennium: humanity’s temptation to self-absorption in the sandbox of radical personal autonomy, and the related temptation to find the answer to the innate human longing for community and solidarity in new forms of authoritarianism.

arol Wojtyła brought to the papacy an exceptional package of personal gifts and talents, which had been honed by decades of intellectual and pastoral work. His unshakeable faith in the divine direction of his life led him to deploy those skills in ways that renewed the Catholic Church’s self-understanding, made the Church a pivotal player on the world stage in a host of venues, and set the evangelical course of Catholic life and mission in the third millennium of Christian history. All of that can be gratefully acknowledged. Yet we do not grasp John Paul II “from inside” unless we begin from the understanding that this most consequential of popes in hundreds of years was first and foremost a radically converted Christian disciple. Everything in his mature life and his papacy proceeded from that.

And that was the deepest source of his capacity to inspire others to lead lives of heroic virtue in imitation of Jesus Christ – and thereby to bend history in a more human direction.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About George Weigel 419 Articles
George Weigel is Distinguished Senior Fellow of Washington's Ethics and Public Policy Center, where he holds the William E. Simon Chair in Catholic Studies. He is the author of over twenty books, including Witness to Hope: The Biography of Pope John Paul II (1999), The End and the Beginning: Pope John Paul II—The Victory of Freedom, the Last Years, the Legacy (2010), and The Irony of Modern Catholic History: How the Church Rediscovered Itself and Challenged the Modern World to Reform. His most recent books are The Next Pope: The Office of Peter and a Church in Mission (2020), and Not Forgotten: Elegies for, and Reminiscences of, a Diverse Cast of Characters, Most of Them Admirable (Ignatius, 2021).


  1. Amen and thank you, George Weigel, for reminding us what we have lost, what the world has gained and the direction to which we are called. It is not complicated: we are called to lead. We are called to be holy. We are called to: Never, ever settle, he would say in many variations on a common theme, for anything less than the spiritual and moral greatness that the grace of God makes possible in your life. And when you fail – as we all do – don’t lower the bar of expectation. Get up, seek forgiveness, be reconciled to God and others, and then continue the great dramatic adventure of life in the gap. Live in those terms, he suggested, and you will never, ever find life anything other than exhilarating, no matter how hard it becomes.”
    It is now up to us to listen, learn and live it.

  2. Masterful memory jog and message!

    We read that “[Pope St. John Paul II] discerned that the real driver of history over time is neither politics nor economics, but culture: and at the heart of any culture, as at the beginning of the word ‘culture’’ is cult: what a people cherishes and worships.”

    And, today, shifting from the recent post-World War II culture upstaged by St. John Paul II, we now have the resurgent culture of Islam again at the gates of Christian geography and the Faith. (The real “paradigm shift”?). At this new defining moment, the accommodation toward big-tent religious pluralism “lowers the bar,” an abdication we are inspired (above) to NOT do in even our own lives.

    With the tension today between natural religions and the Faith, as earlier between the East and West, would John Paul II simply try to “ameliorate tensions between the two in the hope that, over decades (if not centuries) they might come to some sort of convergence?”

  3. Charisma varies great men exude it. The best exude a holy confidence that the world required following the tumult and division of post Vat II. Not surprisingly most were drawn to a man of obvious moral character and strength. Some Catholics despised him [progressive sisters protested his visit to New York]. He connected with youth having spent the early years of his priesthood being with them, young men and women in their teens hiking, skiing observing their behavior, their affections. Perhaps his acting background disposed him. He was asked by Paul VI to develop a segment on human love for Humanae Vitae (Understanding the ethics of married life more deeply and learning to look at the human person more adequately are the objectives of the book “Karol Wojtyla and Humanae vitae. The Contribution of the Archbishop of Krakow and the group of Polish theologians to the encyclical of Paul VI”, written by Pawel Stanislaw Galuszka). As a priest and philosopher who writes and preaches, taught in mission settings for myself personally John Paul II’s greatest literary, doctrinal contribution is Veritatis Splendor, and the affirmation that it is the object of the act itself, what the act does not the intent whatever that benefit may be that determines the morality of an act. John Paul drew this directly from Thomas Aquinas. A premise when examined in context of the subtlety of counter ethical theory such as the highly influential Joseph Fuchs SJ in Natural Law, who describes a “Soteriological love of the Redeemer from the natural law of the Creator Word”. An appealing vision of merciful love that accommodates rather than a call to repentance and Metanoia. This is precisely the core issue incorporated in Amoris Laetitia in which a soteriologic love of the Redeemer surpasses what has been revealed in the Gospels. Attempt has been made to demonstrate a doctrinal consistency between the two monumental doctrines. That core premise of Veritatis Splendor dispels so disingenuous an effort.

    • Thank you for noting this Father. As a forty year veteran of street side pro-life work, I am disheartened to observe the pervasive indications in this pontificate where “mercy” prioritizes alleviating pangs of Gods gift of guilt while ignoring the victims of sin, particularly the most tragic victims of the sins of the sex revolution, the slaughtered unborn. Trivializing their plight of the slaughtered innocent has become so habitualized, even those of us disheartened by yet another sham Synod, on the Amazon, did not even express much in the way of post Synod expressions of disgust over the cold-blooded non-concern by our prelates for the practice of burying children alive in that extolled “paradise.” Moral entropy is not slowing down. If tens of millions of dead babies can’t get leading cardinals to figure out that the sex revolution is an evil event in human history, all is lost, short of Our Lord’s direct intervention.

      • Edward while I hope for a universal spiritual conversion, the current trend away from the Revelatory teaching of Christ, the unchangeable Word of God during this pontificate compels me to agree with you in principle. Whether Pope Francis is convinced his policy of loosening moral principles for sake of mercy is just in Amoris Laetitia and later documentation, I leave that judgment to God. Although the effects of his tenure is subject to my judgment. A radical shift in policy to ecology and secularized social justice principles [a global wage] that is permissive to increase in abortions, a proactive accommodation of homosexuality without and within the Church to detriment of the family. Evident in his suppression of the work of John Paul II in the Institute bearing his title, and the holy, affirming family policy of its pres Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, evident in the appointment to axiomatic Vatican positions of men who are in favor of accommodating homosexuality. Mercy is effectively pitted against repentance and following Christ. Those who remain faithful are demeaned even persecuted. For the first time since the formation of a visible Christian communion committed to the Apostles Credo, the Nicaean credo has that Mystical Body been prevented from celebrating Easter Sunday Mass of the Resurrection in churches in communion with Christ. It’s difficult not to consider divine disfavor with this pontificate.

  4. Thank you for Witness to Hope and these words, Mr. Weigel. I never met JPII (though I attended his Mass at the Pontiac Silverdome) but he formed my life, weak as I still am.

  5. John Paul II’s interpretation of the Council through his papal magisterium – the extensive body of teaching that includes his encyclicals, apostolic letters, apostolic exhortations, and other writings – was contested in his time and remains contested a decade and a half after his death (Weigel). This excellent assessment is perhaps the foremost feature of the author Weigel’s essay and vital to understanding the current dilemma. I would add even conservatives have misunderstood and demeaned John Paul II accusing him of Modernism. There’s no question this pontificate has sought to carry on the nefarious ‘Spirit’ of Vat II while attempting to undo John Paul’s legacy. A testament to its efficacy. That legacy was intended and remains to ensure a true historical doctrinal congruence while meeting the exigencies of a changing culture, rather than simply accommodating it.

  6. Thank you for a beautiful, in-depth appreciation of the soul of Pope John Paul II.
    Would that this throughly Polish saint where here today admonishing all American voters, especially Christian ones, that our rights come from our Creator, not from the “State.”

  7. Thank you for reminding us of such a great diamond of a soul borne from the ashes of suffering. It truly helps us expand our understanding and faith as we weave throught the crisis each and everyone is going through right now, also borne from man’s folly. Trust and continued struggle is what will forge us to our ultimate and only worthy goal, to be with our Creator, together with all those holy and courageous humanity travelling the same path towards our one destinty.

  8. JPII should not have been hastily made a saint. The sex abuse scandal now infecting the worldwide church started to surge during his papacy. These cases of predominantly homosexual predation by priests and bishops were not forcefully confronted by JPII because these somehow went against the big ideas of his pet theological projects. These were the over-hyped and near cult-like idealization of sexuality (e.g., Theology of the Body, Love and Responsibility, etc.) and of the ministerial priesthood (e.g., Pastores Dabo Vobis, Gift and Mystery, etc.). By turning a blind eye to these developments, the gay mafia in the ranks of the bishops and priests grew in numbers and power and enabled this scandal to explode and its consequent cover-up. JPII promoted the global icon of this scandal, Theodore McCarrick, not just once but five times: Auxiliary Bishop of New York, Bishop of Metuchen, Archbishop of Newark, Archbishop of Washington, and Cardinal.The Legionaries of Christ and Regnum Christi founder, Marcial Maciel Degollado, another icon of this scandal who preyed upon his seminarians and priests and sired children, was favored by JPII with a preferential treatment and called him “a model of heroic priesthood.” George Weigel in his hagiographical biographies of JPII tried defending this epic papal failure by rationalizing that JPII was disinclined to humiliate others which led him to misjudge others, even among bishops and priests. Here, Weigel is either a big liar or just blinded by his hagiographical obsession. JPII humiliated, even crushed, a lot of theologians he judged not toeing the line (picture JPII openly scolding Ernesto Cardenal at the tarmac of Managua airport). It should be noted here that in some of the earliest sex abuse cases brought out into the light, the victims and journalists involved were brutally smeared by Weigel in his aim to continue to prop up his hagiography of JPII. Weigel’s hyper idolization (e.g., starting and encouraging the name and title: “John Paul the Great” – (this essay is the latest example) blinded him to JPII’s biggest blind spot. He should never have been hastily beatified and canonized.

    • Thaddeus,

      What you say is true. I, too, have always held the St. John-Paul in high esteem, so much so that I named my fourth son after him. But, even with that edification felt by so many, I found it so odd that he was canonized so rapid, especially in light of holy souls who had to wait years and years, if not a century , to be recognized by Holy Mother’s Church hear on earth. Js

9 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. The Soul of Pope St. John Paul II - Catholic Mass Search
  2. The Soul of Pope St. John Paul II | Catholic Canada
  3. Some reading material, 08.05.20 – RC Largs and Millport
  4. The 20th century's emblematic pope - California Catholic Daily
  5. On John Paul II’s centenary – Catholic World Report
  6. A Saintly View of Vatican II – Catholic World Report
  7. A Saintly View of Vatican II - Catholic Mass Search
  8. A Saintly View of Vatican II: On St. John Paul II and the Council – Catholic World Report
  9. A Saintly View of Vatican II: On St. John Paul II and the Council - Catholic Daily

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.