Japanese district court: Failure to recognize same-sex marriage is unconstitutional

By CNA Staff

/ Tekke via Flickr (CC BY-ND 2.0).

CNA Staff, Mar 17, 2021 / 08:46 pm (CNA).- A district court in Japan has ruled that the government’s failure to acknowledge same-sex marriage is a violation of the constitution.

A Sapporo district court said the government’s definition of marriage was discriminatory and violated constitutional protections for equal treatment under the law, the New York Times reports.

However, the court ruling does not automatically change the country’s legal definition of marriage, according to NPR. To do so would require legislation by Parliament, which has previously refused to enact such legislation.

Advocates of same-sex marriage say they will now push for Parliament to redefine marriage in the country.

Current Japanese law does not acknowledge same-sex marriage, but does not expressly prohibit it either.

The case against the Japanese government had been filed by three same-sex couples who argued they had been deprived of legal services and benefits, the New York Times reports. Although they sought $9,000 in damages per person, the court denied their request, saying the government is not liable because the idea of same-sex marriage is novel in Japanese culture.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.