The Dispatch: More from CWR...

Wisconsin Supreme Court kills Gov. Evers’ mask mandate

The 4-3 ruling says Governor Tony Evers violated State law with his emergency declarations.

Gov. Tony Evers of Wisconsin. (Image: Screenshot from

MADISON, Wisconsin — The pendulum of statewide political power swung back toward the fulcrum on Wednesday when the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled 4-3 that Gov. Tony Evers’ repeated use of emergency declarations to control the COVID-19 pandemic was illegal, thus ending the statewide face-mask mandate.

The ruling in Jeré Fabick vs. Tony Evers was the latest salvo in a running battle between the Democrat governor, whose COVID-19 mitigation strategy relies heavily on executive mandates, and Republican lawmakers, who have not only refused to approve Evers’ emergencies, but voted in early February to end the latest one. Hours later, Evers issued yet another emergency order for the same emergency. That violated state law, the court ruled. The case plaintiff is a frequent Republican donor and owner of a large construction-equipment business.

“The question in this case is not whether the governor acted wisely; it is whether he acted lawfully,” wrote Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Brian Hagedorn, a frequent swing vote, opining for the court’s conservative majority. “We conclude he did not.”

Evers has issued six emergency declarations on COVID-19 since the Wuhan coronavirus first made a major impact in Wisconsin in March 2020. According to Wednesday’s Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling and a similar ruling May 13, only the first emergency declaration was valid. Evers’ Feb. 4, 2021 declaration, along with four previous emergency declarations, were illegal, according to Wednesday’s ruling.

“Executive Order #105 was declared the same day the legislature revoked the then-existing state of emergency by joint resolution,” the ruling read. “…we conclude that the state of emergency proclaimed in Executive Order #105 exceeded the Governor’s powers and is therefore unlawful.” The governor’s emergency declaration is limited under state law to 60 days, unless an extension is approved by the Wisconsin Legislature. That has not happened.

Rick Esenberg, president and general counsel for the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty, said, “Governor Evers abused the law and the constitutional separation of powers by declaring multiple, consecutive emergencies. This decision ensures that Wisconsin’s constitutional order cannot be suspended for unlimited periods of time as long as the executive branch can justify an emergency declaration.” Esenberg participated in the November 2020 oral arguments in the case.

Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc., a plaintiff in another lawsuit against Wisconsin over COVID-19 regulations, applauded Wednesday’s ruling. “We are thankful for the people of Wisconsin, who are the real winners in this epic case that defied a tyrannical government and its puppets, namely Governor Tony Evers,” said Dan Miller, state director for Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc. “Wisconsin has always been a leader in science, but today we led on the rule of law. We are grateful that our State Supreme Court took the time to really look at the facts of the case and stand up to the executive branch and show them how checks and balances of power really work.”

Legislative reaction to the court ruling fell along political party lines.

“Governor Evers has been trying to rule this state like a king since March 2020,” said Sen. Steve Nass, R-Whitewater. “Governor Evers has shown repeated hostility towards the civil liberties of the people of this state. He and his advisers have attempted to shred constitutional limitations on government powers by moving to control every aspect of our daily lives by fiat for the last year.”

Despite the court ruling, Nass said he fears it won’t be the last word from the governor. “I have no doubt that Evers and his minions are not done yet. They will now focus their energies on organizing further infringements on civil liberties through excessive actions by liberal-leaning local governments and public health officials.”

Rep. Gordon Hintz, the Democrat Assembly minority leader from Oshkosh, said the ruling could cost lives. “I am deeply disappointed in today’s decision by conservatives on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. They got it 100 percent backwards today,” Hintz said in a statement. “The majority’s decision pretends that a pandemic is unchanging and ignores the devastating human impact of COVID-19. And it ensures that Wisconsin’s response to future pandemics will be more complicated and take more time, which in turn will cost more lives.”

The ruling could be a harbinger of forthcoming court action in two faith-related cases spurred by government actions to control COVID-19.

In one case, Madison-based St. Ambrose Academy sued the Dane County public health agency for its emergency order in late August 2020 to ban in-person classroom instruction in grades 3-12 due to COVID-19. The last-minute action by Public Health Madison & Dane County upended school-opening plans at St. Ambrose and numerous other Catholic elementary, middle and high schools. The Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a temporary injunction that allowed schools to open in September. Oral arguments in the case were heard Dec. 8 and a decision could come at any time.

Another case involves Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc., which intervened as a plaintiff in a suit against the Wisconsin Department of Health Services over statewide emergency rules that strictly limited the size of indoor gatherings, and declared certain businesses and organizations to be essential and allowed to operate without occupancy restrictions. Pro-Life Wisconsin was joined as a plaintiff in the suit by the Pro-Life Wisconsin Education Task Force Inc., Pro-Life Wisconsin state director Dan Miller, and Miki Jo’s Mixup, a restaurant and bar in Amery, Wis.

Both the St. Ambrose and Pro-Life Wisconsin cases are being handled by the Thomas More Society, a religious liberty law firm based in Chicago.

It is unlikely Wednesday’s Wisconsin Supreme Court action will do anything to ameliorate the strained relationship between the Republican-controlled Wisconsin Legislature and Democrat Evers. The Legislature is close to finalizing a trio of bills that would bar state or local health officials from closing churches or barring religious gatherings in an effort to stem COVID-19, and prohibit employers and state government from requiring that individuals receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Evers already vetoed similar provisions in another COVID-19 bill in February.

Evers’ reaction to the rebuke from the Wisconsin Supreme Court was to advise state residents to “mask up,” whether or not such advice is enforceable.

“Since the beginning of this pandemic, I’ve worked to keep Wisconsinites healthy and safe, and I’ve trusted the science and public health experts to guide our decision making,” the governor said. “Our fight against COVID-19 isn’t over—while we work to get folks vaccinated as quickly as we can, we know wearing a mask saves lives, and we still need Wisconsinites to mask up so we can beat this virus and bounce back from this pandemic.”

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Joseph M. Hanneman 101 Articles
Joseph M. Hanneman writes from Madison, Wisconsin.


  1. Yeah, that happened in Michigan as well. Nothing changed after the governor was stripped of her authority. She simply had the Health Depts and issue orders and edicts, and the greater medical community shame and manipulate people emotionally so the mask up, vaccinate, and stay home.
    I expect the governor in Wisconsin will due likewise.

    • You can’t be shamed by those whose opinion you do not value. People need to push back. This has gone way too far. Carlson interviewed a Catholic woman this week who was threatened by her parish priest in the MIDDLE OF MASS for not wearing a mask. She was in back of the church away from others, holding her one year old, and is 6 weeks pregnant with her second. When she didnt put the mask on, they called the COPS, who arrived and attempted to remove her for “trespassing” from the “business” according to the live video I watched. This happened in Texas. They threatened to put her in CUFFS!!! In the end she was given a ticket, even though there is no actual LAW in Texas you must be masked. Church officials have been complicit in this shut down , mask up, support the mob thing for the last year. It is a total SCANDAL.

      • It is a bit hard to push back on the medical community. If you need their services, you will dance to their tune. For awhile my doctor’s office refused to see anyone who was actually sick. (Actually, I think that is still true. ) Anyone with any kind of fever symptoms was required to go to the ER. Currently you must have an appointment, answer “social distance” questions, (no going to a funeral or wedding or any kind of event), not have traveled out of state, if you want or need to be seen by a physician or physical theraptist, dentist, eye doctor, or anything. Often times, even now, waiting rooms are closed and you must wait in your car. Masks are mandatory in all medical offices and centers, gyms, sports clubs, etc. Hospitals were very restrictive–only patients may go into the hospital, and even when dying, some refused family. This is still the case in some areas.
        Any elective procedure must be preceded by a negative Covid test. Patients are refused service is they test positive.
        I have no idea how anyone can “push back” against the medical community when they are pro-lockdown, masks, social distancing, and now mandatory vaccination.

  2. As in Michigan, it’s understandable when the governor orders an emergency shutdown, due to the unknown. Once that has occurred, it should have allowed these governors time to work with the elected representatives to keep life protected yet keep the economy going. Once it was determined this was not going to be a repeat of the 1918 flu where people were dropping like flies, what was the best course of action etc…?

    In Michigan, that collaboration didn’t happen, just puzzling things like an expensive
    home under construction sat without a roof, and people could not take their motor boat out, garden centers outside were not open, yet abortion clinics were considered essential.

    As many correctly predicted a year ago, you could not stop that virus via lockdown.

    • No, it isn’t understandable. I am not sure exactly what you mean by “emergency shutdown,” but the measures (i.e. mandatory mask wearing, non-essential business closures, lock downs) implemented violated people’s natural rights, are unprecedented, and unscientific.

      • I can live with don’t go out of your home until we figure out what this is and is everyone going to drop over the minute you get it — after two weeks this was obviously not going to happen and the restrictions should have been lifted.

        There have been lockdowns before, out of caution, prior to this pandemic. But one person running the whole show from one city in the state is exactly what you are talking about, In MI they are pressing the governor for her science on how the restaurants should have been locked down like they were.

        We won’t get into the double standards on how they were applied

  3. Finally, someone recognizes that re-issuing a 60 day emergency order upon the expiration of the previous 60 day order is contrary to why the 60 day limit exists….

  4. I would say that in another month when the great bulk of people have been vaccinated, that those who have gotten the shot go out with no mask. Anyone who is not vaccinated or is afraid , wear a mask or stay home. There will likely be confrontations at first and success will depend upon how man have spine enough to re-take their lives. But really I strongly believe that unless people start defying the orders we will be masked for the rest of our lives. They are already talking about making us carry a vaccine passport like some Nazi gulag state. Sorry but this disease has NEVER been deadly enough to justify these draconian losses of personal freedoms and constitutional rights. And it could not be clearer that the DEM governors dont wish to relinquish their “emergency ” powers, now in effect a year and counting….

  5. I believe that the whole purpose of these extreme and unnecessary measures is to create an atmosphere of hysteria in which people around the world will take the vaccines. My guess is that there is some ulterior motive behind these vaccines that is not being revealed to us. Just what that motive is remains yet to be seen.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.