City of splendor and filth: A review of The Accursed Tower

Roger Crowley’s book about the fall of the last Crusader stronghold in the Levant is both a tragic tale and potent reminder.

Detail from a painting by Dominique Papety (1815–49) of the Hospitalier Maréchal defending the walls at the Siege of Acre, 1291. (Wikipedia)

In 1108 Tughtegin, the Turkic atabeg of Damascus, offered to trade Gervase of Bezoches, the captured crusader Prince of Galilee, for the city of Acre (and two smaller possessions). Baldwin I, King of Jerusalem, refused. Such was the value of the city which had quickly become the main point of arrival for soldiers and pilgrims from Europe. So Tughtegin used Gervase’s scalp as an Islamic military banner and his skull for a goblet. Even unredeemed captives had value.

Acre was strategically located on the Levantine coast. It possessed a good harbor for shipping and was of significant value as a port to Genoese, Venetian, and Pisan merchants. Craftsman, artists, and laborers of all kinds found work in the bustling city. It was protected by the sea and a network of walls and ditches around the landward side of the city and the adjacent suburb of Montmusard. Towers built at intervals along the walls were the linchpin of Acre’s defenses. One tower was said to have been cursed by Christ Himself. Unsurprisingly called the Accursed Tower, it most likely acquired the name from various attacking armies—both Muslim and Christian—over the decades.

It is also the name that historian Roger Crowley gives his recent study of the fall of the last Crusader stronghold in the Levant. Crowley is no stranger to cities under siege. He is the author, among other books, of 1453: The Holy War for Constantinople and the Clash of Islam and the West and Empires of the Sea: The Siege of Malta, the Battle of Lepanto, and the Contest for the Center of the World. In The Accursed Tower, Crowley tells the story Acre in vivid and visceral detail. It is a thrilling tale. But he also gives the reader a sense of the city as symbol for the Christian West.

By 1291, the year Acre fell to Mamluk armies, the city had become a bastion of contradictions. It was the seat of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, the Holy City having long been lost to the Muslims. It was a destination for devout and daring Christian pilgrims, but a den of iniquity for residents. It was a city of exotic scents, but teeming with malodorous sewage.

It was a formidable stronghold, but rotted from within by factionalism and civil discord. For Europe, though, Acre was all the remained of Outremer (“overseas”) and the hope of restoring the Holy Land to Christian rule.

And that hope rested largely on a tower that guarded the city at its most vulnerable spot, a salient that jutted out from its landward walls. The Accursed Tower allowed Acre’s defenders an excellent vantage point to watch for hostile forces in the approaches to the city. And it maximized the defenders’ ability to shoot arrows, launch boulders, or send Greek fire down upon attacking armies. But it wasn’t impregnable.

Mamluks—slave-warriors of the Fatimid sultan in Egypt—were masters of siege tactics and weaponry. They employed mangonels and trebuchets of varying sizes and used them with deadly accuracy. They also devised screens to protect their miners and sappers while they went about the work of undermining Acre’s towers and walls. And, what’s more, the Mamluk army consisted mostly of infantry and light cavalry, making them exceptionally mobile. They defeated the terrifying Mongols at Ain Jalut some thirty years before and had won a succession of battles afterward. The Franks—as the crusaders in the Levant were known—had been pushed to the very sands of the sea. And, at Acre, they were up against it.

The sea offered some hope. The people of the city looked for the ships of Henry II, King of Cyprus (and the rump Kingdom of Jerusalem). On May 4th, 1291 he finally arrived with a fleet of ships and a small number of troops. But it was too little, too late. As Mamluk miners and sappers made steady progress, it became clear to Henry and the Masters of the Templars, Hospitallers, and Teutonic knights, that the city would fall. On May 18th, and continuing over the ensuing days, there was a mad rush for the quay. The wealthy could afford to escape aboard the few ships available for evacuation. The poor were not so fortunate. Though the Genoese galleys made no such distinctions and attempted to rescue as many people as possible.

The walls breached, the towers brought low, left the remaining fight to the labyrinthine streets. It is a part of the story Roger Crowley tells particularly well. The reader feels the urgency, panic, and terror of soldiers and citizens. It is an increasingly desperate scene given to both heroism and cowardice. One senses, too, the exhausted end of a once vibrant Frankish culture in the Levant. Crowley aptly quotes the anonymous Templar of Tyre, a probable eyewitness to Acre’s fall: “Thus as you have been able to learn, was all of Syria lost, and the Saracens took and destroyed it all.” He lamented the loss of everything, “so that altogether the Christians did not hold a palm’s breath of land in Syria.”

Or, as Crowley succinctly puts it, “It was all over in the Holy Land.”

Paradoxically, perhaps, the loss of Acre was not as significant to the Christian West as it is today. Crowley is right to point out that it “did not stir the level of lamentation that the loss of Jerusalem had a century earlier.” There were feeble attempts to regain a foothold in the Levant after 1291 but none amounted to much. And though the phenomenon of crusading was far from over (e.g. the Reconquista in the Iberian peninsula continued until 1492), it was certainly over in the Holy Land.

But seen on a continuum of Islamic jihad against the West, the significance of the fall of Acre is obvious. For the jihad did not stop there. It continued under the Ottomans at Constantinople (1453), Rhodes (1480, and again in 1522), Malta (1565), Vienna (1683), and the Barbary Wars (1801-3, 1815). It continues in the present day. Crowley’s book is both a tragic tale and potent reminder.

The Accursed Tower: The Fall of Acre and the End of the Crusades
By Roger Crowley
Basic Books, 2019
Hardcover, 272 pages


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Timothy D. Lusch 11 Articles
Timothy D. Lusch has appeared in the National Catholic Register, Saint Austin Review, New Oxford Review, Crisis, Toronto Star, Michigan History Magazine, and numerous other publications online and in print.

4 Comments

  1. The paradox isn’t lost on the Catholic Diem Brothers Assassination’s on November 2nd,1963 followed by lies about their demise by the MSM in our country.Fast forward to April 30th,1975 and the fall of Saigon to the communists and the resulting boat people trying to escape the calamity.No towers like at Acre but the resulting loss of Christianity in that area of Southeast Asia is still felt today.The CCP’s “Long March” has now shown up at Washington DC’s front door. No NVA tanks to bust through the front gate.No need for tanks at all. They have the democrat party.

  2. From a eschatological point of view Lusch makes a valid point, the relentless deadly continued assault of Islam on the disciples of Jesus Christ. Would that the Rabbi who presumably brought Abrhamic religion into Arabia had withered in the blazing sun. However, in the end we don’t determine the course of history God does. We are intermediate players who God knows require adversity. Although Islam today seems less dangerous that the advance of secular humanism within the Church. Islam seems the expected chastisement.

  3. I am noticing that the right hand side bar that enables the reader to scroll down while reading the article disappears but only on on CWR sites. This is a strange and rather suspicious glitch that you might want to look into. I wouldn’t put it past those hostile to Catholic posts to have put some kind of malware into the site. If your computer doesn’t do this, it’s probably just mine and you can ignore this post. Just thought I should let you know. I really enjoy CWR.

    • Not your imagination Don. One time an article on CWR was not available through Google , kept dumping me out of the website so I tried DuckDuckGo and it worked fine. The article was on political ascent of LGBTQ. I never thought there would be a day in which the freedom of speech would be legally stifled in this country.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*