The Dispatch: More from CWR...

New book describes an atheist’s vision of the future—and godhood

Yuval Noah Harari’s most recent book, entitled Homo Deus, argues that the “new human agenda” of the near future will consist of “attaining divinity”.

(Image of tree: us.fotolia.com/mantinov)

The challenge of finding language in which believers and non-believers can communicate is unintentionally illustrated in a bestselling new book which predicts that human beings will soon reinvent themselves as gods.

The book, Homo Deus (Man God), is the work of Yuval Noah Harari, an Israeli historian who achieved fame several years ago with another bestseller, Sapiens (as in “homo sapiens,” that is). The earlier volume presented an overview of human history and pre-history up to now. Homo Deus, published by HarperCollins, is, in the words of its subtitle, “a brief history of tomorrow.”

Along with providing a guided tour to current developments in science and technology, Harari argues a thesis: The great project of humankind in this century, he says, will be “to acquire for us divine powers of creation and destruction, and upgrade Homo sapiens into Homo deus….we may well think of the new human agenda as consisting really of only one project (with many branches): attaining divinity.”

I leave to others the credibility of this from the technological and scientific perspectives. The book is an interesting read and worth pondering. But its vision of human deification rests on a misunderstanding.

As an atheist, Harari doesn’t mean “god” in the sense in which believers speak of God—a being eternal, all-powerful, omniscient and omnipresent, creator and father of all. He means beings with life spans greatly extended by science and intelligence enhanced by technology to the point of being super-smart.

What he doesn’t mean, because his atheist creed doesn’t allow it, is beings of whom it could rightly be said that they are transcendent. Nor, obviously, does he believe in the transcendent God of theism. (But neither, perhaps, do believers whose appreciation of “transcendence” as applied to God is scant.)

The problem this presents was underlined a few years ago by historian Brad S. Gregory in his similarly provocative book The Unintended Reformation (Harvard University Press). In much of the literature that takes God’s non-existence more or less for granted, Gregory wrote, “the God being imagined and whose reality is denied or doubted is not the God of traditional Christianity”—a transcendent God. But if there be such a God as that, he tellingly adds, “a transcendent God is by definition not subject to empirical discovery or disproof.”

Atheists generally fail to grasp that. Here, then, is the communication gap between them and believers. Since they do not reckon with what transcendence might mean, atheists like Yuval Harari fail to comprehend what belief in the transcendent God of faith might be like. And unless and until they have at least some faint apprehension of what a transcendent being might be like, there is no arguing with them about whether such a being exists.

Harari’s own faith in what science and technology have in store may be excessive. But even if he’s spot on, his vision  doesn’t shatter any pillars of faith for those who grasp that “eternal” doesn’t mean unlimited existence in time but a manner of existing—literally beyond imagining now because outside our time-bound experience—entirely beyond the limitations of living in time.

For some hint of what that means, we have to turn to a mystic like St. Teresa of Avila, who says repeatedly that her experience of God can’t be described in words because there are no words to describe it. That transcendent God bears no resemblance to the transformed human beings of Homo deus. On the subject of God, it seems, atheists and believers are talking past one another.

About Russell Shaw 148 Articles

Russell Shaw was secretary for public affairs of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops/United States Catholic Conference from 1969 to 1987. He is the author of 20 books, including Nothing to Hide and the highly acclaimed American Church: The Remarkable Rise, Meteoric Fall, and Uncertain Future of Catholicism in America.

6 Comments

  1. Consider how similar thinking has polluted the Catholic Church. The current pontiff’s preferred theologian, Cdl. Kasper, published this in 1967: “The God who sits enthroned over the world and history as a changeless being is an offense to man.” (Kasper, God in History, 1967).

    • Modernism is modernism, wherever it comes from. The liberal Protestant preacher of the early 20th century, Harry Emerson Fosdick, once wrote/said, “to modern man the substitutionary atonement is a moral outrage.” In Calvin Coolidge’s words, “he was agin’ it.”

  2. Atheists say “And Man created God”. As Marx would argue as an opioid. Apotheosis reaches back before Harari’s projection for the future. It came into vogue with New Age, among Catholics post Vat II with ideas like Cardinal Kasper’s quoted by Chris in Maryland. And with the current Pontificate and process of creating God in Man’s image. Religion has run full circle from Lucifer’s worship of self back to Lucifer’s worship of self.

  3. Well, perhaps the picture of the tree is many to remind us of it, but isn’t it funny how it always comes back to there devil’s false promises in the garden.

    “Ye shall be as gods…”

    Doubtless the project is ongoing as we speak. The result will be the false deification of one man; namely the Antichrist.

  4. Biological transcendence (i.e. living indefinitely) is no new idea, and I don’t think I’ll be reading this book. I already read a much earlier one. In 2005 inventor and futurist Ray Kurzweil published “The Singularity is Near”, arguably the first serious look at the subject. He predicted that by 2049 (“the singularity”) humans would have the technology to live forever. Though he was optimistic, he was honest enough to list the dangers on the road to transcendence. Yet his optimism stemmed from a key logical fallacy in his thinking: That more intelligence equals more morality (and hence cooler heads, buttressed by sharper tech-enhanced minds, would prevail in safely wielding such powerful technology).

    I’m fairly confident that most of my colleagues on this post will agree that more intelligence will not necessarily bring more morality. And if this is true, we have no good reason to think that super-tech will end all the grand problems of the world.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. New book describes an atheist’s vision of the future—and godhood -

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*