The Dispatch: More from CWR...

‘Enough!’ End war before it ends us, Pope Francis says as Ukraine invasion continues

Kevin J. Jones   By Kevin J. Jones for CNA

Pope Francis holds his crosier as he leads a Lenten penance service in St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican March 25, 2022. (CNS photo/Paul Haring)

Vatican City, Mar 27, 2022 / 10:36 am (CNA).

Pope Francis has again lamented the war in Ukraine and appealed for peace more than a month after Russia’s invasion.

“Enough. Stop it. Silence the weapons. Move seriously toward peace,” Pope Francis said again in remarks after the Sunday Angelus March 27.

Speaking to a crowd of some 30,000 people gathered in St. Peter’s Square on Sunday, the pope said more than a month had passed since “the beginning of this cruel and senseless war that, like every war, represents a defeat for everyone, for every one of us.”

“We need to reject war, a place of death where fathers and mothers bury their children, where men kill their brothers and sisters without even having seen them, where the powerful decide and the poor die,” he said.

The pope noted reports that half of all children in Ukraine have been displaced due to the invasion.

“This means destroying the future, causing dramatic trauma in the smallest and most innocent among us,” he said. “This is the bestiality of war – a barbarous and sacrilegious act!”

“War should not be something that is inevitable. We should not accustom ourselves to war,” the pontiff said. “Instead, we need to convert today’s anger into a commitment for tomorrow, because if, after what is happening, we remain like we were before, we will all be guilty in some way. Before the danger of self-destruction, may humanity understand that the moment has come to abolish war, to erase it from human history before it erases human history.”

“I beg every political leader to reflect on this, to dedicate themselves to this! And, looking on battered Ukraine to understand how each day of war worsens the situation for everyone,” said the pope.

“Let us continue to pray untiringly to the Queen of Peace,” he said, noting that he had consecrated humanity and especially Russia and Ukraine to the Immaculate Heart of Mary on March 25.

That prayer of consecration was joined by scores of bishops, priests and lay faithful from around the world. Pope Francis thanked everyone for “such a huge and intense participation.”

The pope also took his plea to social media, using his English-language Twitter account to post his comments in English, Russian and Ukrainian to his nearly 19 million followers there.

The war in Ukraine has displaced some ten million people from their homes, 3.6 million of whom have left for neighboring countries, the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees has said.

As of March 23 the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has recorded 977 civilian deaths and nearly 1,600 injuries in Ukraine, but considers these figures to be incomplete and far fewer than the final casualty counts, the Washington Post reports.

Thousands of soldiers on both the Ukrainian and Russian sides are believed to have been killed in the fighting, though estimates vary significantly and cannot yet be confirmed.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 12204 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

19 Comments

  1. Pope Francis will not say this because of political reasons, but I will: this war along with its sufferings is caused by the unjust desires of only one human being, Vladimir Putin.

    • Certainly the recent aggression rests with Mr. Putin but what interests set up the scenario in the first place & put the Ukraine in harm’s way? The Western nations haven’t been doing the Ukraine any favors by offering them false hopes.
      The Ukrainians don’t appear to have a single ally which is truly sad.

    • Perhaps someone should suggest that while everyone has the right to choose personal non-violent surrender, those responsible for the Common Good and the welfare of others have no right, for example, to sacrifice the necks of the wives and children to the knife of an assailant.

      On May 3, 1983 the (United States) National Conference of Catholic Bishops published the pastoral letter: “The Challenge of Peace: God’s Promise and Our Response.” In this document, the pacifist ideology of unilateral disarmament (Pax Christi) was replaced. Pope John Paul II had placed Cardinal O’Connor in a review position and required the document to be submitted to Rome two or three times for clarity on moral principles (apart from ideology) and actual prudential judgment, e.g., “…Equally important in the age of modern warfare is the recognition that the justifiable [!] reasons for using force have been restricted to instances of self-defense or defense of others under attack” (n. 214).

      Also in 1983 the German and French bishops’ conferences published pastoral letters (German: “Out of Justice, Peace;” and French: “Winning the Peace”), printed together by Ignatius Press in 1984 under the editorship of James V. Schall, S.J.). The three pastorals stressed, alternatively, the danger of nuclear holocaust and the place for deterrence, the danger of Soviet weapons superiority along the then Iron Curtain, and the danger of state-sponsored Marxism. But none was pacifist.

      In the interests of synodality (!) perhaps these sober assessments by bishops’ conferences should influence papal one-liners tending to criminalize self-defense (somewhere: “all wars are unjust”).

      Yet, there is also the point to be made, with needed force and precision, that the lucrative arms trade does tilt toward easy escalation (anywhere) almost inevitably toward global disaster. But it is precisely at such times that one hopes for, and has a right to look forward to, from the perennial Catholic Church, very measured application of moral theology to increasingly complex, concrete circumstances. Is Putin listening? North Korea? Iran?

      In the circumstances of Gethsemani, Peter was instructed not to use his sword, but was he told to never own it?

  2. If only more Pto-Life Christians , Catholic Christians, gather in Earnest with Discernment?

    Was not evangelism of Billy Graham , Johnathan Edwards, Saint Paul, put to shame and guilt?

    Wether in 1949? Or 1743? There was need!

    When a man, a woman, can stay in need of redemption but not a distinguishing mark of wanting treat change

    “PICK UP YOUR MAT AND WALK”, “YOUR SINS HAVE BEEN FORGIVEN”. “Now, Go and SIN no more”

    Words of such force and magnitude.

    What is the difference in your life? What is the difference in my life?

  3. Let me be partially sarcastic – how long will it be until the Pope says something to which the powers-that-be at twitter take offense and cancel him, or whatever it’s called.

    FYI – I have NO social media accounts, or whatever they’re called, and have no intention of changing that. If that puts me out of touch, so be it. I confine my ruminations(?) to CWR.

    • You’re so right. The propaganda media love Bergoglio. In 10 years I have never read so much as a word of criticism of him. Thank you for pointing this out.

        • As usual, your ignorance and malice are on full display. I explicitly referred to the liberal propaganda media of which you are a feckless myrmidon.

          • I usually read these four Catholic sites: CWR, NCRegister, wherepeteris, and Vatican news. Which ones do you consider to, be liberal? Oh, and I read mercatornet, which is not strictly a religious site, but it is more Catholic than most Catholic sites.

  4. It’s complex! The common adage when caught between seeming offsetting principles. One humorous anecdote was the advertisement of a hapless [former] roommate standing by a pile of belongings being thrown out the apartment window by a visibly impervious woman. A passerby stops and looks at him quizzically, he responds, “It’s complicated!”.
    Where do we find justice? For heroic Ukraine, as well as land grubber, cowardly giant Russia [how the entire media, US generals, both political parties view the matter for once all are unanimous]. How simple! Would that it and other issues were so easy to judge. Although Russia is [presumably by natural law itself] a perennial demon. That makes unanimity on Russia easy. How can any just claim for security from Nato [let’s not forget Nato is as a dangerous to Russia as it is to Papua New Guinea, perhaps even Pago Pago].
    Now the war cry is, let’s destroy Russian ambition by destroying it’s army in Ukraine. War criminal Vladimir Putin [or is it Rasputin?] has cast his evil spell on the Russian people. Unfortunately, his policy of devastation of Ukraine by bombardment when land forces fail fulfills the prophetic vision of credentialed pundit and armchair world strategist. So the arms continue to pour into Ukraine, perhaps far more lethal in the making, the killing and misery continues on increasing scale, the war cries reaching ‘fever pitch’.
    Maybe, perhaps maybe, in this one instance, Pope Francis is correct in calling war, all war bad. After all, it’s against the odds that he’s always wrong.

  5. One wonders just who Pontiff Francis thinks he’s talking to.

    Q1 – Is he suggesting that Ukrainians are immoral for fighting against a foreign army that invaded their country?

    Q2 – Is he preaching to the choir so that he can say he said something about the Russian invasion of Ukraine, but has carefully calibrated the statement to be sure it is without any meaning?

    • Chris, although I agree Pope Francis is generally ambivalent, as he seems here, he did, for example, say to the media earlier in reference to Ukraine, “That when a country is attacked it defends itself, everyone, including civilians”. He added that Russia’s attack was a massacre. His fear of a nuclear confrontation [even a tactical nuclear exchange would be devastating for Europe and the US] has justification with an escalating proxy war. Biden is making wild comments that could cause an apparent paranoid Putin to respond.

    • Pope Francis has been denouncing this war right from the beginning of this invasion. He is not preaching to the choir but to the world. He is, and has always been, against war.

      • Malware alert! Yes and no…

        Pope Francis first denounced only the “conflict”, which is different from later publicly recognizing this “invasion” (your word) as an act of “war” (your word). His earlier comments were received by many as meaning “neutrality” in the face of overt aggression (https://www.wsj.com/articles/pope-francis-laments-war-in-ukraine-without-taking-sides-11648226928).

        So, yes, Pope Francis broadly denounces war; yet, the earlier non-position implied that both parties are equally guilty–that self-defense is immoral.
        Pope Benedict XV likewise denounced World War I, but at least he had a plan rather than a platitude (“To the Belligerent Peoples,” August 1, 1917).

        Summarizing, his propositions for that war were the need to assert moral force over material force, simultaneous disarmament, arbitration in place of conscription, free movement of people and commerce especially at sea, restitution of territories seized during the War (!), and harmony among national aspirations and with the common good (!). Dismissed at the time, parts later reappeared (without attribution) in President Wilson’s Fourteen Points of Peace (Jan. 8, 1918), one of which became the right to national self-determination.

        Unlike the AT & T smartphone advertisement, it is complicated.

        • Upon reflection, I find that my use of the word “platitude” is inaccurate and probably unjust….Without knowing the right word, my meaning goes something like this…

          First, the hair-trigger nature of modern technology with its catastrophic potential does raise novelties not in play when Augustine defined the just war.
          Second, if it is true (?) that papal advisors are thinking about an exhortation amending just war theory, I would hope such a statement does not displace concrete prudential judgment with undefined “fraternity.”
          Third, instead, on the application of moral theology (Catholic Social Teaching) to very convoluted circumstances on steroids, did Catholic academia abdicate its potential contributions the moment it claimed the total autonomy of the Land O’ Lakes Declaration (1967)? Overwhelmed now by administrative hyper-compartmentalization, plus the trendy ideologies of identity politics and intersectionality and STEM—who is left to help an overtaxed Pope Francis answer such modernday conundrums as subsidiarity and solidarity, both together, and the (forgotten) Common Good?

          How, too, to clearly articulate both the nature and backstory of global flash points, while also affirming with courage that there is no peace without justice, and no justice without truth?

          What is truth? Other than mislabeled “platitudes,” what is the knitty-gritty right word (in addition to the Word) for all of the above? What is our protection from too-simply airbrushing that all war is immoral—even measured self-defense, or deterrence against rogue-state nuclear blackmail?

          • One can denounce the war in different ways. Pope Francis, who condemns war in his writings, played an active role behind the scenes which only his stance allowed him to do. But since that was to no avail, he took a tougher stance. The correct strategy I thought.

  6. Given Pope Francis’s inability exercise restraint on what he says and does in public, and repeated contradiction of existing, unchangeable Church doctrine, not only on Just War Teaching, but also other issues (such as support for homosexual unions, and his averment that Apostates “remain part of the Church”), I think it would be fair to ask about his mental state and whether he still healthy enough to hold office. Many experts have, after all, questioned the mental health of President Biden and former President Trump for the same or similar reasons.

    If he is losing it, then his handlers are guilty of elder abuse by parading him around and allowing him to humiliate himself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*