The Dispatch: More from CWR...

The Armenian genocide, healing, and faith

Armenians have survived for centuries, enduring trauma after trauma, and yet they are alive when some of their ancient adversaries are not.

An Armenian woman kneeling beside a dead child in a field outside of Aleppo, in a photo taken sometime between 1915 and 1919. (Wikipedia)

For more than a dozen years I have taught a course titled “Eastern Christian Encounters with Islam”. The course aims to show the complicated history between Eastern Christians and Muslims in such countries as Syria, Egypt, Armenia, Russia, and elsewhere. There is much nonsense talked about Muslim-Christian relations in those and other places in the ancient and modern world, with apologists on both sides trying to tell us that either those relations are nothing but bloodshed, martyrdom, and violence; or peace, harmony, and universal friendship. The truth, of course, is far more complex and messy than that.

Pride of place in the course is Armenia. Armenia’s singular status reflects my own quirks: to read my two books Orthodoxy and the Roman Papacy (2011) and Everything Hidden Shall Be Revealed: Ridding the Church of Abuses of Sex and Power (2019) is to see that I have something of an unrequited love affair with the Armenian Church and her eminently sensible structures which have much to offer the larger Church.

But I also have a deep sense of the pain endured by the Armenian people, and not only in the 1915 genocide which President Joe Biden recognized yesterday in an official statement. For nearly fifteen years in teaching my course, I have pointed out to students how every recent presidential candidate has campaigned on recognizing the Armenian genocide as such, but once elected proceeds cravenly to capitulate to Turkish demands not to do so. It is to his considerable credit that Biden has stood up to Turkish bullying on this point.

No serious scholar or sane observer believes Turkish denials and obfuscation of the events of 1915 for which the evidence—including scores of letters, articles, and photos of mass graves, of priests hanged, and of women crucified naked—is massive and overwhelming. As I always tell my students, anytime any government anywhere wants to criminalize speech (as the Turks have done, banning the use of the term “genocide” in Turkish media, classrooms, and elsewhere, and prosecuting people who do use it), you should automatically suspect that they may have something terrible to hide.

For all of its terrors and horrors, however, 1915 was far from a stand-alone event. Most immediately it was preceded by the Hamidian massacres of Armenians in the early 1890s, which both foreshadowed the genocide of 1915 but also echoed other massacres stretching back to the eighth century. This longer history is well covered in The Thirty-Year Genocide: Turkey’s Destruction of Its Christian Minorities, 1894–1924 by Benny Morris and Dror Ze’evi (Harvard University Press, 2019).

As the late Eli Wiesel once recognized, modern Armenia is like modern Israel in that both see the origins of their national life in trauma and catastrophe. For a half-century now and more, scholarship (much of it reviewed here) has been unanimous in recognizing the well-documented events of 1915 that led to approximately one million Armenians being killed, and, in the same period and region and for the same regions, several hundred thousand Greek Christians and Assyrian Christians as well. In total, close to two million Christians—Armenians, Greeks, and Assyrians—were killed in Anatolia and Armenia in the spring and summer of 1915. Still others died even five years after the Great War ended with the forced population exchanges of 1923.

But these genocides have continually been denied officially by the Turkish government as the successor to the Ottoman Empire. For Armenians, such a denial is, as Wiesel once put it, an “insult to memory.” Why is it important for Armenian memory that such events be recognized?

Before the pandemic hit last year, I was to have been at a conference last June in the Czech Republic of Eastern (primarily East Slavic) Christians where I was asked to lecture on the theme of traumatic memory and its transgenerational transmission. There is not just the memory of Soviet persecution and slaughter, which we Ukrainian Catholics know only too well, but also of course the Armenian, Greek, and Assyrian genocides. My lecture drew on my clinical training in traumatology to argue that trauma needs to be discussed carefully as a necessary first step to healing.

Such discussion needs to use the right terminology if it is to avoid further hurt. Imagine if Catholic churchmen today, instead of speaking about the sexual abuse of innocent and undeserving children, started suggesting—as, analogously, some extreme Turkish nationalists have done about 1915—that the children basically made the first move and practically begged for the assault, and thus bear the responsibility for their rape and molestation. It is important to call things by the terms used by those who endured them if only as a measure of basic respect and dignity. So Armenia rightly insists on the term genocide, which was coined in the 1940s by Raphael Lemkin to describe a deliberate, systematic killing of an entire people for reasons of race, religion, and/or ethnicity.

A failure to recognize the events of 1915 in these terms means, in the words of another recent book on the subject, that those events remain Open Wounds: Armenians, Turks and a Century of Genocide by Vicken Cheterian (Oxford UP, 2015). A failure to see 1915 as a genocide means that it is much easier to dismiss responsibility, blaming it on just a few rogue soldiers rather than—as we know—an organized and systematic campaign advocated and approved at the highest echelons of the Ottoman Empire.

As every Catholic in the confessional knows, there can be no healing and reconciliation without first confession and admission of responsibility. This is why our own abuse crisis is still ongoing: too many churchmen today act like the Turkish government, trying to pass off abuse as “just a few bad apples” rather than a systematic and structural problem. Wounds remain open while those bearing them and causing them both remain in denial. That is true of individual souls as of whole churches and entire empires, past and present.

In a landmark book published twenty years ago, two American psychiatrists, Jacob D. Lindy and Robert Jay Lifton argued in Beyond Invisible Walls: the Psychological Legacy of Soviet Trauma (2001) that

trauma operates on many levels and its complexities defy our ordinary categories. It lacks the structure and limits of a discrete disaster such as an earthquake….The effects reverberate over years or even decades….What we are discussing here is on the order of a sustained catastrophe that never goes away.

I have seen this clinically in my patients. The nature of trauma is that it can be profoundly disruptive, disorderly, and destructive of psychic structures and inner peace. It keeps its own timetable and schedule. Sometimes it operates chaotically but wordlessly, perhaps especially in those who are scarcely aware of what was endured by their family in the past. Sometimes all we have of trauma is what the Anglo-American psychoanalyst Christopher Bollas has famously called the “unthought known.”

But other times we have plenty of concrete evidence: Since the 1990s we now have convincing clinical evidence published in international scholarly journals showing that demonstrable traumatic sequelae can be and are passed down to at least two succeeding generations: in other words, if my maternal grandmother was in Auschwitz, then both my mother and myself can be profoundly affected by that even if we were not alive at the time. This has also been demonstrated for the descendants of East Germans, Ukrainians, and Poles terrorized and traumatized by communism, and of course Armenians and their genocide.

This must not, however, incline us to despair. Armenians have survived for centuries, enduring trauma after trauma, and yet they are alive when some of their ancient adversaries are not. Though I do not want to speak for them, permit me to suggest that perhaps part of the reason they have endured and survived so much trauma comes precisely from their Christian faith, which contains precisely the sorts of resources for healing that modern clinicians since Judith Herman’s landmark 1992 book Trauma and Recovery have all advocated for: to overcome trauma, one must, first, find a safe place in which, second, to tell the story of that trauma before, third, being sent back healed and grateful to a renewed life.

This threefold pattern has been articulated especially well in a new book by Heinz Weiss, Trauma, Guilt, and Reparation: the Path from Impasse to Development, which I recently reviewed elsewhere. That pattern, I suggested on CWR last year, is precisely what Armenian Christians, like all Catholic and Orthodox Christians, do every Sunday in liturgy: we gather in the safety of our churches to tell the story of a traumatized innocent man who is tortured and executed before being resurrected. We are then dismissed to take this story of his triumph over death out into the world as good news.

The English Catholic scholar Marcus Pound’s book Theology, Psychoanalysis, and Trauma (SCM Press, 2007) reminds us of the biblical etymology of the word, which is not at all a new one but expresses a concept with which the biblical writers were thoroughly familiar: “Trauma implies a break, deriving from the Greek τραῦμα, to wound: ‘He went up to him and bandaged his wounds’ (Luke 10:34).” Pound rightly reminds us that every celebration of the Eucharist is a re-narration of trauma: it is, after all, the Last Supper of a condemned man. But the liturgy also, of course, ends with hope and the triumph of the resurrection. This, Pound indicates, is a model for us, what he calls a “liturgical therapeutics”

Liturgical therapeutics can remain incomplete or even ineffective if the surrounding political and cultural context remains hostile and in denial. It helps, then, that the US government has taken this small and overdue step. In the rebuilding of shattered lives, those seeking healing are helped when people around them cease to live in denial and instead call things by their rightful name. Let us hope and pray the Turkish government soon sees sense and does likewise.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Dr. Adam A. J. DeVille 110 Articles
Dr. Adam A. J. DeVille is associate professor at the University of Saint Francis in Ft. Wayne, IN., where he also maintains a part-time private practice in psychotherapy. He is the author and editor of several books, including Orthodoxy and the Roman Papacy (University of Notre Dame, 2011).


  1. This is the first thing the President has done that I approve of.

    Next up should be acknowledgement of the Rape of Nanking by the Japanese in 1937-1938.

    This last century was the bloodiest in the history of mankind, and now things aren’t getting too much better.

    God help us.

    • Completely agree. My wife is Chinese and her father fled both the Japanese and Mao’s “liberating” army. Seem like the past genocides and mass murders to include Ukraine, Rwanda, Bosnia etc., are lost to all but historians. Past lessons not learned are due to be repeated a la the Ueghers.

  2. “Every Sunday in liturgy: we gather in the safety of our Churches to tell the story of a traumatized innocent man who is tortured and executed before being resurrected. We are then dismissed to take this story of His triumph over death out into the world as good news.”

    Is there any way more pedestrian to describe it? Is there any way more PERFECT to describe it?

    Let me finish with what I once heard as the opening of a Priest’s homily on Christmas day –

    “Today we celebrate the unthinkable.”

  3. We can thank the Holy Father too , who has reminded us of the oneness in the wounds as an aspect to be deeply taken in , when we can trust in the compassion and the remedy given us in our Lord and His Mother , esp. during The Passion , how every evil thought of every human has been paid with the price of the thorn wounds transformed into flames of Love – and same to thus heal us and generations , in the awesome call to be persons who desire to administer The Precious Blood to all .

    The Scriptures , O.T esp. meant to bring us the taste of the fallen nature and the generational spirits , The Spirit thus grieving with us to bring us the healing – with more gratitude and its joy , when we can trust more in the infinite graces being poured into our lives as The Blood and Water , that we invoke same for each other too , to make possible the rising into The Divine Will and its Light to help drive away the darkness of fears and angers and bitterness .

    Thank God that we live in times with more resources for same , along with the good hearted efforts of those with compassionate hearts in the professions , called to supplement the mission entrusted to The Church .

    May the compassion for the genocide victims of the past be transformed into desire to vocally and in good will try to eliminate the modern genocides of our times against the innocents , whose sufferings too are taken up in The Lord . The effects of such , as hardness of hearts and all that come with it , manifesting as abuse issues any where – the wisdom in the words of the Holy Father about the oneness in the wounds …

  4. America America 1963 a film by director screenwriter Elia Kazan [A Tree Grows in Brooklyn] gives a graphic account of the 1890’s Turkish Army massacre of Armenians under Sultan Abdul Hamid. It was my first knowledge of the genocidal horror of Armenians burned alive in churches, cut down indiscriminately by Turkish mounted troops. Kazan born Constantinople 1909 [named Istanbul 1930] emigrated to America 1913 a year before the German cruisers Goeben and Breslau bombarded French naval positions N Africa sped to Istanbul and convinced [at cannonpoint] Ottoman Turkish sultan Mehmed V to flag the German ships with the Turkish ensign. The Germans flying the Turkish flag then sailed into the Black sea and bombarded Russian naval facilities bringing reluctant Turkey into the war. War with the West apparently was the opportunity for a weakened, disheveled Ottoman Empire to establish Turkish ethnic hegemony, at the genocidal expense of Greeks, Armenians, Christian Syrians throughout the Anatolian Peninsula. Greeks and Armenians inhabited Anatolia prior to the arrival of the Seljuks followed by the Ottomans. The film tells a story of genocide and flight from Turkey of Kazan’s uncle Elia Kazantzoglou during the genocide under sultan Abdul Hamid. Stavros’ [Elia] Armenian travelling friend Vartan is killed by Turks Stavros after a long treacherous journey reaches Constantinople and boards ship to America. Kemal Ataturk, co-founder and leader [he was an Army officer at Gallipoli] of the modern Turkish secularist State following the fall of the sultanate is alleged to have been a participant in the genocide. Author DeVille I’m confidant is aware of the history of Ukrainian genocide by the Soviets which would be a worthy commentary. I’m aware 0f Holodomor starvation in the thirties, however Ukrainian friends have mentioned mass killings during the last year of the War.

  5. Abortion is still denied by Biden et al. It’s the elephant worldwide now, dwarfing everything else. I think he prefers to point elsewhere at others.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. When Your Church Hides Dead Children - Catholic Herald

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.