The Dispatch: More from CWR...

San Francisco archbishop: State can’t close churches, ‘science’ is on our side

“Political elites issuing health orders that they themselves don’t obey,” wrote Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, “and destroying countless livelihoods without any scientific basis for such action—is infuriating.”

San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore J. Cordileone leads a rosary rally through the city's streets Oct. 3, 2020. (CNS photo/Dennis Callahan, Archdiocese of San Francisco)

Washington D.C., Feb 12, 2021 / 10:30 am (CNA).- Government officials cannot close churches as “non-essential” establishments during the pandemic—particularly when they are contradicting the “science” in doing so, the Archbishop of San Francisco wrote on Thursday.

Catholics “have scientific evidence that positively demonstrates we can celebrate Mass safely indoors,” Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco wrote in an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal [“California’s Unscientific Worship Ban”] on Thursday.

He penned the article after the Supreme Court on Feb. 5 ruled that the state of California’s ban on indoor worship was unconstitutional.

“Political elites issuing health orders that they themselves don’t obey—and destroying countless livelihoods without any scientific basis for such action—is infuriating,” Archbishop Cordileone noted, in reference to government officials not abiding by public health orders.

Cordileone added that such episodes were “especially” infuriating for Catholics, who had scientific proof that indoor Masses could be celebrated safely.

“Only religious authorities have the right to determine which religious services are essential for their people,” he wrote.

The Archdiocese of San Francisco has battled public authorities for months on worship restrictions. After churches were ordered closed for months due to the pandemic, Archbishop Cordileone marched in outdoor Eucharistic processions in protest, and said that the restrictions were mocking God.

In mid-September, the city allowed for outdoor worship services to accommodate 50 people at once, but still allowed only one person at a time inside a church building. After the Justice Department told the city its rules might be unconstitutional, San Francisco then allowed for indoor worship at 25% capacity.

Then in November, the state determined that San Francisco and San Mateo counties were among the areas at highest risk of COVID-19 spread. Under the state rules, the counties could not allow indoor worship services—although other businesses such as hair and nail salons, massage parlors, and tattoo parlors could remain open.

Critics of the order noted that religious worship was being treated more harshly than were secular activities.

A week before Christmas, the archbishop said he instructed priests to offer Mass indoors “if weather or safety required it,” in contravention of the state order against indoor worship.

“I knew my people had to have access to the Eucharist, rain or shine,” he said in his op-ed. Archbishop Cordileone noted that he instituted safety measures for indoor Masses, including an attendance cap at 20% capacity and requirements to wear masks and socially distance.

On Feb. 5, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that California’s ban on indoor worship was unconstitutional. The court ruled that the state could limit indoor capacity at worship services to 25% capacity at most, while allowing the state to ban singing at liturgies.

At the time of the ruling, the state had put nearly all counties in its top tier of restrictions reserved for areas with the worst spread of the virus. Thus, the state had a near-total ban on indoor worship.

Cordileone called the decision a “very significant step forward for basic rights.”

Chief Justice Roberts, writing in his own opinion, said that the total ban on worship in “the most cavernous cathedral” reveals “not expertise or discretion, but instead insufficient appreciation or consideration of the interests at stake.”

After Cordileone allowed priests to celebrate Mass indoors with restrictions, local officials sent warnings to parishes and the city’s health department issued two citations for violations, he said.

Following the victory at the Supreme Court, he said that outdoor Masses would continue “as weather permits. “But the decision allows us to exercise our constitutionally protected natural right to worship God without fear of harassment from government officials,” he wrote.

As CNA reported in September, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) described attending an indoor Mass in San Francisco—in apparent violation of restrictions in indoor worship at the time. Her office later told CNA that Pelosi “misspoke,” and had been “participating regularly in church services virtually.”


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 2897 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

7 Comments

  1. Believe it or not, but I really don’t care to hear what Nancy Pelosi thinks or does concerning the Catholic Church. Her actions and words belie her Catholicism.

    • paf — Agreed. I also do not care to hear what Ms Pelosi says about her Catholicism. My reason for not caring is not because of a political position nor a religious belief.

      I don’t care because it is none of my business. Her actions are between her and her conscious on a personal level, her and her pastor or bishop on a participation level, and her and her God on a spiritual level. None of those are mine to judge or comment on.

      I do have opinions on her political positions and actions. Those are indeed between her and me, between her and the duties of her office, and between her and the Constitution. All those are my business. Her position as Speaker make them so.

  2. Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco prays with his flock, the rosary, Eucharistic adoration, fighting for the rights of his charges. Maybe other bishops will follow his example.

    “The Archdiocese of San Francisco has battled public authorities for months on worship restrictions. After churches were ordered closed for months due to the pandemic, Archbishop Cordileone marched in outdoor Eucharistic processions in protest, and said that the restrictions were mocking God.”

    Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco:

    “Only religious authorities have the right to determine which religious services are essential for their people,”

    “I knew my people had to have access to the Eucharist, rain or shine,”

    “But the decision allows us to exercise our constitutionally protected natural right to worship God without fear of harassment from government officials,”

    Thank you, Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*