Sometimes it can take decades or even centuries for the Catholic Church to acknowledge that a holy man or woman should be considered a saint.
While Pope Saint John Paul II made the promotion of canonizations a hallmark of his pontificate, it is more common in Church history for canonizations to proceed very slowly. The Church has generally been willing to wait for many years for God to make known His will about the sanctity of a deceased Catholic. On the other hand, sometimes the Vatican chooses to delay canonizations for the sake of peace in international politics. For example, now would not be a propitious moment for the Vatican to honor the many Catholics who have died as martyrs in communist China.
However, there are other reasons that the beatification of Anne Catherine Emmerich was delayed until 2004, almost two centuries after her death. One reason is that she claimed to be the recipient of mystical experiences, even though some contemporary investigators publicly called her a fraud. Another reason is that while the writings containing her detailed visions of the life of Christ have inspired some Catholics, some have argued that the poet Clemens Brentano—who published her visions years after her death—was the true author.
Can we know the truth about this controversial woman?
Anne Catherine Emmerich (1774-1824)1 was born in a village in northern Germany. She came from a poor, Catholic family and helped on the family farm until she began working as a seamstress. As a young woman, she tried to enter multiple religious orders but was refused by them all because she did not have enough money to pay the required dowry.
One religious community finally agreed to accept her if she would learn to play the organ, and she took the position of a servant in the household of an organist, on the promise that he would teach her. However, she soon discovered that the organist and his family were penniless and often starving. Anne never learned to play the organ. Instead, she spent her wages to support the family, and her own mother sometimes brought extra food for the family. After several years, one of the organist’s daughters was accepted into a community of Augustinian nuns, and the nuns agreed to accept Anne as well.
Anne was overjoyed to finally be able to fulfill her dream of becoming a nun. However, she was ill so often that she couldn’t perform many of her assigned duties. During the times when her health improved, she was very careful about observing the Augustinian rule, much more careful than most of the other nuns in her community. Some of the nuns were inspired by Anne’s unfailing cheerfulness, but other nuns resented being upstaged by a mere novice and made her life difficult.
Although Anne was allowed to take religious vows, she was not able to live as a nun for very long. The German government forced Catholic religious communities to close, and she and the other nuns had to leave their convent.
A poor widow accepted Anne into her home as a servant. But, once again, Anne was sick so frequently that she became a tenant in the woman’s home. One of Anne’s sisters served as housekeeper instead. That’s when the news of Anne’s mystical gifts began to spread.
According to Anne’s family, Anne had loved to pray since she was a little girl. Although she could sometimes be a moody child, she was deeply empathetic toward the needs of the poor and gave generously to beggars. Anne’s childhood friends later reported that Anne was very sensitive about doing what was right and was scrupulously worried about committing even the smallest sin. She also told her friends that she had seen visions of her guardian angel, our Lord, the Blessed Mother, and threatening figures, one time in the form of a black dog.
When she was in the convent, other nuns noticed that Anne ate very little food and that sometimes when she prayed, she would become insensible to anything else for long periods of time, typically called a spiritual ecstasy. Anne suffered painful headaches, which mimicked the pain felt by Christ due to the Crown of Thorns.
Shortly after Anne was forced out of the convent and began living in a private home, her friends saw signs that she had received the stigmata. Bloody wounds appeared on her hands, feet, chest, and head, and began to bleed with no apparent cause. Witnesses said that Anne was sometimes swept away in spiritual ecstasies during prayer. But when she was awake, she was cheerful and full of love for God despite her pain. She almost completely stopped eating and drinking, and when she was forced to eat, she became violently ill. Like some other mystics of the Church, Anne was able to survive for years even though she only consumed the Eucharist.
Of course, the news spread all over town that a young woman had mystical gifts, news which eventually spread throughout Germany. Since Anne was not living in an enclosed community, visitors could—and sometimes did—appear on her doorstep and insist on seeing her. Some were pious Catholics who became regular visitors as they sought her spiritual advice and medical remedies. Other visitors pestered her with embarrassing and foolish questions, and they distorted her words to mean whatever they wanted. If Anne was in a spiritual ecstasy when these nosy neighbors showed up, she could not stop them from examining her wounds. It appears that Anne’s sister, who was often rude toward Anne, allowed these visits.
Some of Anne’s visitors were medical doctors who were certain that she was a fraud or was mentally unwell. Those skeptical doctors often changed their minds after examining her and acknowledged that she was a woman of sound mental health. They were inspired by her faith and kindness, but they could not explain the source of her mysterious wounds.
The early nineteenth century was not an easy time to be a faithful Catholic, particularly in Germany. Events like the French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars had caused many to turn away from the Church and God Himself. The secular authorities repeatedly sent doctors to examine Anne with the intention of disproving any supernatural cause. Those doctors examined Anne’s wounds, bandaged her wounds in a way that caused her even greater pain, and assigned nurses to keep her under 24-hour surveillance. After multiple intrusive examinations, the authorities still had no proof that she was secretly eating or inflicting the wounds upon herself. Undeterred, they simply lied. They ignored their own results and publicly stated that she was a fraud.
Anne had many loyal, devout friends, including priests, who were won over by her faith, kindness, and patience in suffering. They were also inspired by her retelling of the visions she received. For example, she often described seeing events from the life of Jesus and His Mother. She told them how things looked and what people said, filling in details from the Gospel accounts that seemed surprisingly realistic to her friends. Although Anne had only a limited education and never left her native Germany, these visions displayed a remarkable knowledge of events from the Bible.
One of Anne’s most regular visitors was a German poet, Clemens Brentano. Clemens was from a wealthy family and had only recently returned to the practice of his Catholic Faith when he met Anne. But he was won over by her faith and spent innumerable hours talking to her and taking down notes about her visions.
Anne’s health slowly deteriorated, and she died in Dülmen in 1824. Her tomb was opened twice after her death because of rumors that her body had been stolen. Both times, her body was found to be incorrupt.
Nine years after her death, Clemens published his first collection of her visions, The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Other writings followed, which have since been translated into other languages. Some of the details from The Dolorous Passion were incorporated into Mel Gibson’s famous film, The Passion of the Christ. Over the years, many scholars have examined these writings and have been surprised by the accuracy of the descriptions of Holy Land geography and history, although others have pointed out inaccuracies as well.
When Pope John Paul II beatified Anne, the Vatican noted that this was done in recognition of the heroic virtue she displayed throughout her life and of the miracles associated with her intercession. But the Vatican also carefully pointed out that Clemens Brentano was the author of the writings bearing Anne’s name. Since documents were found in Clemens’ library after his death that demonstrated he had performed his own research on the Holy Land, he could have (consciously or unconsciously) added his own research to the writings he attributed to Anne.
Modern readers may find these works either inspirational or questionable. But that does not change the fact that the evidence of her life—separate from the visions—demonstrated that she was worthy to be called Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich.
There is another argument against Anne’s holiness related to the fact that she shared these visions with others at all. It may sound very holy to receive visions from God, but great saints of the mystical life, most notably Saint John of the Cross, have written that we should be very careful about attaching any great importance to visions. It is easy for us to misinterpret their meanings, become more attached to the visions than to God Himself, or become proud.2
However, it appears that Anne shared her visions more out of innocence than pride. After all, she did not write books or try to publicize the visions. She was bedridden and simply shared her spiritual insights, including the visions, with those who cared enough to come visit her and talk to her about God. The simplest explanation is that Anne was one of those pure souls who received visions of angels from childhood and who generally assumed that this happened to everyone. Padre Pio of Pietrelcina seemed to think the same thing.
Perhaps God granted these mystical experiences to Anne for the sake of her own salvation. Or perhaps her visions and the physical signs of the stigmata helped to strengthen German Catholics during the nineteenth century, when skepticism toward the faith was particularly widespread in society. The books containing her visions have remained popular for more than a century, have inspired many Catholics in their own meditations on the life of Christ, and, it must be noted, have not been formally condemned by the Church.
On the other hand, perhaps these visions were really intended to help one specific person get to Heaven: Clemens Brentano. According to modern biographies, Clemens lived a restless life and flitted from one emotional extreme to another. If Anne Catherine Emmerich’s God-given purpose in life included helping even one troubled soul to seek God’s grace and make it into Heaven, then she deserves the title of holy woman and—maybe someday—saint.
Endnotes:
1 Her name is also sometimes spelled Anna Katerina Emmerick. Although biographies often refer to her as Sister Emmerich, a common practice in Germany, she is referred to by her first name throughout this article.
2 See Saint John of the Cross, Ascent of Mount Carmel, chapter 19, for example.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


This is a fine introduction to Blessed Catherine. Despite my serious interest in the lives of the saints I have never felt compelled to research her at all. This article provides something to work with.
It must be pointed out that St. John of the Cross is often conveniently used by all manner actors. His was a deeply rooted profound wisdom and mystical character. It is disconcerting to see fallen away religious who never avail themselves of the sacraments and the liturgical life appeal to his “nada” while he himself was immersed as a faithful priest in the sacramental life which supported his contemplative life. Ironic as well, while he was sober about extraordinary experiences, his advocate and mentor Saint Teresa of Jesus was blessed with a rich visual prayer life and made no secret of it.
We are so blessed to have these two souls always before the Blessed Trinity advocating for the Church. May their lives be a lesson for us.
As it is it can’t be argued with conviction as Ms Beutner suggests that Catherine Emmerich was not a holy woman, nor that she feigned holiness.
What matters in her instance is the good effect she’s had on many, including Clemens Brentano noted by Beutner, the redactor, perhaps contributing author of her alleged visions.
She was beatified, which says something of the authenticity of, at least, her holiness. Visions can proceed from the heart of the prophet as held by Aquinas. Padre Pio wrote an essay called The Agony of Jesus, in which Jesus at the washing of the feet held Judas’ feet at his breast and kissed them. Should we give that credence? Although, it does evoke honest sentiment for some.
I have two questions. Are Clemens Brentano’s notes available somewhere, and is there a cause for her canonization? Thanks.
Brentano’s notes constitute the translation (1870) by Carl E. Schmoger, CSSR, published as “The Life of Anne Catherine Emmerich,” Tan Publishing, 1975, in two large volumes of 600 pages each.
Only a few odd details in Emmerich’s visions still stick in my memory (fifty years since I read Schmoger). She reports something about a unicorn and about mystically visiting Nepal. Also, Mary’s elaborate and pearled wedding garment sounds a lot like what we find in one of the psalms. (Or, maybe Brentano generously and poetically embellished throughout?)
These and at least some other examples might be easily dismissed…. Other legitimate visionaries are also described as inevitably–and only sometimes–mingling real visionary material with their own cranial impressions and imaginations. The magisterial Church must sort such things out, but how could it be otherwise, given our mortal and finite incapacity to see with total clarity, but rather “through a glass darkly”?
I think some of the writings were pretty silly. And some were offensive. But to be fair we don’t know what she actually said & whether it was faithfully written down or not. Much of what’s attributed to Anne Catherine, for better or worse, might instead reflect Clemens Brentano.
I feel empathy for her & her situation. It must have been very difficult.
Further,only God is holy. Man is incapable of holiness having been born corrupt. No human is holy. Pronounce, ordaine, wash, wish, but man is incapable of milking the cow of holiness or, for that matter, grace.
The process of salvation and sanctivization is progressive through out scripture. Man is not enabled to replicate God by his own choice for that is not God’s will for man. Even the Son of God deferred his choices to the will of His Father. The Eklesia
only are separate unto the Father as a gift to his Son in Paradice. The Father is in absolute charge. Not man!
Baptism takes away Original Sin, Mr. Bess. After that, our sins are our own doing.
Our Lord instituted the Sacraments and gave us instructions how to carry them out .
The Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God was not born corrupt. She is Holy.
This is a very informative article. It introduced facts about which I was not previously aware. I am finishing up an extensive article supporting and defending the Ordinary Magisterial teaching contained in the Roman Catechism’s teaching on the no-pain childbirth of Jesus. Emmerich’s vision of the Nativity was cited. Her vision was consistent with the visions of at least four saints and credible mystics, lending credence to the authenticity of her visions.
We don’t base Catholic doctrine on visions! The idea that Our Lady gave birth painlessly predates any saints’ visions because it was deemed appropriate as a reversal of the curse on Eve.
Some of Emmerich’s visions–whether that’s what she actually saw–support Catholic practice. For instance, St. Peter baptizes the new converts after Pentecost by rowing them out in a skiff on the pentagonal Pool of Five Porticoes where they are sprinkled from a
jetting fountain in the middle of the pool so that “sprinkling” can be seen as a valid form of baptism.(How long would it take to process 5000 people that way?) But the Pool has been excavated by modern archaeologists. It was rectangular with a walkway connecting the long sides to make the fifth portico. So much for historical accuracy.
I realize I may offend people by criticizing Emmerich’s visions (not to mention Valtorta’s in these pages). Anna Katharina’s manifest virtue is not at issue here. It’s worth mentioning that she didn’t just lie in bed having visions and offering spiritual advice. She kept busy sewing clothes for the poor.
The childbirth of Jesus was painless because the conception of Jesus was pleasureless (Fulton Sheen)
I respect Anna Katharina Emmerich’s personal character but please don’t be so soft on the “accuracy” of her visions. “The Dolorous Passion” is the book most touched up by Brentano and he had books in his library to provide historical details. Discovery of Brentano’s contribution to the enterprise–which went way beyond simple transcription–was what halted Anna Katharina’s cause. The German bishops got things going again by deciding to ignore her revelations entirely. Their official statement declared “she wrote no books.”
Her 4-volume “Life of Jesus Christ and Biblical Revelations” was edited by Fr. Carl E. Schmoger from Brentano’s loose notes. I’ve read it all and I don’t see how anyone can take these books seriously, included the description of Mary’s house at Ephesus, which is a fanciful description of a church building in which Our Lady happens to be sheltering. Emmerich’s Old Testament visions are ludicrous. My favorite is her description of albino woolly mammoths romping in the Earthly Paradise atop Mt. Everest. Let’s stick to the Gospels, shall we and read Life-of-Christ visionary literature as works of pious imagination.
I don’t doubt the holiness of Blessed Anne or the veracity of her beatification. I don’t, however, know what to make of her purported visions of Creation, consistent with a literal reading of the Book of Genesis, which is contrary to Church teaching.
Not contrary to church teaching. It is allowed to take the genesis account literally. Or not to.
I think her account of how the immaculate conception happened was mind blowing.
It’s hard to take this summary very seriously when it talks about “Germany” as though it were a nation in the early 1800s. Germany was then a country in the same sense Eastern Europe is a country — which is to say, it was a region with a shared culture, but no single government.
Bismarck was only 9 years old when Emmerich died.
No one is holy, only God. What in the world the Catholic even make people saints. In the Bible, believer of Jesus Christ is generally called Saints. And even if we are doesn’t mean we are sinless. We need to constantly pray and ask for Forgiveness daily because human beings are sinners. We are only become holy because what Christ has done.
God says, “Be holy as I am holy.” For what did Christ die, if not to make men holy?
I feel so sorry she hasn’t been canonized yet because if you study thoroughly her life and case you see that she’s been so mainly due to lack of faith in her so deep, detailed, clear and 99% realistic visions (not to mention their link to her own personal stigmata, which stamp more ink on her holiness soul paper)…We must also remember that no holy soul is 100 % perfect (so as to be able to deliver perfectly true human visions), unless God himself alone…
She also truly deserved (among very little number of chosen souls) the title “prophet”
alongside Hildegard of Bingen (1098-1179), the sibylle of the Rhine, due to their edifying future prophecies regarding the church…
Sincerely, what makes be believe more in her visions is the fact that her acquisition of the very rare grace of hierognosis (differenciation, by touch or other senses, between all what is sacred or profane) – other than her serious stigmata case – was definitive in conferring the title of prophet on her…