Vatican Observatory addresses one of science’s greatest enigmas: quantum gravity

Victoria Cardiel By Victoria Cardiel for EWTN News

A conference addressed the subject of quantum gravity with regard to the incompatibility of quantum mechanics with general relativity, presenting a challenge for researchers to propose solutions.

Vatican Observatory addresses one of science’s greatest enigmas: quantum gravity
Participants in the conferences organized by the Vatican Observatory from June 22-26, 2026. | Credit: Vatican Observatory

The Vatican Observatory, one of the oldest astronomical institutions in the world, hosted its prestigious Vatican Observatory Lectures at its headquarters in Castel Gandolfo, Italy, last week. This year’s series focused on quantum gravity.

The event brought together internationally renowned experts and a select group of doctoral students and young researchers who delved into one of the most complex and fascinating problems in modern physics: unifying quantum mechanics with general relativity.

The difficulty of this challenge lies in the very nature of the two theories. While quantum mechanics describes the behavior of elementary particles with enormous precision, Albert Einsteinʼs general relativity explains gravity as the curvature of space-time on a large scale. However, the two frameworks prove incompatible when one attempts to apply them simultaneously.

In relativity, space and time are not an immutable scenario but rather dynamic entities that warp and evolve. Attempting to subject these quantities to the rules of quantum physics gives rise to profound mathematical inconsistencies.

One of the best known is the so-called “perturbative non-renormalizability.” In simple terms, renormalizing involves controlling the infinite corrections that appear in quantum calculations in order to make physical predictions.

This method works in the other fundamental forces of nature but fails in the case of gravity, where these corrections multiply without limit, generating an infinite number of parameters that makes the theory unviable. Overcoming this obstacle constitutes one of the great objectives of current theoretical physics.

The conferences, held at the observatory’s headquarters in Castel Gandolfo and coordinated by Jesuit Father Gabriele Gionti and Father Matteo Galaverni, explored the issues from various perspectives.

Professor Claus Kiefer of the University of Cologne in Germany presented the canonical (in a nonreligious sense) quantization approach to gravity, focusing on the so-called “problem of time.”

If time itself is subject to quantum fluctuations, a fundamental question arises: How do we define the evolution of a physical system? Kiefer explored the implications of this issue for the study of black holes, including the nature of singularities where gravity reaches extreme levels.

Professor Roberto Percacci of the International Higher School for Advanced Studies in Trieste, Italy, presented a covariant approach in which gravitons — hypothetical particles that mediate gravity — are treated as spin-2 quantum fields.

A particular highlight was the asymptotic safety program — a proposal suggesting that gravity could be consistent within the quantum regime without recourse to additional exotic entities, thanks to the specific behavior of its constants at very high energies.

From a more conceptual perspective, Professor Sergio Cacciatori of the University of Insubria in Italy delved into the difficulties inherent in quantizing a universe where the very fabric of space-time is subject to uncertainty.

His remarks highlighted questions that border on the philosophical yet carry very concrete technical implications: What does it mean to measure time when it fluctuates? How is observation defined in a context where the observer is part of the system?

Finally, Professor Pierpaolo Mastrolia of the University of Padua in Italy contributed the scattering amplitude approach, a key tool for calculating particle interaction probabilities. His research reveals surprising parallels between the theories describing fundamental forces such as electromagnetism and nuclear interactions and certain formulations of quantum gravity, such as supergravity or string theory. These analogies open up promising avenues toward possibly unifying quantum mechanics with general relativity.

Beyond the technical aspects, these lessons have once again highlighted the uniqueness of the Vatican Observatory as a meeting place between traditions, disciplines, and generations. In an environment marked by centuries of history, young researchers not only receive high-level training but also participate in a setting of free and open dialogue where the great questions of human knowledge, such as the origin of the universe or the ultimate nature of space and time, can be addressed without prejudices.

Founded in the 16th century at the behest of Pope Gregory XIII, who ordered the construction of the Tower of the Winds at the Vatican and gathered astronomers and mathematicians to reform the calendar, the Vatican Observatory has maintained a constant quest to understand the universe throughout the centuries. It was Pope Leo XIII who, in the late 19th century, revitalized its research activities, establishing it as an international point of reference.

At a time when science is advancing in the study of the infinitely small and the immeasurably large, the Vatican has reaffirmed its commitment to research and critical thought. For, as quantum gravity demonstrates, the deepest questions remain open, and finding their answers is a task that can only be tackled as a community.

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, the Spanish-language sister service of EWTN News. It has been translated and adapted by EWTN News English.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


3 Comments

  1. We read: “For, as quantum gravity demonstrates, the deepest questions remain open, and finding their answers is a task that can only be tackled as a community.”

    The “deepest questions”?

    Einstein believed in God, but not in a personal God, and in this bubble universe possibly remained a Monist—with the notion that God is only the highest or deepest level of a complex creation whose existence (ex nihilo?) is self-sufficiently mathematical. Yes?

    J. Robert Oppenheimer said about the deepest questions:

    “Our civilizations perish; the carved stone, the written word, the heroic act fade into a memory and in the end are gone [….] Yet no man, be he agnostic or Buddhist or Christian, thinks wholly in these terms. His acts, his thoughts, what he sees of the world around him—the falling of a leaf or a child’s joke or the rise of the moon—are part of history; but they are not only part of history; they are part of becoming and of process but not only that: they partake also of the world outside of time; they partake of the light of eternity.
    “These two ways of thinking, the way of time and history and the way of eternity and of timelessness, are both part of man’s effort to comprehend the world in which he lives. Neither is comprehended in the other [!] nor reducible to it [!]. They are, as we have learned to say in physics, complementary views, each supplementing the other, neither telling the whole story” (J. Robert Oppenheimer, “Science and the Common Understanding,” Simon and Schuster, 1953, p. 69).

  2. “Young researchers who delved into one of the most complex and fascinating problems in modern physics: unifying quantum mechanics with general relativity” (Cardiel for Ewtn).
    Actually, the presumed science quantum gravity is really a theory. While it may be found to have verifiable features it has yet to be scientifically verified. Peter Beaulieu’s quote of Oppenheimer in that vein speaks of complementary ‘views’:
    “They are, as we have learned to say in physics, complementary views, each supplementing the other, neither telling the whole story” . The whole story may be metaphysical. Meaning beyond the laws of physics and ultimately attributed to a prime mover. God.

  3. Mr. Beaulieu, I hope you get to this before Mr. Olson goes and shuts down this arm of the CWR!

    Considering space is laden with everything needed to build out cosmic processes, including its own stability, we can derive a picture of a common set and sequence (more or less) of activities that reach to sustained light and a new more densely organized order within it. This common set can occur in separate parts of the universe simultaneously and produce diverse and differentiated results; one such result, the Milky Way, the Solar System and earth with its sun.

    From water to water, like this.

    1. Abyssal
    2. Darkness
    3. Formlessness
    4. Coldness
    5. Stillness
    6. Vastness
    7. Mist
    8. Cloud
    9. Tremour
    10. Water
    11. Wind
    12. Driving
    13. Sparkings
    14. Shadows
    15. Quakings
    16. Lightenings
    17. Circlings
    18. Mixings
    19. Heat
    20. Melting
    21. Rocks
    22. Crashing
    23. Thunder
    24. Light!
    25. Storms
    26.Tempests
    27. Deluges
    28. Downpours
    29. Rainfalls
    30. Snowfalls
    31. Dewfalls
    32. Great Storehouses of Water

    These actions have a similar behaviour among different “liquids” whether the location is earth or someplace very alien to life like Jupiter. Some environments will convey thunders much more harshly than on earth. Etc.

    Water and its components are found everywhere, it should come as no surprise. And a lot of other basic items likewise.

    Space is made for it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*