Denver, Colo., Jul 31, 2018 / 02:01 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Former Michigan Congressman Bart Stupak has one word to sum up the plight of the pro-life Democrat: “Lonely.”
“We’re not trusted in our party. We are not appreciated by Republicans, even though nothing can pass without us,” he told a gathering of pro-life Democrats in Denver. “It really is a hard road to go.”
Stupak was among the speakers at the Democrats for Life of America annual conference held July 20-22 on the theme “We want our party back.”
When Stupak joined Congress in 1992, there were 20 pro-life Democrats. Now there are only three who openly take a pro-life stand.
“I think there’s more, I think there’s a lot more,” he said. “But our numbers have dwindled so much that there’s no leadership within the Democratic Party to ask these members to vote for pro-life legislation.”
He said he was positive a 20-week ban on abortion could pass Congress with enough key pro-life Democrats. In his view, about 30 Democratic votes are needed to counter to votes of pro-choice Republicans.
“Republicans will never admit it but if you go back and look no right to life legislation can pass in the U.S. Congress without the support of Democrats,” said Stupak.
The nine-term Congressman was a key leader in an amendment intended to limit the provision of abortion in the 2010 health care bill known as the Affordable Care Act. His 2017 book “For All Americans” discusses the passage of the act.
“You need to constantly support the right-to-life Democrats. Remind them they’re doing the Lord’s work. You have to be there for them,” he told his audience. “We have to support our pro-life Democrats and have to remind our party why we are such an integral part.”
Lincoln Davis, a former congressman from Tennessee, also attended the Denver event. U.S. Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.), who faced a strong primary challenge this year from a candidate backed by pro-abortion rights groups, addressed the gathering in a pre-recorded video. He received the Democrats for Life Bob Casey Whole Life Award, named for the former governor of Pennsylvania.
Michael Wear, a political strategist who directed faith outreach for President Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign, spoke to the conference via live video. He recounted his background in an all-Democrat, blue-collar union family. When he became a Christian, he said, it “put new life and meaning behind what I viewed as the central commitments of the Democratic Party: fighting poverty, civil rights, human dignity.”
“The pro-life movement needs Democrats, and the Democratic Party need pro-lifers. You have earned your place in politics, we have earned our place. Our responsibility is to steward the influence we have as best we know how to do the most good as we know it,” he said.
While on some issue the Democratic Party did not necessarily fit, Wear said, “you join a political party not for that party to influence you, but for you to influence that party.”
“Registering for a political party does not mean signing one’s conscience over to “every jot and tittle of the party platform,” he told the audience.
“You’re willing to hold in the tension of contributing to something you don’t always agree with all the time… but our civic life is not just about our personal preferences. It’s about the common good, about how we live together,” said Wear. “Political parties are a very important way of how to do that.”
Wear saw the Democratic Party of 2006 and 2008 as better for pro-life advocates than the current situation. In his view, the pro-life movement is a “helpful, sort-of-nagging element” that pushes Democrats to “stand up for life.”
He believed President Barack Obama cautioned his party against alienating others, including on the issue of abortion. Obama’s controversial visit to the University of Notre Dame had positive elements for Wear. The Democratic Party platform at the time had language about reducing abortion, language which “ended up pleasing nobody,” the president decided to keep this language in his speech.
The conference drew some opposition from Colorado Democrats and Democrat-leaning groups.
Progress Now Colorado, which previously attracted attention for misleading ads against pro-life pregnancy centers in the state, ran internet ads critical of the conference. In a parking lot outside the conference hotel, the group set up a billboard truck which said, “abortion access is a progressive value.”
On the morning of July 21, several critics gathered outside the hotel for a small press conference: Karen Middleton, executive director of NARAL Colorado; Sam DeWitt, access campaign manager for Compassion and Choices Colorado; and Democratic state legislators Sen. Rhonda Fields and Reps. Leslie Herod and Jovan Melton.
Herod objected to the effort to make space for Democrats who are opposed to abortion.
“Democratic values are not up for debate… the national and Colorado Democratic platforms are clear. Upholding the legal right for anyone to access a safe and legal abortion is essential and non-negotiable,” she said.
Herod characterized abortion as fundamental “to achieving the kind of gender, race and economic equality that we as Democrats have been fighting for, for decades.”
“Let me be clear: a Democrat is someone who stands for equality, stands for choice, stands for racial justice. If you don’t stand for those things then you are not a Democrat,” she said.
Middleton, herself a former Democratic state legislator, said Colorado was “a solidly pro-choice state” and contended that those gathered for the conference were not in fact Democrats, but present “under a ruse.”
“This notion, a false narrative of a false move into the party really needs to be pushed back,” she said. “We’re here to say, ‘No, we don’t believe you, you are not welcome here, we want to see you really let us move forward together, unifying access to abortion care for all.’”
Over a dozen pro-life Democrats and their allies held a brief counter-demonstration. Playing up the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate’s opposition to unionization of its workers, they held signs such as “Pro-Labor, Pro-Life.”
Just minutes later, the conference hosted speaker Justin Giboney, an attorney and political strategist from Atlanta who was elected as a delegate to the 2012 and 2016 Democratic National Conventions.
“A lot of Democrats disagree with the party on abortion but stay silent. We’ve got to speak up,” he said. “Without the assumption of ill intentions on the part of pro-lifers, people would have to acknowledge that there is another life at stake in these debates.”
He said he appreciates the Democratic Party’s “commitment to serving the least of these” and its recognition that government “has a role to play in improving people’s lives.
“The party must not turn away from these fundamental values,” he added.
Giboney, who is African-American, said his formation in traditional black Protestantism “means my faith cannot be separated from my politics.” He placed himself in the Progressive Era tradition of social programs for the poor, workers’ rights, government reform, and criminal justice issues.
Giboney rejected political progressivism that defines itself in “the Western European expressive individualism, permissive culture sense of the term.” While many people appreciate the Democratic Party’s stand on immigration and heath care, he said, they “see the party as speeding recklessly away not only from a sense of morality, but also a sense of reason, a sense of pluralism, and moving so far left on social issues that it is irresponsible. It has become illiberal.”
He feared that other issues will be sidelined for secular progressive issues he said are being championed and funded by a few interest groups.
According to Giboney, there were groups that wanted him kicked out of the Georgia delegation to the Democratic convention. He worried the party is “openly engaging in religious exclusion” to limit the participation of people with certain religious beliefs, hindering any pro-life Democrats’ run for office.
Such candidates will not get exposure or funding if they maintain their beliefs publicly; staff will leave candidates because they fear they won’t get a job later.
“While the party accepts the vote of religious voters, it will treat them as unfit if they try to run for public office,” he charged.
In Giboney’s view, some pro-life advocates on the political right had contributed to false narratives. He found it hard to relate to the Republican Party’s version of the pro-life movement, which he said isn’t “whole life.”
“How can you care about the unborn, if you don’t care about the poor or the immigrant?” he asked. “People ask these questions because too many pro-lifers don’t have a strong record on some of these other issues.”
He stressed the need for pro-life advocates to show compassion for people in a crisis situation and to do more than simply encourage a pregnant woman to have a child, who will then grow up in poverty and the pressures of a harsh criminal justice system.
“I think pro-life Democrats are in the best position to do those things and we need to take up that task.”
[…]
I knew Francis II would say something dumb.
Ever satisfied?
Satisfaction is an evil thing to desire. So, no.
Leo’s comments were disheartening. As I hold to the Church’s traditional teaching on the death penalty, I suppose that means I can no longer consider myself pro-life.
Correct. Synodaling has freed you from your backwardist, reactionary, dogma loving, inadmissible ideologies. And it’s about time, since we are in year 12 of the Franciscus Church paradigm shift. Glad you are on board, but how did you miss the drone show?
Anyway, let’s summarize what we have learned from this latest Synodaling:
The death penalty is inadmissible and not pro-life.
The major award to Durbin is admissible and pro-life(ish;)💋
Mr. Cupich said this: ““The tragedy of our current situation in the United States is that Catholics find themselves politically homeless.”
It’s thinking like this that makes this man a particularly unworthy bishop. He simply is not thinking like a successor to the Apostles. It’s as if the first Apostles were in a quandary about which Roman senator ought to be the next Caesar. This is a bishop who does not think as Christ thinks. He thinks as Mammon.
I would suggest that cupich retire very quickly, repair to some Carthusian monastery and spend the remainder of his days in contemplation and repentance for what ill-effect his episcopacy has had on the faithful whom he was charged with shepherding.
You either support abortion or you don’t.
He did, he does and he will continue to do so – therefore he should NOT receive an award of any kind from The Cardinal – End of discussion.
Smart move by Durbin.
Agreed. As a professional politician, Durbin no longer needs the headache from this silly award or episcopal allies like Cupich. From today’s Gospel: Luke 9:60
Sadness equating illegal immigration into a bankrupt nation with the murder of Holy Innocents in the womb – largely financed by our government. The seamless garment has a big hole i its posterior portion.
Still praying for a Catholic Pope. No wonder Cdl Cupich was smirking on the loggia.
“We can move forward if we Keep Hope Alive.” Untrue in this life if you have been aborted.
Pope Leo said that “it’s important to look at many issues [OTHER THAN THE MASS MURDER OF CHILDREN] that are related to the teachings of the Church.” Leo is a miserable Franciscus II. Attempting to gaslight pro-life from a country palace after a dip in the pool just won’t do.
Well, at least Senator Durbin is a professional politician and knows when he is defeated. Praying for him to return to Holy Communion.
Well, at least we finally have a working definition of Synodaling:
Gatherings to change attitudes so that we can eventually change dogmas, like the Sixth Commandment. “We can move forward if we Keep Hope Alive.” Untrue in this life if you have been aborted.
Pope Leo said that “it’s important to look at many issues [OTHER THAN THE MASS MURDER OF CHILDREN] that are related to the teachings of the Church.” Leo is a miserable Franciscus II. Attempting to gaslight pro-life from a country palace after a dip in the pool just won’t do.
Well, at least Senator Durbin is a professional politician and knows when he is defeated. Praying for him to return to Holy Communion.
On a positive note, we finally have a working definition of Synodaling:
Gatherings to change attitudes so that we can eventually change dogmas, like the Sixth Commandment.
Well apart from the fact that the position Durbin espouses deserves “total condemnation,” not giving him an award is a completely neutral position, not condemnation. As for His Holiness, his statement was disappointing mush. I can certainly be read as allowing for the exact selective dissection of Durbin’s record to find justification for honoring him that Cupich was purporting.
Cupich, Leo & Company should surmise what sane Catholics think they can do with their “seamless garment.”
The murder of one million innocent unborn children is not in any way equivalent to the death penalty, properly administered, which is not a sin, as the Church taught for over 1900 years. Murder (abortion) however, is first on the Catechism’s list of sins that cry to heaven. If the pope, and bishops, all with years of Theology, Philosophy, and most with advanced degrees, cannot see that, then a lot has been wasted on their education.
As to inhumane treatment of illegals, I would refer the pope to last December when the Vatican instituted new penalties for illegal entry into the Vatican, of up to a $25,000 fine and up to Four years in jail. I ask, which is more humane, Four years in jail or deportation to a person’s country of origin?
In 2004 Pope Benedict, then Cardinal Ratzinger, said that unlike abortion and euthanasia, disagreeing with the Vatican on the death penalty was not a reason to refrain from receiving the Eucharist.
We all know what to expect from Cardinal Cupich, but how to react to the pope’s comments? Pathetic, outrageous, an embarrassment? After Pope Leo’s election I saw a lot of commenters ask the question as to whether we were getting a second Pope Leo XIII or Pope Francis 2.0. As time goes on I suppose the answer will be clear.
Deportment to country of a person’s origin? Not always so, not always a good idea if so!
It’s always a good idea to deport raping, murdering, and sex trafficking criminals convicted in their own country, to that country. Those simply deported back to their point of entry are a policing matter for that country, Mexico, espeically since their government aided and abetted the criminal entry into the U.S.
What’s next for the good bishop? Awarding Satan for keeping Jesus company in the desert?
Leo XIV expressed awareness of the difficulty and tensions, alluding to conflict of interests. Then added:
1 It’s important to look at the overall work that a senator has done. 2 It’s important to look at many issues that are related to the teachings of the Church.
As discussed elsewhere he responds to a conflict of interests between the sacred and the secular with a double bind. Was Pope Leo in favor or not?
If the one person with supreme authority leaves an important affirmation of Catholic doctrine hanging it is clear he is not affirming that doctrine as possessing priority over a secular interest.
Virtually all clergy from deacon, presbyter, bishop, cardinal, pope are afflicted with mealymouth disease. It can be cured. A painful chastisement from the heavens can do it. Or something like Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point for Catholic clergy would be more pleasant.
The men who were capable of a turning point moment among the cardinals: Muller, Eijk, Burke, Sarah, Zen, Woelki et Al were in an apparently smaller division but significant minority reason why an initial consensus could not be reached. The affable quiet man Cdl Prevost became the compromise choice.
At this stage the quiet man is turning out to be an affable conduit for the majority who favor Pope Francis’ ‘new paradigm’. Certainly Leo’s response was more amenable to soothing Cdl Cupich than true blue Catholic prelates like Paprocki. Durbin in the meantime bites the bullet and become a gaypride infantslayer folk hero.
Perfect analysis. Thank you, Father.
“Catholics find themselves politically homeless”??? Really?? I beg to differ.
I am 71 and have been voting Republican since I was 18. I NEVER miss an election. No one political party will reflect Catholic belief perfectly. These are secular groups, not religious ones, and will reflect a tolerant width of belief we may not always agree with 100%. HOWEVER there is an absolutely HUGE difference between the Democrats and Republicans. A blind man could see it. The Republicans have fought to get ROE repealed. They support law and order, respect our police and oppose perversion of sexual roles in society. They oppose foisting perverted sexuality on children in our schools. They oppose men in womens sports and locker rooms and bathrooms. By contrast the democrats SUPPORT all of those noxious positions, in addition to supporting the availability of abortion until the day of birth. The DEMS also gladly supported the influx of an estimated 20 million illegals into the country, far too many of whom are violent criminals. The Republicans support the closed border we have had since Trump returned to office.
Now, many “old guard” democrats have endorsed a socialist/communist mayoral candidate in NYC who is looking poised to win the election. We do recall what has happened in nations where Communists came into power, dont we? Christians were suppressed, churches closed, clergy jailed or murdered. That is what you are supporting when you vote DEM. Disgusting.
You can’t see the difference between the two??? Or are you just so self righteous that Trump’s occasionally abrasive personality has made you blind to reality, or blind to good and evil?? For those Catholics who persist in voting in the favor of the morally twisted Democrats, I have one word for you. It begins with “stu” and ends with “pid”.
I beg to differ if you consider a Republican form of government important. Unless you are blind, it’s hard not to see the erosion of balance of power in our present government. The Executive branch is trying to run the whole show. Judges and members of congress are being badgered and bullied into compliance. The Executive privilege is being abused on every front. The military is being micromanaged to the point that Generals jobs are being threatened if they dare to disagree. The sports and entertainment industries are being coerced. Businesses are being punished. Foreign governments are being bullied and their leaders personalities and reputations maligned. Law firms are being prevented from representing clients. The Educational freedoms at the local level are being taken over by the federal government (something Republicans were formally against), the Press is being badgered into what they can report. People’s very citizenship are being revoked. Even local libraries are being told what they can and cannot do. The medical and pharmaceutical industries are also being run by government agencies. We are being told what shots we can and cannot have. In short every facet of our lives are becoming controlled by the whims of one man. What kind of government is this? Is this what we want? Is this man really pro life? Is the end “Christian Nationalism “? If so do you really think that the word Christian will remain once other objectives are achieved? How long can you feel at home considering the present trajectory toward despotism? The offerings of the Left are equally scary and in no way can be acceptable to the Christian. Don’t label me as a leftist as I abhor their lack of sexual morality and lack of respect for family values. Both parties seek complete control of our lives by the State. I think that there is still room in the Center for a party which would more truly represent Christian values and would seek to gain them through ethical means.
“Don’t label me a leftist…” even though I speak like one and think like one 🙄. You forgot to include the obligatory comparison between Trump and Hitler in your post.
Athanasius: neither party is all good and all bad. If you combine the good of both and eliminate the bad of both you just may arrive at balanced solution to our problems. No one is all wrong, no person entirely evil. We can’t assume that a person’s motives are bad just because we disagree with what they stand for. Take a look at the platform of the American Solidarity Party as an example of the kind of possibility that I am suggesting. It was built entirely on the Teachings and Practices of the Catholic Church. Thomas Aquinas taught that virtue is found in the middle of the extremes. Where on the political continuum does the present Republican Party stand? How far right do you need to go before you become wrong? Is it farther right than it was 20 years ago? Thirty? Fifty? If so why? Is being far right good and healthy? I’m addressing you as one on the right because that is where you seem to be coming from, but I can ask the same questions to the present Democrats. I’m not saying that everything that the Republican Party stands for is bad. It isn’t. But the end never justifies the means and I am Very concerned about many of the MEANS that are being employed to gain these “good” ends. Despotic governments can achieve great things much faster and better than democratic ones. Just look at the great empires of the past- Mesopotamia , Egypt, Rome and Modern China- to only name a few. Not all work out this way though. What I am trying to point out is that things are getting done fast now , but this is not necessarily good. IF corners are being cut and due process is being violated, a red flag should be thrown up and we should stop and evaluate what is going on. Time to step back and take inventory. It’s never a bad idea to stop and ask questions and analyze a situation and see if we are possibly rationalizing. I am concerned because I have a feeling that many Christians are beginning to compromise values in order to reach seemingly good ends.
Jim, Your liberal bias comes through loud and clear.
I dont see that executive privilege is being abused. Trump is almost the only one getting anything done, as democrats take him to court over the most insignificant action, creating a huge roadblock to doing anything for the people.
Were you OK with the killing in Washington DC until Trump sent in troops? Or in Chicago where 58 people were recently killed but their mayor says everything is fine? Is he crazy? Honey, if you cant do your job as an elected official, get out of the way and let someone else do it. If it has to be Trump, so be it. This isnt politics, peoples LIVES are at stake.
The military is a place where chain of command is everything. You dont get to decide if you like your orders or chose not to obey them. If thats what you want to do, you are in the wrong job. A “do my own thing” military is the path to chaos. After years of DEI promotions and women who cant do the work, yes, I am glad the object is to have the fittest and strongest and most qualified in the jobs.
You think the press is being badgered, after years of being a propaganda tool for the Dem left? Thats funny? Were you blocked from posting online during the Biden years, because I WAS. I am still finding my very mild but conservative posts blocked on liberal run sites like AOL. So, I guess you were ok when they lied through their teeth for the left and never gave the conservative point of view?
Thus far to my knowledge NO ONE’S citizenship has been revoked. Thats propaganda. Trump joked about doing that to Rosie but to anyone with a sense of humor, they got the joke. JOKE, get it? Since she hates the country so much its doubtful she would mind anyway if it happened.
As for drag queen shows for children at libraries being stopped, good. I dont want my tax dollars used for perversion and indoctrination of children. The dems made an art of suing any lawyer who took Trump on as a client or having them disbarred. How is that not control, suppression, violence?? Now it comes full circle and the left is howling. Too bad.
I dont see us heading toward Christian Nationalism. Neither do I think such a thing would be threatening. I have no idea what supposed “objectives ” frighten you,( or what objectives you see lurking in the dark??) but the fake threatening world you have conjured up for yourself is a waste of energy. As far as I can see, it has been the left, which I do not distinguish from the DEMs or communists , who have destroyed the quality of life for average people, dangerous unvetted illegals and with partisan judges (who always need to be overruled),ignoring violent crime against innocents . You dont really believe that those charges against Trump under Biden were legit, do you?? Russia-gate has long been proven a dangerous farce too. As was every charge that followed.
Recently a medical professional confided that he was trying to visit Washington DC to see the African American Museum “before Trump shuts it down”. WHAT????? NO PLACE EVER has there been talk of such a thing happening. That is more propaganda, or outright hysteria. I am left to conclude that DEMs are either a little short in the IQ department, or have been so thoroughly propagandized that they can no longer see reality. Sad. I would not vote for a DEM at this point for a million dollars.
One final question. Which side do you imagine would be more than happy to outlaw religion? That pretty much says everything that needs to be said. If you are ok with the complete chaos that Dem/leftist rule represents, you have my sympathy.
Isn’t the Church entrusted with the mission to transform the world—not to be conformed to it? When individuals, particularly those in positions of public leadership, persist in advancing pro-choice policies, they bear a grave responsibility. Even if such actions are brought to confession, true repentance must be evident in a change of heart and conduct. The continued public promotion of abortion, absent sincere contrition, reveals a disconnect between professed faith and lived witness. In such cases, it is not only appropriate but necessary for the Church and its faithful to speak with clarity and courage—calling out moral inconsistency where it undermines the sanctity of life and the integrity of Christian witness.
John 8:11: Jesus tells the woman caught in adultery, “Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more”.
John 5:14: Jesus also told a man he healed, “See, you have been made well. Stop sinning, or something worse may happen to you”.
Meaning of “Go and Sin No More”
Mercy and Forgiveness: The words are not a means of punishment but an expression of God’s love and grace, offering the woman a new life rather than condemnation.
Call to Repentance: It’s a command to abandon the sinful lifestyle and embrace a path of righteousness, purity, and holy living.
Transformation, Not Perfection: Jesus isn’t saying that the individual will never be tempted again or never stumble. Rather, through the power of the Holy Spirit, sin’s grip is broken, making sin no longer a lifestyle choice.
A New Beginning: Just as the woman’s life was saved, the phrase offers a chance for a new beginning, inviting the individual to be changed by God’s mercy.
Significance in Christian Theology
The phrase underscores that while God offers forgiveness for sin, this forgiveness is accompanied by the expectation of a changed life.
It highlights the transformative power of encountering Jesus, where true repentance and holiness become possible
No. Reform the individual. The World is given over to Satan.
Tickertape across the bottom of the screen this morning: Pope Backs Pro-Abortion Sen. Durbin for Award.
That’s all 99% of the public sees and hears.
Pope Leo is not talking to a crew of Augustinian Friars in the Chapter House. He is talking to lay people, non-Christian, non-Catholics, and an unsettling discouraging crew of Roman Catholics with either no catechesis or erroneous catechesis. The tickertape is totally accurate with them…no nuance, they got to get to work, to school, take care of the kids and pay the bills.
The dearth of vocations for the last sixty years has resulted in a dearth of men with leadership skills. The result of hard lessons not absorbed by the episcopate over that period are hitting the fan. It appears it is not going to get better until the episcopate have no sheep to shepherd and they are reaping the financial consequence that brings.
To compound matters we read at another source today that Pope Leo [along with Arnold Schwarzenegger] has no difficulty in saying it is time to swap words for “decisive and coordinated climate action” and does so without an iota of ambiguity.
It seems when he wishes Pope Leo can speak most clearly about a natural phenomenon which is outside of his expertise and which itself quite ambiguous. From whence the change in the weather? Its all quite theoretical at best. Every prediction of doom has not materialized, while it remains a crisis? I think not, nor do a sizeable portion of the world meteorologists who do not rely on leftist funding from dubious sources.
The Vatican had best stick to what is commonly assumed to be its field of expertise, theology, but these days even that is thrown to a consensus of synodal participants.
If Pope Leo is going to heal the divisions within the Church he had best start with himself.
Pope Leo should have a little fortitude.
“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil,who change darkness to light, and light into darkness”.
Isaiah 5:20
A lifetime achievement award? “Amen I say to you, they have received their reward.”
The dark night of the soul continues as ‘men without chests’ seem to be our politically motivated shepherds.
The good Lord’s permissive will perhaps.
The Church awaits another Benedict of Nursia.