Brooklyn Bishop Robert Brennan said he is “appalled” that a church in his diocese was used to shoot a provocative music video, released Oct. 31, 2023, with the prelate set to investigate why the more-than-100-year-old Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary Church permitted the controversial video to be recorded on its property. | Credit: Courtesy of the Diocese of Columbus and Jim.henderson, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons
CNA Staff, Nov 2, 2023 / 14:13 pm
Brooklyn Bishop Robert Brennan is “appalled” that a church there was used to shoot a provocative music video, the diocese said this week, with the prelate set to investigate why the more-than-100-year-old parish permitted the controversial video to be recorded on its property.
A newly released music video by pop musician Sabrina Carpenter showed the American-born singer dancing provocatively on the altar at the historic 19th-century Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary Church in Brooklyn.
The Oct. 31 music video of the song “Feather,” which has amassed more than 2 million views on YouTube, included scenes shot both inside and outside the church. Carpenter appeared at one point in the video with no pants while profane decorations lay atop and around the altar.
The video depicted several men fighting over the singer and eventually killing each other over her; their funeral coffins appear to end up in the Catholic church in the video.
One of those coffins says “RIP B—-.” Several items like cloths, candles, small statutes, a coffin, and a vase appearing to hold a dark liquid that says “RIP” are sitting on the altar, while the tabernacle remains hidden behind them and the church’s statue of the Blessed Virgin Mary looks down from atop the altar.
A Nov. 2 statement from the Diocese of Brooklyn to CNA said that Bishop Brennan “is appalled at what was filmed at Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary Church in Brooklyn.”
“The parish did not follow diocesan policy regarding the filming on Church property, which includes a review of the scenes and script,” the statement said.
The parish reportedly told the diocese that the production company “failed to accurately represent the video content,” with the diocese adding that Brennan “is taking this matter seriously and will be looking into it further.”
CNA reached out to the church’s pastor, Monsignor Jamie Gigantiello, for comment but did not receive a response before publication time.
Mia Barnes, the director of the music video, also did not respond to a request for comment.
The Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary parish was established in 1863, according to the New York City chapter of the American Guild of Organists.
For more than 100 years the church has been a home to Lithuanian Catholics, according to the Tablet, the diocesan newspaper.
In 2022 the church welcomed Lithuanian President Gitanas Nausėda, where the leader pledged his country’s support for its southern neighbor Ukraine in the war that Russia had launched earlier that year, the Tablet reported.
Other articles from the Tablet show that the church has hosted other Lithuanian leaders such as Archbishop Gintaras Grušas of Vilnius in 2019 and the former head of state Vytautas Landsbergis in 2017.
Annunciation is “the only church in the New York metropolitan area that offers a weekly Sunday Mass in Lithuanian,” according to the Tablet.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Michelangelo’s The Creation of Eve, from the Sistine Chapel ceiling, c. 1510. / null
Denver, Colo., Nov 15, 2022 / 09:00 am (CNA).
Michelangelo’s artistic masterpiece in the Sistine Chapel broke new ground in portraying the dynamic creative acts of God, but his work also depicts the combined importance of men and women through all of sacred history, art historian Elizabeth Lev has said.
“The spirit of artistic adventure led the artist to experiment with a completely new vision of creation,” Lev said Nov. 12. “He took a book that had been painted, sculpted, mosaiced, and illuminated over and over again in the history of art and created something completely new.”
She spoke at the closing keynote Saturday evening at the fall conference of the University of Notre Dame’s de Nicola Center for Ethics and Culture. Lev teaches at the Rome campus of Duquesne University and the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas. Her speech, “Creation, Complementarity, & St. John Paul II in Michelangelo’s Sistine Ceiling,” focused on one of the key artistic treasures of Vatican City.
The 16th-century Florentine artist Michelangelo was commissioned by Pope Julius II to paint the Sistine Chapel’s ceiling and the upper section of its walls. This was the artist’s focus from 1508 to 1512. He later finished the Last Judgment above the chapel altar from 1535 to 1541.
The ceiling frescoes show the creation of the heavens and the earth, the creation of Adam and Eve, their expulsion from the Garden of Eden, the great flood, and the rebirth of humankind through Noah.
Lev cited St. John Paul II’s description of Michelangelo’s work in his poem “Meditations on the Book of Genesis at the Threshold of the Sistine Chapel.”
“It is the book of the origins — Genesis,” the pope said. “Here, in this chapel, Michelangelo penned it, not with words, but with the richness of piled-up colors. We enter in order to read it again, going from wonder to wonder.”
Lev reflected on the first three panels depicting the creation of the world. These show “the mighty dynamic figure of God the Father at work.”
“It’s not what God creates, it’s that God creates,” she said. Michelangelo broke ground in portraying God as “physically engaged in creation.” For Lev, this offers “a preview of the Incarnation.”
Turning to Michelangelo’s famous depiction of the Creation of Adam, Lev noted that the artist depicts “just God and the creature formed in his likeness.” Adam is shown as “somewhat listless” in contrast with God’s energy. Adam is “sentient and awake but he has no will or strength or purpose to rise,” she said. “He looks completely passive and dependent despite that incredibly beautiful form.”
“It’s God who reaches towards man,” she continued. For Lev, the outstretched finger of God makes the viewer “almost lean forward in his seat waiting for that final Act of Creation, the divine spark, the Breath of Life that will release that latent energy and allow Adam to take his place as the greatest of creations.”
“This is the joy in humanity that permeates the Renaissance,” Lev said.
Michelangelo’s The Fall and Expulsion from Paradise from the Vatican’s Sistine Chapel (1508-12).
There is academic debate over a female figure shown in the Creation of Adam. As God the Father stretches out one arm to Adam, his other arm curls around a female figure. Some have identified this figure as Wisdom, some as Mary.
Lev suggested it is best to identify this figure as Eve, both because the figure provides visual balance to Adam and because her gaze “connects her more intimately with Adam.”
The creation of Eve from Adam, depicted next on the chapel ceiling, shows Eve emerging from Adam’s side with her hands clasped in prayer, an image of the Church and the personification of Mary, the “Second Eve.”
Lev cited St. John Paul II’s 1999 homily inaugurating the newly restored Sistine Chapel, after centuries of grime and soot were removed. The pope called the chapel the “sanctuary of the theology of the human body,” alluding to his catecheses offered from 1979 to 1984. The pope suggested that Michelangelo allowed himself to be guided by the Book of Genesis’ depiction of mankind in Eden: “the man and his wife were both naked and they felt no shame.”
Before the fall, Lev commented, Michelangelo depicted Adam and Eve in the state of grace as “two of his most beautiful figures.”
“They are filled with dynamism. They’re buoyant. They’re luminous,” Lev said, adding that their bodies “suggest immortality.” After the fall, however, both of their bodies “lose their luminosity” and appear heavier, like a burden. Adam’s shoulder seems to force Eve into the background, “subjugating her.”
For Lev, the artistic depiction of the genealogy of Jesus Christ also deserves attention. The portrayal of the ancestors of Jesus Christ shows “a genealogy of men and women struggling from generation to generation.” These figures seem “more approachable” and “much more similar to candid family photographs.” Even though 22 women in Jesus’ genealogy are not named, Michelangelo pairs them with their husbands.
Lev noted that Michelangelo broke with artistic convention both by including mothers and by showing them as busy, everyday women “tending to toddlers, toilettes, and tasks.” His style of painting them with “incredible immediacy” adds observations of human nature: Eleazar’s wife holds the purse strings and the key to the house, and her husband looks “startled” as she surveys their son. Other depictions are “tender and intimate,” like the portrayal of the wife of Manasseh, who cradles a swaddled son while rocking an infant’s cradle.
Here, Lev drew on John Paul II’s 1995 “Letter to Women.” He wrote that womanhood and manhood are complementary at the physical, psychological, and even ontological level.
“It is only through the duality of the masculine and the feminine that the human finds full recognition,” the pope said. “To this unity of the two, God has entrusted not only the work of procreation and family life but the creation of history itself.”
Lev noted that the passing of generations “necessarily emphasizes the begetting of children.” This means that the complementarity of the sexes is essential for a population to form and for creation to continue.
In Michelangelo’s portrayal of the Last Judgment, the artist still looks back to creation but also breaks new ground. He placed Mary next to Christ, as “a foil to Christ’s sternness.”
“She is the picture of mercy gazing down towards the elect, placed by the wound in Christ’s side whence the Church sprang,” Lev said. “Mary is transfigured into the Bride of Christ, for whom he gave his life and to whom he cannot say no. She is the conduit to Christ, as Eve was the link between God and man in the creation of woman.”
For Lev, the Sistine Chapel shows the “incredible gift of creation” from the beginning of the world down through the generations, “through which all of us today are a part of that continuation of creation.”
Rome Newsroom, Nov 15, 2021 / 09:15 am (CNA).
Speaking at an event for a diocesan charity to which he is alleged to have illicitly given Vatican funds, Card… […]
Bishop Michael Burbidge of Arlington, Virginia, at the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ fall plenary assembly in Baltimore, Nov. 16, 2022. / Katie Yoder/CNA
Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jan 30, 2023 / 12:50 pm (CNA).
The U.S. bishops… […]
3 Comments
When bishops [perhaps Bishop Brennan has is different] permit the gay banner crowd to decorate churches and virtually take over the Gospel message then anything goes. Disturbed pastors will respond in kind.
Pope Francis welcomes the gay banner folks, regardless of whether they don’t conform to ‘crystalized ideologies’, rather the opposite. It’s logical. You can’t appease Pope Francis on this and other moral practices and expect to please Our Lord.
Reading up on the pastor Msgr Gigantiello, he’s a celebrity among celebrities with a background of hotel management, cuisine, fundraising, has a home he shares with his priest idol Msgr Cassato in Westhampton NY. He’s involved in fundraising for education of impoverished children.
He may not have been entirely aware of the altar production with so many contacts involved in the parish. Although like all of us we’re responsible as pastors. As was Cardinal Schönborn, who was chastised by Benedict XVI 2010 for suggesting practicing homosexuals be permitted to receive communion. Schönborn who later presided over a gay dance troupe performing in the sanctuary of St Stephens Cathedral Vienna, one homosexual prancing on the communion rail. With toleration of that affront to Christ by a high ranked prelate, underlings have reason to feel free in promoting the same. We’re living in a corrupted Church that requires serious cleansing. It seems we’re begging for that, perhaps the big one. God have mercy on us all.
The Pastor takes final responsibility for what happens in his own parish. The buck stops with HIM. Why then the constant reference to the inanimate object ” the Parish” as the object of blame??? Unless it can be proven that one of his curates deliberately gave permission for this while the pastor was away, the pastor should be blamed, and receive a major penalty. Removal from his parish, and a long time spent away doing penance someplace. The church is more and more not only looking like sodom, but making excuses that somehow, in spite of thousands of years of tradition,that disrespect and blasphemy in a church setting is ok. Of ALL people, a priest should know better than to allow any such thing. Its disgusting. I agree that I am apprehensive that God will decide he has had enough of it. We need a conservative Pope who will do a thorough house-cleaning and remove once and for all these super liberal churchmen at ALL levels. Lets hope the church can survive until then.
When bishops [perhaps Bishop Brennan has is different] permit the gay banner crowd to decorate churches and virtually take over the Gospel message then anything goes. Disturbed pastors will respond in kind.
Pope Francis welcomes the gay banner folks, regardless of whether they don’t conform to ‘crystalized ideologies’, rather the opposite. It’s logical. You can’t appease Pope Francis on this and other moral practices and expect to please Our Lord.
Reading up on the pastor Msgr Gigantiello, he’s a celebrity among celebrities with a background of hotel management, cuisine, fundraising, has a home he shares with his priest idol Msgr Cassato in Westhampton NY. He’s involved in fundraising for education of impoverished children.
He may not have been entirely aware of the altar production with so many contacts involved in the parish. Although like all of us we’re responsible as pastors. As was Cardinal Schönborn, who was chastised by Benedict XVI 2010 for suggesting practicing homosexuals be permitted to receive communion. Schönborn who later presided over a gay dance troupe performing in the sanctuary of St Stephens Cathedral Vienna, one homosexual prancing on the communion rail. With toleration of that affront to Christ by a high ranked prelate, underlings have reason to feel free in promoting the same. We’re living in a corrupted Church that requires serious cleansing. It seems we’re begging for that, perhaps the big one. God have mercy on us all.
The Pastor takes final responsibility for what happens in his own parish. The buck stops with HIM. Why then the constant reference to the inanimate object ” the Parish” as the object of blame??? Unless it can be proven that one of his curates deliberately gave permission for this while the pastor was away, the pastor should be blamed, and receive a major penalty. Removal from his parish, and a long time spent away doing penance someplace. The church is more and more not only looking like sodom, but making excuses that somehow, in spite of thousands of years of tradition,that disrespect and blasphemy in a church setting is ok. Of ALL people, a priest should know better than to allow any such thing. Its disgusting. I agree that I am apprehensive that God will decide he has had enough of it. We need a conservative Pope who will do a thorough house-cleaning and remove once and for all these super liberal churchmen at ALL levels. Lets hope the church can survive until then.