Cura corporis and cura animae: The Church and the Coronavirus Crisis

Afflicted or not, sick or not, people are in need of both the physicians of the body and those of the soul, now more than ever.

People wear protective face masks in St. Peter's Square after the Vatican reports its first case of coronavirus March 6, 2020. The Vatican health clinic was closed temporarily, the Vatican announced March 6. (CNS photo/Remo Casilli, Reuters)

I was supposed to be in Italy with a group of twenty-plus students this spring break. It has been a tradition for almost two decades now: to spend spring break exploring some of the most fascinating sites in human history. We were supposed go to Sicily then to central Italy–to the where all roads meet, in the Eternal City. We were going to stay until March 9, giving students the opportunity to participate in the Angelus prayer in St. Peter’s Square with Pope Francis, again an experience of a lifetime for young men and women, Catholic or non-Catholic, to see the Holy Father leading the faithful in prayer and giving his Apostolic Blessing to students, their loved ones, and blessing devotional items they had purchased.

But our spring break study abroad trip to Italy was canceled this year, as is the case for many other universities in the United States due to the outbreak of the coronavirus.

Not only are spring break study abroad trips canceled, the live Angelus is also canceled. The Holy Father’s most proximate communication with the faithful in St. Peter’s Square is being put on hold due to the virus. A 66-year-old tradition is being canceled. It was Pope Pius XII who in October 1954 began to recite the prayer with the pilgrims who congregated in St. Peter’s Square. So did Pope John XXIII and all pontiffs who succeeded him. The dialogue between the pontiff and the people became ritual, a ritual of communicated love. Sister Pascalina Lehnert, the pontiff’s personal confidant and secretary for four decades until the death of Pius XII in 1958, recalls that the Holy Father did not have any rest behind his window. He had to open and close the window several times because the crowds would not go away, persistently asking for more blessings.

According to the latest news coming from the Holy See, the Angelus of March 8 will take place “from the Library of the Apostolic Palace and not in the square, from the window. The prayer will be broadcast live via Vatican News and on screens in St. Peter’s Square and distributed by Vatican Media to the media that request it, so as to allow the participation of the faithful.” Does this mean that the virus is in the air? The piazza is big enough to respect the recommended interpersonal distance of six feet, as the coronavirus is believed to spread from person-to-person contact. What are the odds of exposed or coronavirus-stricken people, especially in Italy – which has been a geographic hotspot of the virus and a vanguard of taking drastic measures to contain the virus – going to St. Peter’s Square for the Angelus?

On the other hand, what are the odds that the Holy Father could be infected, given the distance between the piazza and the Pope’s Window, which is probably more than three hundred feet away from Saint Peter’s Square? I was heartbroken our study abroad was canceled, but the cancellation of the live Angelus made me move beyond a personal, visceral response and reflect more deeply on the role of the Church in times of crisis – both in past eras and today.

The medievals thought that viruses were in the air, and it was because of the air, via inhaling infected droplets, that people got infected. The famous physician and professor of medicine at the Universities of Perugia and Bologna, Tommaso del Garbo (1305-1370), and his authoritative manual Advice of How to Live in Times of Pestilence (Consiglio contro la Peste) comes to mind. The famous medieval physician was eulogized by Petrarch who was known for his aversion to physicians and the medical profession in general. Surprisingly, in a letter to his physician friend John of Padua, Petrarch eulogized “[Tommaso del Garbo was] so esteemed in his art that he was reputed capable of resuscitating the dead.” Del Garbo was an eyewitness of the epidemic of 1348 which devasted especially the urban cities of Medieval Europe, including his native Florence. Eventually, Del Garbo became famous for his work Advice of How to Live in Times of Pestilence, as he was a physician-eyewitness who came up with practical ways to fight the spread of disease.

Besides practical advice on what to eat and drink, breathe and bathe, as well as to wash hands and body, the famous Florentine physician developed some practical advice for priests in the time of pestilence. Del Garbo dedicated a chapter to all those who took care of the sick in the time of pestilence in Italy: the caregivers of the body and the soul, the physicians priests – those individuals who labored selflessly in the hospitals using the power of medicine and in the churches using the power of prayer. In his manual of precautions against the spread of pestilence Del Garbo seemed not to be much worried about the physicians, because they knew how to take precautions, but was more worried about the priests – the physicians of the soul. As medical doctors were on the front lines, acting in persona Christi, fortifying the infirm and afflicted who had fallen in the field, these brave priests were the front-liners of a wounded and diseased Body of Christ, or what Pope Francis today calls the priests laboring in the field hospital.

For the famous physician, taking care of the body and soul was a unified venture; these were the “two right hands” of the art of medicine as St. Basil the Great (330-379), who himself was a trained physician, wrote. According to Del Garbo’s manual, the priest is the one who enters the rooms where the sick of pestilence are lying, facing a disease that most probably will kill them. During the time of pestilence thousands of priests braved the pestilence and did not leave the sick dying alone. His advice to priests is to open wide the windows so that fresh air enters and renews; wash the hands not with soap and water, as we do to protect against the coronavirus, but with vinegar and rosewater (acqua rosata); and keep two clove buds in the mouth.

The priest who confessed the sick in their rooms were advised by Del Garbo to ask family members to leave the room so that the infirm confessed using a louder voice if possible so that the priest be able to keep some distance from the sick and not put his mouth near that of the infirm, so that he [the priest] could avoid breathing the same air. Breathing the same air, that was the proximity of the priest, the Church of the hospital to those hospitalized or confined during the pestilence.

The early and medieval Church understood the art of medicine as putting mercy into practice, and the priest – the physician of the spirit – was the front-liner of doing exactly that: putting mercy into practice. There was a positive theology of illness, as illness comes from God, and nothing that comes from God could be evil. Consequently, illness and the suffering related to illness was seen as a means of unity with or returning to God. That was the benefit of suffering: for the sick: participating first-hand in the sufferings of Christ; and the priest, by acting in the person of Christ, fortified the spirit with prayers and confession.

If there is a take-home lesson to be learned from the coronavirus, it is the fact of the extreme fragility of human nature. People, in their helplessness, look up to the front-liners. Medical doctors, nurses and other healthcare providers are on the front lines courageously fighting the virus in China, Iran, South Korea and Italy, which are considered level three and red zones of the coronavirus by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Is the Church a front-liner on the same front line as the medical professionals? Broadcasting the Angelus, closing churches, making the Lourdes pools off limits, distributing Communion in hand only: do all these closures, cancellations, and changes meet the front-line expectation of the spiritual hospital? One thing is sure: afflicted or not, sick or not, people are in need of both the physicians of the body and those of the soul, now more than ever. Presence is a gift, and dispensing mercy a high calling – and in a coronavirus-suffering world, the Church is called to do both.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Ines Angeli Murzaku 27 Articles
Ines Angeli Murzaku ( is Professor of Ecclesiastical History at Seton Hall University in New Jersey, Director of Catholic Studies Program and the Founding Chair of the Department of Catholic Studies at Seton Hall University. She earned a doctorate of research from the Pontifical Oriental Institute in Rome part of the Pontifical Gregorian University Consortium and has held visiting positions at the Universities of Bologna and Calabria in Italy and University of Münster in Germany. She is a regular commentator to media outlets on religious matters. She has worked for or collaborated with the Associated Press, CNN, Catholic World Report, National Catholic Register, Voice of America, Relevant Radio, The Catholic Thing, Crux, The Record, The Stream, Vatican Radio (Vatican City), and EWTN (Rome). Dr. Murzaku is currently writing a book on St. Mother Teresa entitled Mother Teresa: The Saint of the Peripheries who Became Catholicism’s Center Piece to be published by Paulist Press in 2020.


  1. Well, obviously it would probably be a better idea to cancel the Angelus altogether. That way people would not gather together and spread the virus. And, if Holy Communion is so dangerous that communion on the tongue must be forbidden, then better just stop giving communion altogether to anyone but the celebrant. Better yet, just to be on the safe side, cancel all Sunday, Holy Day and weekday masses for the remainder of 2020. Close the churches for the rest of the year. No sacrament of confession. Maybe general absolution, broadcast once or twice a year, to people in their homes. Of course, we should close the seminaries. Too dangerous to have men gathering together there. Family Rosary recitation in the home should be done away with, because gathering family members together would be hazardous. And then, by the end of 2020, after everyone has gotten used to staying away from mass and the sacraments for an entire year–well, you may as well just shut down the church permanently. If you tried to re-open, probably few if anyone would show up anyway. I mean–no use doing something halfway. Let’s do the whole measure and go out of business for good. Think of how much safer we’d be.

    • The irony that the very people who he capitulated to – the Chicomms – are the same ones that unleashed this virus on the world thus causing all the chicken little’s to lose their minds in hysteria is lost on one Jorge Bergoglio.

  2. Seems like the tribulations are upon us. This virus spreads so rapidly, we have to try everything to restrict, avoid and contain, and it can be very emotional. France does not allow communion by mouth or hand contact. Northern Italy locked in, churches closed, priests left, sacraments not available, no confessions or even Extreme Unction; we should pray for them the most. My diocese abolished hand contact, communion on the tongue, no chalice of the precious blood for the faithful. Let us make it an especially good lent of sacrifices to appease the Divine Judge. He is our merciful Savior.

  3. This coronavirus can be spread by personal contact but it can also travel through the air, a characteristic of respiratory viruses. Generally this is a problem indoors but not outdoors. Please do wash your hands with soap and water. Vinegar and rose water are better than nothing, however, but not much better. Is the author seriously recommending the use of cloves or am I missing something?

  4. ‘ what you did to the least of these ..’ – Vatican seems to have made it clear that the concern was for those who have to do the mundane work needed to make all the rest possible, such as those who have to screen the crowds ; setting an example of concern for their well being would be judged by God for what it is .
    Thank God that enough technology is also in place ,to circumvent some of these issues too . More hearts choosing to live lives that can support the warfare of body and soul needed in our times , such as the day of fasting asked for next week are commendable indeed .
    Having read how the virus might have traits of agents that can damage both immune systems and lungs , only time might tell what the effects might be even in those who might seem clinically well ; that might include the young .
    Living lives that are good for the soul – most persons in our times have had enough occasions to know what that means ; this threat might give enough of an incentive to restore the will , to do same and that would not need much of the other frills we often are given , instead, more of that oneness in the wounds , with the poor and wounded , both physically and spiritually and same might be what is more needed , to be ready for what the signs of the times might be telling us .

  5. I read where Bergoglio urges priests to take Communion to the sick….while everyone in Vatican stays 1m from each other, while still apparently all still using common coffee machines around which they are forbidden to congregate…leading by example.

    We COULD have MORE Masses so that folk can keep distance and pews and doors wiped between Masses, and no group or family admitted if even one has a fever.

    Instead, here, with a case of the virus in a city 45mins distant, they still are using the yukky common chalice, attending with coughs, sneezes, coughing into hands and then handling chalice and trying to shake hands and offended when such is declined….and watched a school bus from the infected city cross directly in front of me this morning, and USPS/FedEx/UPS likely still cheerfully accepting packages from known USA hot zones.

    But am sure churches here will close to stop the spread….and equally sure it will do zero to stop same.

  6. English is not my strongest side, but I will try:
    The point is that now is very clear what bishops
    and most clergy think about faith,
    sacraments etc. Most of them are non belivers
    In medieval time “black death” killed 30% of
    european population. Today worldwide died
    0,00005 % and churches are closed, priests
    run away from the flock. No shepards on front
    line means all this church is just empty show
    just easy job, to get some money for easy
    life. This convid-19 took away courtain and
    we can see that clergy from top are nonbelivers
    this epidemic is like a test. And the test already
    failed . After convid-19 when all will be back
    to routine life the biggest looser will be church
    and sadly the abandoned souls.

    • No argument, only agreement….they show themselves only business managers and being spiritual guides in a crisis is utterly foreign to most. A Polish prelate of a titular Roman church defied the ban, and now, today, the managers are waking up to their PR blunder and allowing churches to reopen…

      WHILE heroically saying it up to local pastor, SO, if a church closed, it is not their fault, and if one gets the virus, blame the local pastor, not THEM…ZERO unified leadership, scattered as sheep and every man for himself.

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Cura corporis and cura animae: The Church and the Coronavirus Crisis - Catholic Mass Search
  2. Koronavirus jen odhalil absolutní pokleslost a bídu současného katolického kněžství! Kde (časný) pozemský život byl povýšen nad (věčnou!) spásu duše!! :-( – MARIÁNSKÉ SPOLEČENSTVÍ: PRAVDU NELZE UMLČET

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.