At March for Life, Trump gets mixed reviews

Washington D.C., Jan 24, 2020 / 04:45 pm (CNA).- On Friday, President Donald Trump became the first U.S. president to address the March for Life in person. His appearance was greeted by pro-lifers with both excitement and hesitation.

The presence of the president brought with it additional security, similar to when Vice President Mike Pence spoke at the pre-march rally in 2017, but higher than his unexpected appearance last year.

Trump’s decision to attend personally, instead of via video message as in past years, meant attendees were prevented from bringing certain items to the rally, faced long lines, and had to pass through metal detectors before entering the Mall.

The extra measures discouraged some potential attendees, who stayed away, worried that the logistics of juggling security and children would be too much.

Connie Poulos told CNA that she had already decided, reluctantly, to skip this year’s march due rather than face the event solo with her young son, the news that Trump was speaking at the rally made her feel “less bad” about missing the event, fearing the president would alienate non-Republicans.

“As a pro-life person, I think the movement needs all the help it can get to cross party lines,” she said.

While signs are always commonplace at the March for Life, this year distinctly partisan bent. Familiar “Vote Life” or “Choose Life” signs manufactured by the Knights of Columbus were joined this time by “Pro-Life Voices For Trump” and “Most Pro-Life President Ever” signs with pictures of president. These signs were supplied by the RNC and were distributed at the rally by volunteers.

Despite hesitation by some, most attendees told CNA they were happy about the president’s appearance.

“President Trump is one of the greatest presidents that this country has ever had. A man who has a heart after God to do what God has called him to do, in spite of [what] anybody else thinks or [does],” Barbara Bell, who described herself as a “black American who loves the Lord Jesus Christ, and loves President Trump,” told CNA.

Bell, who is 70 years old, told CNA she was attending her fortieth March for Life in 2020. She came down from Massachusetts for the event, and she said she was even more excited than usual when she heard that Trump would be speaking.

While politically independent, Bell said that she was extremely impressed with what Trump had accomplished during his time in office.

Mimi Vertrees, an 18 year old attending the March for Life for the first time, traveled to DC from Nashville, Tennessee. She carried a sign reading “Stop Calling Violence Feminism,” and she told CNA that she believed there is a “misconception” about feminism because of its embrace of abortion.

Vertrees said she thought it was “amazing” that Trump was coming to address the March for Life, and that she was “so excited” when she found out he would be coming. She stressed that she thought it was important for the president to be physically present at the event.

One young woman was en route to Washington when she found out that Trump would be speaking at the rally. Quinley Fawks, who traveled 22 hours on a bus from Salisbury, Missouri to attend the March for Life, said that finding out Trump was coming heightened her anticipation.

After it was announced on Wednesday that Trump would be attending the rally, Fawks told CNA, her bus leader made the announcement, and “everyone was really excited. We were surprised and happy.”

This was Fawks’ second time attending the March for Life, and she said that she made the choice to embark on the long journey because “We’re here to save the babies.”

One rally attendee who was not excited to see Trump was Clarence Richard of Minnetonka, Minnesota. Richard was dressed as Uncle Sam, and his hat read “U.S. Army Veteran” and “Remove the GOP.”

Richard was most upset by Trump’s policies at the southern border, which resulted in children being separated from their parents. He carried two dolls, which he said were meant to “represent the young children at the border.”

While this was Richard’s first March for Life, he said he had been a longtime supporter of the pro-life cause.

“This is bananas,” said Richard. “We shouldn’t be allowing [Trump] to speak.

Each year the March for Life winds its way past the Canadian embassy, where a small contingent of Canadians come out to show their support. Valerie Luetke of Oakville, Ontario, was one of the people there this year.

This said this was her first trip to the March for Life in the United States, but she had attended the Canadian March for Life in Ottawa several times.

“We just kind of wanted to see how big it is, how passionate [everyone] is, and of course, Trump is speaking,” Luetke said. She told CNA that she found Trump’s speech to be “amazing,” especially since Justin Trudeau, the prime minister of Canada, is publicly against the pro-life cause.

“It’s really inspiring,” she said. “I know not everyone supports him for all of his policies, but I think the fact that he’s here is really amazing.”

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


  1. Wow. Find one “plant” who doesn’t like Trump’s border policy protecting the United States from invasion by welfare-seeking “democrat” voters and base the headline for the story on that an article. How “unbiased”. Lois Irwin

  2. CNA could have performed a service to their readers by reporting at least one line of what the President actually said, in addition to what said about him being there to say whatever he said.

    For example, on one reported concern that Trump’s being there would alienate members of the opposing political Party–the risk of alienating the alienators [!]–did he say anything original, culture-restoring, unifying and presidential, or not?

    Or, in the crowd were his own comments simply unnoticed by the reporters, like Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address?

    • Afterthought:

      “Two score and seven years ago, the Supreme Court brought forth on this continent a new abomination deceived by pro-“choice” and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal, but that under their Roe v. Wade fatwa some can be de-created…” etc.

      Trump and/or his speech writers could have had a field day pivoting off the fact that the previous president found an excuse to conspicuously NOT attend the 150th Anniversary of Gettysburg, where (Republican!) Abraham Lincoln bound up the American nation–quite in contrast with Obamanation’s legacy of fractious identity politics.

  3. To hear the President of the United States say that every life is a gift from God – that’s what the world needs to hear. Everybody loves new life; it’s just that many of us have been tricked into thinking that the unborn are somehow not human.

  4. This is bananas,” said Richard. “We shouldn’t be allowing [Trump] to speak.

    Dems would rather hate Trump than stop baby murder.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.