The ancient roots of deification in the Latin tradition

“Deification is our destiny as Christians and our common Christian heritage,” says Dr. Jared Ortiz. “It is a teaching that naturally and rightfully belongs to all Christians, including and especially Catholics in the West.”

(CNS photo/Gregory A. Shemitz)

Dr. Jared Ortiz is Associate Professor of Religion at Hope College, author of You Made Us for Yourself: Creation in St Augustine’s Confessions (Fortress Press, 2016), founder and executive director of the Saint Benedict Institute, and a contributor to Catholic World Report. He is also editor of Deification in the Latin Patristic Tradition (The Catholic University of America Press, 2019), a collection of essays that has been praised as “a valuable contribution to the field of Patristic studies.”

He recently corresponded with Carl E. Olson, editor of Catholic World Report, about the new volume and the place of deification, especially in the Latin Patristics tradition.

CWR: First, how would you define deification?

Jared Ortiz: Let me begin by saying that deification is what the Bible means by salvation. It is the fullest meaning of what it means to be saved by Christ. Even though the idea is biblical, the word “deification” is not. It comes from two Latin words, deus, which means “(a) God” or “divine” or “holy,” and facere, which means “to make.” Many people associate this term with emperor worship, though this is not the word the ancient Romans used to describe the elevation of the emperor to a divine status. Deification is not a pagan import, but a Christian revelation. It is deeply Christological and ecclesiological.

CWR: Say more about the Christological and ecclesial dimension of deification.

Ortiz: Deification refers to our glorious destiny in Christ through the Holy Spirit. It means a real transformation of the Christian into a son of God who shares in God’s very own life. It involves our graced participation, that is, it involves our living a life in the Spirit which both requires and augments our freedom as we grow into the image of God, that is to say, as we grow in godliness. From start to finish, this process involves the sacraments which communicate God’s life to us, the hearkening to the word which melts our hearts and makes them malleable so we might be conformed to Christ, and the communal life where God works in and through us as we encounter Christ in others.

CWR: Is the word “deification” common in the early Church?

Ortiz: No. In one Latin database, words with a deif– root occur only 73 times from the second to the seventh century. There is a burst of the use of this term in the ninth century and again in the twelfth and especially the thirteenth centuries. Still—and this is the essential point—the content of deification is found throughout the writings of all the major Latin Fathers.

CWR: When did you first learn about and become interested in the topic of deification?

Ortiz: I probably first learned about deification from old Scott Hahn cassette tapes I borrowed from a parish library. Deification is a key idea in Scott’s theological vision, which he usually talks about in terms of “divine sonship.”

CWR: And how have you, as an academic, gone about researching and writing about it?

Ortiz: I started to study deification more intensely when I wrote my dissertation on creation in Augustine’s Confessions. I wasn’t looking for deification in Augustine, let alone in a study on creation, but I was surprised time and again that, for Augustine, creation and deification are intimately related. For Augustine, the fact that God created us out of nothing means that we must understand our destiny as deification. My dissertation, now book, makes that argument at length.

CWR: How did your recent volume, Deification in the Latin Patristic Tradition, come about?

Ortiz: Interestingly, it started when you and Fr. Meconi invited me to write the Latin Fathers chapter for Called to Be the Children of God: The Catholic Theology of Human Deification (Ignatius Press, 2016). When I started that project, a number of scholars told me that my essay would be short because the Latin Fathers didn’t really have a theology of deification. This annoyed me and, honestly, it just seemed wrong. I spent a long summer in the Mount Angel Abbey library and gathered what I saw could be a book’s worth of Latin deification material. I wrote my essay, but knew there was much more to say. A few years later, when I was a young prof at Hope College I put together a three-day twelve-person workshop at the 2015 Oxford Patristic Conference with top-notch scholars from around the world. Each scholar studied a different Latin author. The papers from the workshop were all expanded and included in the volume.

CWR: As you note in the Introduction, many people think that deification is something widespread in the Eastern traditions, but not in the Western tradition. Why this perception? What is problematic or misleading about it?

Ortiz: Let’s start with the second question: the perception that deification is a teaching of the East and not the West is misleading because it is false and has no basis in reality. It is problematic because it reinforces lame prejudices between East and West and also blinds Christians from seeing what is in their own tradition. Every single Catholic priest every single day at every single Mass for as many centuries as we know has said these deification-rich words: “By the mystery of this water and wine, may we come to share in the divinity of Christ, who humbled himself to share in our humanity.” How can we say deification is absent from the West when it is at the heart of our Eucharistic prayers? Why is it we do not learn about this more frequently except that we have been trained not to see what is before our very eyes?

CWR: But how did we get to this point?

Ortiz: My friend Carl Mosser has done the most interesting work on how we all came to adopt such an odd prejudice (see his essay here). Let me summarize his argument briefly. At the turn of the twentieth century, Adolf von Harnack, the great Protestant historian of dogma, proposed a theory about the development of Christian doctrine which cast the Christian tradition primarily as one of decline. Starting from the simple moral teachings of Christ, Christian doctrine became corrupted due to the influence of Greek philosophy. According to Harnack, the teaching at the heart of this decline was the doctrine of deification. This doctrine, he claimed, became the defining feature of eastern Christianity. The west was only mildly corrupted by it.

Harnack’s influence was such that this thesis became standard. Orthodox Christians (many of whom recently migrated after the Russian Revolution) adopted his argument, but modified it in one essential way. They agreed that deification defines eastern Christianity (something no Orthodox would have said before this), but for them this was not a sign of apostasy, but the mark of the true faith. For the Orthodox, it was western Christians, Catholic and Protestant, who were the apostates because they abandoned the deep truth about salvation. Despite readily available counterevidence, this narrative has dominated scholarly and popular conversations around deification—as well as ecumenical dialogue—up until our own time.

CWR: How do the Latin and Greek Patristic traditions compare on deification?

Ortiz: The Latin and Greek tradition do not differ very much in how they express deification. There is variety and a range of expressions and emphases, but these are similar in each tradition. The great Greek Patristic scholar, Norman Russell, wrote the final essay in our volume comparing Greeks and Latins. He identified five key characteristics which both traditions share. Deification is Christologically driven, ecclesial in nature, eschatological in orientation, and, finally, draws on similar Platonic themes, such as participation, the soul’s ascent to God, and becoming like God through moral and ascetical discipline.

CWR: Can you give some examples of how deification is expressed in the Latin Patristic tradition?

Ortiz: I love the passage from the City of God where Augustine sets the whole trajectory of creation, fall, and redemption in a deification key:

“We wished to be God ourselves when we fell away from him, after listening to the Seducer saying, “You will be like gods.” Then we abandoned the true God, by whose creative help we should have become gods, but by participating in him, not by deserting him.” (City of God, 22.30)

Augustine says this so naturally it is clear that deification ideas are an integral part of his theological vision. Also, there is such a delightful polemic in here as well since Augustine has spent nearly a thousand pages rejecting all the pagan gods only to replace them with true gods, that is, those among us who worship the true God and share in his life.

Leo the Great is a master at what is called “the exchange formula,” which he modeled on the thought of St. Paul who says, “For your sake he become poor, though being rich, so that by his poverty you may become rich” (2 Cor. 8:9). Throughout all liturgical seasons, Leo uses similar expressions to connect his rich Christology with his understanding of our transformation in Christ. In a Pentecost sermon, Leo has Christ say to us, “I have united you to myself, and I have become the son of man so that you can be sons of God” (Sermon 77.5). In a Holy Week sermon, he says, “Being like unto us and equal with the Father, he lowered his divinity to the human state and lifted his humanity up to the divine” (Sermon 3.2). In other words, God became what we are so that we could become what he is.

Tertullian offers perhaps the most unique and interesting expression of deification when he describes Christ as “sequester.” Tertullian cites 1 Timothy 2:5 where Jesus is described as the “mediator between God and man.” In his early writings, Tertullian translates the Greek mesites into the Latin mediator, but this is problematic in the Latin of his time. Mediator is a legal term which denotes an impartial person who enters into a property dispute between two parties but is independent of both parties. But this is not a helpful way to understand the Incarnation as it would undermine salvation. In his later works, he translates this word with another legal term, sequester. A sequester was one who became the legal owner of the disputed property until the case was settled. In the Incarnation, Christ becomes the legal possessor of humanity whose ownership is under dispute since the Fall. As sequester, Christ has to ensure that his property is restored to its rightful Owner in the best condition which, for Tertullian, meant the full restoration, body and soul, to prelapsarian holiness.

CWR: You wrote the opening chapter, “Making Worshippers into gods: Deification in the Latin Liturgy,” in which you state, “Deification was not the esoteric teaching of a few superior theologians, but a popular teaching that was written in to the very art and architecture of Latin churches and baptisteries.” Can you give some examples of this?

Ortiz: Take the image on the cover of the book. There you find some pretty artistically primitive Latin Christian art which at the same time conveys a number of pretty profound deification themes. The piece is a tombstone with an etching of a young girl. There she is pictured being baptized and receiving an outpouring of grace from a Holy Spirit-infused heavenly font. Note how the water completely ensconces her: she is surrounded, covered, enveloped in divine life.

The scene is framed by images of flora and fauna, the same kind of imagery one finds in baptisteries of this time as well. Why is that? Because in the death of baptism and the death of the faithful one enters into Paradise. The prayers of the baptism liturgy bear this out. One blessing over the baptismal font reads,

Restore the innocence which Adam lost in paradise which his wife let go [sorry, ladies!], which the intemperance of gluttony devoured. Give a healthful draught to men who are upset by the bitterness of the apple; purge the disorders of mortals and with a divine antidote cure their age long distemper. Wash away the filth and squalor of the world: Make a way through the wall of fire which protects the garden of paradise and open a flower-strewn path unto them that return. May they receive the likeness of God which once was lost by the malice of the serpent. (from the Liber Ordinum)

These images and prayers are meant to convey the mystical reality that the baptized are no longer bound to their sins and now enjoy the grace that our original parents had.

Baptisteries were often octagonal and this is not without significance. For Latin Christians, the number eight signified the end times when God “will be all in all” (1 Cor. 15:28). God created all things in six days and he hallowed the seventh day. But unlike the other days of creation, the seventh day has no evening. It opens up into an eternal eighth day. The eighth day was also the day of resurrection, the day after the Sabbath when Christ rose from the dead, and so was a sign of eternal life. In baptism, we enter into this eighth day, the final age of all things. A prayer from the Easter Vigil baptismal liturgy captures this powerfully: “On this night your people are new born and brought forth unto eternal day, the halls of the kingdom of heaven are thrown open, and by your blessed ordinance human conversation is changed to divine” (from the Missale Gothicum).

CWR: Can you give an overview of the chapters?

Ortiz: The book is framed by two synthetic chapters: the first chapter is on the Latin liturgy, particularly the rite of baptism (which included “confirmation” and Eucharist). This is the worship into which all the Latin figures would have been initiated and into which they initiated others. It demonstrates the principle lex orandi, lex credendi, that is, how the church prays reflects and determines what she believes. It also demonstrates that deification is a teaching widely accessible to all Latin Christians. The last chapter is a comparison between the Latin and Greek understanding of deification, the first essay of its kind ever to be written in light of real evidence. The essays in between cover all the major figures of the Latin tradition up to the early seventh century: Perpetua and Felicity, Tertullian, Cyprian, Novatian, Hilary, Ambrose, Jerome, Augustine, Peter Chrysologus, Leo the Great, Boethius, Benedict and Gregory.

CWR: Do you have any parting thoughts for our readers?

Ortiz: Deification is our destiny as Christians and our common Christian heritage. It is a teaching that naturally and rightfully belongs to all Christians, including and especially Catholics in the West. During this Advent and Christmas season, pay close attention to the prayers at Mass which are rich in deification themes. You might even catch this ancient and famous Christmas prayer:

God, you who marvelously created the dignity of human substance and more marvelously reformed it: grant us, we ask, to be sharers in the divinity of your Son, Jesus Christ, who deemed it worthy to become a partaker of our humanity. (Verona Sacramentary, 1239)

God has a destiny in store for us that is more beautiful and more wondrous than we could ever imagine. This is available to us in the sacraments and the life of grace that flows from them. Pray that you will be transformed and let God “change you into his likeness, from one degree of glory to another” (2 Cor. 3:18).


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Carl E. Olson 1136 Articles
Carl E. Olson is editor of Catholic World Report and Ignatius Insight. He is the author of Did Jesus Really Rise from the Dead?, Will Catholics Be "Left Behind"?, co-editor/contributor to Called To Be the Children of God, co-author of The Da Vinci Hoax (Ignatius), and author of the "Catholicism" and "Priest Prophet King" Study Guides for Bishop Robert Barron/Word on Fire. He is also a contributor to "Our Sunday Visitor" newspaper, "The Catholic Answer" magazine, "The Imaginative Conservative", "The Catholic Herald", "National Catholic Register", "Chronicles", and other publications.
About Dr. Jared Ortiz 12 Articles
Dr. Jared Ortiz is Associate Professor of Religion at Hope College and author of You Made Us for Yourself: Creation in St Augustine’s Confessions (Fortress Press, 2016) and editor of Deification in the Latin Patristic Tradition (The Catholic University of America Press, 2019). He is also founder and executive director of the Saint Benedict Institute.

13 Comments

  1. Key wording from Ortiz regarding deification is that it “involves our graced participation” in the divine life. We participate in, but do not actually share the divine nature itself. We are graced, but not God.

    A rejection of this Revelation of participation (together with this crucial distinction) is asserted by Islam which—-by deleting the historic fact and fullness of the Incarnation as two natures in one self-donating Person (human nature elevated within the divine)—-stays stuck on square-one with “let God be God and Man be Man.”

    To understand—-and evangelize—-our divinely revealed human destiny in Christ, including but transcending any related steps toward fraternity and the common good, requires that we refrain from un-vetted text insertions (?) to the effect that “the pluralism and the diversity of religions [equivalence ?], colour, sex, race and language are willed by God in His wisdom, through which He created human beings.”

    Indeed, the written concession by other religions and especially Christianity to a generic, creed-minimal and multicultural “way of life” is arguably the definition of Islam as a very assimilating, sectarian and “congregational theocracy.”

    • From the Catechism, the paragraph (no. 460) I call “the most shocking paragraph” in the CCC:

      The Word became flesh to make us “partakers of the divine nature”:78 “For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God.”79 “For the Son of God became man so that we might become God.”80 “The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods.”81

      The footnotes are, in order, from [78] 2 Peter 1:4; [79] St. Irenaeus, Adv. haeres. 3, 19, 1: PG 7/1, 939; [80] St. Athanasius, De inc. 54, 3: PG 25, 192B; [81] St. Thomas Aquinas, Opusc. 57, 1-4.

      The CCC elsewhere, in par. 1997, quoting St. Athanasius, does state: “[God] gave himself to us through his Spirit. By the participation of the Spirit, we become communicants in the divine nature. . . . For this reason, those in whom the Spirit dwells are divinized.” So there is that. The key is recognizing that we do not and cannot “become God” ontologically; but, because we really do share in His Trinitarian life, we are “made gods” in a certain sense, as Aquinas writes.

  2. “Every single Catholic priest every single day at every single Mass for as many centuries as we know has said these deification-rich words: “By the mystery of this water and wine, may we come to share in the divinity of Christ, who humbled himself to share in our humanity.”

    Actually, for as many centirues as we know every priest said: Deus, + qui humánæ substántiæ dignitátem mirabíliter condidísti et mirabílius reformásti: da nobis, per hujus aquæ et vini mystérium, ejus divinitátis esse consórtes, qui humanitátis nostræ fíeri dignátus est párticeps, Jesus Christus, Fílius tuus, Dóminus noster: Qui tecum vivit et regnat in unitáte Spíritus Sancti Deus: per ómnia sæcula sæculórum. Amen.”

    That is,

    O God, + Who in creating man didst exalt his nature very wonderfully and yet more wonderfully didst establish it anew;; by the Mystery signified in the mingling of this water and wine, grant us to have part in the Godhead of Him Who hath deigned to become a partaker of our humanity, Jesus Christ, Thy Son our Lord; Who liveth and reigneth with Thee, in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God. World without end. Amen.”

  3. “The book is framed by two synthetic chapters: the first chapter is on the Latin liturgy, particularly the rite of baptism (which included “confirmation” and Eucharist).”

    May the rites of initiation be truly restored in the West so that it is used for initiates of all ages.

    • “May the rites of initiation be truly restored in the West so that it is used for initiates of all ages.”

      May the East stop carping and criticizing and sneering and complaining about the West. May the sacrament of Matrimony be truly restored in the East so that it is not mocked by divorce and remarriage. And may Sol, even if only just once, say something nice about the West.

  4. Caligula awakened mysteriously enthralled asked Claudius if he noticed a difference. Claudius gasped sorting his thoughts lest he offend the madman emperor and blurted, You…you…you’re a god! Is there difference in Man becoming likened to God? Or a god? Yes. Roman gods were multiple. Caligula conceivably could have been among them. Eusebius made Emperor Konstantin a virtual god. God however is One, exclusive in his existence and impossible to replicate. We become likened to God as Boethius [Manlius Severinus] said by participation in living a moral life. Not by identity as one with the One true God. To be like God or a god however we must in some way identify with his Essence. The key in what manner we become like God in his Essence or a god is the term used by St Athanasius of Alexandria [quoted by Editor Olson] “communicant”. We participate in the divine essence in this world by grace. We become like God or a god as a communicant of the divine essence by in the Beatific Vision.

  5. As an addendum to my comment: By divine favor God communicates [as knowledge] his Essence to us in the Beatific Vision. Then we shall become [a god] like him who is God. “Beloved, we are God’s children now, and what we will be has not yet appeared; but we know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is” (1 Jn 3:2).

    • Knowledge of what exists is a form of its possession. Knowledge of God’s Essence, infinite love is not known through mediation of the senses. It is known directly. The most intimate of all knowledge. Knowledge of an all consuming fire that pervades the soul that can never be extinguished. We retain our identity distinguishing God as the object of our love. Thus the soul in the words of the Psalmist says “My heart and my body faint for joy. God is my possession forever” (Ps 73:26).

  6. Deification, divine sonship, is the very KEY to all the History of Salvation, the whole Bible and all True Catholic Teaching for 2,000 years, even if, as the article says, it is not always mentioned by name or given the very highest emphasis it should have received in the past, today and always. Right off the bat in Genesis, We see Satan promising his own crooked, false, poisonous, destructive version of deification (as he does with all godly things): “”For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God…” (Genesis 3:5). “For God knows…”, he says. It is him, Satan, who was informed by God of The Father’s Master Plan to deify humankind through Jesus Incarnation and Saving Work, and he together with a third of the angels rebelled with pride and became demons forever.

    That false deification was so similar in APPEARANCE, FEELINGS and EMOTIONS to the real divine thing that Eve fell for it in spite of her unstained intelligence before the Fall. Heck, that third of the angels, with much greater capacities than us, and who followed Satan, also fell for it. It is the Ultimate Most Absolute Gift!! That Holy Promise of Deification, inverted, poisoned and corrupted by Satan, is behind every temptation, big and small, and behind all the Anti-Christian, Anti-Catholic, Anti-Truth Political radical and vicious groups and ideas today.

    Their fanatical, demented, hate-intense radicalism has a zeal that is dark, evil and bottomless because it is the very shadow, the total opposite of the True Deification that God has promised us through Jesus and His Sacrament on Earth, the True Holy Catholic Church. That’s why they speak as if they have “unquestionable, ultimate authority” while having absolutely none. Their evil, blind, fiery zeal is the very opposite of the Holy Spirit’s Most Passionate Zeal that we all should have for the True God and his loving call to deification. Let’s pray for all our Church enemies, both inside and outside, that we should turn to God and His Anointed Son Jesus, to pursue True Deification so that we receive the REAL promise of his Absolute Love!!

  7. Love the words and the explanation of the seventh day having no evening and opening to the eight day ..
    Adam, who was destined to have been the high priest of creation , to have kept away the enemy , who had been thrown down to the earth after The Fall ( ? was he
    to have gotten rid off the tempting tree , before Eve was created ) – https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/resources/sacraments/holy-orders/adam-high-priest-of-humanity
    Through our Lord , we are asked to extend our forgiveness all the way to them as well to thus get rid off any bit of the spirit of Cain ; he might have kept a grain of the bitterness for having been expelled from The Garden and no gratitude for The Lamb that was slain ; instead , became envious towards towards Abel who had enough goodness , courage and compassion , willing to deal with the loss and the blood as well, to offer up what was precious to him – the lamb ..
    Dec. 8th , Feast of Immaculate Conception and ‘noon hour of grace ‘ , to help augment the graces The Father wants to pour into our lives , in these times when there are many lives who have fallen for the carnal spirits , esp. through contraceptive use and blame all else for the problems around .
    May His infinite mercy be recognized more , in our midst , through these devotionals and esp. the sacraments , to trust that , ‘we move in Him ..’
    https://biblehub.com/acts/17-28.htm and those of us who have been called and consecrated for the priestly roles through baptism , to intercede on behalf of others too , be faithful to same as well .

  8. Deification origin Middle English (in the sense ‘make godlike in character’):

    “We are taught that God is Love but the essence of Love is Truth.
    Our Father gave of himself in his Son to reconcile mankind to Him. The essence of love in His Son is Truth, and He bears witness to it, Jesus teaches us not to resist the evil doer and is true to His own Word, he can do no other, but submits to His own essence which is Truth and bearing witness to the Truth, permits the evil in man to murder him, He is lifted up by mankind for mankind’s redemption, we see a reflection of the evil within ourselves (own actions) as He submits to the Will of our Father bearing witness to the Truth (their own essence)

    The Truth knows (embraces) itself, (“I am Father as well as Son we are one”) it can do no other, those who refuse to acknowledge the living Word of God, once they have heard (understood) it within their hearts, are destined to eternal separation from God, as our Father is restrained by His own essence, as His essence (Truth) is not within them”.

    The essence of love is Truth and in obedience to the Truth Jesus fulfils these words
    “But a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth, for the Father is seeking such as these to worship Him”

    So, the true worshiper will worship the Father in spirit and in truth, and this can only be done in humility (St Bernard Humility; a virtue by which a man knowing himself as he truly is, abases himself) As a humble heart is the only place where the transforming action of the Holy Spirit can take place.

    kevin your brother
    In Christ

  9. Christ is the Word incarnate. He also has the Father’s DNA in His human body; otherwise, He would have been a woman if Mary was the only contributor to His DNA. We can only be adopted sons and daughters of God (see Romans 8:15, 23; Galatians 4:5; and Ephesians 1:5).
    The Greek word behind the word ‘partakers’ in 2Peter 1:4 is “koionos”, which is defined as “a partner, associate, comrade, or companion”. The Holy Spirit is called the “comforter” in John 14:16. The Greek word behind it is “parakletos” which is defined as “summoned, called to one’s side, esp. called to one’s aid”. We can never be natural sons of God as Jesus is, even with His presence within us. We cannot be deified in the sense that Christ is.

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. The ancient roots of deification in the Latin tradition | Catholic Canada
  2. SATVRDAY EDITION – Big Pulpit

Leave a Reply to SOL Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*