The Dispatch: More from CWR...

Presidential censures and commonsense

Censure is more than a reprimand. It’s been described as a public shaming and it is an act outside the Constitution, meaning that while it is an extraordinary, legislatively it is less than impeachment.

U.S. President Donald Trump visits the U.S.-Mexico border in Calexico Calif., April 5, 2019. (CNS photo/Kevin Lamarque, Reuters)

“The Senate is no longer a place for any decent man,” mourned Senator Henry Clay, January 1837. This was his judgment following a Senate vote rescinding a senatorial censure of President Andrew Jackson. Clay appeared in the Senate dressed in the deep black then affected by grieving loved ones over the loss of someone dear.

This all turned on Jackson’s veto of a bill renewing the charter of the Bank of the United States. In simple terms, Jackson was Democrat; Clay was Whig.

Whigs held a majority over the Democrats and had earlier demanded a paper Jackson had read privately to his Cabinet, related to the bank. Jackson unceremoniously refused to deliver it. After a ten-week debate, the Whig Senate majority voted 26 to 20 (overwhelmingly party-line) to censure Jackson.

Jackson sent a message denying the validity of the Senate’s censure and the Senate promptly voted party-line to formally vote to refuse to include the President’s message in the Senate Journal.

When the Jacksonian Democrats regained the Senate majority in 1837, led by Missouri Senator Thomas Hart Benton, they rescinded the censure mere weeks before Jackson’s second term ended.

No president has been formally censured since. Not that it hasn’t been attempted. Censure is more than a reprimand. It’s been described as a public shaming and it is an act outside the Constitution, meaning that while it is an extraordinary, legislatively it is less than impeachment.

Here is a review of censures that have been advanced against Presidents of the past:

• John Adams: Largely for murky reasons besides his prickly personality, an opposition congressman tried to advance a censure. It did not reach the floor.

• John Tyler: Just because the majority mostly didn’t like him, what began as an impeachment resolution morphed into censure, which was set aside. Finally, so the opposition could walk away with something, it ended up as censure by a select committee composed of opposition party members.

• James K. Polk: This also began as impeachment for launching an unconstitutional war on Mexico. That probably had some merit but it became a resolution of censure that was never voted on by the House of Representatives.

• James Buchanan: Apparently he and his secretary of the navy were suspected of awarding contracts to Democrats, based on “party relations.” The resolution was framed as an “admonishment” but was never adopted.

• Abraham Lincoln. In this case begun as censure but ended as a recommendation to the president that members of Congress should not also be military generals, and Lincoln’s name never appeared.

*Andrew Johnson: As Lincoln’s successor, Johnson, a Democrat, ran afoul of Radical Republicans and was impeached—no censure, just straight to the heart—for violating the Tenure of Office Act that prohibited a president from dismissing cabinet officers without Senate approval. He did it anyway and won acquittal by one lone Republican senator’s vote.

• Ulysses S. Grant: Grant sent war ships to the Dominican Republic without—horrors!—congressional approval. Minority Democrats booing, Republican majority cheering, the resolution for censure never reached the floor.

• William Howard Taft: The president allegedly interfered with a disputed Senate election, back in the day when senators were elected by state legislatures. The censure was dropped but the Senate did adopt a resolution that if presidential interference of that sort did indeed ever occur, it would certainly be a censorial offense.

• Harry S. Truman: During the 1952 steel strike Democrat Truman seized the steel mills on national security grounds. The opposition Republican resolution never received a vote. Besides that, the Supreme Court, on a suit from the (Republican?) steel owners, ruled the president lacked the authority to seize private property for national security or other reason without, so it indicated, congressional authorization.

• Richard Nixon: Nixon was subject to several opposition censure resolutions: the Vietnam War, the Watergate scandal, other topics. None reached the floor. Nixon resigned from office in August 1974 following the House Judiciary Committee bipartisan vote recommending several articles of impeachment to the full House.

• Bill Clinton: Monica Lewinsky; need I say more? Many Democrats and not a few Republicans endorsed censure instead of what ultimately occurred, a Senate impeachment trial. The actual articles of impeachment said nothing of Lewinsky but did cover obstruction of justice and perjury in unrelated civil depositions (Clinton lost his law license over that one). Republicans owned the House, impeachment was adopted by Republicans; Democrats owned the Senate, Democrats voted against conviction. With but rare individual exceptions, Congress voted their party.

• George Bush: Censure resolution over his handling of the Iraq War and, separately, “unlawful authorization of wiretaps” were introduced by opposition congressmen and, like others, went poof, none reaching the floor.

• Barack Obama: Censure resolutions against Obama (introduced by Republicans) charged that he usurped the legislative power of Congress with flurries of executive orders or, in some way, had acted unlawfully. None reached the floor.

What we see in history is that thing George Washington somewhat naively warned against, as if he could stop it by mere words: party faction. In the first real presidential election in 1800, almost everything we deplore about American electoral contests was introduced to us, including congressional investigations, by our Founders. Thanks, guys.

That said, presidents usually provide the grounds of their own congressional troubles with censure, or almost censure, or just-kidding-around censure.

This is the way I look at the House resolution against President Trump. Never mind that his “Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came” Tweet was boorish, tactless, and unpresidential. The truth is that Trump himself set himself up. A Democrat slap has merit. But in the moment, given the history of congressional slaps, it just looks like one party doing another.

I would feel a whole lot better about it if any censuring of any president was undertaken by not by congressional opponents but by congressional friends. Or adopt a rule: one-quarter of the minority party must vote with the majority on issues of censure, reprimand, and admonishment.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Russell E. Saltzman 11 Articles
Russell E. Saltzman is a former Lutheran pastor who has written for First Things (where for a brief stint he was associate editor), Aleteia, and others. He was the long time editor of Forum Letter, an independent Lutheran publication previously edited by Richard John Neuhaus.

2 Comments

  1. ‘ To Thee do we cry poor banished children of Eve ..’ so goes the prayer, in the deep yearning in our hearts , to return ..to The Father , through The Mother , to The Kingdom , who is our Lord Himself ..and very likely , the Pres. himself , having ‘memories ‘ of his possible distant roots in The Church , also expressing same , even blessing the nation , to return there ..
    https://www.catholicstand.com/the-continuing-impact-of-our-lady-of-guadalupe/ one of the best articles on Our Lady of Guadalupe …
    she too possibly not wanting her children to be in exile , in one sense ..
    The Church too desires that persons could have decent lives in own lands .
    May the blessing and yearning for same be what is heard loudly in most hearts .
    Mary , our loving Mother , our Lady of Guadalupe , free us all from the false gods of money , pride and self will and lead us unto the True God .

  2. “I would feel a whole lot better about it if any censuring of any president was undertaken by not by congressional opponents but by congressional friends. Or adopt a rule: one-quarter of the minority party must vote with the majority on issues of censure, reprimand, and admonishment.”

    Very good point and super idea. The overall history lesson on this was very instructive. I didn’t now it. Thanks.

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Presidential censures and commonsense -
  2. Presidential censures and commonsense - Mama Mary - Our Loving Mother

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*