CNA Staff, Sep 28, 2020 / 12:00 pm (CNA).-
The U.S. Department of Justice on Sept. 25 warned San Francisco officials that its current restrictions on public worship in the city may be unconstitutional, drawing praise from Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone.
“Catholics in San Francisco have been patiently suffering injustice for months. At last, a competent legal authority is challenging the city’s absurd rules, which have no basis in science, but are grounded in hostility to religion and especially the Catholic Church,” Cordileone said Friday.
The DOJ on Sept. 25 sent a letter to Mayor London Breed, warning that the city’s rule allowing only “one worshipper” in places of worship at a time regardless of their size— while allowing multiple patrons in other indoor establishments— is “draconian” and “contrary to the Constitution and the nation’s best tradition of religious freedom.”
San Francisco’s restrictions on public worship remain among the strictest in the country. Until Sept. 14, public worship in the city was restricted to 12 participants outdoors, with indoor services prohibited.
As of Sept. 14, houses of worship are allowed to have 50 people at religious services outdoors, with indoor services still prohibited until at least Oct. 1.
San Francisco’s revised health order from Sept. 14 states that “[o]nly one individual member of the public may enter the house of worship at a time,” with no reason given.
The DOJ letter called on the mayor to treat places of worship equally with other venues where people share enclosed spaces, such as gyms, tattoo parlors, hair salons, massage studios, and daycares.
At those establishments, San Francisco city authorities already allow capacities of between 10 and 50 percent, depending on the type and provided that sanitary measures and 6-foot distancing is followed.
California’s church service limits earlier this year were challenged by a Pentecostal church, which argued houses of worship were being unfairly treated more strictly than other secular venues, including restaurants, hair salons, and retail stores.
In May, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with the state of California. In a 5-4 decision, Chief Justice John Roberts argued that the court lacks the expertise and authority to second guess the decisions of elected officials in the context of public health decisions during a pandemic.
The DOJ cited Chief Justice John Roberts’ concurrence in the May 2020 case, in which he wrote that “restrictions on places of worship” may be consistent with the First Amendment, but only when such restrictions “apply to comparable secular gatherings.”
The DOJ said it is reviewing their options and may take further action.
San Francisco City attorney Dennis Herrera defended the city’s actions in a statement Friday. He did not address the apparent disparity between restrictions on worship and on secular activities.
“Maybe the federal government should focus on an actual pandemic response instead of lobbing careless legal threats. San Francisco is opening up at the speed of safety,” Herrera said.
“Religious gatherings indoors and outdoors are already set to expand in a few days. This expansion is beyond what is described in the federal government’s letter. It’s consistent with San Francisco’s careful approach and follows closely behind what the State of California allows.”
The mayor has said the city will allow indoor worship services with a 25 person limit by Oct. 1. The Cathedral of St. Mary of the Assumption has a capacity of nearly 2,500 people.
“One person at a time in this great Cathedral to pray? What an insult. This is a mockery. They are mocking you, and even worse, they are mocking God,” Cordileone said in an outdoor homily Sept. 20.
Catholics in San Francisco had marched in Eucharistic processions across the city that day to protest the city’s continued restrictions on public worship, culminating in several concurrent outdoor Masses as the Cathedral.
Priests at many parishes around the archdiocese, including the Cathedral, are celebrating multiple Masses every Sunday— outside, and spaced out— in order to adapt to the restrictions.
Outdoor Masses pose their own health challenges, as the Bay Area is experiencing some of the worst air quality in the world, due to smoke and other pollutants coming from wildfires ravaging the West Coast.
Hotels in San Francisco are fully reopened; indoor gyms are set to reopen at 10% capacity; and most retail stores are allowed to operate at 50% capacity, while malls are restricted to 25%. Gyms operated in government buildings for police officers and other government employees have already reopened.
In addition, Archbishop Cordileone has noted, businesses requiring extended, close one-on-one contact reopened Sept. 14, such as hair salons, nail salons and massage parlors, but “we are allowed only one person in church at a time for prayer.”
While Cordileone has said city officials have been “cordial and respectful” in their dialogue with the archdiocese, he said the city still has not responded to the archdiocese’s safety plan— outlining how churches could be safely opened for indoor services— which they submitted in May.
Becket, a religious liberty law firm, has a page tracking restrictions on public worship related to the pandemic. By their estimation, six states— California, Nevada, Virginia, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Maine— are treating religious activities unequally as compared to similar secular activities.
The City of San Francisco has been closely monitoring Catholic churches in the city and has repeatedly issued warnings to the archdiocese for apparent health order violations.
In advocating for a safe reopening of indoor Masses, Cordileone has cited an article on Mass attendance and COVID-19, authored Aug. 19 by doctors Thomas McGovern, Deacon Timothy Flanigan, and Paul Cieslak for Real Clear Science.
By following public health guidelines, Catholic Churches have largely avoided viral spread during the more than 1 million Masses that have been celebrated across the United States since the lifting of shelter-in-place orders, the doctors found.
They said in their article that there is no evidence that church services are higher risk than similar activities when guidelines are followed, and no coronavirus outbreaks have not yet been linked to the celebration of the Mass.
Even while protesting the city’s apparent unequal application of health restrictions, the archbishop has encouraged his priests to lead their parishes in following the city’s guidelines.
More than 19,000 people have signed a petition supporting Archbishop Cordileone’s call to end “unfair” restrictions on the Mass.
[…]
Let’s now hear from the entire USCCB bishops applauding the President’s action in this instance.
(HINT: YOU WON’T)
Why not? I don’t understand. I pray for it. Well I must not pray for it, is (catholic) common sense. It is only applaud, say “well done”, something like that. Even they can say: “We are not agree with you in many things, but this one is honourable”.
Maybe is something more about the activists we do not know…
Every United States citizen who was born and survived, started out at the end of a lifeline.
Waiting for the USCCB laudatory press release……..Buhler……….Buhler……
I’m sure all of us just missed Pope Francis’s words of support and thanksgiving…right?
And the grateful response from the USCCB said….nothing.
Great News. President Trump followed thru on this campaign promise. Moreover they should have never been prosecuted to begin with.
It is hard to believe, after all this time, that the USCCB has not risen up to challenge this blatant atrocity. How does the law address these actions? Amendment one? In contrast, Trump wisely pardoned these peaceful protesters, but his blanket pardon of the criminal rioters at the US Capitol has caused havoc across the nation, is not. No president should have the power to refute the law.
“but his blanket pardon of the criminal rioters at the US Capitol has caused havoc across the nation.”
Maybe according to NPR, MSNBC, and the DNC talking points you receive, but not true for most thinking people. Things are great. Trump is taking necessary action to reverse what your fellow democrats have done to the country. Face it, your party lost. Elections have consequences, so deal with it like an adult.
Why?? Because you dont have a personal interest in it? An awful lot of people on J6 just walked into the Capitol building and looked around. The Dems chose to throw the book at them for doing so. Yet oddly, never seemed to have the time to investigate church vandalism. THIS in the face of far too many BLM RIOTS in which police were injured and police stations ( and whole towns) were burned down with nary a peep from the Dems. Disgusting. Its about time this charade was turned on its head. Insurrection? With no military support and no help from a foreign power?? Really? My cat could run a better “insurrection”. Calling a demonstration gone bad an “insurrection” is nothing more than partisan propaganda.
I believe Mr. Morgan that both protests involved simple trespass violations. The Capitol building is after all a public building owned by the people of the United States.
It’s not the first occasion Americans have dressed up in silly costumes and trespassed. At least they didn’t destroy any tea this time around.
🙂
As that great statesman and politician Barack Hussein Obama once stated so eloquently: “Elections have consequences.”
I wonder how much the bishops are acting on their own and how much this is at the Vatican’s direction? Pope Francis seems anti-US. ( a Marxist?). and anti Trump.
I just read a USCCB article on the Born Alive aAbortion Protection Act. It passed the House with republicans voting for it and democrats voting against. It failed the 60 vote requirement in the Senate as the democrats voted against it. No mention – not at all, of that fact in the article. The bishops have no problem mentioning Trump’s name.
It is wonderful that the President pardoned or commuted the sentences of the J6 hostages. That he pardoned the FACE hostages is icing on the cake!
The comments here seem to challenge the facts. I feel that I reflect on the facts. Probably the most egregious is the deflection of the truth about the denial of the invasion of the US Capitol by the Trump MAGA criminals. Republican officials and Trump family members Ivanka and Don Jr. plead to Trump to halt the riot. He refused and, instead reclined to the WH, for several hours, to finally arise to say “Please go home now. We understand your pain, we LOVE you.” We shoud remember when the following day Republican leader Mitch McConnell addressed Congress saying, “The president is directly and morally responsible for the Jaan. 6 invasion of the Capitol.”
The following URL contains the facts.
Article III: Treason. Protect and defend the constitution from all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC.
https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-3/44-aid-and-comfort-to-the-enemy.html
I really like reading everyone’s comments. Please keep them free of disparagements.
God save the Union.