Vatican City, May 13, 2017 / 02:32 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The following is an unofficial transcript of the in-flight press conference on the papal plane returning from Fatima to Rome on May 13, 2017.
Greg Burke: Thank you Holiness, they were 24 very intense hours, as you said, for the Lord, 24 hours for Our Lady. It’s apparent that the Portuguese felt very touched when you said, “We have a Mother,” that they feel this in a special way. 100 years ago Our Lady didn’t appear to three important journalists, she appeared to three shepherds, but we’ve seen how they with their simplicity and sanctity were able to make this message reach the entire world. The journalists make the message arrive – it is seen from the number of nations from which they come – and they’re very curious about this trip of yours. If you’d like to say something first, great…
Pope Francis: First of all, good evening. Thanks. And, I’d like to respond to the first of the possible questions, so we can do things a bit more quickly. I’m sorry when we’re at the halfway point and they come to tell me that it’s snack time… let’s do them all together. Thanks.
Greg Burke: Good, let’s begin with the Portuguese group, with Fatima Ferreira of the Portuguese TV Radio
Anna Elza Ferreira (Redevida de Televisao): I don’t know what I think about sitting in front of the Holy Father. Well, first, many thanks for this trip. Holy Father, you came to Fatima as a pilgrim, to canonize Francisco and Jacinta in the year that the apparitions mark their 100th year. From this historical point of view, what is left now for the Church, for the entire world? Also, Fatima has a message of peace. Holy Father, you are going to receive in the Vatican in the coming days, the 24th of May, the American president Donald Trump. What can the world expect and what does the Holy Father expect from this encounter? Many thanks.
Pope Francis: Thanks. Fatima certainly has a message of peace. It’s brought to humanity by three great communicators that were less than 13 years old, which is interesting. Yes, I came as a pilgrim. The canonization was something that wasn’t planned from the beginning, because the process of the miracles was in progress but the all of a sudden the export reports were all positive, and it was done – that’s how the story was told – for me was a very great joy. What can the world expect? Peace. And what am I talking about from now on with whomever? Peace.
Ferreira: And what remains now of this historic moment for the Church?
Pope Francis: A message of peace. And I’d like to say one thing … before disembarking I received scientists from all religions who were doing studies in the Vatican Observatory at Castel Gandolfo, including agnostics and atheists. And an atheist said to me, “I’m an atheist.” I won’t tell you from what ethnicity or place of origin he was – he spoke in English. And at the end, he asked me, ‘I ask you a favor: tell the Christians that they should love their message of peace more.”
Aura Miguel (Radio Renascença): Your Holiness, in Fatima you presented yourself as the “bishop dressed in white.” Up to now, this expression applied rather to the vision of the third part of the secret, St. John Paul II, the martyrs of the twentieth century. What does it mean now, your identification with this expression?
Pope Francis: The prayer, that, I did not write it… the sanctuary wrote it… but also I have tried because they said this, and there is a connection with the white. The bishop of white, Our Lady of white, the white glow of the innocence of children after Baptism and innocence… there is a connection to the color white in that prayer. I believe – because I did not write it – but I believe that literally they have tried to express with white that desire for innocence, for peace… innocence: to not hurt the other … to not create conflict, the same.
Miguel: Is it a revision of the interpretation…
Pope Francis: No, but that vision … I believe that then Cardinal Ratzinger, at that time prefect of the Doctrine of the Faith, explained everything clearly. Thank you.
Claudio Lavanga (NBC News): Thank you. Holy Father, yesterday you asked the faithful to break down all the walls, yet on May 24 you meet a head of State who is threatening to build walls. It is a bit contradictory to your word, but he also has – it seems – opinions and decisions different from you in other topics, such as the need to act to confront global warming or the welcoming of migrants … Thus, in light of this meeting: what is your opinion of the politics that President Trump has adopted so far on these topics and what do you expect from a meeting with a Head of State who seems to think and act contrary to you?
Pope Francis: The first question … I can respond to both… I never make a judgment of a person without listening to them. I believe that I should not do this. In our talk things will come out, I will say what I think, he will say what he thinks, but I never, ever, wanted to make a judgment without hearing the person. The second…
Claudio Lavanga: What do you think about the reception of migrants?
Pope Francis: But this you all know well…
Claudio Lavanga: The second instead is what you expect from a meeting with a head of state who thinks contradictory to you?
Pope Francis: Always there are doors that are not closed. Look for the doors that are at least a little bit open, enter and talk about common things and go on. Step by step. Peace is handcrafted. It is made every day. Also friendship among people, mutual knowledge, esteem, is handcrafted. It’s made every day. Respect the other, say that which one thinks, but with respect, but walk together … someone thinks of one way or the other, but say that …. Be very sincere with what everyone thinks, no?
Claudio Lavanga: Do you hope to soften his decisions after the meeting?
Pope Francis: This is a political calculation that I do not permit myself to make.
Greg Burke: Thank you Holiness, now there is a change of places, Elisabetta Piqué is coming.
Elisabetta Piqué (La Nacion): Thanks first of all for this brief and very intense trip. We wanted to ask you, today is the centenary of the apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima, but is is also the important anniversary of a fact of your life that took place 25 years ago, when the Nuncio (Archbishop) Calabresi told you that you would become the Auxiliary Bishop of Buenos Aires, something that meant the end of your exile in Cordoba and a great change in your life. Have you every connected this fact that changed your life with Our Lady of Fatima? And in these days that you’ve prayed before her have you thought about this and what did you think about? Can you tell us about that? Thanks.
Pope Francis: Women know everything, eh! No, I didn’t think about the coincidence, only yesterday while I was praying before Our Lady I realized that one May 13th I received the phone call from the nuncio 25 years ago. I don’t know… I said, well look at that. I spoke with Our Lady a little about this. I asked her forgiveness for all of my mistakes, also of a bit of bad taste for choosing people… but yesterday I realized this.
Greg Burke: Nicolas Seneze of La Croix is coming.
Nicolas Seneze (La Croix): Thanks, Holy Father. We’re returning from Fatima for which the Fraternity of St. Pius X has a great devotion and much is said about an agreement that would give an official statute to the Fraternity in the Church. Some even imagined that there would be an announcement today… Holiness, do you think that this agreement is possible in a short timeframe? And, what are the obstacles still? And what is the sense of this reconciliation for you? And, will it be the triumphant return for faithful who have shown what it means to be truly Catholic or what?
Pope Francis: I would toss out any form of triumphalism. None. Some days ago, the Feria Quarta of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, their meeting – the call it the Feria Quarta, because it’s the fourth Wednesday – studied a document and the document still hasn’t reached me, the study of the document. This is the first. Secondly, the current relations are fraternal. Last year, I gave a license for confession to all of them, also a form of jurisdiction for marriages, but even before the problems, the cases they had, for example, had to be resolved by the Doctrine of the Faith. The Doctrine of the Faith carries them forward. For example, abuses. The cases of abuse, they brought them to us, also to the Penitentiary. Also the reduction to the lay state of a priest, they bring to us. The relations are fraternal. With Msgr. Fellay I have a good rapport. I’ve spoken many times… I don’t like to hurry things. Walk. Walk. Walk. And then we’ll see. For me, it’s not an issue of winners and losers, it’s an issue of brothers who must walk together, looking for a formula to make steps forward.
Tassilo Forcheimer (ARD): Holy Father, on the occasion of the anniversary of the Reformation, Evangelical Christians and Catholics are able to walk another stretch of road together. Will there be the possibility to participate in the same Eucharistic Mass? Some months ago, Cardinal Kasper said: A step forward could take place already this year.
Pope Francis: There have been great steps forward, eh … we think of the first statement on justification, from that moment the journey has not stopped… the trip to Sweden was very significant because it was just the beginning and also a commemoration with Sweden… also there is significance for the ecumenism of the journey… that is, to walk together, with prayer, with martyrdom, with works of charity, with works of mercy. And there, Lutheran Caritas and Catholic Caritas have made an agreement to work together. This is a great step. But steps are always awaited. You know that God is the God of surprises. But we must never stop. Always go on. To pray together, to give testimony together and to do works of mercy together, that announce the charity of Jesus Christ, to announce that Jesus Christ is Lord, is the only Savior, and that grace only comes from Him. And on this path the theologians they will continue to study, but the path must proceed. And (with) hearts opened to surprises.
Mimmo Muolo (Avvenire): Good evening Holiness. I’m asking you a question in the name of the Italian group. Yesterday and today at Fatima, we saw a great witness of popular faith together with you. The same that is found, for example, also in other Marian shrines like Medjugorje. What do you think of those apparitions, if they were apparition, and of the religious fervor they have aroused seeing that you have decided to appoint a bishop delegate for the pastoral aspects? And if I can permit myself a second question I know is very close to your heart besides that of us italians… I would like to know, the NGOs were accused of collusion with the boat traffickers of men. What do you think of this? Thanks.
Pope Francis: I’ll start with the first. I read in the papers that I peruse in the morning that there was this problem, but I still don’t know how the details are and because of this I can’t give an opinion. I know there is an issue and the investigations are moving ahead. I hope that they continue ahead and that the whole truth comes out. Medjugorje, all the apparitions, or the presumed apparitions, belong to the private sphere, they aren’t part of the public, ordinary magisterium of the Church. Medjugorje. Medjugorje. A commission was formed, headed by Cardinal Ruini. Benedict XVI made it. I, at the end of 2013 the beginning of 2014, I received the result from Cardinal Ruini. It was commission good theologians, bishops, cardinals, but good. Very good. And the commission. The Ruini report was very, very good. Then there were some doubts in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and the Congregation judged it opportune to send each one of the members of this Feria quarta (Editor’s note: “Feria Quarta” is a once-a-month meeting in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith during which current cases are examined) all the documentation, even those that seemed to be against the Ruini report. I received a notification – I remember it was a Saturday evening, late evening… and it didn’t seem right. It was like putting up for auction – excuse me the word – the Ruini report which was very well done. And Sunday morning the prefect received a letter from me that said that instead of sending them to the Feria Quarta, they they would send the opinions to me personally.
These opinions were studied and all of them underscore the density of the Ruini report. Principally, three things must be distinguished: the first apparitions, that they were kids. The report more or less says that it must continue being studied. The apparitions, the presumed current apparitions: the report has its doubts. I personally am more nasty, I prefer the Madonna as Mother, our Mother, and not a woman who’s the head of a telegraphic office, who everyday sends a message at such hour. This is not the Mother of Jesus. And these presumed apparitions don’t have a lot of value. This I say as a personal opinion. But, it’s clear. Who thinks that the Madonna says, ‘come tomorrow at this time, and at such time I will say a message to that seer?’ No. The two apparitions are distinguished. The third, the core of the Ruini report, the spiritual fact, the pastoral fact. People go there and convert. People who encounter God, change their lives…but this…there is no magic wand there. And this spiritual and pastoral fact can’t be ignored. Now, to see things with all this information, with the answers that the theologians sent me, this good, good bishop was appointed because he has experience, to see the pastoral part, how it’s going. And at the end he’ll say some words.
Muolo: Holiness, thank you, also for the blessing of my fellow citizens who thank you, they saw it and are very happy…
Greg Burke: Holiness, now if I can be the nasty one, we have done all of the language groups and…
Pope Francis: Time is up already?
Greg Burke: There’s a question, they tell me.
Pope Francis: One or two more.
Joshua McElwee (National Catholic Reporter): Thank you, Holy Father. The last member of the Commission for the Protection of Minors, who was abused by a priest, resigned in March. She, Ms. Marie Collins, said that she had to resign because the officials in the Vatican did not implement the recommendations of the commission that you, the Holy Father, approved. I have two questions: who is responsible, and what are you doing, Holy Father, to ensure that the priests and bishops in the Vatican implement the recommendations suggested by your commission?
Pope Francis: Marie Collins explained the matter to me well, I spoke with her, she is a good woman, but she continues to work in the formation of priests on this point… she is a good woman who wants to work … but she made this accusation, and she has a bit of reason… why? Because there are so many late cases, then in this period of lateness, because they accumulate there, you have to make legislation for this… what should the diocesan bishops do? Today in almost all the dioceses there is the protocol to follow in these cases: it is a great improvement. This way the dossiers are done well. Then there are the accusations…this is a step. Another step: there are few people, there needs to be more people capable in this area, and the Secretary of State is looking for, even Monsignor Mueller (Editor’s Note: Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Mueller, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith), to present new people. The other day two or three more were approved… the director of the disciplinary office changed, who was good, eh, he was very good but he was a bit tired… he returned to his home country to do the same with his episcopate. And the new one is an Irishman, Msgr. (John) Kennedy, he is a very good person, very efficient, prompt, and this helps a lot.
Then there is another thing: Sometimes the bishops send – if the protocol is okay, it goes right away to the Feria Quarta and the Feria Quarta studies and decides. If the protocol is not okay, it must go back to be redone. That’s why you think of continental help or in a continent or two … in Latin America, one in Colombia, another in Brazil, as pre-tribunals or continental tribunals… this is in the planning… but then it’s fine, they study it at feria quarta and they take away his clerical status. This goes back to the diocese, and the priest makes recourse. First, the application was studied by the same Feria Quarta that had given the sentence, and this is unfair. I created another tribunal and I put an indisputable person as the head, the Archbishop of Malta, Msgr. (Charles Jude) Scicluna, who is one of the strongest against abuses, and this second – because we must be just – the one who makes recourse is entitled to have a defender. If he (the defender) approves the first sentence, the case is over.His only option is a letter asking the Pope for pardon. I have never signed a pardon. I believe, I do not know, another question. This is how things are. We’re going forward. If Marie Collins was right on that point, we were also on the way. But there are 2000 cases piled up.
Portuguese journalist: I’m going to ask a question about the case Portugal, but I think that it can be applied to many of the Western societies. In Portugal, almost all of the Portuguese say they identify themselves as Catholics. But the way the society is organized, the decisions that we make, often are contrary to the indications of the Church. I refer to marriage between homosexuals, the legalization of abortion, now we’re going to begin discussing euthanasia. How do you see this?
Pope Francis: I think it’s a political problem. And that also the Catholic conscience isn’t a catholic one of total belonging to the Church and that behind that there isn’t a nuanced catechesis, a human catechesis. That is, the Catechism of the Catholic Church is an example of what is a serious and nuanced thing. I think that there is a lack of formation and also of culture. Because it’s curious, in some other regions, I think of the south of Italy, some in Latin America, they are very Catholic but they are anti-clerical and ‘priest-eaters’, that … there is a phenomenon that exists. It concerns me. That’s why I tell priests, you will have read it, to flee from clericalism because clericalism distances people. May they flee from clericalism and I add: it’s a plague in the Church. But here there is a work also of catechesis, of raising awareness, of dialogue, also of human values.
[…]
These new rules seem needlessly complicated and almost invite abuse. “Good fruits” was a typical argument during the surge in apparitionism in the 1990s but some of the “seers” who attracted large followings turned out to be frauds. Others, I think, just had over-active spiritual imaginations.
When investigating possible supernatural phenomena, I’ve long wondered why no one thinks to consult professional stage magicians. They’re specially qualified to detect hoaxes and illusions.
Penn and Teller moonlighting as miracle investigators just seems right somehow.
I have something you should see I caught on video 12 years ago. I can send you the link I uploaded it to Youtube. It’s amazing.
Now, if only the same rigor and clarity were applied to the clericalist illuminati who have received private revelations on matters of moral theology, and who lead from behind after decades of non-evangelization and now synodal ambiguity around the event or whatever.
Take, for example, the recent appointment as a seminary rector a priest who opines that “A homosexual relationship does not lose its dignity due to the lack of fertility.” https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2024/05/17/vatican-overturns-own-decision-on-seminary-dean/
The shell game continueth!
In a governance decision, the ventriloquist illuminati erase the moral substance of the Incarnation, the Catechism, and the encyclicals Humanae Vitae and Veritatis Splendor—regarding the inseparability of the unitive and procreative aspects of human sexuality. And, invent a way to turn this trick without having to mention any of these directly or by name…
The enigmatic “paradigm-shift” Church weareth no clothes.
Thank you!
Bingo. The episcopate and the inhabitants of theology departments are concerned about Marian apparitions while gleefully posing as the recipients of new revelations for the past sixty years without respite. And oddly, as they pass away they hand on this erroneous “grace” of receiving even more revelations to their progeny. It is just amazing.
Even more amazing is the lack of self-awareness and the utter hubris of this new class of mystics we have been forced to shoulder since the mid-century council.
“Now, if only the same rigor and clarity were applied to the clericalist illuminati who have received private revelations on matters of moral theology…”
Peter, you hit the nail on the head!
But sadly we know Tucho is not likely to apply much “rigor and clarity” to “the clericalist illuminati who have received private revelations on matters of moral theology” that contradict Scripture, the 2,000 year old teaching of the Church, and the previous 265 popes.
Instead, this new centralized power will be used to harass the faithful and let the dissenters go free.
I can’t help but wonder if Tucho and his boss aren’t worried that some new private revelations will reveal heaven’s anger over the current “smoke of satan” being allowed to rage untreated within the Church. That’s why they want to take control of the revelations like they want to control the synods and everything else.
How ironic (hypocritical?) from a papacy that claims to want to “decentralize” decision making!
Dear Maggie,
BINGO!! You get the gold star for the insight into what this is really all about. Only Satan would want to squelch and silent the “little stones” that our Heavenly Father has and is raising up to speak out against the mockery in Christ Bride here on earth.
Thank you so much for this link. The article title is misleading. It should be VATICAN APPOINTS AS DEAN OF THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY A PRIEST WHO TEACHES MORALITY AND WHO FAVORS BLESSING HOMSEXUAL UNIONS
If the seers present their vision as saying something idiotic, it’s false. Not complicated. As simple solution.
And a double benefit:
In this way we’ll be spared the idiotic judgments of this current pontificate.
I take comfort in the clause “the faithful are not obliged to give an assent of faith to them.” I remind myself of this every time I hear the latest conspiracy theory regarding the Third Secret of Fatima. I’ll take the public deposit of faith, thank you very much. What’s enough for God is enough for me.
An attempt at suppression of Marian devotion?
Would any readers buy a second hand car off Tucho ? Bergoglio ? Paolin ?
Even less trust their words on matters of faith and morals…
Probably. This latest document gives to the exceptionally all-knowing pope and his infinitely kiss-healed minister the power to pronounce as frauds the two witnesses (Elijah and Enoch) who shall perform wonders and speak against the Anti-Christ when he comes. They could also grant papal approval and authority to the likes of the anti-Christs themselves.
This author of perverse books has zero aurhority to judge any apparition of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Zero.
She came to warn us that one day Rome would be the seat of Bergoglioism, Tucho and chums. That Tucho seeks to control her messages only confirms the situation predicted at La Salette.
First , the Latin Mass, next ax Fatima and Lourdes.
Thinking of Fr. Benedict Groeschel making us laugh when he was discussing his great book – A Still, Small Voice: A Practical Guide on Reported Revelations:
“Private revelations don’t belong to the deposit of Faith. So you don’t have to believe ‘em. But if you don’t believe in Lourdes, you’re an idiot!” 😂
That’s a good one. Although I often shake my head while hearing some Catholics talk as if Marian visions were the source and summit of Catholic life, the story of Bernadette was very instrumental in my return to the Catholic Church 30 years ago. Necessary for salvation? No. Helpful toward salvation. YES!
About Fr. GROESCHEL, whom I as a visitor was lucky to meet when in 2003 he visited St. Nicholas Parish in back-country Gig Harbor in Washington state…he opined that Medjugorje might well have included a genuine apparition at the beginning, while all the rest was what he speculated as more of a recurring “echo,” possibly innocent but more of the human imagination.
In 1991 the non-Catholic associate professor at the University of Kansas, Sandra L. Zimdars-Swartz, published “Encountering Mary: From La Salette to Medjugorje” (Princeton University Press)– which “is neither apologetic nor antagonistic.” One recurring THEME in some cases is the interactive shaping of a possibly unclear experience into something both solid and false—due to the reinforcing exchange between the individual and other enthusiasts not directly affected. The announced NORMS seem to me to exhibit the rigor and precision one would hope for in discerning what is unreal from what is real, or only partly so…
On the stage of history, the sociological reinforcement of some experiences by engagement with others outside such experiences is of enormous interest and relevance. To the point—how exactly did MUHAMMAD come to believe, probably sincerely at first, that his experience at Mt. Hira in A.D. 610 was a visitation from Angel Gabriel to begin dictating (!) the Qur’an in tribal Arabic?
Islamic history, itself, records that, at first, Muhammad himself was unsure and troubled…He CONSULTED his first wife, Khadijha (they were atypically monogamous for the twenty-five years that she lived), and from her sought the advice of her revered and aged cousin, Waraqua ibn Naufal, at first an Arabian monotheist (hanif)—and then a Jewish convert and then convert to some version of Christianity. (peripheral Arabia was a pagan mixing zone influenced by Arian spinoffs: Nestorianism and Monophysitism, etc.).
“Waraqua knew something of the older scriptures and declared that what had come upon his cousin’s [Khadijha’s] husband was none other than what had previously descended upon Moses, the ‘namus’. This term seems to have been understood by the Arabs as meaning an angelic messenger, especially Gabriel, but it is a corruption of the Greek nomos, meaning ‘law,’ or Torah” (Frederick Denny, “An Introduction to Islam,” Macmillan, 1994, p. 64.) This and similar commentaries draw from the Qur’an, itself.
Islam is theoretically egalitarian and has NO magisterium, NOR a Congregation/Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (meaning “belief”). Angelic dictation in Arabic, or possibly only auditory recall under some form of epileptic seizure? Later followed by a pattern of self-originated echoes and confirmations by battle victories? The rest is history!
As some would morph the “hierarchical communion” of the perennial Catholic Church into more of an egalitarian “fraternity,” or “inverted pyramid,” or “polyhedron,” or whatever—unwittingly resembling contour-free and hyper-sectarian Islam?—we Catholics can take heart that, at least regarding the range of real/alleged apparitions, our dicastery still has a pulse.
If only the ILLUMINATI in purple and red hats—so intent on detaching (im)moral practices from the real Faith and Magisterium, i.e., the Catechism, Humanae Vitae, Veritatis Splendor—were equally scrutinized.
Muhammad smiles…
If the “curatur” criterion — the phenomenon is producing spiritual fruits — is reason to leave something alone, when are Francis and Fernandez announcing that Traditionis Custodes is repealed?
Taking controll is what this is all about. Our Government is or has done the very same thing. Pope Paul VI said SMOKE IS IN THE CHURCH. faithful laity was move on this.
“By their fruits you shall know them.” Let’s wait a few months to see what the fruits of this new document are, instead of immediately applying a “hermeneutic of suspicion.” My guess is that the last word will soon be said about a certain alleged series of apparitions in Eastern Europe.