
Denver, Colo., Mar 24, 2020 / 04:00 am (CNA).- Ian, a 30 year-old living and working in an addiction recovery community in southern Florida, is somewhat used to paradoxical living conditions. Ian has been clean and sober for ten years, and he lives in an area he says is densely populated with recovering addicts. Seven minutes from his house, though, is spring break territory.
Ian finds the contrast puzzling.
“(The surrounding) community is very spring break-esque, but it’s also the largest recovery community in the United States. It’s the largest recovery community for people that are getting sober or staying sober…so it’s just weird because it’s two polar extremes,” he told CNA.
Last week highlighted the differences between the communities even more, as the sober living community observed social distancing and isolation per federal coronavirus guidelines, while hordes of spring-break revelers hit the beach and blithely partied on.
“It’s really polarized at this point,” Ian said. “There are people that are clearly trying to keep their space, and then there’s people that just don’t care.”
‘It’s affected everything’
Spring breakers notwithstanding, the addiction recovery community in Florida and across the United States is scrambling to make group and sponsor meetings as available and effective as possible, while observing federal and state guidelines which dictate that no more than 10 people may gather together, and in some cases, that people cannot leave their homes except for essential supplies and emergencies.
“It’s really affected everything,” Ian said of the coronavirus restrictions.
Ian told CNA he qualifies for membership in multiple 12-step programs, including Heroin Anonymous, but that he has remained the most active in Alcoholics Anonymous.
Despite what people might think about Alcoholics Anonymous meetings based on movies or T.V. shows, Ian said that the primary reason for in-person meetings is not so much therapy as it is to offer a place for newcomers to meet others in recovery and to find a sponsor.
“The idea is that someone who is brand new has a place to go where they can meet someone who’s not brand new, and in that process get involved with the 12 steps,” he said. “It’s the catalyst of all other things, i.e., the newcomer really getting involved with the 12 steps.”
“If you bring them to a group that is really enthusiastic…they get almost attacked by people that are trying to help people. And so before you even know it, you’ve got a sponsor,” and a community, or at least the prospect of onem he added.
Involvement in Alcoholics Anonymous varies from person to person, but typically, a member of AA attends meetings at least once a week (often more frequently), and has regular meetings with a sponsor, who is usually a member with more years in recovery offering guidance through the 12 steps of recovery.
While coronavirus restrictions have put a damper on in-person interactions, Ian said he and his friends anticipated that lockdowns and quarantines were possible in the face of coronavirus, and they worked to put together Zoom online conference meetings, as well as a master spreadsheet of anyone available to sponsor new people.
“We’re going to be actually sending this to every local halfway house and treatment center and saying, ‘Hey, if you have new people that need sponsors, all of these people are willing to take as many as possible until it becomes unbearable,’” he said.
Back to the roots
“Father C”, a priest in Pennsylvania who is in recovery from alcohol addiction, spoke to CNA on the condition of anonymity. He said that in some ways, remote ways of connecting people in recovery to one another are a throwback to the early days of Alcoholics Anonymous, when the organization, founded in 1935, reached new people primarily by telephone.
“Groups only got organized because one alcoholic reached out to another and shared the message of his own recovery through the practice and the steps,” “Father C” told CNA.
Before they had texting or other digital ways of organizing meetings, “two people meeting together…even on the telephone, was a meeting to them,” he said.
Only after the telephone became more common in American homes, and the word about Alcoholics Anonymous got out, were organizers able to establish bigger group meetings.
Dave, a Catholic father of six in recovery in Maryland, said that mail was also used in the early days of AA.
“So the history is that Bill Wilson got sober in New York and Dr. Bob Smith got sober in Akron, Ohio. And Bill was in Ohio at the time when they started; Bill got Bob sober. And then they hung out and they would go to these Oxford Group meetings. Oxford Group is a Protestant group that had some of the basic tenants of AA,” he said.
“When Alcoholics Anonymous started, it was mainly these disparate groups of people that would exchange letters before there were meetings everywhere. So it’s a little bit of how things were in the beginning, but just with a 21st century spin on it,” he added.
More isolation, but more ways to connect
Joelle is a wife and mother in her 50s in Fresno, California who has been in recovery through AA for 10 years. She serves as an event planner for AA (though, all upcoming events have been canceled).
The move to virtual meetings means that newcomers will have to be especially proactive about reaching out for help, Joelle told CNA.
“We have a principle, a little refrain, that we say. It’s: ‘When anyone, anywhere, reaches out for help, we want the hand of AA to always be there. And for that I am responsible.’ Well, in this time, (newcomers) really are going to have to reach out. They’re going to have to find us,” Joelle added.
“Because usually somebody drops into a meeting and they don’t leave that meeting without some phone numbers and exchanging numbers so that they don’t get lost in AA. But, obviously that’s not possible right now.”
The “big saving grace” at the moment has been videoconferencing, Joelle said. The groups with which she’s involved have set up online conference meetings via Zoom, and put the word out via Facebook and word of mouth about the change. So far, attendance has been high.
“One of the meetings I go to is an every-morning-meeting, every day of the week, at 6:30 a.m. And a lot of the people who come to that meeting, they’re kind of hit-and-miss because some days they need to be at work at 7:30 and coming to a 6:30 meeting doesn’t make sense. But now that we’re on Zoom, all of them are coming,” she said.
They’re also picking up people from other groups who have not yet organized virtual meetings, she said.
“So our meeting is bigger and more vital than ever. I also think the stressful situation makes people want more AA meetings.”
Joelle said she sees this time as “kind of a mixed bag.”
One the one hand, she said, social isolation can be really bad for addicts. She predicts that a lot of people will discover during their time of social isolation that they are alcoholics or drug addicts.
“There’s going to be people who figure out they’re alcoholic during this time because being trapped at home, instead of busy with work and activities, heavy drinkers are very likely going to figure out that there’s an issue there,” she said. “But how are they going to get ahold of us?”
Because 12-step groups typically happen locally, Joelle said she would encourage those looking for a meeting to do an internet search with the name of their city plus “AA meetings,” or whichever recovery group they need.
“You’re going to find all kinds of meetings,” she said. She encouraged newcomers and those long in recovery to take advantage of extra time at home to connect to even more virtual meetings than they might normally be able to attend in person.
“I would say we need more connection, not less, when there’s stress,” Joelle said. “So home isolation is really rough for an alcoholic. But being able to attend more meetings because you’re sitting at home and so you don’t have conflict…in some ways it’s more convenient for people now. In other ways, you’re still sitting at home by yourself.”
Joelle said she thinks this time might pave the way for more virtual meetings in the future for AA, even after the threat of coronavirus has passed.
“AA already has conference call meetings, which I know is kind of old-fashioned, dial-in meetings…but from my perspective, there’s plenty of times when you would want to have someone able to Zoom in, because maybe they’ve got cancer and they’re in chemo, and so they’re stuck at home, they can’t come. I really believe this will be the wave of the future in terms of giving people more options.”
The steps at a social distance
While being able to host online meetings has been convenient in many ways, Ian said he still had many concerns about people in recovery programs, particularly those who are in early recovery.
Often, those in early recovery will take part-time jobs as restaurant servers or cashiers so they can focus on their recovery, Ian said, but a “huge influx” of people are losing such jobs in his community, he said.
“We’re just having a lot of people not only not have an income, but also not be able to participate both in meetings and fellowship, which is as, if not equally, important as meeting attendance,” he said. Fellowship typically involves 40-50 people or so going out for dinner or just hanging out together after meetings. Get-togethers of that size are now banned throughout the country.
Ian said he is also concerned about newcomers who were working the steps for the first time, because, somewhat like the sacraments of the Catholic Church, there is something particularly effective about completing those steps in person.
For example, he said, the fourth step of AA, which is to make “a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves,” is typically undertaken in person, with one’s sponsor. It is similar to the sacrament of confession, where sins are stated to a priest in person.
“There’s something about doing that face to face with someone and seeing someone’s face not judging you,” he said. “Like someone looking at you and being like, ‘He doesn’t think I’m a scumbag or a loser.’”
“When you remove that facial component, even through FaceTime, you’ve obviously diminished the effectiveness or efficacy of that step,” he said. “So there’s all these other underlying limitations that we’re going to tease out over the next few weeks or months potentially.”
Staying close to God when Masses are canceled
Another component of recovery that will be challenging for Catholics at this time will be remaining close to God when all public Masses and other liturgical celebrations have been canceled throughout the United States.
Connecting with a higher power is crucial for all 12-step recovery programs, but doing so can be hard for Catholics who can’t attend Mass or go to confession regularly due to coronavirus restrictions.
Christine N., a Catholic in recovery in Annapolis, Maryland, said she was “devastated” when Masses were canceled, because she had recently been trying to attend daily Mass as well as Sunday Mass. Now, she said, she’s been watching her local parish’s livestream of morning Mass, and she said she might watch Bishop Robert Barron’s streamed Masses as well.
She encouraged fellow alcoholics and others in recovery to stay the course and to trust God.
“I, and all Catholics, need to continue to pray and have faith that God will never abandon us and that he is with us,” she said. “Believe that, and we’ll get through it. But it definitely feels like a test.”
Dave said that he and his family are part of a movement, started in France, called Teams of Our Lady, which are small faith groups that meet monthly for a shared meal and fellowship, and they also have a rule of life by which they try to live. Their group just had their first online meeting yesterday.
Dave said he encourages Catholics to find virtual ways to connect and share about their faith with other Catholics or Christians.
“I think we have to be willing to share more openly with other people of our faith of what’s going on, share the difficulties, and connect (with each other),” he said, adding that he had also heard of stay-at-home virtual retreats being put on by some priests in Maryland.
Joelle said that for the past few weeks, she has been saying a daily rosary and a morning meditation and turning to prayer more often throughout the day. She encouraged Catholics to “stay out of fear” and to look for ways that God is calling them to be of service every day.
“I am constantly looking for the role that God is assigning me right now,” she said.
“I want to focus on the present and especially on being in service in the present…for me it means using my cooking skills and time to get meals to people who are shut in, especially to people over 65 or who otherwise have health concerns. To be able to take them a meal and leave it on their doorstep and make sure they’re okay, and go grocery shopping for them so they aren’t exposed. Those are things that help Catholics and they help alcoholics too.”
“Father C” said he thinks it is fitting that Catholics are all experiencing a great spiritual hunger for the sacraments during Lent. He said his advice for Catholics in recovery is similar to his advice for other addicts in recovery: “Keep coming back.”
“Stay close, be involved, do service even in the smallest things,” he said. “Think of one another and pray for one another. Even with the social distance, there needn’t be spiritual distance.”
“If God will make the greatest good come forth on the greatest evil, the death of the Son, well, would not God be able and willing to make good come out of this, even those lives that end up being lost to it?” he added.
[…]
These people are nothing if not evil.
Perhaps grossly misinformed!
Sorry, that’s just not believable. They’ve both been pushing abortion for decades. They know what they are doing, even though they probably lie to themselves about it.
No, evil. Because killing an innocent, defenseless and vilnerable human person is a most heinous and evil act. Those who commit those acts or advocate for them are doing evil.
In total agreement with this insightful comment.
If immoral then good is evil. VP Harris and President Biden purveyors of death for the invasive ideology of death sickening humanity. Sharp increase of abortion in CA since the Roe overturn is by appearance hateful spite.
When moral truth is inverted, evil becomes dominant. Good becomes unjust in every conceivable instance. Reason is that evil perceives no possible ethical alternatives and consequently judge differences of judgment illegal as well as immoral. Yet one wonders how Biden considers himself Catholic, makes the sign of the cross in public when abortion enforcement is announced. Putatively there’s sufficient ambiguity even appearance of endorsement from the Vatican, supported by warm welcoming of Biden and antilife Nancy Pelosi.
Some commenters angrily denounce essayists as cowardly for not imputing heresy. Taken as it stands while not meeting the canonical requirements one might say the consistency of misleading words and actions press the red line. Although if the canons were shelved on the issue a multitude could be conceivably charged with so serious a violation of the faith. Even if a slip up occurred. Fear would hold sway stifling valid deliberation. It’s best for clergy to keep the rule, although it seems valid to apply the term error as morally applicable when incidents of error by offhand word or suggestion are consistent.
“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”
Agreed, by his support for and enthusiastic promoting of the immoral act of abortion, Biden should be banned from receiving communion and excommunicated. He is not a good Catholic, and furthermore if what he is, is acceptable to the Church as evidenced by inaction, it is doubtful that the majority of Catholics in good standing are proud or tolerant to be associated with him. I further state that there is one who is very pleased with him, and his name is satan.
Dismembering babies alive is not a human right.
It’s an inhuman wrong.
Thank you brineyman.
There are anti vivisection groups around the world today but sadly their efforts are only to protect defenseless animals from vivisection, not defenseless infants in the womb. Perhaps we could erect a statue for the human victims to stir the public conscience such as was done in memory of a dog in the early 1900’s :
“In memory of the Brown Terrier Dog done to death in the laboratories of University College in February 1903, after having endured vivisection extending over more than two months and having been handed from one vivisector to another until death came to his release. Also in memory of the 232 dogs vivisected at the same place during the year 1902. Men and women of England, how long shall these things be?”
Yeah that is horrible, it’s no wonder we moved from animals to babies so easily, if we don’t respect all life we soon lose respect for any life✝️🙏🏻😔
Unbelieving pagans .
“Reproductive freedom” for me but not for thee.
George Orwell.
This is just another example of the current twisted thinking being fanned out from Washington; quite recently NPR was outed as an extreme leftist organization (employees’ political makeup) by one of their own managers.
This is the same organization that broadcast the sounds of a MI organization to help Whitmer get her Prop 3 passed.
Outing NPR as an extreme leftist organization is about as shocking as outing the South Pole as a cold and uncomfortable place to live. We kinda knew that already.
Yup, we used to say NPR stood for “National Propaganda Radio” and that’s been decades ago.
obviously, but no one from within their hallowed walls ever said that (in my recent memory) and their broadcasting of a MI abortion to propel Prop 3 is directly related to the anti family message coming out of Washington/the elite and the above article (isn’t NPR headquarters in Washington as well?). I used to listen to their stories on the way home from work but couldn’t take them anymore starting about 15 years ago. any human interest story is very interesting to me but let me listen to them not to the commentator
(don’t forget, we have people who are not from the US reading this – we’re headed to thinking like they do across the pond like where if you breathe in front of an abortion clinic you’ll be thrown in the clink)
“Women are dying”??? In point of fact, pregnancy and giving birth is a normal biological function of women and not an illness or disease. I would like to know if there are statistics about how many women die each year giving birth. Unquestionably, on rare occasion seemingly healthy people die suddenly for no obvious reason. But for someone to conflate the idea “women are dying” with a lack of extreme abortion access, is an outright lie. What this administration is interested in is encouraging women to sleep around no matter the moral damage to themselves and society, and then suggesting the murder of their baby is a “solution” when they end up pregnant. How about not sleeping around to start with?
“I would like to know if there are statistics about how many women die each year giving birth.”
Yes, that’s easy. The number is basically zero. The whole “women are dying” trope is just a dishonest, manipulative lie parroted by progressives.
I was listening to an interview with a nurse midwife who has studied the history of childbirth practices & she said the rates of maternal death following delivery actually rose when childbirth was first medicalized & attended by physicians. The reason being that before the protocols of sanitation & understanding of the spread of infection, doctors would deliver babies right after coming from dissecting a body, amputating a limb, etc. without washing their hands or sterilizing their instruments. And they’d pass on any pathogens present on to the mother.
Thankfully we know better now & pregnancy & delivery are far safer. And as you say, normal processes & not diseases. Fertility’s not a disease either but you’d never know that from the pharmaceutical companies.
100% of women will die. Same with men. We are all of us like the grass of the field.
However, we need not soil our short lives with murder.
And the woman married to the First Gentleman who claims that “women are dying” is Vice President Kamala Harris, who will ascend to the Presidency should, God forbid, Pres. Biden pass away or become incapacitated and unable to fulfil his elected office. God have mercy on our current President and grant him a long life and time to repent of his sin of supporting abortion. And God preserve us from a Harris presidency, or any POTUS who pushes abortion as “women’s health care.”
The Democratic Party is a death cult.
Democrats favor killing children in utero. At any time. For any reason.
And so, entire generations of individuals are canceled from existence.
Roughly one-third of all our offspring.
Think about that.
And for the lucky children who escape that horrific death? Democrats are in favor of sterilizing them.
Again, more generations of human beings erased. Denied by the “choice” of their mothers the chance to exist.
Legalizing drugs; gay “marriage”; the sexualization of children; the green new poverty; the open border fentanyl conduit; the denial of the biologically determined sexes; the racist, divisive CRT curriculum — everything the Democratic Party advocates is aimed at denying life and promoting death.
Death is the Democratic Party’s central tenet.
And the American Catholic Church is wholly responsible for it. One hundred percent.
Because if Catholics had voted the Church’s teachings even once in the past 50 years in a national election, no candidate would ever again advocate for abortion for fear of being swept away by a twenty percent landslide.
Our bishops, our priests, our entire community — we have the blood of more than a Billion innocent children on our souls.
We deserve whatever we get.
Spot on, Brineyman.
We can thank our bishops for Biden. They gave the green light for Catholics to vote for Biden. The likes of McElroy, Cupich, Tobin and others intimidated pro-life bishops to shut up about abortion. And Bergoglio had their backs through it all.
What you say is true, but if you think the corollary is that the Republican Party is on the side of the (good) angels, you are mistaken. The GOP has rushed to reassure Americans that they favor and want to protect and even celebrate IVF, and their opposition to the abortion of more fully-developed babies is both spotty (depending largely on where the politician’s supporters live) and contingent (usually, as with their inevitable nominee, coming with lots of exceptions). A pox on both their houses.
Except that the GOP doesn’t bar pro-lifers from running for office.
Keep in mind, though, that the Republican Party Platform is pro-life, and many Republican Senators, Representatives, GOVERNORS (very important, since the repeal of Roe v. Wade returns the issue to the STATES to decide!), State Senators and Representatives, and Mayors, along with many other local elected officials, are solidly pro-life. Sadly, any Democrats who are pro-life end up blacklisted and driven out of office by their Party (e.g., Rep. Dan Lipinski of Illinois). Think really hard about voting for an obscure 3rd party just to keep your conscience clear”–they won’t win and chances are good that the votes lost by Republicans will end up resulting in a pro-abortion Democrat winning. But be careful and do your research!–there are Republicans who embrace the basic tenant of the Republican Party, which is less government interference in daily lives of Americans, and therefore almost always support abortion as a right of people to freely choose.
Its a fact that “catholics” vote for legal abortion in the same number as non-catholics or non-believers. That being said, its also a fact that issues other than abortion are hanging in the balance at election time. These are important issues which impact everyday life. Lets say fighting the push to allow transgender surgeries for minor age children,promoting gay and abnormal sexual orientation to minor children in school,inflation which is impacting family life, open borders which present a real mortal danger to our citizens. These and more. Staying home or voting Democrat for ANY office will put the blood of the country on that voter’s hands. We are running out of time, as the march of Marxist agitators on our campuses should tell you.
The most notorious tag team since Sartoro and Michael/Michelle
I remember a book about 30 years ago by a Catholic writer named, if memory serves, Bud McFarlane. In the book there was an imaginary scene of a man who had either performed or promoted abortions trying to get into heaven, only to find his way blocked by all the babies he had killed, and he had to explain to EACH one of them – individually – why he had done what he had done and EACH of them had to be satisfied by what he told him or her before he could get into heaven.
This was 30 years ago and sometimes the memory gets a tad hazy, so – does anyone out there recall his books? I can’t remember the names of the books.
Women are dying?
The same “argument” as the coat hanger “never again” sloganism.
No perceptible evidence of logic, rational thinking.
Canon law specifies that procuring direct abortion or support of the same incurs the penalty of automatic excommunication.
Well, Catholics now know also that JB declared the most important day in Christianity, The Resurrection of the Lord, “Transgender visibility day.”