Catholic colleges and universities owe students an apology

The Catholic liberal arts college has an obligation to place, in an academically serious manner, Catholicism’s profound vision of the final end of the human person before each of its students.

(Image: Mick Haupt/

For more than forty years, Catholic liberal arts colleges have, to put it mildly, struggled to carve out a recognizable intellectual and educational place in the ever-shifting landscape of American higher education. That they have generally lacked such mooring is not surprising. When it has come to presenting themselves to the outside world, Catholic liberal arts colleges, for the most part, have tended to follow one of two paths. A small number willfully and wishfully pretend that today’s average eighteen-year-old somehow already knows both what Catholic liberal education is, and that it is an intrinsically desirable form of education. However, the majority of Catholic colleges mindlessly scramble, usually in contradictory ways, to latch onto the next-to-last academic fad that ripped through America’s so-called elite institutions of higher learning ten years earlier. Predictably, the results of both of these tactics have been underwhelming.

Identifying the afterthought

The Catholic tradition possesses a rich understanding of the kind of intellectual formation that authentically cultivates the human person as human person. Unfortunately, the educational importance of that understanding is usually an afterthought to today’s typical undergraduate. This fact is as undeniable as it is regrettable—especially for those of us who know firsthand just how life changing an intellectually serious Catholic undergraduate education can be. In truth, the bulk of the blame for this sad situation falls not on the shoulders of your average would-be undergraduate, but on our Catholic colleges themselves. Lacking the imagination, courage, and all-too-often actual knowledge to articulate clearly and convincingly what makes Catholic liberal education substantially different from other forms of higher education, your average Catholic college ordinarily gives no compelling reason why an undergraduate—even a Catholic undergraduate—would want to be educated by this type of school rather than another type of college.

This, more than any concern administrators or enrollment management types like to cite—a looming “demographic cliff” or a “saturated and competitive marketplace”—explains why many of these colleges now rightly worry whether they will be around in twenty years. It also explains why the intellectual life of so many of our Catholic colleges feels uninspired and adrift. Presented with regular opportunities, often coming in the form of financial necessity, to make a persuasive case for the distinctive kind of education it is designed to offer, the typical Catholic liberal arts college today blinks and then reflexively spit shines its latest market-tested mission statement and embarks on a bold new strategic plan.

To be sure, there are Catholic colleges and universities that do not fit neatly into this account. However, their number is comparatively small, even after the cottage industry of founding Catholic colleges and universities that drew inspiration from the image of the Catholic university limned in Ex Corde Ecclesiae took off in the 2000s. But such institutions remain outliers on America’s larger Catholic educational scene. Part of that detachment is intentional, inasmuch as a number of these schools, at least in the rhetoric associated with their foundings, self-consciously fashioned themselves as educational versions of a Benedict Option. Yet, even these schools frequently do not publicly place the intellectual formation that students can uniquely receive from a Catholic liberal arts college front and center, often marketing themselves instead as educational communities where Catholic students can further their education while deepening their faith.

Such schools undoubtedly play an important role in Catholic education in contemporary America. That there are Catholic institutions where an undergraduate can experience a vibrant sacramental life and exercise his faith, both inside and outside of the classroom, unencumbered in his studies by the woke ideological activism that has seized control of so many of America’s colleges and universities is an unquestionable good. Still, in many ways, these schools also follow the first path mentioned above: it is just that in these cases, the student who is likely to attend one of these schools is not your average eighteen-year-old, i.e., she likely has a vague sense of what Catholic liberal education looks like and probably has sound, if untested, opinions about its desirability.

Giving an apology

The hard truth is that if our Catholic liberal arts colleges are going to continue to exist as viable options on America’s broader higher education horizon, they must be able to give a compelling, full-throated defense of the intrinsic desirability of the kind of education they uniquely can offer. Simply put, Catholic liberal arts colleges today have to be able to give an apology, i.e., a defense, for their intellectual way of life that justifies their existence to the students they ask for the responsibility and privilege to educate.

The problem is that colleges, including dyed-in-the-wool Catholic liberal arts colleges, tend to take the desirability and goodness of their continued existence for granted. This is an admittedly odd pose for colleges to strike, especially those that pride themselves on introducing students to Socrates’ stirring defense of the examined life in Plato’s Apology. The reasons why they do this, however, are not difficult to discover. For one thing, higher education, as students and parents today are well aware, has become a lucrative business. One can see this in everything from the willingness of desperate colleges to concoct new majors and programs based on little more than the expressed areas of interest voiced by prospective students to the wince-inducing tendency of college administrators to talk breezily about the “yield” of cash paying students among this year’s applicant pool.

But, there is a less crass and more benign reason why colleges rarely make public cases for their continued existence: love of one’s own. Large numbers of academically minded men and women necessarily populate colleges—faculty, staff, and administrators who, at some point, realized that they feel remarkably at home on a college campus. Some of these people may have even fallen in love with the intellectual life along the way. For the man or woman who has spent a decade or more earning a bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degree, the thought that one needs to justify why there should be places where others can do the same is likely not to occur.

Nonetheless, as Augustine reminds us in the Confessions, the love of one’s own eventually needs to give way to the love of the Good. Aquinas also reminds us that one can never adequately repay a genuine teacher for the good he has done him; at best, he can only help lead others to undergo a similar humanizing transformation. While it may not come naturally to those there, faculty and administrators at Catholic liberal arts colleges that truly take their educational missions seriously owe their students intelligible accounts and periodic defenses of their chosen intellectual and pedagogical principles.

Doubtless, the founding ethos, the charism of the sponsoring religious order, and the lived traditions of a given Catholic college should inform the kind of apology it gives as a particular Catholic college. An individual Catholic college is not just one additional franchise of a larger, homogenized brand. That misguided form of thinking is what frequently leads rudderless Catholic liberal arts colleges to remodel themselves regularly on the latest branding best practices used by the seemingly more successful and financially lucrative colleges in the herd. A college founded by Augustinians, for instance, is apt to place a general emphasis on identifying the true intellectual, moral, and spiritual ends of the human person’s restless heart and seriously consider the tension-ridden lives those who inhabit both the earthly and heavenly cities must live. Likewise, a Dominican institution is apt to emphasize the importance of the search for truth, the harmony of faith and reason, and the fruitful interaction between human and divine science in the formation of its students.

Despite the vital importance and value of such particular traits and inheritances, which testify to the genuine intellectual pluralism that marks Catholicism, there are certain core intellectual and pedagogical principles that are essential to Catholic liberal arts education as such. Giving students fulsome accounts of these principles is essential. Ritualistic incantations of the “Catholic intellectual tradition” or the “harmony of faith and reason” or educating “the whole person” quickly ring hollow if the speaker cannot put any more flesh on the bone than the repetition of such slogans. Indeed, students often notice the intellectual emptiness of such rhetoric far more quickly than faculty, some of whom are quick to read more into the slogan than the speaker intends and others who, not knowing any better, mistake the slogan for an actual argument.

Language articulates, always imperfectly but to greater and lesser degrees of accuracy, the realities presented to the human mind. Knowing a language well helps one express something true about a concrete reality that he knows and perhaps even understands. What is more, someone with this ability is able to use different words and terms carefully to articulate the same reality to different audiences, even when those audiences possess markedly different capacities of understanding. As anyone who has struggled to explain Aristotle’s idea of happiness to an undergraduate class knows, you cannot simply say that for Aristotle happiness is the proper activity of the soul in accordance with virtue. You must begin by saying that happiness is something that everyone desires, and then point out that it is an activity that brings about human flourishing. Such a description is in the main accurate. However, it is also partial and inexact. It gives the untutored student a general idea of what Aristotle means by happiness, while simultaneously laying the groundwork for this student to refine her understanding of this idea through further study, conversation, and reflection.

Faculty and administration at Catholic liberal arts colleges must be able to do something similar when making the case for the intellectual formation that their institutions characteristically offer students. Identifying for students what these basic intellectual and pedagogical principles are is essential. Yet this is only the start. Educators must be able to give such accounts using meaningful language that can speak to a wide range of students with different levels of appreciation of these principles. Being able to do this effectively allows faculty and administration, to use a trendy educational term, “to meet students where they are at”—but to do so in a way that can elevate and deepen their understanding of where they actually are now and where they genuinely and ultimately want to be as human persons.

Three key principles

Laying out the full case for why an undergraduate would want to receive an intellectual formation from a Catholic liberal arts college falls well beyond scope of this essay. However, at a minimum, we can identify two key intellectual principles and one central pedagogical principle of Catholic liberal education that faculty and administration should be able to explain, clearly and intelligibly, to students as substantive reasons why they would want to attend a Catholic college.

A Catholic college owes its students such an explanation. If done well and if (and this is undeniably big “if” given the state of many Catholic colleges today) the education a college offers actually embodies these principles, thoughtful Catholic and non-Catholic students are given compelling reasons to see being educated at a Catholic college as something that is humanly desirable, academically exciting, and intellectually liberating. At the very least, giving an apology for such an education provides students with a much-needed contrast to today’s view of college as little more than the tollbooth young people must pass through if they want credentialed access to the workplace.

In his extraordinary 2006 address at the University of Regensburg, titled “Faith, Reason and the University: Memories and Reflections,” Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI powerfully observes that the teaching and learning that takes place at Catholic colleges and universities operate on the basis of a “single rationality.” Such a rationality speaks to a unified and shared understanding of reason that informs all human thought and every search for truth. This foundational intellectual principle ought to infuse the entire intellectual and academic life of a Catholic college, binding the college’s legitimately various and diverse disciplines and departments into a recognizable educational whole. The affirmation of the unitary character of reason informs and governs the proper and responsible use of logos at a Catholic college.

By explaining the crucial role that this principle plays in the intellectual life of a college, students (and faculty) from across the college are able to appreciate that their particular studies in particular disciplines necessarily operate within the larger whole of reason. A Catholic liberal arts college should be able to explain to its students how the various objects that each science studies, ranging from the most basic of molecular compounds up to the common good of a civil society, relate to the proper and perfecting good of the human person. Such explanation provides students with a basis to see that the various courses that a college’s curriculum lays out for them to take over four years relate to one another in a hierarchical and meaningful way.

Jaded faculty and shortsighted administrators sometimes claim that present-day undergraduates are no longer interested in, or in many cases incapable of, being awakened to the kind of wide-ranging inquisitiveness and intellectual life that adherence to the principle of a single rationality allows. They make a point that should be taken seriously. Certainly, the performative high-school education today’s average eighteen-year-old college freshman has received has not done much to cultivate such intellectual curiosity. Constant cultural and societal bombardment about college as the gateway to a professional career clearly has not helped either. Fortunately, it is extremely difficult to beat the natural desire to know out of a human being entirely. Admittedly, that desire is increasingly covered over and suppressed in students entering Catholic liberal arts colleges—and it will be some time before we understand just how badly COVID-related school shutdowns and two years of ZOOM-school have aggravated this problem.

However, students who are fortunate enough to attend a college where faculty take the vast intellectual horizon the universal scope of reason opens up to the human mind seriously and that also has the proper curricular arrangements and pedagogical practices in place, are given a chance to discover the natural desire to know in themselves. Catholic colleges accordingly need to learn how to communicate the fundamental desirability of this enduring, humanizing experience to their potential and current students as well as to their parents (many of whom may have not experienced this kind of education themselves).

For students at colleges where the unitary character of reason is left unclear or denied, an undergraduate education is likely to look like a hodgepodge of wholly unrelated courses and requirements that students are forced to check off some arbitrarily generated academic list. There are many unfortunate reasons why this may be the case, e.g., a college may choose to exaggerate students’ ability to design their own curriculum or departmental turf wars may dominate the general education curriculum. However, the deepest and most common reason why students’ undergraduate education is apt to feel like a confused mixture of largely unrelated studies and requirements stems from the modern university’s institutionalized belief in the sanctity of unbridgeable disciplinary specializations. In practice, dogmatic adherence to the maxim of strict disciplinary specialization inexorably turns the intellectual community of a college into the functional equivalent of an academic archipelago. Rather than viewing themselves as members of a diverse intellectual community that shares in a common pursuit of the truth, faculty and students learn to see themselves as inhabitants of a nominal academic cluster—intellectually and institutionally separated from those outside their discipline by a vast perspectival and methodological gap.

That a Catholic college should be able to give a defense of itself as a place where students and faculty come together and reason with one another on the basis of a shared commitment to reason, despite their respective disciplinary differences, is not an accident. Catholicism’s claim that God is the source and perfection of all being and, hence, the source and perfection of all truth, demands nothing less. The defense of this essential principle was at stake in the fierce debates about the so-called doctrine of the “double truth” that animated the University of Paris in the thirteenth century. It is the principle that Max Weber famously denies in his “Science as a Vocation” lecture when he asserts that the “progress” of scientific rationality inescapably requires us to “put on blinders” and proceed as strict specialists who only look at questions from the perspective of their chosen disciplines. The recognition that the human mind operates within a coherent universe of reason is not exclusive to Catholicism. Classical philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle made this same point in their own ways. Yet God’s revelation of Himself as the eternal Person who creates, sustains, and governs all beings outside of Himself, provides a Catholic college with both natural and revealed grounds to explain to its students why this principle is vital to its own educational existence.

The complementarity of faith and reason is the second essential intellectual principle that ought to be explained to (and on some level shared by) members of a Catholic liberal arts college. Faculty and students should both appreciate, as Pope John Paull II put it in Fides et Ratio, that faith and reason “are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of the truth.” However, the meaning and “cash value” of the complementarity of faith and reason needs to be unpacked and explained to students. Their education ought to give them some real understanding of the much-cited harmony of faith and reason, as well as an appreciation of the manifold ways that faith and reason should interact and intellectually challenge each other at a Catholic liberal arts college. On this score, it is crucial that faculty and administrators are able to think about the three words in the term “Catholic liberal education” together, recognizing how each word in this lofty phrase interacts with and shapes the other two.

A Catholic liberal education should prod students to think seriously about what it truly means for a human person to be educated, not simply receive training in a specific field or preparation for some profession. It should also encourage students to desire the kind of intellectual and spiritual liberation that only occurs when one reflects upon his or her deeply held unexamined prejudices and popular opinions to see if they actually deserve to be retained and further cultivated. It also ought to place students, both Catholic and non-Catholic, in a position to see how the triune God’s revelation of Himself poses formidable and humanly important questions (especially about our origins and ends) to our natural understanding of our world and ourselves.

Further still, it should equip students to be able to take the measure of the science of theology’s ability to dialogue meaningfully and, if need be, debate with the human sciences. In short, it must help faith weigh its ability to respond reasonably and articulately to unaided reason’s best questions and answers. A self-described Catholic college that does not do these things and challenge its students to reflect seriously on the importance of these three components of a Catholic liberal education is not worth the description it gives itself.

Students’ appreciation of the complementarity of faith and reason should inform and take shape over the whole of their education, not just be relegated to questions and concerns that formally arise in theology and philosophy requirements in a core curriculum. It is exceedingly tempting for administrators, and a good number of faculty, to delude themselves into believing that the Catholic intellectual component of a student’s education is secured simply by requiring every student to take some fixed number of theology and philosophy courses in order to graduate. This approach misses the fundamental intellectual point of a Catholic liberal education. It conceives of such education not as forming an intellectual whole, but merely as the sum total of its various and diverse required parts. Viewed in this way, the Catholic element in a Catholic liberal education is reduced to being exposed to a handful of Catholic authors and arguments in mandatory courses that have little, if any, substantial relation to the rest of a student’s undergraduate education.

Contrary to this reductive and mistaken view, an authentic Catholic liberal education seeks to educate and cultivate the type of mind that wants to know and understand, as Socrates puts it, “the things that are,” as they come to sight through both reason and revelation. For example, recognition of the complementarity of faith and reason ought to generate theological and philosophical questions in a biology student who is trying to understand herself as one instance of a multicellular organism of a species with a discernable biological past. At the same time, this recognition also ought to generate biological questions in a theology student who is trying to understand how it is possible for a created, ensouled, rational being to be ordered to eternal life in God and yet have a material body that is subject to the process of generation and corruption. When taken seriously, Catholic liberal education strives for nothing short of forming educated persons who eventually are capable of formulating these sets of questions on their own and reflecting on these series of thoughts.

The aim of Catholic liberal education

I just used the term “educated persons.” Properly understood, that sums up the aim of Catholic liberal education. Catholicism’s unwavering claim that every human person God creates is a unique, rational, relational, and purposeful being provides Catholic liberal education with a powerful pedagogical principle that ought to inform every aspect of a student’s education at a Catholic college. Believing, as Gaudium et Spes notes, that the triune God’s revelation of Himself in Christ “fully reveals man to man himself” (22), a Catholic college can draw on a unique anthropology that should infuse its view of all the people—students, faculty, staff, and administrators—that form this academic community. This fecund anthropology recognizes the human person as an integrated whole, a union of body and soul who was created with a transcendent end and who naturally desires to know and love and to be known and be loved. This is the view of each student that educators at a Catholic college, who take their charge seriously, are vocationally required to have.

Looking at students in this way gives a teacher a powerful reason to approach each new student as someone who could be her potential intellectual friend, just as it gives a student a reason to see a teacher as someone who could one day be his intellectual friend. It also means that a Catholic college ultimately should not view the young people who matriculate there simply as current students or future alumni or even the next generation of husbands, mothers, doctors, lawyers, teachers or hedge fund managers. Quite the contrary, they ought to come to sight, most deeply, as persons who have come to you seeking assistance in thinking about the perennial human questions, challenges, and concerns that naturally arise in human life, and who want to be better equipped to incorporate the various parts of their individual lives into a dignified and truly satisfying human whole.

A Catholic liberal arts college should not only be aware of this last point, it should be prepared to articulate this point regularly and repeatedly to its students. Students need to hear—and be given the intellectual means to appreciate—that their education, if done right, can help them see how their intellectual and spiritual longings for happiness and wholeness can, to greater and lesser degrees, be integrated into a meaningful whole.

By definition, a Catholic college has something extraordinary and vitally important to say about what that integration ultimately looks like and how it is finally achieved through God in eternal life. Understanding itself as participating, in a distinct and explicitly educational way, in the Church’s larger and more fundamental salvific mission, the Catholic liberal arts college has an obligation to place, in an academically serious manner, Catholicism’s profound vision of the final end of the human person before each of its students. Presenting this vision thoughtfully, in both words and deeds, in no way compromises the intellectual integrity of a Catholic liberal arts college. Just the opposite, it rounds out and completes the Catholic college’s unique educational mission as a distinctive educational community where the full truth about the human person, as this comes into view through both faith and reason, is presented to students to consider seriously. This is the salient point that so many of today’s Catholic colleges either ignore or are ignorant of when they instinctively settle for branding themselves simply as institutions of higher learning where students can gain professional credentials, while also being exposed to so-called Catholic values.

The scope and substance of the type of intellectual and educational apology that I have briefly sketched will seem wildly ambitious or fatally outdated to many, perhaps even most, administrators and faculty at Catholic colleges. This is likely to be the case especially to those armed with data-driven reports from high-priced educational consultants who are convinced that the future of their institutions hinges on mimicking the best practices of America’s most prestigious and financially secure secular colleges and universities. Such faculty and administration would have a fair, if extremely narrow, point to make if the one thing needful for a Catholic liberal arts college was simply financial security and survival.

Setting aside the questionable wisdom of such purely practical financial considerations, the fact remains that the Catholic college Catholic college should stand for much more—intellectually, morally, and spiritually—than the genuine, but very limited, good that is continued institutional survival. To borrow a formulation from Aristotle, a Catholic college seeks, for both itself and its students, not just mere life, but the good life. It seeks not only to live but also to live well. For faculty and administration entrusted with the profound responsibility of educating students at a Catholic college, living well, in part, requires living as responsible members of an academic community that has been bequeathed a priceless intellectual, educational, and spiritual inheritance. That bequeathal comes with the duty and privilege of caring for and passing on this inheritance to future generations of students, faculty, and administrators.

This is undoubtedly a daunting task, one that no Catholic college, living on this side of the eschaton, can ever live up to fully. Nevertheless, it is the honorable task that educators at Catholic colleges have been given and the responsibility that they must try to fulfill. Giving a compelling public case for its singular educational way of life constitutes only one small step towards fulfilling this responsibility. But it is a crucial and timely step that every Catholic liberal arts college, worthy of its name, today must find the courage to take.

(Editor’s note: This article was posted originally on July 24, 2022.)

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Marc D. Guerra, Ph.D. 3 Articles
Marc D. Guerra, Ph.D. , is Professor of Theology and Director of the Core Texts & Enduring Questions Program at Assumption University in Worcester, Massachusetts.


  1. Some essentials in order for a college to call itself a “Catholic” college:

    1. Its target audience is Catholic students. Does this mean that a non-Catholic cannot be admitted? No. But it does mean that its mission is to educate Catholics i.e. those to whom their Catholic faith is core to their purpose in life.

    2. To be a “Catholic” college, it means that all core personnel i.e. faculty and administration must be Catholic. It means that these entities that constitute essential functions in the mission must be faithful i.e. practicing Catholics.

    3. To be a “Catholic” college all faculty must take a public oath pledging to teach only in accord with the teachings of the Catholic faith. Such a pledge must be taken in the presence of the bishop.

    4. To be a genuinely Catholic College, no funding must ever come from the government at any level.

    5. To be a Catholic college, it must seek not only the formation of the individual student as its mission but the transformation of the pagan culture.

    This is a severe list of criteria for what constitutes a genuine Catholic college. But desperate times requires nothing less. There are few Catholic colleges. The ones I attended walked away from their mission a long long time ago. They exist today as mere skeletons of their past. For shame.

    • Fat chance, Deacon Ed.

      Your criteria are only sensible. The fact that the large majority of nominally Catholic universities would never submit to limitations like these shows clearly that those schools have joined so many of the Church’s hierarchy in the category of “Catholic in name only.”

      The millstone industry must be booming these days.

      • Government can grant funds and it should be without conditions that impugn Catholic values or try to straddle with other values. It sounds like I am repeating but legally it is a grant and once made, Government’s position is done. This is an area for the Bishops’ Conference.

        Isn’t saying fat chance 1. throwing away the fight and 2. underestimating God’s call to conversion? Catholics have this work to do and it takes co-ordination, intelligence, shrewdness, mettle and like-mindedness.

        Once you can identify who’s not interested, that person shouldn’t be on your board of management etc. What was ever hard about that? Is that the hard part? Is it the only hard part?

        There is a concupiscence for the individual but there is also concupiscence for the culture. If the priest is cultivating it in the parish then yes there is a rather scaled up problem going on around there.

        This page only mentions Christ twice -and now, a third time. Catholic education must attain to being a witness to Jesus Christ and His life. But if from its constitution the institution relativizes Him or in its ethos it side-lines Him, there will then be no real service or attention to merits.

        How the institution does it depends on its fidelity to the priesthood, the Blessed Sacrament and faith.

  2. The simple fact is Catholic colleges charge exhorbitant tuition and costs: Assumption runs at roughly $46,680 for the first year, and up to $65,000 or more when all costs are added in. The average student loan debt now runs at about $39,000
    Starting out adult life nearly $40,000 in debt is not a good idea, even if one learns to integrate his (her? frogself??) human person and “live well.”

    • Yup. Two of my children graduated from orthodox Catholic colleges that didn’t accept federal funding. It’s a very tough financial burden for young people. I couldn’t afford to assist them outside of a few registration fees.
      Both schools were amazing & both my children found their future spouses through the connections they made at college resulting in 11 of my 16 grandchildren.

      There’s no monetary price you can put on that nor for the affirmation of faith possible at an orthodox school. But there really should be a “3rd Way”. Maybe Catholic 2-year colleges, Catholic trade schools, etc.

      • Since you mentioned Catholic Trade school, I want to give a shout out to Harmel Academy in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The mother of one student there told me her son managed to pay for it (most of it anyway) by the work he did while in school.

        • Thank you for sharing that Kathryn. That Catholic trade school is worth an article in every Catholic publication.
          One of my children was able to work off room and board at Christendom by doing groundskeeping, maintenance, etc.but the tuition was still a long row to hoe.

      • The Franciscan University of Steubenville plans to open a Catholic trade school in the fall of 2023. The tuition and board cost is $15,000/year and the student will earn money for his/her work. The student can earn a bachelors degree or not. But “Catholic” will be a top priority.

      • I realize no one may read this so long after the article was published, but may I offer Thomas Aquinas College for the audience’s consideration? It achieves the vision Dr. Guerra lays out better than any other place I know of. Its founders were seeking to advance a very precise and robust–and ancient, and fully integrated–form of Catholic intellectual formation; they were *not* creating a “safe space” for Catholics in a scary world. See the link below to the founding document, which still guides the institution the same today as it did at the beginning. And it is the only Catholic college that gives full coverage to all the liberal arts, not just the humanities (four years of math and science for everyone, not just philosophy/literature/theology, though it all leads to the latter).

        And, you can have your cake and eat it: full cost, tuition/room/board, is $39,000 per year, the College fundraises enough that it can afford to cover 100% of a family’s demonstrated financial need, so average student debt burden at graduation is under $19,000. There is no need to take on crippling debt–and beware the faithful Catholic school that offers flattering merit scholarships that may change from one year to the next, and always look at the bottom line: out of pocket costs and average debt.

        Sorry for the sales pitch, and obviously I’m biased, but people need to know there is such an option available.

        TAC’s founding (and very much controlling) document can be read here, and a worthy read it is:

  3. To good effect, Guerra cites Benedict’s “Regensburg Address” (2006) and the truth that faith and reason are complementary—versus the contradictory, fragmentary and false “double-truth” (incidentally, the Islamic premise).

    But, behind and above this complementarity is the historical FACT of the Incarnation, that the transcendent God actually talks to people, rather than not. And, further, that the “Word” is actually made flesh (John 1:14). Very alarming (!), more than only routinely recited lines in the Creed.

    Benedict, in other writings, stresses this self-donating, very integrating and singular Incarnation at the center of human history—as a concrete “fact” and categorically NOT a mere “idea” nested among other Christian/humanistic “values.” And, not a fading episode somewhere on the evolutionary path toward modernity. Then, for the college or university student, the additional and inseparable fact is Christ’s (again) self-donated Real Presence (CCC 1374), as the summit of the sacramental (non-secularist) worldview and reality. It is from the fact of the Incarnation (and the Real Presence) that we then can academically and better entertain the complementary fit between the Faith and reason.

    This coherence assumes that personal student curiosity and openness toward the real hasn’t already been stifled by earlier classroom anesthetics or virtual-reality computer games.

  4. Professor Guerra’s Catholic university must be an inordinately good one, since in his essay, he makes some huge assumptions that I’m not sure are valid for the great majority of Catholic schools.

    At the outset of his article, he states, “The Catholic liberal arts college has an obligation to place, in an academically serious manner, Catholicism’s profound vision of the final end of the human person before each of its students.”

    Which is technically true. But he’s assuming that today’s so-called “Catholic” universities do in fact embrace — or even tolerate — “Catholicism’s profound vision.”

    I’m quite certain that the great majority do not.

    Here are a few of many examples of leading “Catholic” universities disavowing the faith:

    A number of leading “Catholic” universities have bestowed their highest awards on politicians who publicly, diabolically and persistently opposed the most fundamental Catholic teachings. And urged others to do so.

    While another leading “Catholic” university covered up crucifixes to please one of the aforementioned politicians who was giving a speech.

    Yet another leading “Catholic” university argued in court that it is a secular institution and not Catholic at all. Its administration was attempting to sell its birthright as a Catholic institution for a multi-million-dollar bowl of pottage in the form of public funding for a campus construction project.

    Since the school’s testimony was given under oath, are we not to believe it?

    It’s been decades since I’ve seen America’s leading “Catholic” universities even acknowledge that “Catholicism’s profound vision” exists, let alone that it is preferable to the profane secularist view that human life consists only of a series of appetites to be satisfied.

    Toward the end of his piece, Professor Guerra states:

    “The scope and substance of the type of intellectual and educational apology that I have briefly sketched will seem wildly ambitious or fatally outdated to many…”

    It does seem that the issue he is addressing was resolved in the secular direction thirty or forty years ago.

    What’s especially sad is that bad Catholic schools — of every level — have the potential of doing more harm to students than bad secular schools.

    A Catholic child can compartmentalize the vile things being presented in non-Catholic schools. These people aren’t Catholics, she might think; they don’t know any better.

    But when Catholic schools present vile things, Catholic students can’t help observing that when
    Catholics themselves don’t believe all this Catholic stuff, why should they?

    Honestly, I think the Catholic faith community in America would be better off if three-quarters of the Catholic schools went out of existence.

    • To quote from a readable book largely about college-level “learning,” written for the benefit of the young whether in college or not, and whether in “Catholic” schools or not:

      “In our coping-challenged culture many college students demand that the campus classroom should be an intellectual ‘safe place’—something like safe sex—where ‘politically incorrect’ ideas are detected early and aborted. Shouting and office sit-ins are becoming routine, with orchestrated protests sometimes oriented at commencement day platforms. If seedy gas stations feature coin-operated condom dispensers, then surely tuition-supported classrooms should be equally supplied, with cerebral condoms” (“A Generation Abandoned,” Hamilton Books, 2017).

      Here’s the 2018 CWR author interview:

      Oops, this book is the work of yours truly, an “ego-driven” contributor to CWR! The book? And now, yet another comment? It’s not my fault. Eve made me do it. No, wait, every day I’m among those who simply find these pages energizing. The CWR made me do it. Blame Carl!

    • Seriously??? You printed all those incidents but never gave us the NAMES of the schools? How is that helpful?? Which school actually covered up their crucifixes to accommodate a speaker?? Was he a satanist? Thats a total scandal. They should absolutely have withdrawn the invitation to speak. So-called “Catholic” colleges which betray Catholicism should be outed so that those students or parents who are paying them exorbitant tuition might at least know what they are ( or, are NOT) getting. They are no better than secular institutions, riding on their past reputations. Disgusting and tragic.

  5. The directive of the Holy Father for taking one year in prepartaion for marriage could be taken as a good guidline – colleges choosing to cut away what might be fluffy areas to choose to focus on what is essential for our times , including on topics related to child rearing , health etc : too .
    Happened to ‘accidently’ listen to a talk by Rev.Fr.Ripperger about the ‘collapse of moral teachings ‘ for six generations ! – inspite of having had good teachers on same such as St.Alphonsus !
    The need to patiently root out the evils that has infected the culture , that manifests in its extremes such as the blatant demands for evil as in The German Church ..and the Holy Father knowing it takes patience , in generations choosing to walk in holiness courses that include all such areas – even topics related to exorcism and such too – preparing battle ready young – the faculty too to be at the forefront of same ..seeking The Kingdom , the rest to follow ..

  6. Three years ago my grandson was an entering freshman at a Jesuit catholic university (I know that is something of a contradiction). As part of freshman orientation he had to sit through a presentation by the head of the campus LGBTQ group. What more needs to be said?

    Regarding Brineyman’s statement: “What’s especially sad is that bad Catholic schools — of every level — have the potential of doing more harm to students than bad secular schools.” It reminds me of a quote attributed to Bishop Sheen in the 1970’s – “I recommend to all my friends and relatives that they send their children to public colleges and universities where they will have to defend their faith, rather than to catholic ones where their faith will be taken from them.”

    • I was reading an article about the Immaculate Heart of Mary order which basically imploded back in the late 1960’s & ’70s. In the article a California mother was asked about sending their daughter to Immaculate Heart College & she answered “No, she can lose her faith at a state college for free.

  7. In the above piece, by my count the Stagirite beats the Nazarite six mentions to one.

    Guerra says, “To borrow a formulation from Aristotle, a Catholic college seeks, for both itself and its students, not just mere life, but the good life.”

    How fascinating that Aristotle rather than Jesus (Jn 10:10) is instinctively drawn upon here!

  8. We have a “Catholic” President who does everything he can to undermine Catholic Church teaching and a Pope who is afraid of his own shadow so why do we should we think that the big money enterprises known as Catholic colleges should be any different? If we are closer than ever to the days of Noah and Lot then we can pray that some in this young generation of future Catholic leaders are strong enough to resist the new American Progressive Manifesto and brave enough to walk away from popularity into social martyrdom, “For the sake of ten, I will not destroy”.

  9. Splendid piece! Deserves wide circulation. Forwarding it to a number of fellow Catholic educators as I type. They’ll appreciate the support and the guidance it gives to their efforts.

  10. It’s too late. Higher Ed will be wiped out relatively soon thanks to the depression and the amplifying political-economic shocks.

  11. Who are the kids attending the “Catholic” colleges? The same kids who went through their local Catholic-in-name-only high school. Their parents, generally low-catechized themselves, make plenty of money since they both work, so tuition is not a hardship. They have never really been involved in bringing up their kids to be faithful Catholics, because they aren’t either. They drop them off at the curb every morning, and weekends are reserved for sports, not Mass. Parents who are serious about passing on the faith generally have large families often home school and make great sacrifices, and they’re certainly not dumb enough to fritter away what little money they have on “Catholic” elementary/secondary schools. They choose wisely when college comes around, but unfortunately tuition remains high even for the few good Catholic colleges. What happened to the Church not wanting our money, but rather, wanting ti educate our kids?

    When parents become serious about the Catholic faith themselves, they will choose better for their kids. Catholic education today is generally “Public School Lite.”

  12. As the Cardinal Newman Society indicates, 90% of the 200-odd “so-called-Catholic-Colleges” listed by the “so-called-Catholic-USCCB” cannot be recommended to parents.

    This is because of the “so-called-Catholic-priests” of the Jesuit and Holy Cross orders, who joined minds and pens with the latter-day super-hero of the US Conference of Bishops, “ex-Eminence-sociopath-sex-abuser-McCarrick,” the erstwhile President of the U. of Puerto, and published their “Land of Lakes” Manifesto (or so-called Statement, was it in 1967?) in which they each rejected all authority outside of their university.

    Flash forward now, and these 90% are well represented by one of the chief Land-of-Lakes-apostasy-colleges, Fordham University, whose very own Chair of the Theology Dept is a homosexual man in a fraudulent-marriage to another homosexual man (this Prof. being Prof. Hornbeck), and of course, he isn’t a Catholic either.

    And as the late Prof. Rice of Notre Dame (law?) lamented, in advising a friend about his children: “If you send them to ND thinking they will be nurtured in the faith, you are wrong. Unless thry have already formed a powerful Catholic faith, their faith will sink like a stone.”

    So the USCCB and 90% of Bishops ought to be making apologies, but since they are indeed liars and frauds, they think thry are performing a sacrament.

    • Chris, be very careful with this kind of thinking…

      Before we know it, people might make a comparison between our very compromised “Catholic” colleges/universities and those Israelites who brought hell upon themselves by mingling too much with the natives and their Baal.
      Or, we might wonder what the proclaiming Church was actually like during those 1,200 years before the first universities at Paris, Bologna and Oxford even existed, and even before the very first Muslim university of al-Azhar in Cairo (in 975 A.D.).
      Or, we might wish for a really sober engagement with the world, and one that in our own chaotic times is based clearly on the Scripture and Tradition (our acquired immune system?) especially including the early Church fathers.
      Before we know it, we might rediscover the graced insights of, say, St. Augustine, whose “coherence” of faith and reason (coherence, a term used by Emeritus Pope Benedict). A term which is less subject to manipulation than, say, synodal “synthesis” which easily acquires a Hegelian coloration and even the rainbow coloration of the “synodal way” in Germania.
      Before you know it, we might perceive the current catastrophe (only accelerated a bit by the COVID hibernation–with Church attendance and collections down by maybe 15 to 20%), and we might even wonder whether the affluent Germania (Cologne diocese reportedly has more money that the entire Vatican) might be dealing with some needs in Rome (only a question).
      Before you know it, we might wish for a council of the whole Church (!), centered on aggiornamento and on ressourcement (both!). But wait, we got that already in the “real” Second Vatican Council of the documents (not the “virtual” council still marketed in Germania and other Western storefronts).
      Before you know it, and instead, we might even find ourselves formed by Eucharistic coherence (!) rather than deformed by bundled moral contradictions under hijacked synodality.

  13. “Catholic colleges and universities owe students an apology” – not just students but also parents and the Catholic community. And not just colleges and universities. The rot starts way earlier. And we now have generations of poorly-catechized teachers and parents. On the bright side, this past Sunday, I went by chance to a different parish for Mass. A new priest! Nigerian. Joyful,faith-filled, enthusiastic! Probably rigid. There is hope and it will be in the parish or nowhere at all.

  14. Too many examples to list but when DePaul, putatively founded in the charism of Charity, removed posters saying “Unborn Lives Matter,” and disciplined the students who put them up, I realized there was little value to the existence of Catholic Universities and no hope they would ever recover it. The list of Newman Society recommended Catholic schools looks appealing but the rest have no business using the word Catholic in their names, mission statements, or marketing material.

  15. *There are successors to the Apostles who have the responsiblity to lead the Church in truth.
    *Let’s put the blame where it lies.
    *Sixty years later, and the madness and sickness still rages on.
    *Sixty years.
    *Will it ever end?
    *Will it?
    (Kudos to Catholic World Report for keeping the faith, when so many others did not.)

  16. *Would it be possible to do a re-set to the last time of sanity, unity, integrity, and general well-being in Church history?
    *I.e., could the Church do a re-set back to the doctrine, liturgy, and customs of the Church as these existed under Pope Pius XII, who died in 1958?
    *I.e., declare all developements of doctrine, all liturgical developments, and all canonizations since 1958 as being null and void.

3 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Catholic colleges and universities owe students an apology | Passionists Missionaries Kenya, Vice Province of St. Charles Lwanga, Fathers & Brothers
  2. Catholic colleges and universities owe students an apology – Via Nova Media
  3. Catholic colleges and universities owe students an apology | Franciscan Sisters of St Joseph (FSJ) , Asumbi Sisters Kenya

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.