On breaking a dominant lie

Roe v Wade was always a judicial coup; a badly reasoned decision that invented a “right” to abortion out of whole cloth, unrelated to the Constitution or democratic process.

Pro-life demonstrators are seen near the Supreme Court in Washington June 15, 2022. The court overruled the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion decision in its ruling in the Dobbs case on a Mississippi law banning most abortions after 15 weeks June 24. (CNS photo/Tyler Orsburn)

We all know the nursery rhyme: Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall/ Humpty Dumpty had a great fall/ all the king’s horses and all the king’s men/ couldn’t put Humpty together again. It’s a kindergarten classic. And the character behind the rhyme has an interesting history. Humpty actually began his career 300 years ago as the name on a cannon in the English Civil War. His work as a talking egg in the fairytale industry came much later. His importance for us today is his co-starring role, with Alice, in Lewis Carroll’s very strange children’s story, Through the Looking Glass, published in 1871.

Humpty has an exchange with Alice in that book that’s worth noting, especially in light of the recent Supreme Court decision striking down Roe v Wade. He says, in a rather nasty tone, that “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” Put simply: Humpty, and Humpty alone, decides whatever his words mean. I’d like to argue that this kind of Promethean self-assertion marks Humpty Dumpty as one of the most prophetic political thinkers of the modern era. Here’s why.

Words are the basis of thought, belief, and action. A rich vocabulary expands the subtlety and precision not just in our verbal expression, but also in our thought. Thus – when properly used – language builds up the dignity of our species. Think the plays of Shakespeare; the novels of Dickens; the poetry of Wordsworth and Hopkins; the works of Augustine and Aquinas.

To the degree that a word accurately reflects reality – words like unborn child, man and woman, male and female – it tells the truth. And as Jesus himself once said, Jesus who is the aboriginal Word or logos, “the truth will make you free.” Not always comfortable. Not always happy. But truly liberated, and always free.

Dishonest, misleading words do the opposite. They confuse and demean us. And in the mouths of bad people, they do massive damage. Josef Pieper, the great German Catholic philosopher, wrote a short, simple text half a century ago – Abuse of Language, Abuse of Power – that’s worth reading. In it, Pieper argues that much of today’s advertising, public relations, and political lobbying is designed to bend the truth; to manipulate its target audience toward morally ambiguous ends. The outcome is predictable. In Pieper’s words, “Public discourse itself, separated from the standard of truth, creates [an epidemic of] vulnerability to the reign of the tyrant.” Or as Hilaire Belloc put it more crudely, “half-truths are like half bricks, you can throw them twice as far.”

Pieper and Belloc were not alone in their worry about language. In his great 1946 essay, “Politics and the English Language,” George Orwell wrote that, “in our age, there is no such thing as ‘keeping out of politics.’ All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred, and schizophrenia.”

We have a government of law, checks, and balances, designed to be of the people, by the people, for the people. In order for that to work, it needs literate citizens with a high degree of self-mastery, community loyalty, and moral sense. It needs mature adults willing to listen and not merely rant; willing to subordinate their private appetites and egos to the common good. This is why the moral content of American public education is so important. And here, I’m speaking of the traditional liberal arts. Education shapes – or should shape – responsible citizens. The root of that word “responsible” literally means “answering to,” or obedient to, some higher purpose or authority.

Thus, the absence of God in the vocabulary of our public discourse is a statement about God. It’s an implied affirmation of his non-existence, or at least his irrelevance to human affairs. And that has practical consequences, because a concept like “the common good” is inescapably moral. It involves what each of us should and should not do to sustain our shared community life. Education of the young always involves more than simply sharing facts; it’s more than merely an information delivery system. It’s also about forming the mind with a framework of meaning; teaching the difference between virtue and vice, truth and lies. At its best, education is part of the glue that holds the country together as a unified people. So when the education system becomes ideologically corrupt, the nation begins to suffer. People conclude that they’ve lost their share of ownership in their own country.

And that’s exactly what many of us feel today.

The ferocity of verbal abuse, physical violence, and irrational hatred unleashed by otherwise “progressive” people with the downfall of Roe is instructive. Roe v Wade was always a judicial coup; a badly reasoned decision that invented a “right” to abortion out of whole cloth, unrelated to the Constitution or democratic process. But we now live in an environment where there’s your truth, and Ann’s truth, and Bill’s truth, and my truth. Which really means that there’s no truth at all; just the naked will to power. And the powerful make the rules to serve their own purposes, not the common good.

The American founding was shaped by a keen sense of both the dignity of human beings, and their fallenness. The founders had both a confidence in man’s ingenuity, and a realism about his weakness. They understood that the human person is utterly unique and unlike any other creature; that freedom is not license; that there is no freedom without commensurate responsibilities; that a God who created nature and humanity does exist; that there are such things as natural law and objective truths that ground the world in reality; and that a real community is more than a collection of people joined together by the same antagonisms, illusions, and sins.

We’re losing nearly all of these little wisdoms. And that’s dangerous, because in a technological age, in a nation with our wealth and global influence, our capacity for damage to human life and dignity is immense.

This is planting season here in Nebraska, and words are a bit like plants. They’re living organisms. We can kill them with abuse, but otherwise they develop naturally, from their seeds, over time. Take the word “liberty,” for example. Its Latin root is libertatem, meaning the condition of a free man as opposed to a slave. The word “blessing” has a similar history. In Hebrew, its root is brk or barak, which means to kneel or to praise. Barak developed into the word baruch, as in Baruch hashem Adonai, which means “Blessed be the name of the Lord.”

Professor John Senior, my mentor in the Integrated Humanities Program at the University of Kansas, and my godfather as an adult convert, was fascinated with such words and their etymologies. And here’s the simple reason why. Our civilization’s idea of the “blessings of liberty” has always – whether we admit it or not — been rooted in the virtue of obedience; our willing and mutually shared submission to higher, godly realities worthy of human worship. Real freedom is not self-assertion. It’s self-gift and self-sacrifice grounded in a humble self-knowledge. We become free first by mastering ourselves for the sake of others, and then receiving the same gift from them. We’re not little planets revolving around the star of our own self-importance. We’re complementary social creatures, and our souls starve if we feed only our own egos and appetites.

Here’s the point.

Words matter. An unborn child is a developing human person; not simply a “fetus,” not a piece of personal property disposable at will, and vastly more than an intrusive bundle of alien tissue. In striking down Roe, the Supreme Court has at least broken the spell of one of the dominant lies of our age. It remains to us – if the word “democracy” stills means anything – to ensure that the humanity of the unborn child is reflected truthfully in our laws.

(Note: This essay is adapted and expanded from remarks made to a Portsmouth Abbey “Blessings of Liberty” conference.)

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Most Reverend James Conley 2 Articles
Most Reverend James Conley is the bishop of Lincoln, NE.


  1. When Hannah Arendt interviewed Adolf Eichmann, the captured overseer of Hitler’s “final solution” to the Jews, she found him to be “quite ordinary, commonplace, and something neither demonic nor monstrous.” (“Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil,” 1964). And, of all the atrocities against the millions of Jews, Albert Speer as a lead operative explained, “I didn’t hate them. I was indifferent to them” (Inside the Third Reich, 1971).

    Of this mentality, decades earlier the Catholic novelist, Georges Bernanos, had already exposed the true face of modernity’s moral relativism. In the late 1940s he wrote,

    “The modern world will shortly no longer possess sufficient spiritual reserves to commit genuine evil. Already . . . we can witness a lethal slackening of men’s conscience that is attacking not only their moral life, but also their very heart and mind, altering and decomposing even their imagination . . . The menacing crisis is one of infantilism” (Interview with Samedi-Soir, Nov. 8, 1947, cited in Hans Urs von Balthasar, “Bernanos: An Ecclesial Existence,” Ignatius, 1996).

    So, yes to the meaning of words, and with Orwell (quoted in the article), it’s a long road “back,” or forward and up (!), from our ordinary, commonplace, indifferent, unimaginative, viral and infantile politics—”a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred, and schizophrenia.”

  2. The overturning of Roe v. Wade corrects the mistake made in 1973 when abortion was made a right, indeed a judicial coup that invented a right totally unrelated to the Constitution or democratic process. It’s similar to what Pope Francis has done last year when he corrected the mistake by Pope Benedict XVI in 2007 liberalizing the old Tridentine Mass that invented the abnormality of having two forms of the Roman Rite liturgy. The SCOTUS and Pope Francis are very much right in correcting mistakes in their respective cases.

    • Marcia P. Wow! What are you thinking in trying draw a parallel with abortion decision and the Pope Francis dismall of the holy Tridentine Mass.

    • Marcia P, your comparison between the SCOTUS decision and Francis’ Traditiones Custodes is an invalid one. The SCOTUS decision did away with a previously non-existent, made up “right” which you correctly observe as outside of the necessary legislative process. Contrast that with Francis’ action which does violence to the Mass of the Ages which has existed for, well, ages. Two entirely different approaches. Two entirely different dynamics. You are comparing a 49 year old judicial fiat with something that has been in existence for centuries. Add to that, you show a cavalier disrespect to your fellow Catholics for whom the Latin Mass is their preferred expression of praising God. No loss to you I suppose, so oh well.

      • Joseph Meynier: The tag “Mass of the Ages” is misleading and false. The form and ritual of the pre-Vatican II Mass is not of the ages, it is only 500 years old going back to the Council of Trent, that is why it is best called the Tridentine Mass in contrast to the Vatican II Mass that we now have. Speaking of language, Latin only became the official language of the church beginning in the 4th century. At the Last Supper, the language used by Jesus and the apostles was Aramaic. When Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire in the first 3 centuries, various languages were used to celebrate the Mass: Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, and Greek – the language that gave us the word Eucharist. If ever there would be a Mass of the Ages, the language of celebration would be Aramaic not Latin. The bottom line here is that the Church always celebrated the Mass in the language most understandable to the people of the times, not in a magical language of the abracadabra type.

        • Deacon Dom: All of your points are well made and I am aware of other rites but I do take issue with your statement that “…the Church always celebrated the mass in the language most understandable to the people of the times…”. Always? I doubt that many of the people who attended the Tridentine Mass over the past 500 years understood Latin as a second or first language for that matter.

          I was speaking in the generic employing a well established term to illustrate a point. You chose to nitpick it. OK. Not sure what you mean by the “magical language of the abracadabra type” (which comes across as more than slightly disrespectful) but I will infer that you mean Latin, the official language of the Catholic Church? If my inference is correct, your contempt for Latin in the Tridentine Mass is telling. Oh and the tag you use, “Vatican II Mass” is false and misleading as it is known as the Novus Ordo Missae.

    • Marcia P, if this is satire, it’s pretty funny; well done. If it is not satire, it is the most ignorant and stupid comment I have ever read in CWR.

  3. Did you hear the comments from Pelosi and Biden after the overturn of Roe? 2 proud Catholics at the highest offices in the U.S., and they are adamant that killing babies is okay. Still hearing crickets from this site and the pope, bishops, etc. against these 2 “good Catholics”. Shame on all of you.

  4. So, the madness of 50 years and over 60 million lost souls.Can now be seen reflected in the howling faces and lungs of tyrannical leftists.As they jump and down with their pre
    printed signs,T-shirts and bullhorns.Much of what we are witnessing.Is bankrolled by only a few.{Soros,Gates,MSM etc,etc}Follow the money.Many of the so called “protesters”are rent a rioter for a day.

  5. We decry there is not a widespread cure for cancer! Where is the next great breakthrough in physics? it would be nice to see da Vinci successor! Have they all been ripped from their mothers womb?

  6. I love the way this article develops a coherent explanation of why truth is foundational to the human condition. Wonderful insights!

  7. Man in the age of high tech and virtual reality perceives persons as images on screens brought to focus or deleted at will, eradicated in violent war games, grotesque fantasy. It was inevitable that the reality of ‘birthing’ human life would become distorted by the imagination of the morally distorted.
    Roe v Wade 1973 was the miscarriage of the Sexual Revolution birthers and the culture of death recognized by John Paul II and Benedict XVI. Striking down Roe gives us breath again, suffering from the noxious fumes of the living dead [let the dead bury their dead]. Let the living in Christ restore life in all its richness and beauty, strength and goodness.

  8. Dobbs has floated a new regimen for abortion. How far Roe has been worked back, remains to be seen. Dobbs is a “strict construction” type decision and that is what Trump wanted.

    Meantime Trump has been forging ahead endorsing his type of political candidates for the legislatures.

    Further, Justice Roberts did not over-rule Roe and with the newly appointed Brown Jackson, there are five Justices who can practically regulate Roe through Dobbs. Or, overturn Dobbs.

    Or, distinguish Dobbs. Embellishing the lie.

    But abortion, however, is crime; and “regulating abortion” is crime also. Arguably all they’ve done is gone the next steps with the crime. Time will tell.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. On breaking a dominant lie – Via Nova Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.