
CNA Staff, Apr 1, 2020 / 07:01 pm (CNA).- As the British Parliament’s permissive abortion law takes effect in Northern Ireland, pro-life leaders strongly criticized the law, pointing to the coronavirus response as proof of the need to protect the lives of the most vulnerable.
“Every unborn baby matters regardless of age or ability, gender or background. He or she has the right to be protected in a community where everyone belongs and deserves our respect,” the Catholic bishops of Northern Ireland said March 31. “Every woman faced with an unplanned pregnancy matters too. She has a right to be cared for within a community where she is protected from any pressure to abort her baby.”
“As the number of deaths caused by Coronavirus continues to rise, news reporters frequently remind us that behind the statistics are real people. Their lives matter regardless of age or ability, gender or background,” said the bishops, noting the heavy government investment in treating patients and protecting medical staff.
“Against this background, we are saddened and dismayed at the Government’s decision to introduce extreme regulations for the delivery of abortion services in Northern Ireland,” they said, citing an “overwhelming will” among the people of the region to “protect the life of every human being.’
Previously, Northern Ireland’s laws only permitted abortion in cases where a woman’s life is at risk, or where there is a permanent or serious risk to her mental or physical health. Backers of the law said it had saved over 100,000 lives by avoiding the permissive law that took effect in other parts of the United Kingdom in 1967.
The new law and accompanying regulations took effect March 31. They mean no explicit legal protections for unborn children up to 12 weeks into pregnancy, compared to legal abortion allowed up to 24 weeks in other parts of the U.K. In some respects the law is more permissive than the rest of the U.K.
Doctors, registered nurses, and registered midwives may perform abortions under the rules. In situations where pregnancy is believed to risk a woman’s physical or mental health, abortion is legal up to 24 weeks. There is no time limit where the pregnancy is deemed a risk to the life of the mother or in cases where the unborn child is deemed to have a fatal abnormality or a substantial risk of severe mental or physical impairment.
The Northern Ireland pro-life group Precious Life has focused on the responses to the government’s late 2019 consultation on the new abortion law. About 79% of respondents voiced opposition to any abortion in Northern Ireland.
Bernadette Smyth, director of Precious Life, said, “thousands of pro-life people throughout Northern Ireland responded in total opposition to a change in the law.”
“Yet, we have seen this week, that the U.K. Government are willing to ignore the results of its own consultation because they are so bloodthirsty and devoted to destroying and killing human lives through abortion in Northern Ireland, even at a time of unprecedented national crisis,” Smyth continued. “People are outraged, upset and hugely frustrated that their democratic voice has been ignored.”
“It is horrifying to learn that one of the most permissive, extreme and inhumane abortion regimes in Europe will be introduced to Northern Ireland by the British Government,” she said. “This is in spite of the fact that our elected representatives returned to Stormont in January and at a time when the U.K. has been brought to its knees by the Coronavirus pandemic.”
“And right in the middle of a national crisis, when people in Northern Ireland and across the world are uniting under the shared understanding that all human life is precious and must be protected, the British Government are still intent on killing and destroying innocent and vulnerable human life in Northern Ireland,” she said.
The Catholic bishops too said the consultation process had been “utterly ignored.”
While Precious Life is circulating petitions asking legislators to repeal the abortion provisions, the bishops said members of the Northern Ireland assembly have some influence. However, their remarks suggested repeal would be very difficult.
Politicians and others opposed to the regulations should not “meekly acquiesce to their promulgation,” they said. Where the regulations exceed the 2019 Act of Parliament, legislators can repeal them.
The traditionally Protestant and pro-U.K. Democratic Unionist Party also criticized the new abortion law.
Paul Givan, DUP Member of the Northern Ireland Assembly said they were “the most extreme, radical, abortion laws anywhere in Europe.”
“It is a travesty that this has been allowed to happen,” he said, objecting that the laws were introduced despite the return of devolved government to Stormont.
While abortion is typically a devolved issue of local control, the British Parliament legislation was passed during an absence of a local government. The parties of the Northern Ireland Assembly could have blocked the law from taking effect, but failed to reach any governing agreement due to a dispute between the two leading governing parties, the DUP and the second-largest party, the nationalist Sinn Fein. The nationalist Social Democratic Labour Party also walked out of a final critical meeting.
Besides the Catholic bishops, leaders in the Church of Ireland, the Methodist Church in Ireland, the Presbyterian Church in Ireland, and the Irish Council of Churches had called on the Northern Ireland Assembly to reconvene to block the abortion legislation.
The nationalist parties traditionally draw support from Northern Ireland’s Catholics. Sinn Fein has turned towards backing legal abortion, while some SDLP leaders have made comments welcoming the changes.
Caoimhe Archibald, a Sinn Féin MLA, said it was “only right and proper that woman can access abortion services without having to travel, that they are free to be able to have healthcare in a modern and compassionate way”.
Among the nationalist critics of the new regime is Peadar Tóibín, leader of the new political party Aontú.
“The right to life is a human right. It is the most important human right that anyone of us have. With out the right to life no other human right can be guaranteed,” he said April 1.
“The current crisis has seen society radically change its behavior, to protect the lives of the most vulnerable. This is something that we in Aontú have always understood,” he said. Sometimes we all have to limit our personal choice and autonomy to protect the lives of others. The slogan ‘my body, my choice’ rings particularly hollow now when we realize that in reality we are all in this together.”
Tóibín cited the Sinn Féin Mayor of Belfast’s statement in response to the coronavirus pandemic that “Every Life Matters.”
“The hypocrisy is breathtaking,” he said. “The abortion law that Sinn Féin helped introduce will directly end thousands of live.”
Tóibín was deputy whip of Sinn Fein’s delegation to the Republic of Ireland legislative body known as the Dail, and still holds a seat in that body. However, he was pushed out from the party over his support for the unborn and opposition to legal abortion. Like the nationalist party Sinn Fein, Aontú competes in both the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, which is part of the United Kingdom.
He charged that the Westminster-based Parliament, Sinn Féin and the SDLP leadership had “forced abortion on demand into the north of Ireland against the wishes of the people.”
“I say forced, because every opinion poll in the north stated that the majority of men and women sought that the issue of abortion would be decided, not in London but in the north of Ireland. It was not just public opinion that held this view. Legally it was a devolved matter. It was for the elected representatives of the north to decide,” he said.
He objected that Sinn Féin had rejected its nationalist stand against British legislation in Ireland and had instead “openly lobbied for Westminster to legislate for abortion on demand in the north.”
“For the first time in 200 years of republicanism, its leadership went cap in hand to London and demanded that it legislate for Ireland over the heads and against the will of the people,” he charged.
Across all Ireland, pro-life advocates have voiced concern about possible changes to government policy to allow at-home abortions using abortion pills during the coronavirus pandemic.
Pressure to legalize abortion in Northern Ireland increased after a 2018 referendum effectively legalized abortion in the Republic of Ireland by a vote of over 66% in favor of removing constitutional protections recognizing the unborn baby’s right to life as equal to the mother’s.
The new law also requires the recognition of same-sex marriage in Northern Ireland.
[…]
Birds of a feather…
Only to the heterodox…
A prophet, indeed — a false prophet.
“The Martini Curve should indeed make us think. I thought about it at the time and ended up with questions rather than answers. What, precisely, was the Church two hundred years behind? A western culture come unglued from the deep truths of the human condition? A culture that celebrates the imperial autonomous Self? A culture that detaches sex from love and responsibility? A culture that breeds a politics of immediate gratification and inter-generational irresponsibility? Why on earth would the Church want to catch up with that? Call me a dullard, but try as I might to adjust my thinking, I’m afraid that’s what I still think about the allegation that Catholicism’s contemporary failures result from our being stuck in a rut behind the curve of history” (George Weigel Denver Catholic 1.8. 2020).
Weigel’s instincts were correct. Cardinal Carlo Martini SJ was ahead of his time [and space] envisioning a Church unlike anything that preceded. Archbishop Bergoglio considered Martini his mentor. What Martini envisioned for a Church 200 years behind Francis is achieving in hypersonic transit.
When previously held eternal truth [tightly held by the unfavorably impressed], revealed once and forever by the Son of God suddenly becomes as relevant as a moth eaten rug we’re reminded of the words of the Apostle, Whoever preaches a Gospel other than what you have received, be he an angel of light’ let him be anathema. Cardinal Czerny SJ doesn’t seem to see the difference.
Some time ago I read Martini’s booklet meditations /retreat based on themes and reflections from David (OT King). I would use Pope Francis’ phrase incurvatus to describe the experience. My impression was, he was leading – teaching – a “turned in” spirit. I think there’s a way of dwelling too much on one’s own being and that it can happen that it ends up being guided; and Martini was one such guide.
I am not an expert nor have I any training. Maybe it is suited to the feminine psyche but not the masculine. I suspect however that my proposed distinction would not salvage the thing for authentic spiritual direction that made one so absorbed.
Mind you, if I had a vision or something like that I would accept that it would command my attention. But just transposing David’s religious encounters into shared “spiritual” feelings is not going to transfix me. Jolly sorry.
My other impression of the ideas from his retreat, is, his presentation of David outside the Incarnational reality; and/or, the presentation of David as archetype of Incarnational reality. With my question why I should I have to solve that, nagging me all the way through the reading!
Besides that Martini had strange ideas about conception and about homosexuality; which went un-redressed until he died.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15056623-david
https://web.archive.org/web/20061207144612/http://www.chiesa.espressonline.it/dettaglio.jsp?id=53021&eng=y
https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2014/02/24/cardinal-burke-francis-asks-people-to-put-aside-obstacles-and-to-welcome-christ-without-any-excuse-into-their-lives/
A Martini is two drinks away from a Montini. Both are ____________ fill-in-the-blank with the correct multiplechoice answer. The cocktail bar beckons.
A couple of years ago the English and Italian and I think Spanish parts of ZENIT stopped publishing but the French and Arabic continued. ZENIT is publishing in English and Spanish once more but the Italian is still at a stall. Another problem with ZENIT is that -at least for my location,- the Google search does not return the main links; instead giving links to fb, dud lead-pages, past pages and so forth. Also going between pages, ads jump in and freeze the screen, it’s very trying. Someone should look into it and make things work well. ZENIT news is often unique plus the articles reveal the atmosphere surrounding the Curia, it is an important resource.
I would note that there used to be SOME REALLY GOOD JOURNALISTS with ZENIT. Where have they gone?
Today in the Arabic section there is a report of the spontaneous interview the Holy Father gave to Spotify, apparently the first week of this month. This led me to the original ZENIT report of it in the English section, July 7, that I had missed. The English page says there is a link to the audio but I can’t find it anywhere.
‘ In regard to the myth that the Pope escapes and goes around the streets, the Holy Father said: “It’s not true,” adding that “the one who did so was Saint John Paul II; he found a way. He liked to ski and 100 kilometers from here it’s possible to ski, and he used to do so. He went with his ski cap and covered his face and no one recognized him; he skied a while and then came back. And in the summer there is nothing here.”
Pope Francis explained again why he changed to his present residence in Santa Marta, and added that on Sundays he eats with the Vatican’s employees. He also said that he is reading a book-interview with the late Jesuit and former Archbishop of Milan, Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini.
The full interview can be heard at this link. ‘
https://zenit.org/2022/07/07/pope-francis-on-spotify-first-interview-on-a-podcast-the-one-who-escaped-from-the-vatican-was-saint-john-paul-ii/
https://ar.zenit.org/2022/07/21/%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a8%d8%a7%d8%a8%d8%a7-%d8%a3%d9%88%d9%91%d9%84-%d9%85%d9%8e%d9%86-%d9%87%d8%b1%d8%a8-%d9%85%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%81%d8%a7%d8%aa%d9%8a%d9%83%d8%a7%d9%86-%d9%83%d8%a7%d9%86-%d8%a7%d9%84/
2012, Robert McClory of NCR was agreeing that Martini was a prophet. He makes a parallel with the context of story of Nicholas Copernicus and Galileo Galilei.
McClory does not resolve issues I identified above; and moreover I wouldn’t place the story of the sciences working through evidences, with the story of Martini.
‘ Was he reaching out to some like-minded colleagues from within the institution, even in the upper reaches of the Vatican, who, like him, have grown weary of the endless retrenchment, the reform of the reform and the insistent papal drumbeat of gloom and negativity? Was Martini hoping for a fearless Galileo, or maybe several, for this age and in this dire situation? God knows, at some point and at some time, there has to be a breakthrough and a sharp turn in the direction of the institutional Catholic church.
May Carlo Maria Martini live on as a prophet of the coming new age. ‘
https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/what-was-cardinal-martini-thinking