Chicago, Ill., Jun 26, 2018 / 02:15 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The religious superior of Fr. C. Frank Phillips, former pastor of St. John Cantius Parish in Chicago, recommended last month that Chicago’s archbishop permit the priest to return to public ministry, CNA has learned.
In a May 21 communique to Cupich obtained by CNA, the priest’s superior recommended that Fr. Phillips “should not return to the parish as its pastor,” but supported the possibility that Phillips might exercise priestly ministry in some other setting.
Phillips, 68, has been accused of misconduct involving adult men. He was removed as pastor of St. John Cantius March 16, and prohibited from public ministry in the Archdiocese of Chicago by Cardinal Blase Cupich.
Since then, Fr. Scott Thelander, SJC, has served as parish administrator ad interim.
Fr. Phillips, who is canonically a member of the Congregation of the Resurrection, had served at St. John Cantius parish since 1988.
In 1998, Phillips founded the Canons Regular of St. John Cantius, with the approval of Cardinal Francis George of Chicago and Resurrectionists.
The Archdiocese of Chicago forwarded unspecified allegations to the Resurrectionists in March.
The allegations were investigated by an independent review board organized by the Resurrectionists, and by provincial leaders. The results of that investigation were forwarded to the Archdiocese of Chicago by Fr. Gene Szarek, superior of the USA province of the Resurrectionists, along with his own proposal for a resolution.
Szarek sent on May 21 a “votum”- an official opinion- to the Archdiocese of Chicago, in response to the findings of the review board. CNA has obtained a copy of that votum, which did not specify the nature of the allegations made against Phillips.
Citing “a certain amount of ambiguity between the allegations of the accusers and the testimony of witnesses, including Fr. Phillips himself,” Szarek said he would instruct Fr. Phillips to undergo a psychological evaluation, “and possible sensitivity training in the very near future.”
Fr. Szarek said further that Fr. Phillips should not return to St. John Cantius Parish as its pastor, considering both his age “and out of respect for the Cardinal’s own preference.”
The superior also wrote that it “seems fair and just to restore the canonical faculties of Fr. Phillips” because “no civil or ecclesiastical crime had been established.”
He noted that Fr. Phillips’ accusers “thought that his removal from the parish was all that they desired.”
Fr. Szarek also wrote that since Fr. Phillips is founder of the Canons Regular of St. John Cantius, “the ideal would be his restoration as their superior general.”
The Canons Regular are incardinated in the Chicago archdiocese, and their assignments are made by the Archbishop of Chicago, Fr. Szarek noted, so “there is no fear that Fr. Phillips could possibly interfere in some way” with the archbishop’s decisions.
“The historical reality of his being the Founder and his ongoing provision of spiritual leadership would be salutary for all,” Fr. Szarek stated, adding that Fr. Phillips “would obviously not reside” at St. John Cantius Parish.
“If the above recommendation is unfeasible, then at least he and the Canons should not be prevented from communication.” A prohibition on communication between Phillips and the Canons Regular had not previously been reported.
Despite Fr. Szarek’s proposal, Cardinal Cupich declined to allow Fr. Phillips to minister publicly. Ordinarily, a priest prohibited from public ministry is able to celebrate Mass only in private, and not able to hear confessions or celebrate other sacraments, unless a person is in immediate danger of death.
“We accept the Archdiocese’s decision that Fr. Phillips’ faculties for public ministry will remain withdrawn and that he not return as pastor of St John Cantius and as Superior of the Canons Regular of St. John Cantius,” Fr. Szarek wrote in a June 24 letter to the parishioners of St. John Cantius parish.
Paula Waters, a spokeswoman for the Archdiocese of Chicago, told the Chicago Tribune June 25 that though Fr. Phillips had not been found to have violated civil or canon law, there was other information that justified barring him from exercising public ministry.
“There are standards for behavior,” Waters told the Tribune.
Stating that the review board recommended that Fr. Phillips not return to St. John Cantius as pastor “and on other factors, the cardinal decided that his faculties to minister would remain withdrawn,” she said.
When asked about the removal of Fr. Phillips’ faculties, a Chicago archdiocese spokeswoman told CNA June 26 only that “it was recommended that Fr. Phillips not return to ministry at St. John Cantius” in the Resurrectionists’ investigation report.
In his letter informing the St. John Cantius community of Cardinal Cupich’s decision, Fr. Szarek wrote: “While we know this news will disappoint some of Fr. Phillips’ supporters, we hope everyone will come to understand that this process was conducted with prayerful deliberation and sincere compassion.”
Protect our Priests, a group formed to support and assist Fr. Phillips had issued a statement June 20 saying that Fr. Phillips had been “exonerated”, saying the review board “concluded that Fr. Phillips has not violated any secular criminal, civil or canon law.”
Protect our Priests stated that the review board, consisting of three leaders from the Chicago area who are not members of St. John Cantius parish, interviewed “the detractors and several witnesses, persons who personally know the accusers, and other individuals who came forward to testify in defense of Father Phillips’ integrity.”
The group added that Cardinal Cupich had directed that members of the Canons Regular of St. John Cantius not be interviewed by the board.
The group stated June 20 that “We … remain confident that in this process, justice and truth will prevail over the mendacity, falsehoods, spitefulness and malevolent connivance from which this unpleasant episode originates; and that the accusers, who recklessly have besmirched their own reputations in this matter, will too choose to make themselves ‘free’, by each of them individually presenting an unconditional retraction.”
St. John Cantius parish was founded in 1892 by the Congregation of the Resurrection, according to the church’s website, and each of its pastors has been a member of that congregation.
[…]
According to Abp. Wenski’s own phrasing of Gov. DeSantis’ statement, “he described any comparison of unaccompanied minors from Cuba in the early 60’s with those from Central America today as ‘disgusting’”.
Then the archbishops says “no child should be deemed ‘disgusting’ — especially by a public servant.”
What public servant did, Your Excellency? Certainly not Gov. DeSantis – by your own omission. He was addressing the “parallel,” which many Floridians of Cuban heritage find contemptible.
Clearly Abp. Wenski is passionate about his advocacy, but he would likely deem it unjust if DeSantis were to twist the archbishop’s statements in like manner.
On the same subject, though: Like many Floridians, DeSantis opposes the Biden Administration’s funding with millions of taxpayer dollars the contracts that go to Catholic NGO’s to traffick the illegals throughout the country after they arrive.
Last Tuesday was the USCCB’s Day of Prayer for Trafficking Victims.
I have asked Abp. Wenski please to condemn the international Coyote drug-sex-gun-and-human traffickers who bring hundreds of thousands of illegals to the Catholic NGO’s at the border. No reply as yet – and not one other US bishop, not even the “good” ones, will do so either.
And they won’t condemn Biden, either.
These criminal Coyote abusers charge $5,000 per head (yes, like cattle) to rob them, assault them even rape them on the way to the border. If the illegal is caught and sent home, he/she doesn’t get a refund.And yet, they are the “silent partners” of the Catholic NGO’s, lawyers, and contractors that profit (check the salaries) from their crimes.
Archbishop Wenski decries a comment Desantis never made. Perhaps he would like to apologize for his deliberate distortion of what the Governor actually said. After that, he can repent of his advocacy of immigration policies that are ruining this country.
Yet more unrealistic and otherworldly comments from a high churchman who lives in a freely provided house with no worries about money and paying the bills.Reality seems incomprehensible to some of these folks. Here’s a reality check. There are many things the US can apparently no longer provide for its people: law and order, modern school buildings, mental health care for those who live on the streets, housing for our homeless. There are other issues, such as the pot holes in the roads we seem unable to fix. Fixing these things takes MONEY. All of these issues are worsened by unlimited illegal immigration. Minors or adults, the net effect is the same. These people are costing us money we no longer have.They need food, housing, medical care, education, etc. The planet contains BILLIONS of poor, and the US CANNOT accept and care for all of them. It really is that simple. This is the truth, whether or not the churchmen like it. Attempting to turn it into a racial issue, moral failing, or anything like it, is simply spreading a lie.
It is amazing how many bishops, including this one, are ignorant of human trafficking of illegal minors, and supportive of violating US immigration laws. For shame.
I wonder why so many (it seems like it could be a great majority) of the “unaccompanied” turn out to be males in their late teens and twenties. Are they truly “unaccompanied” if they are being guided across the border by Coyotes and shady NGOs like Catholic Charities? Many of the “unaccompanied minors” are soon reunited with their parents who are already here or will be coming soon. This suggests that their travels are not acts or desperation, but carefully planned criminal conspiracies. Many of the “unaccompanied” are sex traffickers or their victims. Many of them and their escorts are bringing in drugs that are killing tens of thousands every year. Perhaps the bishops and their cronies will one day address specifics rather than just mouthing leftist platitudes.
I’m reading this article in tandem with the one on CatholicVote’s efforts to get some facts. The leftist platitudes are less than helpful.
Why is grossly obese, black-leather-clad motorcycle “hog”-riding, Latin Mass-suppressing limousine liberal Wenski fawningly referred to in the headline of this odious article as the “Miami archbishop” while Governor DeSantis is demeaned as “DeSantis”? How typical of this FrancisBishop to twist Governor deSantis’ words to fit the open-borders globalist propaganda being shilled by Papa Pachamama and his Vatican Queeria.
I applaud the Archbishop’s comment. Disgusting is the word and meaning DiSantis said. Pushaw should apologize to the Archbishop. This isn’t political, it’s children’s lives.
Made a mistake, Pushaw, stop digging the hole you find yourself in.