Rome, Italy, Sep 24, 2021 / 13:00 pm (CNA).
An influential theologian considered to be close to Pope Francis has praised an alternative text for Germany’s controversial “Synodal Way.”
In a lecture delivered in Rome, Cardinal Walter Kasper offered support for a text presenting an alternative to a document endorsed by members of the Synodal Way dedicated to the way power is exercised in the Church.
He said that the Synodal Way text attempted “to reinvent the Church in the face of the crisis with the help of an erudite theological structure,” reported CNA Deutsch, CNA’s German-language news partner
“There is much that is correct in it, but also much that is hypothetical. In the end, many wonder whether all this is still entirely Catholic,” he commented.
He added that “some statements clearly deviate from the basic concerns of Vatican II,” including on the sacramental understanding of the Church and the episcopate.
The 88-year-old former president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity offered the critique in a lecture delivered on Sept. 17 and shared on Sept. 22 by the Diocese of Regensburg, southern Germany.
The Synodal Way is a multi-year process bringing together bishops and lay people to discuss four main topics: the way power is exercised in the Church; sexual morality; the priesthood; and the role of women.
The German bishops’ conference initially said that the process would end with a series of “binding” votes — raising concerns at the Vatican that the resolutions might challenge the Church’s teaching and discipline.
Bishops and theologians have expressed alarm at the process, which is expected to end in February 2022, but bishops’ conference chairman Bishop Georg Bätzing has vigorously defended it.
Bishop Rudolf Voderholzer of Regensburg presented the alternative text on a new website launched on Sept. 3.
The 36-page document, which has been translated into English and is called “Authority and responsibility,” is the first in a series that will also address the topics of the other three synodal forums.
The text was co-authored by Fr. Wolfgang Picken, dean of Germany’s federal city of Bonn, Marianne Schlosser, a theology professor in Vienna, Austria, journalist Alina Oehler, and Augsburg auxiliary Bishop Florian Wörner.
Kasper said that the alternative document “has a clear grounding in the Council, which we all should have in common.”
“It recognizes the open questions left by the Council and seeks to continue on the path of the Council on the secure ground of the Council,” he said.
“In doing so, it can show: It is not necessary to turn everything upside down. On the ground of the Council, one can go beyond the Council in the spirit of the Council without coming into conflict with the teachings of the Church. This is the way of the living tradition, the way of the Church.”
“It does not understand tradition as a daunting bulwark, but as an invitation to set out on the way of the Church and to be surprised by new insights.”
Kasper’s comments come as participants prepare to attend a plenary session of the Synodal Way in Frankfurt, southwestern Germany, on Sept. 30-Oct. 2. The event will be the second meeting of the Synodal Assembly, the supreme decision-making body of the Synodal Way.
The assembly consists of the German bishops, 69 members of the powerful lay Central Committee of German Catholics (Zdk), and representatives of other parts of the German Church.
Kasper said in June that he was “very worried” about the initiative’s direction.
“I have not yet given up hope that the prayers of many faithful Catholics will help to steer the Synodal Way in Germany on Catholic tracks,” he said.
In “Authority and responsibility,” the co-authors expressed concern about the direction of the Synodal Way.
“In the current debate on Church renewal, the necessity of which has become obvious through the abuse crisis, positions are often put forward whose contents have no secure connection with the reappraisal or prevention of abuse of power within the Church,” they wrote.
“Thus, the calls for the introduction of women’s ordination or the desire for a comprehensive adaptation of Church structures to the standards of modern democracies (especially with regard to the separation of powers), as well as doubts about the spiritual authority of the ordained ministry, the plea for its consistent desacralization or a far-reaching reorganization of the Church’s sexual morality are components of a reform agenda whose origins lie far before the abuse crisis and have only been secondarily associated with it.”
They continued: “Such a conflation of interests does not serve the serious concern with which the Synodal Path was begun and brings with it the danger of new divisions within the German Church as well as in its relationship with the Vatican and the universal Church…”
“If the hope is raised that majority votes of a German synodal assembly could lead to changes in official Church doctrine and universal canon law or at least legitimize a German Sonderweg (special path) in questions of the doctrine of faith and morals, the end result threatens to be a potentiation of the energy-sapping frustration that has already been associated for decades with the struggle for radical reforms in the Catholic Church.”
Pope Francis addressed fears about the trajectory of the Synodal Way in an interview with the Spanish radio station COPE aired on Sept. 1.
Asked if the initiative gave him sleepless nights, the pope recalled that he wrote an extensive letter that expressed “everything I feel about the German synod.”
Responding to the interviewer’s comment that the Church had faced similar challenges in the past, he said: “Yes, but I wouldn’t get too tragic either. There is no ill will in many bishops with whom I spoke.”
“It is a pastoral desire, but one that perhaps does not take into account some things that I explain in the letter that need to be taken into account.”
In June 2019, Pope Francis sent a 19-page letter to German Catholics, urging them to focus on evangelization in the face of a “growing erosion and deterioration of faith.”
“Every time an ecclesial community has tried to get out of its problems alone, relying solely on its own strengths, methods, and intelligence, it has ended up multiplying and nurturing the evils it wanted to overcome,” he wrote.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Voderholzer [Regensberg] is one of the few outspoken orthodox German bishops, Cardinal Kasper has been far more progressive in what seems an anomaly in Kasper’s support of Bishop Voderholzer’s alternative text an apparent curriculum based on Vat II designed to remain consistent with tradition, seemingly likened to Benedict’s hermeneutic of continuity. I say seemingly since preliminary proposals are just that, not the end product. Pope Francis when asked about the direction of the German bishops conference and chairman Bätzing said coyly, everything is in his letter to them implying displeasure. Although somewhat in discontinuity, “Pope Francis encouraged us to continue on the Synodal Way, to discuss the questions at hand openly and honestly, and to come up with recommendations for change (Bätzing). Voderholzer’s involvement is certainly welcome for those of us who are committed to a true hermeneutic of continuity. Rather than appear skeptical I’ll be cynical and offer the suggestion that Cardinal Kasper’s remarkable embrace of orthodox concern with tradition, the Pontiff’s coyness over his almost secretive letter to the German bishops and the German response leaves the impression of Byzantine preempting the disintegration of the German Synodal Way because of a too radical format [and to be quite cynical to insure the success of the Synodal Way as the model for the Endless Synod of all synods Journey]. In that now mushrooming letter the Pope continued, “to come up with recommendations for a change in the way the Church acts”. From the start, Amazonia and its journey to Germany and the Synodal Way there appeared a proving ground in the making for something vastly wider.
Has Cdl. Kasper seen the light??
Hoping here that Cardinal KASPER has “seen the light,” but also recalling his disjointing two-hour introduction to the synod on Amoris Laetitia, much of which was bubble-wrapped and compressed into Chapter 8 and its fatal footnote #351 (later questioned in the dubia, still hanging…).
So, wondering if the German OUTCOME will be a combined final product, diluted and still deluded, and forwarded as a hodgepodge consensus? An all-to-familiar game, whether Kasper now wants it or not. Marginalize the bigoted and so-called conservatives, and move on, undeterred. To set the clock right is to go “backward”! Move those goal posts!
As a needed reality-check for ALL of synodality, the Church might actually consider Cardinal Sarah’s “The Power of Silence: Against the Dictatorship of Noise” (2017). In the short Afterword, Pope Emeritus Benedict writes:
“…What does it mean: to hear Jesus’s silence and to know him through silence? We know from the Gospels that Jesus frequently spent nights alone ‘on the mountain’ in prayer, in conversation with the Father. We know that his speech, his word, comes from silence and could mature only there. So it stands to reason that his word can be correctly understood only if we, too, enter into his silence, if we learn to hear it from his silence.”
This silence between the Son and the Father is a quite different kind of SILENCE than the silent and invertebrate response to the dubia. But, as Pope Francis explains, synodal “decentralization” still assumes Christ at the center. So, of the forthcoming synodal words and “resolutions”—-based on “listening to the Holy Spirit—-this time, on which flip-chart will we find the silence?
How exactly will the two-year synodal compendium, and its flawless summarization (!!!), not marginalize (or worse) the apostolic and living Church’s Magisterium of past TRINITARIAN listening?
It’s a set of temptations, really.
“At first, Kasper denied saying what was attributed to him. As it turns out, he said what was attributed to him. …..
…..
We now know he said what he denied saying. The recording proves it. Either his words mean what they seem to mean or they mean something else.”
https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2014/10/17/questioning-cardinal-kasper-five-points/