What is going on in the Church in America? Is She singing a swan song, or is She rising again from the ashes like the legendary phoenix?
In the spirit of legendary Yankee catcher Yogi Berra, who said, “When you come to a fork in the road, take it,” allow me to answer the latter question with a firm “Yes.”
On the side of Catholic decline-and-dying, many dioceses have made stunning announcements of parish closures and consolidations over the last few years. The most recent news in the Archdiocese of Dubuque was particularly dire. The diocese, which counts around 182,000 Catholics, has announced that its current 163 parishes will be reorganized into 24 “pastorates.” Practically speaking, there will be no regular Masses at 84 of the parishes.
Given the priestly numbers (69 active diocesan and 23 religious priests), some may be tempted to say this is just a matter of an Iowan clerical shortage. In reality, there is also a laity shortage. Nor is it just in Dubuque.
The Pew Research Center has reported for years that the number of people coming into the Church is tiny compared to the number going out (meaning formally leaving the Catholic Church by switching to other Christian groups or leaving Christian faith altogether). For years, their Religious Landscape Study showed the ratio at 6.5 people leaving for each one person entering. In their 2023-24 edition, released earlier this year, this ratio was calculated at 8.4 leaving for each one entering.
Add to this the fact that, even among those still identifying as Catholics, the numbers receiving sacraments, including the sacrament of marriage, have tumbled. The most recent edition of Georgetown’s Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA) “Frequently Requested Statistics” chart shows data from 1965 to 2025. The declines from 1965 are truly stunning and catastrophic. For instance, in 1965, 1.237 million infants were baptized and over 347 thousand marriages were celebrated in the U.S. By 2025, those numbers were around 472 thousand and 107 thousand, respectively.
Those declines did not simply happen in the late 1960s maelstrom, either. Even in 2015, there were still 693 thousand infant baptisms and 148 thousand marriages. The Church in America has been shrinking and shrinking quickly in absolute numbers.
That’s why, when the news stories of conversions in numbers greater than anyone has seen in the last two decades started to hit around Easter time, many people cast a skeptical eye at them. How could the Church really be taking in so many people?
Even in publications not notably sympathetic to the Catholic Church, the titles were unusually exuberant about a development most of their staff were unlikely to approve personally. The New York Times published a piece titled “Roman Catholic Churches See a Surge of Converts.” A 60 Minutes episode used the “r” word in its episode “Catholic conversions rising: Inside the Catholic Church’s quiet revival.”
Intriguingly, many publications highlighted the fact that this surge, revival even, was not simply hordes of unwashed masses trudging off to Mass to numb their poor, uneducated, and uncool lives. One article blared, “NYC’s Hottest New Club Is Catholic Mass.” There, author Brea O’Donnell painted Catholicism in the Big Apple as less Calvary and more Calvin Klein: “Packed pews. Standing room only. 20-and-30-somethings and beyond in their prettiest spring dresses and young men in pressed collared shirts and button-downs, lingering long after the service ends to talk, laugh, and swap Instagram handles. It’s an energy that’s warm and intoxicating… even without the bottomless mimosas.”
That article appeared in Evie, a magazine founded by Catholics and styling itself as a “conservative Cosmo,” so we might see a bit of special pleading. Pro-Catholic bias or not, they must have been reporting somewhat accurately since the Washington Post itself highlighted not only the numbers of people coming into the Church but also their extraordinarily young, good-looking, hip, and even male make-up in an article titled “Why Catholicism is drawing in Gen Z men.” The subtitle of the article is probably pretty accurate in its assessment of motives for seeking Christ’s Church: “Young men in their 20s and 30s are increasingly drawn to the Catholic Church as they seek truth, beauty and, yes, girlfriends.”
Indeed, something is happening. Nor is this merely a phenomenon of young, good-looking Manhattanites—or even just the young and good-looking anywhere. You may find this writer impious to have spent so much time on social media on Easter Sunday, but be assured that he spent a lot of time typing “Welcome home! Deo gratias!” to countless individuals around the country announcing their reception into the Church. That was after attending the Easter Vigil at his own parish, where 31 catechumens were baptized and confirmed, while another dozen or so candidates were confirmed.
When the dust—or, rather, the incense—cleared, an awful lot of newly minted Catholics were visible. An analysis by the prayer app Hallow showed a 38% increase from 2025 in the number of catechumens and candidates confirmed, with some dioceses such as Duluth and Pittsburgh recording growth exceeding 100%. Jonathan Liedl, managing editor of the National Catholic Register, predicted that when all the numbers are counted, 2026 might have seen around 160 thousand adults received—more people than were received in 2005!
How can both trends be happening at the same time? The answer is probably obvious to most Catholics who have been around for a while. When we talk about people formally “leaving the Church,” we are generally talking about people who were not really in it much in the first place. Many were CEO (Christmas Easter Only) Catholics at best. They were often neither evangelized nor catechized within their families and their parishes. Is it any surprise that they now consider themselves something other than Catholic? Or even nothing?
To be clear, even baptized Catholics who never darken the Church’s door are still Catholics. We take Christ at His word, accepting that those baptized have had the very Divine Life poured into them, whether it has produced visible fruit or not.
For a very long time, the Church in America has been operating under the assumption that the Church’s internal institutions—for example, our local parishes—are what we believe the Church as the Body of Christ to be: immovable and destined to last forever. The dominant mindset in far too many parishes, schools, institutions, and even dioceses has been what I like to call Suburban Rite Catholicism.
What this term designates has nothing to do with the location of any particular parish. Beautiful old parishes in cities and small towns can have gorgeous stained glass and still be places where Suburban Rite Catholicism is dominant. The term indicates a faith that is stripped of the fullness, complication, and difficulty of real faith and life in Christ. While the words of the liturgy contain a path to the radical claims of Catholic faith wherever and whenever the Mass is celebrated, they are rarely preached, explained, or presented within that liturgy in a manner that is convincing and convicting. Too often, the end result is that Catholicism is presented as a generically moralistic and therapeutic faith attached to some dull rituals. Neither spiritual intimacy with Christ nor the intellectual depth of the Tradition is presented or sometimes even seen.
Those returning to the Church are often those who have discovered some of the elements of the faith outside the Church and have discovered that Christ in His fullness resides in the Catholic Church—even if this was not clear to them before. These reverts and many of the converts are often drawn to Catholicism by the great saints, thinkers, and artists of the Church.
What often tipped them over the edge, however, was discovering the faith presented to them in its full strength by people who believe and act as if they believe. They want to hear the truth. In a National Catholic Register article, Kayla Bartsch describes the appeal of those Manhattan parishes getting publicity as having less to do with hipness and more to do with truth. These parishes “take the cultural questions of our time as seriously as they take the metaphysical questions of all time, often illuminating how the latter hold the key to the former.”
Those entering the Church also want to see Catholicism’s beauty. In the Washington Post article, convert priest Fr. Dwight Longenecker reports that young men—and, presumably, young women—entering the Church want “very traditional worship with lots of incense and altar boys and sacred music in the traditional style.” “In other words,” he says, “they want it to look and sound Catholic.”
Just so. For now, the Church is dying—shrinking in terms of ultimate numbers. But, where Catholic life, preaching, and worship are blooming, the smaller numbers are still signs of true revival. Pray that the Lord would give us the strength to manifest Christ’s life so that others might seek it out.
(Editor’s note: This article appeared originally in The Catholic Servant and is reprinted with their kind permission.)
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

The great Yankee catcher–and theologian!–is quoted: “When you come to a fork in the road, take it.” Berra also said, “it ain’t over until it’s over,” or “it ain’t over until the fat lady sings,” or “it’s difficult to make predictions, especially about the future.”
But, regardless of any conflicting sets of numbers, overall is the Church in America hollow, when: “Neither spiritual intimacy with Christ nor the intellectual depth of the Tradition is presented or sometimes even seen” (Deavel)?
One may consider that one fork of the road is named Tradition, the alternate choice named Modernism. More than a fork in the road the shepherds of each are leading their flocks in mutually exclusive directions one conforming the world to God, the other conforming their god to the World. The real question may be from which of these two roads are Catholic abandoning and to which of the former Catholics returning. To be certain all Catholic formation in the 50sand 60s was conducted within one of these two camps, Traditional or Modern (Liberation Theologies). Those of us formed under the social justice, Liberation Theology (not Traditional) trying to find and return to Tradition realize how far we have come and yet how far we must yet go go be embrace by Traditionalists. May God have mercy on our souls.
What we have lost. The destruction of the great altars one of the most distressing but it is only the visible symbol of what we have lost. See a summary of what we have lost here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6Zd2p6LThU
Social Justice is as traditional Catholicism as one could get.
“Social justice” is nothing more than secularism. One of the great pillars of social justice is a “woman’s right to control her own body”, that is, free abortion at any time. I am quite certain defending abortion has nothing to do with Catholicism. Further, many of us who are white grew very weary of being accused of the sin of racism, of which many of us were not guilty. But then, accusing whites of many things was very hip in liberal social justice circles. One of the great problems the church has had since the 60’s has been clerics who mistake catholicism with social justice and socialism. It is NOT the same.
I seem to recall Jesus suggesting people “render to Caesar”, and then ALSO “render to God”. Its clear he was talking about two different things.
You might want to discuss your ideas with a qualified theologian. Or just read Rerum Novarum.
Or, you could simply look at the shrinking number of faithful over the last 5 decades or so and draw your own conclusions about how effective it was for Popes to begin to indulge in leftist political pronouncements. Clergy left in droves. Catholic churches are still closing every week. People go to church to connect to God. Not regurgitate what they hear on the news the other 6 days a week. That the last Pope was focused negatively on Trumps immigration policies while he patted pro-abortionists on the head and encouraged them to go to communion told me all I needed to know about the “social justice” crowd’s perspective. And now, the German Bishops stand on the edge of schism in an attempt to normalize homosexuality. No doubt the social justice crowd will be applauding.
The industrial revolution , while not perfect, was more responsible than anything else in lifting the vast majority of world populations out of poverty. I view the pronouncements of theologians the way I do those of Movie critics. In the main, I ignore them as having little to no practical value in the real world.
That’s true Miss Susanne but we sometimes confuse social work with religion. And social justice should be justice for every human being in every stage of life. No matter how weak or helpless.
This is a wonderfully hopeful message to be shared; thank you for writing, Professor Deavel! It also matches the trends that I’m seeing in my parish, too.
Very detailed and honest assessment of what is truly taking place in the Catholic Church at this time.
We can try to understand human nature historically as do philosophers Hegel et Al or we may better serve the question exploring known features of our human nature and what are the causes that initiate tendencies of behavior.
Although we can’t count Hegel as simply an historian. His formula thesis antithesis and synthesis are still visibly evident, “These parishes take the cultural questions of our time as seriously as they take the metaphysical questions of all time, often illuminating how the latter hold the key to the former” (Essayist David Paul Deavel). Our question then is whether much is Lost in Translation in this ongoing process exemplified by the Synodal equation.
A glaring question/objection is does the synthesis, here we can reconsider the Communio thought of Ratzinger, De Lubac, Balthasar – actually provide dividends other than the scholarly intellectual finding intellectual solace?
Deavel admits we’re in freefall while forming a faithful nucleus with a bright future. Although we’re at war with ourselves evident in the battle occurring in the current Chapp article ‘The SSPX is now on a clear and direct collision course with Rome’. That fray exemplifies the ongoing struggle occurring within the limits of canonical compliance.
Vatican II, New ideas are fine insofar as deeper intellectual understanding. Although let’s remember the vast majority are not, do not comprehend fine tuned intellectual concepts. What most perceive are vague ideas that don’t address their lived experience in this world and the enormous challenges to the Christian experience. Perhaps we should, insofar as practical like Wittgenstein when addressing the continued exploration of truth in the modern world, suggesting if it works, then “Leave the damned thing alone”.
AFCz, I very much appreciate the distinction that you make regarding Tradition and Modernism. You raise a very topical question as to what camps (unfortunate term that) people are moving into or out of. Perhaps a future CWR piece will take a deep dive into that.
As regards Catholic formation in the 50’s and 60’s, once the Holy Spirit led me to the TLM in 2007, I began to very quickly realize how poor was my Catholic education in the 60’s and 70’s. (Baltimore Catechism? What’s that?) In my 65 years I have never lapsed but until 2007 always felt like something was missing, particularly at the Novus Ordo Missae. I could not put my finger on it but once I discovered the beauty, richness and depth of our Catholic Church, I realized that there was no going back to the dismal Modernist experience I had endured all those years.
Regarding being embraced by Traditionalists, when I was a newbie to Tradition, I was embraced immediately. Thank you again for the very incisive distinction you make in the opening of your comment.
It might be instructive to query Cardinal David Axelrod about the state of the Catholic Church in America. After all, he does seem to be a close confidant of Pope Leo.
The Pilgrim Church is moving. And whatever is moving is living. Long live the Pilgrim Church.
Joseph Meynier above (11:10 a.m.) – Ah yes. The much-maligned Baltimore Catechism. I still remember why God made me.
I understand there is a newer version out.
You mentioned Fr. Dwight Longenecker in your article. A few years ago, he wrote an article about Ten Reasons Why the Pentecostals Are Whooping the Catholics. I believe the reason is that they have an experiential faith and not simply an intellectual one. Makes all the difference. Fr. John Randall STD found that out. You can read his experience of the Holy Spirit here: https://www.franciscanpenancelibrary2.com/baptized-in-the-spirit
Pope JPII described our situation as a time for the new evangelization which indicates that we are in the midst of the apostasy predicted by St. Paul in 2 Thess 2:3-10 where he predicts the victory of the Church by the effusion of the Holy Spirit. St. Peter described this event using the symbolism of fire in 2 Pet 3:7-10. Could not this sudden wave of conversions be a first sign of what is to come?
It will be a new Pentecost!