‘Heroes’ and ‘villains’: The history of Catholic college basketball and race relations

Loyola Chicago’s 1963 championship basketball team / Loyola University Chicago

Washington D.C., Mar 30, 2021 / 10:15 am (CNA).- In the history of Catholic college basketball and race, there are both “heroes” and “villains,” said one author of a new book on Catholic college basketball programs.

“There are Catholic heroes and Catholic villains in that story,” said John Gasaway, author of the book “Miracles on the Hardwood,” in an interview with CNA last week. Gasaway is also a college basketball analyst for ESPN.com, and his book focuses on the history of Catholic college basketball programs and their continued success.

Some Catholic college basketball programs were ahead of their time in accepting Black players in the 1950s and 1960s – enough to receive commendation from the African-American press, he noted.

“It wasn’t always a perfect history, but they [Catholic schools] did make the right decisions enough times to earn that reputation, and there are indeed some good stories to tell,” he said.

Gasaway spoke with CNA during the 2021 NCAA Division I men’s basketball tournament. Four of the teams that advanced to the tournament’s round of 16 were Catholic schools, although as of Tuesday morning only one Catholic program – Gonzaga University – had advanced to the “Elite Eight” round.

College basketball in the 20th century mirrored the overall transformation of America, especially in race relations – and at Catholic schools this was, in many ways, no different, he said.

The University of San Francisco, which is affiliated with the Jesuits, dominated basketball in the 1950s. The “Dons” were led by Black future hall-of-famers Bill Russell and K.C. Jones. Among college basketball programs, San Francisco was relatively “early” in integrating their lineup – although some Black athletes had already been playing at secular programs since the end of the 1930s, Gasaway explained in his book.

Nevertheless, schools like San Francisco and Duquesne, another Catholic university in Pittsburgh, were lauded by African-American publications for integrating their lineups, Gasaway noted.

Several years later, the Jesuit-affiliated Loyola University Chicago featured four Black starters on its 1963 championship team. Their road to the title included what has been billed as the “Game of Change,” a matchup with all-white southern powerhouse Mississippi State University.

Loyola’s opponent had to decline tournament participation three times in the previous four years because of a regional custom of refusing to play teams with Black players. The players, coach, and university president all wanted to play in the 1963 tournament, but state officials secured an injunction on the team leaving the state. The players and coaches sneaked out of the state and arrived at the tournament for their desired matchup with Loyola, who triumphed in the contest.

“It was a big deal, it led to a photo, and it encapsulated this image that Catholic programs were leading the way on this front. And again, they often did,” Gasaway said of Loyola University and race relations.

However, “that wasn’t true everywhere,” he added. “Mostly we focus on the good stories, but there were some laggards, even in the Catholic camp,” he said of programs integrating Black players.

The Jesuit schools Boston College and Georgetown University didn’t include a single Black basketball player until the mid-to-late sixties, “which is really late in the game, relatively speaking,” Gasaway said.

Georgetown’s delay in integrating its lineup “is highly-ironic to our eyes today, given its subsequent history on this front,” Gasaway noted.

One man would be responsible for changing the program’s trajectory.

Before he was a hall of fame coach at Georgetown University, John Thompson, a Black Catholic, was a successful college player and then coach at St. Anthony High School in Washington, D.C. When he interviewed to become Georgetown’s basketball coach in 1972, a skeptical Thompson asked the search committee why they would hire a Black coach – knowing they had no interest in him as a Black player in 1960.

Thompson was hired, and twelve years later, he hoisted an NCAA championship trophy during an impressive run of three title game appearances in four years. He guided the program to 24 straight postseason appearances and was known for recruiting Black players – so much so that young viewers of games in the 1980s thought the school was a historically-black university.

“If Thompson could hear that, he would laugh long and hard, because he himself – being from the District – he referred to Georgetown as ‘that white school up on the hill’,” Gasaway noted.

“So the transformation he wrought was wondrous, it was dramatic. And he’s quite a figure in the game.”

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

1 Comment

  1. When I was a senior at Loyola High of Baltimore in 1961 we had a really good basketball team and if memory serves the team was entered into a Catholic tournament of some sort and even then John Thompson had quite a reputation. We didn’t go far in the tournament and Thompson’s team won, if memory serves. (This was 60 years ago so my memory is a bit dim)

    Which brings us of course to Lew Alcindor, who was a student at Powell Memorial in New York City. He was pretty good too.

    I also remember living in Boston when Patrick Ewing was by the most coveted prospect in the country, and he wound up under the wing of Thompson at Georgetown.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. ‘Heroes’ and ‘villains’: The history of Catholic college basketball and race relations – Via Nova Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.