Vatican City, Oct 26, 2019 / 03:45 pm (CNA).- The Amazon synod final document, published Saturday, laid out the need to define “ecological sins” while calling the Church to walk new paths of “integral conversion.”
“We propose to define ecological sins of commission or omission against God, one’s neighbor, the community and the environment,” paragraph 82 of the final document states. “They are sins against future generations and are manifest in acts and habits of pollution and destruction of the harmony of the environment.”
“No believer, no Catholic can live their life of faith without listening to the voice of the earth,” Bishop David Martínez de Aguirre Guinea, apostolic vicar of Puerto Maldonado, Peru explained at a press conference to present the final document Oct. 26.
“If we are going to face the problem, then we have to change,” Cardinal Michael Czerny, special secretary for the synod, added.
Czerny, who also serves as under-secretary of the Migrants and Refugees Section of the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, warned that the “good news” will not necessarily reach people in the Amazon “if we continue doing what we have been doing.”
The final document for the Synod of Bishops on the Pan-Amazon region calls for a new four-fold expression of “integral conversion” for the Church in the Amazon: pastoral, cultural, synodal, and ecological. These are framed in terms of “new paths of conversion” in the chapter titles for each of the subjects.
“New paths” are a way of saying “change,” Czerny said. “Without conversions, we are repeating what we have done before …but there is no real change.”
“We have brought our tradition into play so that we can find a way forward,” he said. For the pope, the most important necessary change is “pastoral change.”
The 33-page document, was approved article by article by a two-thirds majority vote on Oct. 26. It is the result of a three-week meeting in Rome during which the synod’s 181 voting members, together with representatives from indigenous communities, religious orders, lay groups and charities, discussed a range of issues concerning the region, spread across nine countries.
In ordinary sessions of the Synod of Bishops, delegates are elected by the world’s bishops conferences. In the special session for the pan-Amazonian region, all attendees were by special invitation.
The document was drafted by a committee of experts and special secretaries, assisted by a drafting committee elected from among the synod fathers. The draft text was presented to the assembly on Friday night, and various amendments were proposed and debated during the approval process.
The final synodal document has no teaching or binding authority of its own.
Pope Francis said in his closing remarks in the synod hall on Saturday that he will write a post-synodal exhortation, to hopefully be published before the end of the year.
Ecological Conversion
In addition to the synod document’s proposal to change universal Church discipline on clerical celibacy and create new roles for women, it also contains strong exhortations on environmental issues and the rights of indigenous peoples.
On the topic of integral ecology and the environment, the document references the threat of exploitation of the Amazon and its peoples.
It also criticizes as “scandalous” the criminalization of Amazonian ethnic communities whose rights are threatened, it says, by public policies favoring the exploitation of natural resources.
These projects “exert pressure on ancestral indigenous territories” and are accompanied by “widespread impunity throughout regarding human rights violations.”
The document notes the Church’s teaching on the inviolability of the human person, which is created in the image and likeness of God.
The synod fathers propose giving support to “fair” sustainable development initiatives, though it does not name specific initiatives.
“The Amazon is in the hands of us all, but it depends mainly on immediately abandoning the current model that is destroying the forest, not bringing well-being and endangering this immense natural treasure and its guardians,” the report states.
It goes on to say it is “incumbent” on the Church to help protect the Amazon by being an “ally” of the local communities, “who know how to take care of the Amazon, how to love and protect it.”
The indigenous peoples are “asking the church to become their ally and the answer of the church is yes,” Czerny said.
“With the Amazon burning, many more people are realizing that things have to change. We cannot keep repeating old responses to urgent problems,” Czerny said. “The ecological crisis is so deep that if we don’t change we won’t make it.”
Czerny said that environmental scientists and other experts who audited the synod helped the bishops to understand “the planet suffering” because “they drove scientific facts home in a way that we can feel them.”
The Canadian cardinal said that people want “a plastic solution” that is not going to affect their lives and not require them to change, but he stressed that it does not exist and conversion is required.
The synod document also condemns the theft of the “traditional wisdom” of the Amazonian peoples as “biopiracy” and a “form of violence.”
“The Church chooses to defend life, the land and the native Amazon cultures,” including in the Amazon peoples’ “registration, processing and dissemination of data and information about their territories and their legal status,” it states.
The report says the Church must guard itself against “the power of neo-colonialism” and “unlearn, learn and relearn” in order to overcome any tendency toward “colonizing models.”
The synod reaffirms a “commitment to defend life seamlessly from conception to natural death and the dignity of each and every person.”
Pastoral service to the indigenous, it says, “obliges us to proclaim Jesus Christ and the Good News of the Kingdom of God.”
Pope Francis announced in his closing speech to the synod that he would create a new section in the Dicastery for the Promotion of Integral Human Development dedicated to the Church in the Amazon.
The synod final document also called for a “socio-environmental and pastoral office” to work in alliance with the Latin American church organizations REPAM, CELAM, CLAR, and other non-ecclesial actors representing indigenous peoples.
Cultural Conversion
The synod document states that “inculturation is the incarnation of the Gospel in indigenous cultures… and at the same time the introduction of these cultures into the life of the Church.”
The Amazon culture and spirituality already have a rich “indigenous theology, Amazonian face of theology and popular piety,” it says, adding that they “reject a colonial style of evangelization.”
“The evangelization that we propose today for the Amazon is the inculturated proclamation that generates processes of interculturality, processes that promote the life of the Church with an Amazon identity and face,” the report states.
Czerny said that it is very important for the Church to learn how to be “interculturally respectful.”
“Not to assume that the way I am or the way we are is definitive, is the norm, is the way it has to be … differences have to be embraced,” he said.
“The church is not an inflexible structure in which your cultures and traditions will find no place … it is the opposite,” Bishop Guinea said.
“A Church with an Amazonian face,” the document states, “needs its communities to be infused with a synodal spirit, supported by organizational structures of this dynamic, as authentic organisms of ‘communion.’”
“The Church’s research and pastoral centres, in alliance with the indigenous peoples, should study, compile and systematize the traditions of the Amazon’s ethnic groups in order to favor an educational effort that starts from their identity and culture…”
Synodal Conversion
The synod document also calls for “new paths for synodal conversion.”
Cardinal Czerny said that this process involved “an unprecedented process of listening” before the Amazon synod.
“You know that synodality is working when you find yourself voting for something that you knew before the synod that you disagreed with,” Czerny said.
When asked what was the working definition of “synodality” understood among the synod fathers, Czerny replied, “Everyone had a sense of what it meant because we were doing it. Could we explain that in words … does it matter?”
A synod is a consultative assembly, convened by the pope or a bishop, to advise on a particular topic of interest to the local, regional, or universal Church.
The Synod of Bishops for the Pan-Amazonian region will conclude Oct. 27 with a closing Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica.
[…]
Accompaniment is ensuring that nobody walking the road to perdition lacks human fraternity on their journey into eternal punishment.
What a great line! Well done, JJ.
Well put!
Ezekiel 3:17-21 is all about prophetic responsibility, and goes along with what you said.
“Accompaniment is ensuring that nobody walking the road to perdition lacks human fraternity on their journey into eternal punishment.”
That erroneous statement certainly sheds light on why it is a sin to accommodate an occasion of sin and cooperate with that which is evil.
Anyone, homosexual or not can be blessed. A blessing can never be conferred to a person or persons that affirms an immoral preference or lifestyle. Cardinal Farrell correctly emphasizes the distinction between blessing of sacramental marriage and pastoral care to be given all persons regardless of sexual preference. The Cardinal whose Dicastery will supervise Amoris Laetitia Family Year refers to civil unions as outside the scope of matrimonial blessings, although he doesn’t clarify whether same sex unions will come under the program’s purview. And if so in what form, whether affirmative, or whether transforming and redemptive. Cardinal Farrrell, considered an advocate for homosexuals had previously refused Mary McAleese, former president of Ireland, and Ssenfuka Juanita Warry, who runs a non-profit advocating for LGBT Catholics in Uganda [CWR 2018] attendance at a Vatican hosted Women’s event and is capable of being direct in affirmation of the faith, a must during this year’s celebration of Amoris Laetitia. Some question whether Pope Francis’ sanction of CDF Cardinal Ladaria’s negative response to the German bishops intent to bless same sex unions will prevail having been disappointed on similar in the past. Nonetheless, there is hope.
In response to those who have reason to believe the Pope’s approbation of Ladaria’s blessing prohibition will not prevail, that reason was aptly isolated in a Catholic editorial commentary, “Will Francis do the same thing he did with intercommunion, leaving same-sex unions to the local ordinary? Likely. Although perhaps not explicitly. He could hide behind a provision of canon law when he did the intercommunion gambit; this latest gayness will be couched, no doubt, under a pastoral provision, perhaps even in reference to Amoris Laetitia and its infamous footnote” (Skojec 1P5). Although I agree, “Likely” leaves room for an otherwise positive. Too often we write off any positive coming from the Vatican. Hope remains that theological virtue that should inspire us to do otherwise, the premise being that grace is always at work. Our mission is to cooperate with God’s benevolence not dismiss it.
Thus speaketh the one who lived with Mr mccarrick and never spoke a word..
(bless his heart, or perhaps that doesn’t qualify for a “blessing”)
Why is it so hard to just call sin “sin,” and proclaim a simple message of “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand”?
Why is it so necessary to constantly make excuses, to soften the blow, to sugar-coat the truth?
Many will say “Lord, Lord,” but will be cast into hell. Should we not be zealous about saving someone from hell? Isn’t that true love? Isn’t that the true pastoral role of the Church?
“Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God?” (St. Paul, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10, RSVCE)
To call sin, sin? But that would be truth telling. The father of lies will not allow his children to do that.
“with the hope that one day they will live in accord with the Church’s teaching.”If the Cardinal did say this then I’m happy. I’d be happy if Fr. Martin ended his building a bridge with that statement. Accompanying someone on their journey to conversion would be a positive.
No doubt, since it is a sin to accommodate an occasion of sin, Pastoral Life, in order for it to be grounded in The Truth Of Perfect Divine Eternal Love, Jesus The Christ Incarnate, must serve for The Salvation of Souls:
“31- When he therefore was gone out, Jesus said: Now is the Son of man glorified, and God is glorified in him [John 13:31] 32 If God be glorified in him, God also will glorify him in himself; and immediately will he glorify him. 33 Little children, yet a little while I am with you. You shall seek me; and as I said to the Jews: Whither I go you cannot come; so I say to you now. 34 A new commandment I give unto you: That you love one another, as I have loved you, that you also love one another. 35 By this shall all men know that you are my disciples, if you have love one for another.” -https://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=50&ch=13&l=34-#x
Let us not forget that the sin of the brother of The Prodigal Son, was a deficit of Love, due to the fact that he did not rejoice in the fact that his brother desired to repent, and be reconciled with his Father.
At the heart of Liberty Is Christ, “4For it is impossible for those who were once illuminated, have tasted also the heavenly gift and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, 5Have moreover tasted the good word of God and the powers of the world to come…”, to not believe that Christ’s Sacrifice On The Cross will lead us to Salvation, but we must desire forgiveness for our sins, and accept Salvational Love, God’s Gift Of Grace And Mercy; believe in The Power And The Glory Of Salvation Love, and rejoice in the fact that No Greater Love Is There Than This, To Desire Salvation For One’s Beloved.
“Hail The Cross, Our Only Hope.”
“Blessed are they who are Called to The Marriage Supper Of The Lamb.”
“For where your treasure is there will your heart be also.”
Let us not forget that the sin of the brother of The Prodigal Son, was a deficit of Love, due to the fact that he did not rejoice in the fact that his brother desired to repen, and be reconciled with his Father.
Ed Peters has an article, “If you want to think clearly about marriage, speak clearly about marriage”. It’s linked to in the Commentary section of The Catholic Thing. I think Peters both thinks and speaks clearly.
What exactly is Cardinal Farrell saying? Is this another case of the doctrine hasn’t changed but we have to be pastoral (wink, wink)?
Pope Francis and his aides ceaselessly emphasize the necessity of “pastoral accompaniment”, but as far as I know, they have never explained what they mean by that.
I would be very grateful for a clear explanation.