Washington D.C., Feb 19, 2021 / 12:30 pm (CNA).- A lot has changed in the three years since CNA’s last ranking of fish sandwiches.
The Chick-Fil-A fish sandwich, which we at CNA crowned the winner of the 2018 fish sandwich rankings, is not on the menu anymore.
Bojangles once had a location near CNA’s Washington, D.C. offices but has closed that restaurant. The chain’s “Bojangler” fish sandwich placed fourth out of the six fast food sandwiches sampled by CNA in 2018.
This year, as Lent is upon us once again, CNA put five fast-food restaurants head-to-head (or fin-to-fin?) to compare their fish sandwich offerings.
New to CNA’s 2021 review is Arby’s fish sandwich offering. Additionally, several other restaurants featured on the 2018 review have updated their fish sandwiches since then.
Note: This review features only fish sandwiches, defined as a piece of fried fish and other toppings and condiments in between bread. All items were ordered as specified on the menu with no modifications, and were obtained at the drive-thru and consumed at home. The ratings cover a five “?” scale, with one being the lowest ranking and five the highest ranking. A “pandering” bonus is awarded to limited-time fish sandwich offerings for the Lenten season. All prices are for Washington, D.C. area locations and may differ throughout the country.
Arby’s
Crispy Fish
Price: $4.29
Calories: 570
Website description: “Put away your fishing boat and rubber fishing pants. Arby’s wild-caught Alaskan Pollock is crispy-fried to golden-brown perfection. We top it with tartar sauce and shredded lettuce.” The sandwich is also available as a “King’s Hawaiian Fish Deluxe” on a King’s Hawaiian roll with the addition of cheese and tomato.
First impressions: The sandwich came wrapped in a dedicated fish sandwich wrapper, and also came with a packet each of Arby’s Sauce and Horsey Sauce. The fish was decidedly more on the yellow end of golden. Arby’s has “the meats,” but could it have the fish, too? I was intrigued.
Review: I liked the sesame seed bun, which kind of elevated the experience. The iceberg lettuce would have tasted better as romaine–it was forgettable and flavorless. The fillet itself was sizable but, again, tasted rather flavorless and was neither crunchy nor crispy. There was an appropriate amount of tartar sauce. I tried the Horsey Sauce and the Arby’s Sauce on the sandwich, which simply made it taste like horseradish and…Arby’s, I guess, respectively. It didn’t enhance it, it overpowered it. There was nothing special about this sandwich, aside from the bun. It would have benefitted from pickles.
Pandering: Yes, this is a limited-time offering.
Rating: ??? and a half
Burger King
Big Fish
Price: $4.49
Calories: 513
Website description: “Our premium Big Fish Sandwich is 100% White Alaskan Pollock, breaded with crispy panko breading and topped with sweet tartar sauce, tangy pickles, all on top of a toasted brioche-style bun.”
First impressions: The website claims that tartar sauce goes on the sandwich, but I’m pretty sure that my sandwich came with mayonnaise instead. The sandwich was wrapped in a dedicated wrapper specifically for fish. It smelled decent. There was a lot of lettuce on the sandwich. I liked that the pickles were crinkle-cut.
Review: The Big Fish has the same problem as the McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish–there’s nothing overtly wrong with it, but there’s nothing overtly good about it either. The addition of iceberg lettuce and pickles added an interesting texture to the sandwich, but I would have preferred romaine lettuce instead. While some of the other sandwiches suffered due to a relative lack of sauces, the Big Fish had a layer of “tartar sauce” (Burger King claims) spread on both the bottom bun and on top of the fillet. The overload of “tartar sauce” gave the distinct feeling of “wow, this is extremely unhealthy,” as I was eating the sandwich, which I guess is an appropriate feeling for Lent. The fish was not crunchy, and had a similar texture to a french fry. The lettuce was flavorless. It wasn’t bad, but I’m not going to go running for a Big Fish again unless I’m on the New Jersey Turnpike on a Friday. Also the Big Fish gave me a stomach ache after I ate it.
Pandering: No, this is on the permanent menu.
Rating: ???
McDonald’s
Filet-O-Fish
Price: $4.79
Calories: 380
Website description: “This McDonald’s fish sandwich has fish sourced from sustainably managed fisheries, topped with melty American cheese and creamy McDonald’s tartar sauce, and served on a soft, steamed bun.” A link on the website for users to “learn what kind of fish is in Filet-o-Fish” leads to a 404 error.
First impressions: It looked like a standard Filet-O-Fish, and was packaged in a cardboard box. I had to wait a short time before I received the sandwich, so I assume it was freshly made.
Review: There was nothing bad about this sandwich, but there was not a whole lot exemplary about it either. The fish wasn’t soggy, but wasn’t super crispy either. The tartar sauce tasted like…tartar sauce. I’m unclear as to why there was half a slice of American cheese on the sandwich, as it was impossible to discern the taste under the tartar sauce. It would have been nice to have pickles or some other vegetable topping as well to add texture and nutritional value to the sandwich. I’m not mad I ate a Filet-O-Fish, but I’m not going to rush back for another one anytime soon.
Pandering: No, this is on the permanent menu, but there must be consideration given to the fact that this was the original “hey, I want Catholics to eat at my restaurant on Fridays” menu item. (We will ignore the Hula Burger.)
Rating: ???
Popeyes
Cajun Flounder Sandwich
Price: $4.49
Calories: 670
Website description: “Our all new Flounder Fish Fillet, served on a warm and toasted buttery brioche bun, with crisp barrel cured pickles and tartar sauce.”
First impressions: The sandwich I received was wrapped in a foil bag, and had a paper wrapper on the sandwich itself–which I assume was to preserve the structural integrity of the sandwich. The fillet itself spilled out from the bun and was not, contra the sandwiches at Wendy’s, Arby’s, and McDonald’s, a square, making it feel less-processed.
Review: This thing is good. There was a level of spice that was not overpowering, but was an interesting contrast to the brioche and condiments. The bread was able to hold up to the sizable flounder fillet, and the flounder had more of a “meatier” taste to it than the pollock sandwiches of other fast food chains. The pickles were delicious, but my sandwich could have benefited from a bit more tartar sauce. If you live near a Popeyes, this is definitely worth getting–although it is significantly more calorie-dense than other options.
Pandering: Yes, this is limited time only and was introduced the week before Lent.
Rating: ?????
Wendy’s
Wild Caught Alaskan Fish Sandwich
Price: $4.39
Calories: 530
Website description: “Wild caught Alaskan pollock fillet, crunchy panko breading, topped with creamy dill tartar sauce, pickles, lettuce, and American cheese. Proof that ice fishing is actually totally worth it.”
First impressions: The sandwich was exactly as the website described it, and it came wrapped in foil. A helpful sticker reading “fish” was placed over the “chicken” print on the foil. I noted that unlike McDonald’s, Wendy’s puts a whole slice of cheese on their sandwich.
Review: After my first bite I said, out loud, “Well done, Wendy.” I did not have super high hopes for Wendy’s after my 2017 review (which was, not coincidentally, the last time I had a fish sandwich at Wendy’s), but this was actually a pretty solid sandwich. The fish was crispy–there was an audible “crunch” sound when I bit into it. The cheese was not doing much for me, but the pickles and romaine lettuce were a nice touch. The pickles were thick cut and flavorful. I thought the sandwich could have used a smidge more tartar sauce, but this was a solid fish sandwich.
Pandering: Yes, this is a limited time offering and replaced the previous Wild Caught North Pacific Cod Sandwich of years past.
Rating: ???? and a half
Final Thoughts:
While I was disappointed to see the Chick-Fil-A fish sandwich go, I must say that I was overall fairly impressed with this year’s slate of fried fish in between buns. Wendy’s and Popeyes, who had fairly strong showings in 2018, both improved their offerings–which was no easy task. It was interesting to see the embrace of food trends–both Burger King and Wendy’s boast about panko breading their sandwiches. (But only Wendy’s fillet actually tasted crunchy.) It was also interesting to see how the fish products have shifted over the years–Alaskan pollock seems to be the go-to fish now, as opposed to cod. And I still have no idea what was actually in the Filet-O-Fish.
The improvements in the limited-time offerings showed the glaring deficiencies of the tried-and-true standby at McDonald’s. It wouldn’t hurt McDonald’s to toss on some lettuce or pickles to their Filet-O-Fish, or perhaps add a flavor to the tartar sauce. It would greatly enhance the experience. McDonald’s could previously rest on its laurels as the original Catholic-pandering restaurant for Lenten Fridays, but those days may be numbered now.
Rankings:
Best fillet: Wendy’s Wild Caught Alaskan Fish Sandwich
Worst fillet: McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish
Best bread: Wendy’s Wild Caught Alaskan Fish Sandwich
Cheapest option: Arby’s Crispy Fish
Priciest option: McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish
Fewest calories: McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish
Most calories: Popeyes Cajun Flounder Sandwich
Best overall: Popeyes Cajun Flounder Sandwich
[…]
Discipline! Lent! Prayer! Denial!
When the factor of Wage and Debt slavery is recognized, Sex slave trade, more humans in the USA are found to be “slaves” today than ever before, by est more humans are slaves to the sex slave trade in the USA than the Entire Atlantic slave trade times.
Todays United States workers are held under wage slaves that is for more profitable than than past history of the slave trade. In today the employer does not have to feed, house, cloth, or water, to debt slaves. On a broad basis, their is limited interest in provide the Corporal works of mercy, visit the sick, imprisoned, and that bear wrongs, and to forgive others..
Revenge rules.
When the issue of slavery comes up, its ok to note.. Britain in the era, Cromwell, outlawed the Catholic church in Britain, Ireland.
The British sold the Irish into slavery, or exiled to the US. In the time of slavery, if a slave owner had dangerous work, he hire the Irish, so his purchased humans, did not get hurt in dangerous jobs, if the Irish did, they were kicked out to the road.
The era of, the British were great, the Irish were bad, pass the plate.
Today its the era of, the British are great, the Islamic are bad, pass the plate.
A lent of, borrow no money, no credit cards…call for an end to slavery in the USA… Pay people a sustainable wage, recognize the hoarding of wealth to a few, the military industrial complex, we were warned about decades back, President Kennedy tried to stand against.
Yes, you are exactly right. We are all slaves here in the U.S. We all wish we had pure, honest, noble leaders today like JFK. And while we’re at it, the earth is actually flat and the moon landings were faked on a Hollywood backlot. I saw Elvis today, but he got away before I could get his autograph.
With all due respect. What are you talking about? I haven’t got a clue.
Civic nationalism is dead, and Weigel’s brand of (neo-)conservatism has done nothing to prevent that.
How can the America of the future thrive if we keep on parroting and holding as sacred the discredited founding narrative with slave-owning founding fathers declaring equality for all, and the genesis of the nation based on the genocide of Native Americans, the slavery of Black Americans, and the white supremacist racism on the part of European Americans. With these considerations, it’s time we read the Book of Exodus the way Laurel Dykstra expounded in Set Them Free: The Other Side of Exodus, that is not from the perspective of the freed slaves but that of the household of Pharaoh. Here we can see America mirroring Egypt and realistically portray its original sins of slavery, genocide, and racism.
Leon Kass’ new book can be purchased at the First Things online bookstore:
Founding God’s Nation: Reading Exodus
G Weigel sets the premise for national unity, “Can we be a true nation if we worship the false god of wealth, bow to the false messiahs of identity politics, and indulge the false ethic of I did it my way?”. Achieving that in a culture at polar odds within itself is the difficulty. Thomas Jefferson’s Liberty in the Proclamation is a far cry from Anthony Kennedy’s Liberty in Planned Parenthood E PA v Casey the latter the Gold Calf standard for Liberalism. So we have two diverse Exodus directions, the desired one leading to the Holy Land lavished by Weigel, the other the current reality returning to Egypt. Civic Nationalism referenced by Sol initially defined as an all inclusive libertarian concept insuring the liberties envisioned in the Declaration, has morphed into an iron clad military encircled Capitol determined to extinguish any political, religious doctrine that places limitation on that Golden Calf of licentiousness. As usual Weigel offers us commendable reading, good knowledge to contemplate for Lent. Consider Henri Bergson in The Two Sources of Morality and Religion. Bergson says Kantian moral imperative ethics aims at social cohesion but is closed. Bergson said there is another kind of morality and religion, an open morality and dynamic religion concerned with creativity and progress. They are not concerned with social cohesion, and thus Bergson calls this morality open because it includes everyone (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) . Anomalously Bergson cited Catholicism as the sole inclusive religion open to all. Golden Calf Liberalism is actually exclusive and divisive, sanctioning any religious, political, ethical belief that limits absolute moral freedom, the equivalent to ‘do whatever you want whenever you want’. My point is Catholicism may be better served today with an emphasis on this unique dimension of freedom, a reasoned definition of the scope and limitations of freedom of conscience, exercised in willingness to live ‘side by side with the sinner’ in the pursuit of truth rather than implementation of the strict societal cohesiveness in apparent process of implementation by the new Administration.