Vatican City, Sep 22, 2020 / 07:00 am (CNA).- The prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) said Tuesday that the Vatican had “done everything possible to dialogue” with an Irish priest barred from public ministry for his views on the priesthood and sexuality.
Speaking at a press conference at the Vatican Sept. 22, Cardinal Luis Ladaria, SJ, argued that the CDF had no alternative but to take action against Fr. Tony Flannery.
“We have done everything possible to dialogue with Fr. Flannery. It was not always easy,” he said.
Flannery, a Redemptorist priest, was barred from public ministry by the CDF in 2012 for his stances on the nature of the sacramental priesthood and human sexuality.
It was reported earlier this month that the CDF had asked the 73-year-old to affirm four doctrinal propositions as a condition of returning to ministry.
“Fr Flannery should not return to public ministry prior to submitting a signed statement regarding his positions on homosexuality, civil unions between persons of the same sex, and the admission of women to the priesthood,” the CDF wrote to the superior of the Redemptorists in a letter dated July 9.
Flannery wrote on his personal website: “I will not be signing this document.”
Ladaria defended his congregation’s handling of the case, telling journalists: “We have done everything possible. In some moments we have had to take some measure that never concerns a judgment on the person, because this is always reserved to our Lord, but on his teachings or on his behavior.”
“And so we have tried always to maintain all of our respect toward Fr. Flannery, but also the duty we have, according to the dispositions of the Church, to protect the faith and therefore indicate when something is not in conformity with the faith.”
In 2010, Flannery helped to found the Irish Association of Catholic Priests, a group whose constitution emphasizes “the primacy of the individual conscience” and “a redesigning of Ministry in the Church, in order to incorporate the gifts, wisdom and expertise of the entire faith community, male and female.”
The Redemptorist leadership in Ireland reportedly wrote to the order’s superior general, who in turn wrote to the CDF, asking for Flannery to be allowed to minister publicly again.
The CDF’s letter, published on Flannery’s website, asked that the priest sign a proposition that “according to the Tradition and the doctrine of the Church incorporated in the Canon Law (c. 1024), a baptized male alone receives sacred ordination validly.”
This proposition regarding the reservation of priesthood to men was supported by excerpts from St. John Paul II’s 1994 apostolic letter Ordinatio sacerdotalis and Pope Francis’ 2020 apostolic exhortation Querida Amazonia.
Regarding the moral liceity of homosexual acts, Flannery was asked to submit to the proposition that “Since the homosexual practices are contrary to the natural law and do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity, they are not approved by the moral teaching of the Catholic Church.” This was supported by a quotation from the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
The priest was also asked to assent to the proposition that “The marriage covenant, by which a man and a woman form with each other an intimate communion of life and love, has been founded and endowed with its own special laws by the Creator (CCC 1660). Other forms of union do not correspond to God’s plan for marriage and family. Therefore, they are not allowed by the Catholic Church.”
This proposition on marriage was supported by the Catechism of the Catholic Church and by Amoris laetitia, Pope Francis’ 2016 apostolic exhortation.
Finally, Flannery was invited to submit to the proposition that “In so far as it contradicts the foundations of a genuine Christian anthropology, gender theory is not accepted by Catholic teaching,” supported by the Congregation for Catholic Education’s 2019 document “Male and female he created them.”
In a response to the CDF letter published on his website Sept. 17, Flannery wrote: “From the first moment it came to me I knew that I was not going to sign it. But it has been sitting there for the last three months or so. Now it is gone, my decision has been finally made certain and clear, and there is a sense of relief and satisfaction about that.”
Speaking at a press conference on the CDF’s new document on euthanasia, Ladaria said: “This is a very unpleasant situation to the congregation, very unpleasant. But it is our responsibility, and it would be an error on our part if we did not bear this responsibility and left it to one side and did not give a word, when, in certain moments, sadly, many times it should be given.”
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Which “Fr” is it? Replace the name with one notorious publicity seeker, Martin, sj..
But since the letters sj appear behind the name F1 will protect zer.
The Vatican bends over backwards to accommodate a homosexualist priest but excommunicates Vigano without even a meeting and removes Strickland from his diocese with no hesitancy at all. We know where Bergoglio’s sympathies lie. Guess what? The People of God don’t support this Pope.
Cardinal Ladaria was replaced with Fernandez shortly following after these above events. Later he would exit from the synodalism meetings prematurely.
Here is Cardinal Radcliffe updating what would seem to be acceptable synodalism nexus between marriage and “homosexualism partnerships”, usefully journeyed.
What the synodalism reality is showing out, is a demarcated papal modus vivendi for incurvatus and for making others acceptably incurvatus -and gnostic yet “not mani”.
It is by invitation only, suggesting that it could be abandoned if it does not swell appropriately. But the idea is to give it a “very long time to grow in a mercy”.
An inculcated single journeying path travelling through incurvatus-land and adapting to points as they might become relevant, made as mission -very queer indeed.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/exclusive-cardinal-radcliffe-controversial-2013-text-misunderstood/
It needs to be said that Radcliffe has been impacting souls -many of them- VERY NEGATIVELY since the mid-70’s, a vast swarth of my generation; and that synodalism is affirming them in spiritual sickness Radcliffe and others similar were preaching through all that time since. When uncovered, the sickness held to as forms of holy docility and holy suffering above diagnosis, prescription, criticism and error. They are not homosexualists themselves but are truly blinded and they embrace homosexualists as “authentic seekers” who are “too often” unjustly targeted.
That is who Radcliffe is.