CNA Staff, Aug 31, 2020 / 06:01 pm (CNA).- One chapter of a recently published book on academic plagiarism discusses at length the plagiarism committed by Fr. Thomas Rosica, including in pieces he ghostwrote for Cardinal Marc Ouellet.
Fr. Rosica resigned as CEO of the Salt and Light Media Foundation in June 2019, four months after reports emerged that he had plagiarized sections of texts in lectures, op-eds, scholarly articles, and other writings.
In a chapter of Disguised Academic Plagiarism, published in July, Dr. M. V. Dougherty argued that Fr. Rosica (identified as R. in the text) was the ghostwriter for several plagiaristic texts of Cardinal Ouellet, the prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, while he was Archbishop of Quebec.
“The apparent devotion to same very narrow subset of source texts in the plagiarizing works of R. and Ouellet’s ghostwriter is only because R. publishes some of his compilations under his own name and offers some of his other compilations to prelates,” Dougherty, who holds the Sr. Ruth Caspar Chair in Philosophy at Ohio Dominican University, wrote in the “Magisterial Plagiarism” chapter of his recent book.
“Considering the evidence known thus far, it is [simple] to assume that the ghostwriter for Cardinal Ouellet is none other than R.,” he concluded.
In an Aug. 27 article, the National Post reported that Fr. Rosica acknowledged via email “that he prepared the texts for three examples of Cardinal Ouellet’s published writing that a new academic investigation shows to be largely plagiarized from many sources.”
Dougherty treated plagiarism in magisterial texts because, he wrote, “these plagiarizing magisterial texts negatively influence the practice of Catholic theology.” He also discussed the plagiaristic use of magisterial texts in theological works, for when “readers of those plagiarizing theological texts encounter magisterial documents stripped of their magisterial endorsement, and this privation impedes a proper assessment of their quality.”
He began by demonstrating the plagiarism in a homily delivered by Cardinal William Levada, then-prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, in 2007.
Dougherty found that in preparing that homily, the unidentified ghostwriter for Cardinal Levada “incorporate[d] lengthy sections” of a theological article by Fr. Jeremy Driscoll first published in 2000.
The homily delivered by Cardinal Levada uses text from Fr. Driscoll, but predicating of ‘sound theology’ what was predicated of ‘good preaching’ in the source text.
“Since the key terms preaching and theology do not have coextensive meanings in the discipline of theology, one must ask whether the ghostwriter’s plagiarizing construction is still intelligible,” Dougherty reflected. “If one answers in the affirmative, one renders oneself vulnerable to the ex hypothesi objection that theology must lack the rigor found in other disciplines if a coherent contribution can be made by taking an article and simply substituting one discrete technical term from the discipline for another. Both the source article and the plagiarizing article contain systematic, biblical, and historical claims, and it is difficult to conceive how these claims could remain reliable when migrating to different contexts.”
Dougherty then turned to Cardinal Ouellet’s ghostwriter, who turns out to have been Fr. Rosica.
The philosophy professor demonstrated that in preparing a speech delivered by Cardinal Ouellet in April 2007, Fr. Rosica “misappropriated passages without attribution from a wide range of works to produce a fraudulent amalgam for the cardinal’s address.”
Chief among these was the plagiazired text delivered by Cardinal Levada, Dougherty noted, so that “one finds herein the remarkably complex phenomenon of a plagiarist plagiarizing a plagiarizing text produced by a different plagiarist.”
Again, the same texts are predicated of differing subjects, which Dougherty said calls “into question the intelligibility of the texts manufactured by the two plagiarizing ghostwriters. Have they each produced coherent works of Catholic teaching, or are the plagiarizing documents simply theological word-salads?”
The professor also noted that sources plagiarized by Fr. Rosica in preparing Ouellet’s April 2007 speech include a 2005 conference paper by Igor Kowalewski and an English translation of a book by Fr. Edward Schillebeeckx, some of whose writings were investigated, though not condemned, by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
Dougherty noted that “it is notable that some of [Schillebeeckx’] words here are acquiring a magisterial quality via their promulgation by Cardinal Ouellet. Readers of Ouellet 2007 are certainly unlikely to suspect that they are encountering the work of Schillebeeckx.”
The professor also discussed a 2007 speech, and a 2008 homily, both delivered by Cardinal Ouellet and plagiaristically ghostwritten by Fr. Rosica.
He then turned to the theological writings of Fr. Rosica, many of which “were revealed to be plagiarizing compilations of the works of others.”
The priest’s plagiarism was first reported by LifeSiteNews in February 2019.
Dougherty noted that Origins, a documentary periodical published by Catholic News Service, “published eight of the plagiarizing articles by R. in the period of 2009–2017” and also “issued the three plagiarizing articles by Cardinals Levada and Ouellet”.
“In light of these 11 defective articles published under the names of ‘R.,’ ‘Levada,’ and ‘Ouellet,’ one is tempted to conclude that Origins has been established as significant gateway for the proliferation of plagiarizing content in the discipline of Catholic theology in recent years,” Dougherty wrote.
Fr. Rosica has apologized for his plagiaristic acts.
He is reported to have misrepresented his academic credentials, claiming falsely in his official biography to have earned an advanced degree from École Biblique et Archéologique Française de Jérusalem.
Fr. Rosica now serves as a chaplain to a home for retired religious.
Previously he had served as a Vatican press aide and a university president, and he was a central figure in the planning of World Youth Day 2002 in Toronto.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Having followed the saga of plagiarism by Fr Rosica there is only one conclusion;elevated positions in the Church ( as elsewhere) obviously seem to pose dangers of abuse of ecclesiastical power, arrogance and over estimation. All clerics must be subjected to a thorough scrutinytheir credentials and previous conduct.
Are we to believe that plagiarist Fr. Rosica did his own plagiarizing? Or, was he also routinely relying upon yet another layer of cut-and-paste artisans? Interns who—as recent graduates from “higher” education—-had little understanding of quotation marks and “lower” footnote credits? Recent and grade-inflated down-loaders of college term papers from the Internet?
Of course, we all knew and understand that many prelates don’t have time to write their own stuff, or to suspect and always notice familiar material. (Fraternal collegiality.) In this busy world, moving paragraphs around from one public address to another probably wasn’t much different than moving problematic priests around from one parish address to another. (Not so much a coverup as routinely just moving things along?)
Ah, well, regarding straight-shooter priests, finally we now have the real deal—-the non-plagiarist and pop-up original—-the poster-child Fr. Martin, SJ! No merely scholarly deception of interchangeable sameness here!
Maybe Gutenberg’s moveable type was a big mistake. But, in this new virtual/ paperless era, who reads anything/anymore/anyway? Not when the digital social media enables subliminal rainbow photo-ops (even with a busy Pope Francis!) to do the trick.