The Dispatch: More from CWR...

Transgender lawsuit against Catholic hospital cites new US Supreme Court precedent

The lawsuit cites the June Supreme Court decision Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga., which holds that the Title VII 1964 Civil Rights Act’s ban on sex-based employment discrimination means that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is also banned.

(Image: sudok1 |

CNA Staff, Jul 20, 2020 / 05:47 pm (CNA).- A Catholic hospital in Maryland faces a lawsuit from a person who presents as a transgender man because it would not perform a hysterectomy on the person’s healthy uterus. The lawsuit, whose backers have for decades opposed Catholic ethics in Catholic-run hospitals, cites a 2020 Supreme Court decision that holds employment discrimination on the basis of gender identity to be a violation of U.S. civil rights law.

University of Maryland St. Joseph Medical Center, a Catholic-founded hospital now in the University of Maryland Medical System, canceled the hysterectomy for 33-year-old Jesse Hammons of Baltimore, which had been scheduled for Jan. 6.

The plaintiff’s claims that the hysterectomy would not have been canceled if it were for a diagnosis other than gender dysphoria. Because the hospital performs hysterectomies for other diagnosed conditions, it treated Hammons unfairly. Hammons said the surgery would help eliminate the production of estrogen and drastically improve mental health.

Gender dysphoria is a condition in which a person believes themselves to have been “misassigned” their gender at birth. While medical support for “gender-affirmation” surgery has broadened, and is covered by many insurers, the surgery also has its critics.

Michael Schwartzberg, media relations director for the University of Maryland Medical System, said that federal privacy regulations bar it from commenting on any specific case. Any patient seeking care not available at the Catholic hospital can receive care at other hospitals in the system, he said.

“The health and safety of our patients is, and always will be, our highest priority,” said the spokesman, saying the hospital was built on “a mission of loving service and compassionate care.”

St. Joseph Medical Center was founded in 1864 by the Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia. In 2012, when it became a member of the University of Maryland Medical System, the medical system agreed to continue to run the hospital as a Catholic institution.

The hospital’s self-description on its website frequently references its Catholic background and mission, stating that it is “guided by our Catholic health care tradition of loving service and compassionate care.” It describes itself as “a 218 licensed bed, Catholic acute care hospital that observes the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services.” The religious directives come from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Gail Cunningham, senior vice president for medical affairs and chief medical officer for the hospital, said that removing an otherwise healthy organ would violate Catholic ethics, the lawsuit said. She canceled the surgery and told the surgeon that gender dysphoria was not a sufficient medical reason for the procedure.

The name of Hammons’ surgeon was not listed in the lawsuit, but he or she has admitting privileges at St. Joseph’s Medical Center. The surgeon has worked with self-identified transgender men before. Doctors with admitting privileges at the hospital agree to abide by the Catholic ethical directives, the medical system’s statement said.

Hammons’ preparation involved months of blood tests, ultrasounds, and other health screenings. Hammons’ surgeon called the night before the operation to say it was canceled because of the medical center’s Catholic principles. The surgery was scheduled at another hospital in May, then moved again to June due to coronavirus restrictions.

Hammons, whose spouse Lura Groen is a pastor of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, said it was a surprise that a hospital’s religious affiliation could be an obstacle to the surgery, the Washington Post report.

“I felt like this hospital didn’t see any worth in my life and the care that I needed,” said Hammons. “The University of Maryland St. Joseph’s should be caring for all of Maryland’s residents. We shouldn’t be denied based on who we are.”

“Discrimination is not a part of religious liberty,” Groen said in a statement from the American Civil Liberties Union. “As a faith leader and taxpayer, I am appalled that this act was done at a government institution and in the name of religion.”

A 2016 letter to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services signed by the general counsel for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, together with other groups, affirmed that refusing surgery to someone seeking surgery that would allegedly change their gender would not be discriminatory.

“It is not ‘discrimination’ when a hospital provides care it considers appropriate, declines to perform procedures destructive to patients’ welfare and well-being, or declines to take actions that undermine the health, safety, and privacy of other patients,” the letter said.

“A hospital does not engage in ‘discrimination’ when, for example, it performs a mastectomy or hysterectomy on a woman with breast or uterine cancer, respectively, but declines to perform such a procedure on a woman with perfectly healthy breasts or uterus who is seeking to have the appearance of a man.”

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland July 16, claims St. Joseph’s Medical Center violated the equal protection clause under the Fourteenth Amendment and anti-discrimination provisions in the 2010 Affordable Care Act.

The American Civil Liberties Union is involved in the case. It has been engaged in a decades-long crusade against Catholic hospitals, often objecting that they will not provide abortions, which Catholic teaching recognizes as killing the unborn child.

In recent years, it has backed efforts to force compliance with LGBT demands. As CNA has previously reported, the legal group is a beneficiary of a major patronage system seeking to classify religious freedom protections as illegally discriminatory where religion conflicts with LGBT or pro-abortion rights demands.

Hammons is also being represented by the law firms Rosenberg Martin Greenberg and Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, the Baltimore Sun reports.

The lawsuit cites the June Supreme Court decision Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga., which holds that the Title VII 1964 Civil Rights Act’s ban on sex-based employment discrimination means that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is also banned.

The decision, authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch, adopted the transgender-favored language of gender “assigned at birth.” While Gorsuch cited the Religious Freedom Restoration Act as a possible limit to his redefinition of sex discrimination, it is unclear whether these protections will withstand legal challenge.

The University of Maryland Medical System is a private nonprofit that operates 13 hospitals in Maryland. It is one of the largest employers in the state, the Washington Post reports. Its board members are appointed by the Maryland governor and it has received close to $25 million in the past two years.

Joshua Block, a staff attorney with the ACLU, is representing Hammons. He said the presence of Catholic hospitals is a church-state separation problem, given their mergers with taxpayer-supported hospitals like the University of Maryland Medical System.

“As Catholic hospitals continue to expand … you’re going to run into these sorts of establishment clauses more and more,” Block told the Washington Post.

“It’s important to make crystal clear here that if you’re going to have a hospital that is organized around religious beliefs, that hospital can’t be intertwined with the government.”

In a July 17 statement, he characterized the hospital as “a governmental entity” that “cannot deny medical care based on religious beliefs.”

Hammons had the surgery June 24 and claims a drastic positive change in mental health, reporting better focus and energy.

“I can really just see how wrong it was to be denied in the first place,” Hammons said, according to the Washington Post.

Among the sceptics of “gender affirmation” surgery are Paul R. McHugh, M.D., the former chief of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Lawrence S. Mayer, M.B., M.S., Ph.D., then a scholar in residence in the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine’s psychiatry department. In 2016, they reviewed hundreds of scientific articles on sexual orientation and gender identity issues.
“Compared to the general population, adults who have undergone sex-reassignment surgery continue to have a higher risk of experiencing poor mental health outcomes,” they concluded, in a report published by The New Atlantis journal.

Several Catholic hospitals have faced lawsuits for declining to conduct transgender surgeries.

The ACLU is currently representing a self-identified transgender plaintiff in a lawsuit filed in March 2019 against St. Joseph Health of Northern California, a group of five Catholic hospitals in California, St. Joseph Hospital, Eureka declined to perform a hysterectomy on the plaintiff’s healthy uterus.

In September 2019, a court allowed an ACLU-backed 2017 lawsuit to proceed against California’s largest chain of hospitals, Dignity Health, after doctors declined to perform a scheduled hysterectomy at Mercy San Juan Medical Center. The defendant in that case also claimed that she was denied the procedure due to gender identity.

In 2017, a transgender-identifying individual sued St. Joseph’s Regional Medical Center in Paterson, N.J. For canceling a hysterectomy in 2015.

There is also legal controversy over whether Catholic institutions’ employee health plans should cover transgender surgeries. In January 2019 the Catholic healthcare network PeaceHealth settled an ACLU lawsuit over transgender surgeries, saying that it has covered these procedures in its employee medical plan since January 2017.

While religious freedom protections and traditions of religious tolerance tended to protect Catholic institutions in the U.S., Catholic adoption agencies are now barred from operating or receiving taxpayer funds in many localities because they place children only with married men and women rather than same-sex couples.

If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.

About Catholic News Agency 9044 Articles
Catholic News Agency (


  1. Even if it were true that sexual orientation can be equated with transgender, the fact is that there’s a stark difference between accepting a transgender person into your hospital for general treatment and accepting a transgender person into your hospital for “transgender” surgery.

    This is an issue of conscious rights for the hospital rather than of individual rights to seek a treatment which makes a condition worse.

  2. “Gender dysphoria is a condition in which a person believes themselves to have been…”

    That shoud be “is a condition in which a person believes himself to have been…” *A* person is singular, and therefore requires the singular “himself” (which is both the masculine and the common gender) rather than “themselves.”

    I also noticed that the author of the article carefully avoided using any pronouns for the woman who wanted the surgery, rather than using the appropriate “she” and “her.”

    CNA needs to quit playing along with the barbarians’ games and denying reality.

    • I totally agree. It’s sad to see CNA substitute “that person” and “individual” for words like “her” and “woman” or “man.” Being respectful of someone’s feelings should be weighed with precision and facts.

  3. Why can’t these people go to other hospitals? Clearly just trying to set up Catholic hospitals int same way some gays tried to setup bakers when there are plenty of other cake bakers around.

    Bostock shouldn’t apply anyway, since this is not an employment discrimination suit. And the decision not to perform surgery on healthy organs is one that any hospital and its doctors should be allowed as a fundamental part of sane medical practice, regardless of the religious reasons they may also have for not performing unnecessary surgeries to humor patients’ mental health disorders and mutilate their bodies.

  4. Surgery does not improve mental health. The Lutherans need to take a much harder look at who they think is fit for ordination.

    • Nice, comprehensive update. They will just end up closing down Catholic Hospitals the way they did Catholic Foster Care and adoption facilities. Who’s the loser?

  5. Gender “dysphoria” is defined as a “state of feeling very unhappy, uneasy, or dissatisfied”. Two thoughts… Webster’s definition attempts to reveal a person on the verge of suicide. Second, the Catholic Churches’ cavalier “go to another hospital” reeks with lack of empathy and a Lack of a holistic approach to a person in trouble.

    Homosexuality and Trans Gender lifestyles apparently have existed from the dawn of time. Some have never left societies’ closet for fear of being ostracized. If a Catholic hospital refuses treatment for gender reassignment it may be more of a concern that no Catholic surgeons are trained to do the reassignment.

    If a LTGBQ person has “decided” their lifestyle, why would they choose a life of scorn and separation? More shocking is that a transgender person would opt for the uncertainty of a major surgical procedure not offered by many hospitals?

    • “f a LTGBQ person has “decided” their lifestyle, why would they choose a life of scorn and separation? More shocking is that a transgender person would opt for the uncertainty of a major surgical procedure not offered by many hospitals?”

      Mental illness or evil or both.

    • Homosexuality is a spiritual decision that the Bible warns us about. It is not a question of scorn if the individual has made a decision to turn away from the normal, but a point spiritual provocation to the Lord and man. To condone this spiritual behavior and submit to its conclusion is to come into agreement with this provocation.

  6. I know this sounds flip, but — if this monster gets as far as the SCOTUS, it will turn out to be just one more instance of Chief Justice Roberts or one of his colleagues blowing another hole through the First Amendment while blathering about supporting it.

  7. Again…and again…where are the bishops (including the bishop of Rome)? Why are they not shouting from the rooftops about it? Is the Church hierarchy still Catholic? Or are they just a bunch of McCarricks and James Martins???

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Transgender lawsuit against Catholic hospital cites new US Supreme Court precedent - Catholic Mass Search

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.