The Dispatch: More from CWR...

The Tyranny of Fashion

Our “woke” society is sleepwalking its way to an Orwellian future.

(Image: Composite of photos by Jorge Saavedra and Muhammad Ruqiyaddin | Unsplash.com)

Fashions come and go, but sometimes they can stick around long enough to do considerable damage. Smoking was fashionable for a great many decades and was glamorized in films for more than half a century—long after it was known to markedly increase the risk of lung cancer, heart disease, and other illnesses.

No one knows how long transgenderism will remain in fashion, but let’s hope it won’t be for long because, unlike smoking, it strikes at the very foundation of civilization. The two genders are not optional. They are indispensable for the generation of new life, and for providing the stable families which form the basis of society.

The transgender fads also strike hard at another sine qua non of civilization—the acknowledgment of objective realities. The trans person is encouraged to ignore the facts of his or her biology, and to replace reality with illusion—or, more properly, with delusion.

Transgender persons are encouraged to lie about their nature, and, to make matters worse, the rest of us are expected to collude in the lie. Of course, “expected” is not quite the right word. Increasingly, the lie is required, and punishments are meted out to those who won’t go along with it. The transgender fantasy is so far removed from reality, that the brittle construct can only be kept intact by raw compulsion.

Islam is not a fad, it’s a 1400-year-old faith, Yet, in recent years it has become a fashionable faith. Celebrities convert to it. Academics defend it. Politicians praise it. And Catholic leaders declare their solidarity with it.

Meanwhile, in the fashion industry, designers in London, Paris, and New York compete with one another to produce upscale lines of hijabs and abayas. And last month, the Swedish edition of Elle magazine, chose Imane Asry as the winner of its “Look of the Year” competition. Asry, a hijab-wearing social media influencer told Elle, “This is an acknowledgement that its more than time that we begin to normalize the hijab in the fashion industry.”

Few people, especially in the fashion industry, question whether it is a good idea to normalize the hijab and the abaya. For many, it’s simply the latest trend, and that’s all they need to know. Yet, the hijab is best understood as a symbol of control rather than an emblem of freedom. The hijab is most prevalent in Muslim societies that practice fundamentalist forms of Islam, and regard women as little more than possessions. In some places—such as Iran—women who choose not to wear it end up in prison.

But just as it’s not fashionable to talk about the persecution of Christians in the Muslim world, it’s not fashionable to talk about the persecution of Muslim women who don’t want to wear the hijab. Likewise, to get back to the subject of transgenderism, it’s not fashionable to talk about the suffering that teens and young adults go through as a result of adult encouragement to follow their illusions. The slaughter of Christians in the name of Islam, and the damage done to young bodies by dangerous cross-sex drugs and irreversible surgeries are things that are simply not talked about in polite society.

Although there are many obvious differences between the transgender movement and the religion of Islam, the attempt to “sell” both to the general public is essentially the same. Both are presented as misunderstood minorities who will bring diversity and enrichment to society if given half a chance. And in both cases the aggrieved parties are presented as victims—of transphobia in the one instance and of Islamophobia in the other. By the same token, their critics are cast as hate-filled victimizers.

Trans activists and Muslim activists also present their causes as a matter of civil rights. But their demands actually bear little resemblance to the claims of traditional civil rights movements. When women marched for the right to vote, they were only asking for a right that men already possessed. But transgender persons and their advocates are asking for special rights which will only be available to a select few.

Moreover, these newly created rights would infringe on the rights of others. Giving a man who claims to be a woman the “right” to use the women’s locker room, quite obviously takes away a women’s right to privacy. And forcing a teacher to address a male student as “Miss” deprives him of his right to freedom of speech.

Likewise, Muslim activist groups are not asking for the same rights that are granted to other religions; rather they are claiming special privileges. As is now becoming clear, the fundamental right they claim is the “right” not to be criticized or offended. This right, of course, is an obvious infringement on the right to free speech. Yet, amazingly, the European Court of Human Rights ruled last year that harm to “the religious feelings” of Muslims took precedence over the right of an Austrian women, Elizabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, to voice criticism of Islam. The specific crime for which Sabaditsch-Wolff was found guilty was mentioning that Muhammad had married a six-year-old girl—a fact that is well-attested in Islamic scripture. Nevertheless, it was a fact that Austrian Muslims did not want to hear—least of all from the mouth of an infidel woman.

So, just as the transgender movement forces people to lie, it seems that non-Muslims will increasingly be required to collude in lies about Islam: that Muhammad was the perfect man and a model for all mankind, that Islam is a religion of peace, that terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, and so on.

In short, both Islam and transgenderism are essentially totalitarian movements that seek to control freedom of thought and expression. Unlike the campaign to glamorize smoking, the normalization of these rigid ideologies endangers not just the physical health of the individual, but also the moral and spiritual health of the whole society.

The wonder is that so many—especially among the “woke” generation—are working to normalize these destructive systems. But it’s less baffling when one considers the role of fashion in forming our views. Although the evidence strongly suggests that these ideologies ought not to be promoted, fashion, not evidence is usually the deciding factor. Fashion not only dictates what to wear, but what to think. Author Lillian Hellman famously said, “I will not cut my conscience to fit this year’s fashions,” but tailoring one’s conscience is something that is done on a fairly regular basis in our politically correct society.

So, the normalization of dangerous trends continues. Unfortunately, modern technology now provides tools for speeding up the normalization process. In The Madness of Crowds, Douglas Murray explains how hi tech can be used to manipulate minds and sell big lies in subtle ways. Moreover, as he points out, these powerful tools are concentrated in the hands of a small group of ideologically driven activists who are quite convinced that they know what is best for the rest of us:

The presumptions of Silicon Valley began to be imposed on the rest of the world online… on each of the hot button issues of the day it is not local custom or even the most fundamental values of existing societies that are being driven, but the specific view that exist in the most social-justice-obsessed square miles in the world.

As one small example of the imposition of “woke” presumptions, consider what happens when you google “Jihad Watch” on your laptop. The first thing that catches your attention is a large box on the top right which informs you that “Jihad Watch is an anti-Muslim conspiracy blog run by Robert B. Spencer.” Well, that sounds pretty bad. And if you like to think of yourself as a woke person, you certainly don’t want to go chasing after conspiracy theories. In all likelihood you won’t bother to visit the “conspiracy blog,” and will thus be deprived of a wealth of information about jihad activity as reported by Spencer from such “conspiracy” sites as Reuters, The BBC, The Times of Israel, The New York Times, The Guardian, and The Times of India. But never mind. Your well-tailored conscience will continue to be a good fit for the fashions of the day.

Multiply such algorithmic sleights of hand a thousand times, and you’ll better understand why the woke among us are completely asleep to the real sources of tyranny. Our “woke” society is sleepwalking its way to an Orwellian future.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About William Kilpatrick 70 Articles
William Kilpatrick taught for many years at Boston College. He is the author of several books about cultural and religious issues, including Psychological Seduction, Why Johnny Can’t Tell Right from Wrong and, most recently, Christianity, Islam, and Atheism: The Struggle for the Soul of the West. Professor Kilpatrick’s articles on cultural and educational topics have appeared in First Things, Policy Review, American Enterprise, American Educator, The Los Angeles Times, and various scholarly journals. His articles on Islam have appeared in Aleteia, National Catholic Register, Investor’s Business Daily, FrontPage Magazine, and other publications. Professor Kilpatrick’s work is supported in part by the Shillman Foundation. For more on his work and writings, visit his website, turningpointproject.com.

6 Comments

  1. Mr Bill has once again hit the nail on the head with his hammer of logic and facts.The generation of selfies,and the constant inane reporting of what’s “trending” on our computers has created a dumbed down and “stoned” society that is easy pickings for the “Devils Worship”.

  2. I don’t consider transgenderism a fad as much as another stage (perhaps a late stage) in the evolution of the progressive movement. It is true that fads come and go however the “trans” movement is all about the progression to “no natures” and a complete eradication of the natural law so that everything moral and psychological is in flux (even Heraclitis would have a tough time with this!) Also, transgenderism began with feminism or the hope of the full transformation of gender and is it any wonder that feminism is a great ally to the T in the LGBT? Further, unless you can successfully wrench the T away from the LGB this is not going away any time soon. Lastly, socialism and communism are also political evolutionary theories mostly favorable to social progressivism (unless like Russia they have a traditional nationalism) so that here in the U.S. where socialism is becoming more popular we are seeing parliamentary alliances being established that all feed off of each other satisfying each others appetites. But like Ungoliant they want to consume all.

  3. Radical Islam and Transgenderism are essentially alike, as implied in the article here. The similarities go way much deeper, though, as both amputate and re-fabricate both Language and Reality, and therefore both need the violence, force and intimidation of anti-cultural made-up laws. Both are the result of the Progressive Dehumanization and the Weaponized Virulent Inferiority Complex that has been infecting Christianity, the United States, Europe and the World, with special emphasis on those who believe in the TRUE JESUS and the TRUE FREEDOM that He came to bring.

    If we truly believed, like our Holy Catholic Ancestors, in the Absolute Eternal Authority and Unassailable Superiority of Jesus Christ, True Man and True God, and His Holy Catholic Doctrine, LGBT would not have a faint hope of existing. It would have remained as the demented dream it is, but exclusively in mental hospitals and institutions.

    To defeat LGBT and its nefarious, progressive, poisonous hyper-feminization, hyper-infantilization, hyper-stupidization and hyper-insanification of humankind, it is imperative that we pray with all our hearts to Jesus and ask for His Almighty Grace to return to His Absolute Supremacy over us, over the whole world, over the Church and over all that exists. “… He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross. Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is ABOVE EVERY NAME, that at the name of Jesus EVERY KNEE should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, and that EVERY TONGUE should confess that Jesus Christ is LORD, to the Glory of God the Father”, (Philippians 2:8-11). Yes, even the demons destined to Hell. Now, THAT’S Absolute Superiority!!

    From now on, every time you hear the toxic LGBT False Gospel, the Islamophilia False Gospel, Pope Francis’ Compromise False Gospel, etc. preached in any way, form or as the article mentions, fashion, REALIZE you are being pushed to accept the unacceptable, tolerate the intolerable, humanize the demonic, and sanctify the unsanctifiable, by accepting a Satanic Feeling of Inferiority in yourself and becoming an ACCOMPLICE. Reject it, refuse it, abhor it and you will be taking away the power from these hyper-false victims, which in Truth are our HYPER-VICTIMIZERS!!

    “Submit yourselves, then, [totally] to God [and His Absolute Supremacy]. Resist the devil [in God’s Supreme Authority, at any cost], and he will flee from you”, [brackets mine] (James 4:7)!! “As it is written: “For Your sake we face death all day long; we are considered as sheep to be slaughtered.” No, in all these things we are MORE THAN CONQUERORS through Him who loved us”, (Romans 8:36-37). Let’s submit to Jesus’ LGBT: Liberated, Glorified, Blessed and Transformed in His Image!!

  4. I’m sort of confused about the French lawsuit. I just finished a primer on Islam written by a Muslim in 1962. The name of the young girl who married Mohammad is A’isha, and she became the favorite of Mohammad’s wives. After his death, she was prominent in many of the older Haddiths and she’s traditionally been held in very high esteem by the Muslim community.

    The only issue of controversy is her age. I was unable to quickly locate the discussion in my book, but Wikipedia states that she was from age 6 to 9 at her betrothal. As I recall, she was married a few years later.

    Nowhere did I read that Muslims seek to hide the name of A’isha. If they do and if they seek to rid themselves of her, they’ll have to eliminate a significant number of sound Haddiths from Islamic Tradition. This would have a significant effect on Islam.

    The lawsuit is not making sense to me. Has something changed in Islam?

    • No-nothing has changed in Islam, and child brides are common in rural areas in Muslim dominant countries. They try to keep that quiet as it makes them look bad in non-dominant Muslim countries.
      .
      They also hide such things as “female circumcision.”

  5. Makes me wonder if ‘Wormwood’ and ‘Apophis’ are the same object in space heading toward Earth in 9 years. Fifty years ago I would have said no way; but not I am not so sure. Can you imagine a U.S. 8 years from now in which it would be a crime for a Catholic priest to refuse to perform a marriage ceremony for a gay couple in front of the blessed sacrament? Where it would be legal to ‘abort’ a child up to 1 week after birth? Where it would be legal for a doctor to prescribe euthanasia medication? A world in which the vast majority of the 10 Billion humans on this planet are either Muslim, no religion or ‘Progressive’ Christians like Pete Buttigig? When that day comes I wonder if I would actually welcome Wormwood. Oh well, confession for me this weekend.

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. The Tyranny of Fashion - Catholic Mass Search
  2. Catholic World Report:The Tyranny of Fashion – chaos

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*