The Rise of Skywalker: Reduced expectations and damage control

The final installment in the Skywalker saga is entertaining, but can’t overcome the problems inherited from the previous two films.

Daisy Ridley as Rey in "Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker"

Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker is not a good movie. Its frenetic pace rushes us through a convoluted plot, any particular moment of which has its own problems. The plausibility of the plot and characters’ decisions relies too much on the viewer’s distraction. J.J. Abrams, who got his big-time start in TV, seems to have wanted to cram a full season of plot and characters into 142 minutes. Fitting for the Disney property, this Star Wars movie feels much more like a Marvel movie than one of George Lucas’ films.

Still, if you are going to see The Rise of Skywalker, you are probably less interested in how the movie works as a movie and more interested in whether it manages to finish out the nine-film Skywalker saga successfully. After all, if The Rise of Skywalker is a mess, it also inherited a mess from The Last Jedi, which had itself inherited a bland plot and characters from The Force Awakens.

The Rise of Skywalker, therefore, is operating with reduced expectations. It is highly entertaining, with several fun action sequences and some humor. But along the way, it tacitly admits how misbegotten the sequel-trilogy story was from the beginning, concedes that the new heroes and villains are not compelling, and utterly repudiates the creative choices of Last Jedi director Rian Johnson.

In order to understand the problems with the sequel-trilogy, you have to understand where the story stood at the end of the previous two trilogies. In the prequel-trilogy (The Phantom Menace, Attack of the Clones, and Revenge of the Sith) the Jedi have grown arrogant and complacent, and are unable to see the rise of the evil Sith from within their midst. Their blindness flows from their aloofness, and their aloofness is the result of the ossification of the Jedi teaching that personal attachments are to be avoided because they give rise to passions like anger and jealousy, which themselves lead to the Dark Side.

The inhumanity of Jedi practice leaves young Anakin Skywalker open to seduction to the Dark Side. His secret affair with and then marriage to Padme Amidala is the opening that Sheev Palpatine, later revealed to be a Dark Lord of the Sith, needs to turn Anakin from the Light. The failure to take account of the place of both friendship and love, the prequels show, results in a vulnerability to the very dark impulses the Jedi strive to oppose. The Jedi’s own apolitical lack of attachments also seems to blind them to the motives of Palpatine, whose ambitions are alien and opaque to them. The prequel-trilogy ends with the failure of the Jedi, but also with a new hope: Anakin’s children, Luke and Leia.

The original Star Wars trilogy presents Luke and Leia as the Jedi’s only hope, while also depicting the old Order’s flaws; as I explained in my review of Rogue One, “When Luke receives visions of his friends Han and Leia suffering on Cloud City in The Empire Strikes Back, Yoda warns Luke that his attachment to his friends should not blind Luke to the bigger picture: completing his training so that he can defeat Darth Vader. Yoda’s allegiance to calculation and his admonition to Luke are not just the difference between the caution of age and Luke’s hot-blooded spiritedness; they also reveal that Yoda is not moved by personal love, as Luke is. But it is ultimately Luke’s capacity for personal love that overcomes Vader, not his advanced Jedi training. Luke receives what he can from Yoda, but also surpasses his flawed master.”

The Return of the Jedi therefore leaves us with Luke Skywalker as the hope for the founding of a renewed Jedi Order, because he has received both what was good in the old Jedi Order and also rejected the sources of their corruption.

The story that J.J. Abrams tells in the sequel-trilogy is really about the aftermath of Luke’s failure to re-found the Jedi. In The Force Awakens, we are told his failure has to do with his nephew, Ben Solo, turning to the Dark Side.

As I said in my review of The Last Jedi, “The very thing that distinguished Luke from the old-school Jedi Obi-Wan and Yoda was his ability to see the potential for redemption in even the darkest of figures. That his ‘instinctual’ reaction to Ben Solo’s corruption would be the desire to murder him eviscerates Luke’s character, making him prone to exactly the same failing of the Jedi that he supposedly conquered in Return of the Jedi.”

That Luke might fail to re-found the Jedi Order is plausible, and could make a very interesting story. But that Luke would fail to re-found the Jedi Order by making exactly the same errors that his masters made and that he repudiated in The Empire Strikes Back and The Return of the Jedi subverts his character, and in a particularly wooden and unintelligent way.

The Rise of Skywalker therefore has a huge burden: it must tell the story of the returned Jedi, but after the original trilogy’s “new hope” has been dashed. The problem, as becomes clear in Rise of Skywalker, is that neither Rey nor Kylo Ren are sufficiently self-possessed, or have been sufficiently fleshed out as characters, to bear the burden of moving such a weighty plot forward. Kylo Ren is too damaged, too compromised a character to pull it off; there is really only one way his story can end. So we are left with Rey, who might be able to succeed in one of two ways: she could demonstrate herself to be a miraculous sage, able to exercise wisdom without having acquired it through experience; or she could rely on the Jedi wisdom of the ages. Even the latter route has its problems: if she relies on the wisdom of Jedi tradition, how could she avoid the flaws that led to their corruption and fall during the Clone Wars?

What follows here contains The Rise of Skywalker spoilers. It must be said Rey does not show herself to be particularly reflective. Her main insights are given to her by others: by Luke, Leia, Han Solo, and even Kylo Ren. So she is not a sage. While The Last Jedi’s explicit message was that Rey needed nothing outside of her own resources in order to succeed, in The Rise of Skywalker, Rey undertakes Jedi training with Leia and tries to commune with past Jedi, hoping that they will guide her through the Force. The Last Jedi seems comfortable, along with Kylo Ren, to “let the past die.” But The Rise of Skywalker instead turns Rey into a conduit for the past.

Rey’s victory over Palpatine is the final repudiation of Rian Johnson’s vision in The Last Jedi. Far from having everything she needs in her own awesome self, Rey cannot win unless she stands consciously as the heir and recipient of an ancient tradition that transcends herself.

The strength of the old Jedi Order is her strength. But where is Luke Skywalker’s personal love? Where is his willingness to sacrifice self for others? How can this mode of victory provide for a re-founding of the Jedi that both recognizes the old Order’s goodness and avoids its flaws?

Rise of Skywalker tries to satisfy, but the sequel-trilogy has taken too many wrong turns and missed too many opportunities for resolution to be possible in a single movie. The ending of the nine-movie saga cannot be satisfying, but at least there may be some relief: there will be no more unworthy successors in the Skywalker film saga and, in the end, at least Abrams has limited the damage Johnson had done. Any new hope for better Star Wars stories, it seems, lies in the episodic streaming shows. “Help me, Dave Filoni. You’re my only hope.”


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Thomas P. Harmon 17 Articles
Thomas P. Harmon is Associate Professor and Scanlan Foundation Chair in Theology at the University of St. Thomas in Houston, TX. He lives in Sugar Land with his wife and five children.

17 Comments

  1. Disney ruined Star Wars. Rogue One was the only decent Disney Star Wars movie, but Disney actually had little to do with that film’s plot.

  2. Star Wars films generally put me to sleep but I’ve taken my children in the past because I assumed the plots were free of deviancy & R rated material.
    This latest edition features what another Catholic publication called a “fleeting same sex kiss.”
    So, nope I’m not supporting this movie with my hard earned $$.
    I want to watch “A Hidden Life” instead but don’t see it scheduled to play in our local theatres yet.

    • I went with a family member who wanted to see the film. I didn’t know about the same sex kiss, if I had, I wouldn’t have gone. Disney has become a sellout to the SJW crowd. Second, the film doesn’t pass “the squirm test”. If I find myself squirming in my seat it is because the movie isn’t holding my attention. And the Kylo Ren character is a joke.

      • Ron,
        I read on the BBC’s site today that Disney has removed that scene for the film’s release in Singapore.
        It’s a shame Americans don’t receive the same respect.

        • mscracker – I would like to think if just 10% of Christians said “Enough!” Disney would change; however, the “bathroom” boycott against Target was very successful, in terms of folks staying away, but Target was so entrenched with their position that they were unwilling to change. Probably because if they had, the media would have trashed them. Disney on the other hand, wouldn’t need to make an announcement they just need to clean up future movies.

  3. I liked The Last Jedi. If TROS is dedicated to erasing TLJ’s legacy to appease a bunch of whiny fanboys, then I think it would be better to give it a pass.

  4. Rey, yeh I liked her better when she was called Jania Solo daughter of Han and Leia Organa Solo. I also like Kylo Rhen better when he was called Jacen Solo/Darth Caedeus (twin brother of Jania and old brother of the late Anakin Solo).

    Also the only other Ben character was Ben Skywalker son of Luke and Mara Jade Skywalker.

    The Star War Legends/Original Expanded Universe novels and stories are the only true sequels. Disney is just making weird fan films. The REAL Luke Skywalker restored the Jedi Order, married a hot red head and had a son and grandchildren and Great Grandchildren.

    I have little use for the Incel they called “Luke” in the Disney Fan Films even if he was played by Mark Hamell.

    • “The REAL Luke Skywalker”

      /me squinches up her eyes and looks at you. You do realize that Luke Skywalker isn’t real, right? 🙂

      But I know what you mean. None of the sequel novels I read made me run screaming, figuratively speaking, from the series the way the first of the third trilogy did. It sounds as if 2 and 3 are even worse.

      • Of course Luke is real. He is a real fictional character who really exists in the fictional world we really created in our imaginations.:D

  5. While not nearly as bad as it could be according to current immodest fashions, the picture of Rey is immodest and shouldn’t be on a Catholic website.

    “A dress cannot be called decent which is cut deeper than two fingers’ breadth under the pit of the throat; which does not cover the arms at least to the elbows; and scarcely reaches a bit beyond the knees. Furthermore, dresses of transparent material are improper.” (Cardinal-Vicar of Pope Pius XI, Cardinal Pompili, on 24 September 1928)

    • And 91 years before Pope Pius XI, Pope Gregory XVI’s Cardinal-Vicar would probably have said that a dress could not be called decent that did not cover the arms to the wrist, and did not reach to the ankles. Clothing changes. Rey’s outfit isn’t immodest, though it is ugly.

  6. From what I’ve heard, one of the major issues that long time Star Wars fans have is that the sequel-trilogy plays it fast and loose with the canon of the saga. You could say that the dispute is over the hermeneutic of continuity versus the hermeneutic of rupture. Between coherence and incoherence.

  7. Good review, if too kind. The whole thing is one big overstuffed holiday ham. With leads that lack spark or star power. Your time is better spent watching Netflix’ Lost in Space reboot, which is, in a word, T-rrific.

Leave a Reply to mrscracker Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*