Bishop Cary: “Satan wants to destroy the Eucharist” and the priesthood

“The diabolical aspect of [former Cardinal McCarrick’s] betrayal is crucial,” says Bishop Liam Cary of Baker, Oregon. “It goes beyond human frailty, it is a deep-seated evil, and a betrayal of the Son of God.”

Bishop Liam Cary in Baker, Oregon saying Mass in 2012. (YouTube)

Bishop Liam Cary, 71, has led the Diocese of Baker, Oregon since 2012. He was born in Portland, the oldest of four children, and grew up in Prineville, twenty miles away from Redmond where he presently resides as diocesan bishop. In 1961, at age 14, he entered Mount Angel Seminary, where he studied through his college years. He left the seminary for 18 years, but returned and was ordained a priest at age 45 for the Archdiocese of Portland in 1992. He served in multiple parishes in the archdiocese before coming to Baker, which makes up the eastern two-thirds of the state of Oregon.

Bishop Cary spoke recently with CWR about vocations, the current scandals in the Church, the controversies over inter-Communion, the importance of reading Scripture, and recent 50th anniversary of Humanae Vitae.

CWR: What influenced you to become a priest?

Bishop Liam Cary: I was impressed by the example of my pastor at St. Joseph’s Parish in Prineville, Fr. Thomas McTeigue, who died at age 45 in 1960. (He had a bad heart; I remember how he’d come to dinner and thoroughly salt his meat. I’m sure that wasn’t good for him!)

Fr. McTeigue was a very holy man. As a bishop, I think I can appreciate that better. He was highly respected and widely admired by both his fellow clergy and the people.

He died at age 45, and I was ordained a priest at 45. So, in effect, I think of myself as having taken his place.

CWR: Can you give an overview of the Diocese of Baker?

Bishop Cary: Land-wise, we’re about the 4th or 5th largest diocese south of the Canadian border. We have 66,800 square miles of territory east of the Cascades. But, population-wise, we’re about the 3rd or 4th smallest, with about 30,000 or 40,000 Catholics. Bend is our largest city, with about 95,000 people. We have many other small and tiny towns.

I live 20 miles from Bend. The area here is high desert, which means we have sunlight about 300 days per year. It is a wonderful climate, with no humidity. It is a beautiful country, and a joy for me to drive through. I can drive somewhere by one route and enjoy one kind of terrain, then come home by another and enjoy an entirely different kind of terrain.

We’re a mostly non-Catholic area. In fact, we have a history of anti-Catholicism going back to the 1800s. We live in a part of the state that once had KKK parades. We have a long heritage of suspicion towards Catholics.

We have 35 priests, who serve from 35 to 40 parishes and missions.

CWR: How are you doing for vocations for the priesthood and religious life?

Bishop Cary: We have three seminarians. I ordained a priest two years ago, and we’re on track to ordain another next year. We have programs to promote vocations, such as Quo Vadis Days, a camp for young men to learn about the priesthood.

In the women’s religious area, we have some Sisters of Mary of Kakamega from Kenya, who run a home for the aged in Bend. They’ve been here seven or eight years, and have been well received.

This year, we’ve also welcomed three Salesian Sisters of St. John Bosco who are teaching in St. Francis School, one of four parish schools we have in the diocese. They’ve been a wonderful addition, and our parents and grandparents are delighted to have the presence of religious in our schools again.

CWR: You regularly write letters to Catholics in the Diocese of Baker. Some of your most recent letters are about scandal in the Church. How do you think we’ve come to the place we are, and what do you think can or must be done?

Bishop Cary: It is a mystery, as the evil of sexual abuse is so often a hidden activity. The 2004 John Jay Report studied this topic as regards to priests and deacons, but did not examine why it happened with bishops: how it came to be, the extent to which some might be actively involved or helped cover it up.

We need to have a better view of what went on specifically among some bishops, so that we can take effective measures to prevent it from happening again. I believe the 2002 Dallas Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People was successful in combating sexual abuse by priests and deacons; we now need something similar for bishops. At our upcoming USCCB General Assembly in Baltimore [November 12-14] we’ll be looking at some proposals involving third party mechanisms to ensure that bishops are not complicit in sexual abuse, and that someone can report an allegation of sexual abuse involving a bishop and not have a fear of being retaliated against. And, we need to ensure that allegations are not merely reported, but that action is taken, something like a priest before a review board.

As I reflect on cases such as the one involving the former Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, I am reminded of apostolic betrayal in Scripture. Both words are crucial. The Apostles were the witnesses at the first Eucharist. Betrayal is linked to the Eucharist, for as we say at Mass, “the night before He was betrayed …”

Our Lord knew who his betrayer was. He knew they were coming for Him in the Garden of Gethsemane and could have easily avoided capture, but He didn’t. When His name was called, He stepped forward out of the darkness. Why? Had He not allowed Himself to be betrayed, it would have suggested that betrayal was one sin God can’t forgive, and Satan would have won. When we reflect on our own experiences of being betrayed, we can begin to appreciate all the Lord has done for us.

I’d also add that Satan wants to destroy the Eucharist, and he can do that by trying to destroy the priesthood, and the bishops as well. If he can do this, he can ruin the faith of the people.

CWR: Pope Paul VI has been canonized and this year marks the 50th anniversary of the papal encyclical Humanae Vitae. What are your thoughts on these two events?

Bishop Cary: Humanae Vitae is the defining statement of the Church against the modern world. Artificial contraception is taken for granted by so many; they believe it is the way to go. But the Church replies no, it’s not.

Catholics need to consider that if the Church is wrong on this issue, why wouldn’t it be wrong on any other issue … say, that Christ is present in the Eucharist or that Jesus is God made man? Humanae Vitae is linked to the nature and the authority of the Church.

I’d also note that the discussion of contraceptive use so often focuses on the circumstances of the individual couple, but overlooks that what they do has social and cultural consequences. Contraception separates sex from reproduction, and reproduction from sex. Once that has been accomplished, considering modern reproductive technologies, young people can no longer see the connection between the two.

It suggests that the responsibility of the child is the woman’s alone. So, if a man and a woman, who are unmarried, have a child together, he’ll often take on the attitude: that’s your business, not mine. This can lead to abortion.

Contraceptive use indicates that we can’t expect people to be chaste—or to practice “restraint” as they called it in the 19th century—it’s too much to ask. Chastity, this line of thinking goes, is not necessary for the moral perfection of the individual and society. It began with married people in the 19th century; now we can’t expect our 8th graders to be chaste.

And, the mentality that goes with contraceptive use is that it is needed to prevent overpopulation. A couple should have no more than two children; it is wrong to have a large family. Couples who do want many children must overcome the opprobrium of others.

CWR: In 1946, Pope Pius XII said that the greatest sin in the world today was that men have lost the sense of sin. Was he right? And, have we lost the awareness that there are devils who do tempt us to sin?

Bishop Cary: Yes, Pope Pius XII was right. We do sin, and then we try to justify our sins. And yes, we’ve lost awareness of the enemy. Let me revisit the McCarrick case. The diabolical aspect of his betrayal is crucial. It goes beyond human frailty, it is a deep-seated evil, and a betrayal of the Son of God.

CWR: Some German bishops said that they were going to allow intercommunion for Protestant spouses earlier this year. You published a column stating your disagreement with this practice. Can you explain?

Bishop Cary: People have told me at funerals that I should invite everyone up to Communion, whether Catholic or not. But, when you receive Communion and say “amen,” you are saying that you are a Catholic. You are saying “amen” to the Body of Christ, to the priest who put that Host in your hands, to your belief in the Mass itself, to the Creed recited at it, to the sacramental life of the Catholic Church and to your belief in the special role the Blessed Mother plays in that Church. If you can’t say “amen” to these teachings of the Church and all the others, that you believe and profess them, you shouldn’t be receiving Communion.

We have a 500-year-old disagreement with Protestants on a number of issues. We need to respect their decision not to be Catholic. By inviting them to Communion, we are putting them in a situation of declaring themselves to be something they are not.

CWR: We just had a midterm election. You asked Catholics in Baker to vote yes on Measure 106, which would have stopped taxpayer funded abortions. What other public policy issues are of importance to you?

Bishop Cary: First off, Measure 106 did not pass, which was a disappointment, but not unexpected.

In Oregon, I’m increasingly concerned about the bureaucratic imposition of a secular morality. We had a state bureaucracy make a change to our state insurance that would allow 15-year-old children to have sex reassignment procedures without the approval of their parents. The bureaucracy made its decision, and everyone is expected to get in line.

Or, there was a bakery outside of Portland that refused to make a cake for a same-sex wedding. The state fined them $135,000 and drove them out of business. They are trying to force citizens to do something that goes against their conscience.

CWR: You have a strong background in Scripture. Why is it important for the ordinary Catholic to regularly read the Bible?

Bishop Cary: It is foundational. It is God speaking to us, in the world as it is, and to us as we are. This is the place to find the truth, directed at our minds and hearts.

We need to receive that Word in a communal form, in the liturgy, and privately, as we close the door of our room, and let it assimilate within us. In this way, the Lord will speak to us on the details of our lives.

Jesus offers us peace: “Peace I leave with you, my peace I give to you …” (John 14:27). One way we can have that peace is from the Word of God. My favorite saint, St. Francis de Sales, reminds us that it is most important that we find and keep our peace of soul. That is one of the functions of the Word of God.

CWR: What basic program of spirituality would you recommend to the typical layman?

Bishop Cary: There are many good programs out there. But to be serious about the spiritual life, we need to start small and regular. I was raised near a Benedictine monastery. The order of the day was to say short prayers at regular intervals, rather than long prayers right off the bat.

I would find things that speak to you. I would make use of holy images, and have them in a small space conducive to prayer. I would consider doing the Liturgy of the Hours, either the whole thing or small adaptations.

CWR: Who are some of your Catholic heroes?

Bishop Cary: Fr. Thomas McTeigue would be one, as well as another pastor I once knew. I also admired my aunt. She never married, and died at age 55, but was a very holy person. I can also think of other holy people who were part of my life that I’d like to be like.

As far as saints, I mentioned my fondness for St. Francis de Sales. I love his writing style. He was very good at connecting spirituality to the daily life of lay people.

About Jim Graves 159 Articles
Jim Graves is a Catholic writer living in Newport Beach, California.

14 Comments

  1. “Catholics need to consider that if the Church is wrong on this issue [contraception], why wouldn’t it be wrong on any other issue …”

    Isn’t it obvious yet that the Church must have been wrong about all of those things that were “reformed” in Vatican II? Practically everything the Church has taught about Herself, God, man, the liturgy, morality, Revelation, Tradition, heresies, and Church governance must have been wrong or why were all of them “reformed”? Not much that is Catholic remains and what does remain is being systematically destroyed. Why isn’t it obvious that by their fruits ye shall know them? What good fruits are there in the Church since this Council? None.

    • For Elaine,
      Let’s be careful to not tar things with too-wide a brush. To actually read the Vatican II documents can be an interesting pass-time. (There is evidence that many seminarians of the 70s never did this.) Yes, there are some troublesome lines—now being exploited for sure, but also cobbled into the mix are at least some correctives, today to be underlined. A good pair is these:
      Constitution on the Church in the Modern World: “Thus, the human race has passed from a rather static concept of reality to a more dynamic, evolutionary one” (for sure an echo of Teilhard de Chardin’s poetry—not real theology).

      Constitution on Divine Revelation: “The Christian dispensation, therefore, is the new and definitive covenant, will never pass away, and we now await not further new public revelation [Veritatis Splendor versus “anthropological cultural change;” or any discontinuous “paradigm shift”] before the glorious manifestation of our Lord Jesus Christ.” Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today and forever (Heb 13:8).

      Rather than a “reform” in the sense of revolution, the imperfect but real Vatican II (not the virtual Vatican II) was about (1) more effective Christian engagement in the world: aggiornamento or “todaying” (not any toadying type of “updating”), and (2) ressourcement (a foundation in Scripture and the Church Fathers, rather than today’s well-positioned clericalism and grafitti theologians du jour).

      The ever-up-to-date St. Augustine anticipated today’s manipulated confusion some fifteen centuries ago when he said “we can say things differently, but we can’t say different things.” As in Old Testament times, the problem is false prophets (the “prophet” motive), maybe not the real Vatican II.

  2. The Bishop says…
    “I’d also add that Satan wants to destroy the Eucharist, and he can do that by trying to destroy the priesthood, and the bishops as well. If he can do this, he can ruin the faith of the people.” Could that be interpreted as only Catholic clergy is being attacked by Satan? Without being too facetious one could add a familiar saying of Flip Wilson when he said to escape responsibility… “the Devil made me do it”. I call that “transference”… it will never end, but the blame must be squarely placed on the failing Catholic hierarchy.

    • If the church today 2018 is desperate or worried that the scandal will leave us fewer priests, we can easily turn to converted ministers, deacons to fill in. The faithful will just love to see that happen because after all of these mess, we want more cleansed, purified, more HOLIER CHURCH.

  3. After reading the COR ORANS for the contemplative cloistered nuns, the first part of its description is very beautiful but the last part when it demands the strict cloistered nuns to go out to join federations, etc. etc. looks so threatening, not like command from our dear Lord as He even respect the freedom of His creatures….. Strict cloistered contemplative nuns who love and live their hidden life with Christ in silent solitude represent the heart of the Mystical Body of Christ, the CHURCH. Now to remove them from fixing their full attention to God in their daily life would force them to turn their back to God, sad indeed….it would diminish their close union with God and the weaken their heart-support to the Mystical Body of Christ… Am afraid the devil will rob the consecrated brides of Christ and destroy the Myscical Body of Christ. Please pray that good Pope Francis will revise the COR ORANS and remove the demand from obliging the strict contemplative nuns to turn away their focuss from God in the prayer life as God respects the freedom of His creatures. Our dear Lord also told St. Martha, “Martha. Martha, why are you so worry and fret about so many things? only one thing is necessary, Mary has chosen the better part and it will not be taken away from her.” Jesus also confirmed ,”No one can serve two masters” in one go, so……

  4. I don’t ever recall any priest or bishop mentioning the grave harm done to the victims of the sexual abuse. They always talk about process and the need to preserve the priesthood and the church from the attack of evil. There’s something terribly wrong and amiss in that mindset.

    • I’ve seen numerous remarks, both formal and otherwise, by bishops and priests lamenting the serious harm done to victims. There are many out there.

  5. Elaine et al,
    Look for the good ( Christ) and stop focusing on the bad (evil one). Otherwise you become part of the problem. In the Church I attend in Florida during season the daily mass swells to 300 to 500 people. Yes, that’s right. During lent we have 500 people at daily mass. We also have three different prayer groups, stations of the cross, adoration. Our generation learned to pray and when we retired we continued to pray and help the poor. Our parish has a great outreach through St. Vincent de Paul. We are the Church, the people of God. How about you?

  6. If the bishops don’t formalize as pre-1910 that adult sex in the priesthood is grounds for dismissal, they are wasting our time again like not including bishops in the 2002 charter. Same old bait and switch of men of “deep” faith.

  7. I would suggest that Rome is trying its darnedest to replace the council of Trent with Vatican 2 and to substitute the Eucharist with Ecumenism

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*