Battered by another scandal involving yet another gay priest
in the Bridgeport Diocese, faithful Catholics remain bewildered by the apparent
inability of their leaders to protect the Church from such humiliation. While prior cases involved gay priests
like Fr. Jude Fay, a pastor in Darien, who had embezzled more than a million
dollars from parishioners’ donations to support a lavish lifestyle with his gay
partner, this latest case involves something much more sinister.
On Friday, January 18th, Connecticut Catholics
awoke to front page above-the-fold headlines in the Connecticut Post claiming: “Meth
Priest Case Widens: Clergyman Liked Cross-Dressing, Sex in Rectory.” Reporting
that Monsignor Kevin Wallin, a pastor who had been on leave from the Diocese
for the past year—but still on the payroll—had been arrested for dealing
crystal methamphetamine.
That was just the beginning of the story. Reading further,
Connecticut Catholics learned that in the spring of 2011, when Monsignor Wallin
served as pastor of St. Augustine’s Cathedral in Bridgeport, rectory personnel
became concerned when: “Wallin, sometimes dressed as a woman, would entertain
odd-looking men, some who were also dressed in women’s clothing and engaging in
sex acts in the rectory.” The Post also
reported that “bizarre sex toys” were found in the pastor’s residence within
the rectory.
In the spring of 2011, rectory personnel contacted the
Diocese. Diocesan spokesman Brian Wallace was quoted in the Post as saying that “diocesan officials consulted lawyers
about the situation and were assured that none of Wallin’s behavior appeared
illegal.” Still, according to Wallace, “We approached him and he admitted he
was struggling a bit and shortly after that he resigned (July, 2011) and the
bishop granted him a sabbatical.”
Struggling a bit? Most Catholics find this behavior much
more than “struggling a bit.” Most Catholics would find it unbelievable that
the Diocese would continue paying a stipend to a pastor who is having
cross-dressing sex parities in the rectory. But, they would be even more shocked to learn that during
the time Wallin was collecting money from parishioner donations, federal drug
enforcement authorities claim that he was allegedly making more than $9,000 a
week for selling methamphetamine. In fact, his amphetamine selling business was
so lucrative that in order to launder the money, Wallin had purchased an adult
sex shop in North Haven named The Land of Oz.
Still, even after his arrest on federal drug charges, Wallin
continues to collect his stipend from the Diocese. The front page—again,
above-the-fold—of the Saturday, January 19th edition of the Connecticut
Post headline warned: “Church
May Withhold Meth Priest’s Paycheck.”
Stories like this make it difficult for faithful Catholics
to defend the Church against both serious criticisms and biased attacks. This
case opens the door again to those who want to make dramatic changes in the
authority structure of the Church. Groups like Voice of the Faithful who have
lobbied for empowering the laity—at the expense of the authority of the bishops
and priests—have been given a gift from the way the Wallin case has been
handled. A spokeswoman for SNAP (Survivors Network for those Abused by Priests”
has already claimed that this case is just one more example of the “bishops’
long pattern of deception.”
It is not a coincidence that the 2007 attempted takeover of
the governance of the Catholic Church in Connecticut by State lawmakers emerged
in the Bridgeport Diocese. The proposed bill, which was later withdrawn by the
two Democratic lawmakers who had proposed it, would have removed the governing
authority from the bishops and priests, and transferred it to lay leaders. It is likely that such proposals will
emerge yet again in light of these latest revelations.