The Dispatch: More from CWR...

Chastity vs. Tyrannical Sex

“The moment sex ceases to be a servant,” observed G.K. Chesterton, “it becomes a tyrant.” Evidence for the destructive consequences of tyrannical sex abounds in wrecked relationships, wrecked families, and wrecked lives.

(us.fotolia.com/MG)

G.K. Chesterton got a lot of things right. Here’s one: “The moment sex ceases to be a servant it becomes a tyrant.” Evidence for the destructive consequences of tyrannical sex abounds in wrecked relationships, wrecked families, and wrecked lives.

But there’s an alternative. The solution to the problem of sex run rampant lies in the cultivation and practice of chastity.

Sounds simple. But what do we see all around us today? The answer to that is no less simple: we see a bad situation that appears to be getting worse.

Fresh evidence for that depressing conclusion comes from a recent Gallup survey.

On ten issues on which Gallup has measured public attitudes for years—since 2001, in most cases—the level of public approval hit a new high in early May.

The issues include birth control (91% approval), sex between an unmarried man and woman (69%), gay or lesbian relations (63%), pregnancy outside marriage (62%), and pornography (36%).

Even polygamy registered a new high, though admittedly still pretty low—just 17%.

To a great extent, the explanation for numbers like these lies in the tyrannical dynamic of unfettered sex. Today, though, it also has another, important source—a complementary, ideologically driven campaign of opposition to traditional sexual morality. Not surprisingly, the Catholic Church is a prime target for this effort.

Here is a case in point.

Lately there has been a rather lively discussion of a book by Father James Martin, a Jesuit priest and writer, that calls on the Catholic Church to show “respect, compassion, and sensitivity” to the LGBT community. I haven’t read the book—Building a Bridge is its title—but I agree entirely that LGBT people do deserve respect, compassion, and sensitivity. For Catholics, of course, that shouldn’t be at the expense of compromised fidelity to the teaching of the Church.

That said, I cite (for the light it sheds on the campaign against the traditional teaching) a scathing review of Father Martin’s book that appeared in the June 18 Washington Post. The reviewer is one Sally Kohn, whom the Post identifies as a CNN political commentator and who identifies herself as a lesbian.

Ripping into the volume, Ms. Kohn notes that the words “respect, compassion, and sensitivity” come from the Catechism of the Catholic Church. But, she adds, the Catechism also repeats the Church’s time-honored disapproval of homosexual sex.

And that being so, she has no interest in receiving respect, compassion, and sensitivity from the Church. Instead, what she wants is for the Church to admit that it’s wrong, and, following upon that admission, extend “full inclusion and equal dignity” to LGBT people who are “healthy, happy [and] sexually active.”

Sally Kohn is hardly alone. Many other activists and would-be change agents of the sexual revolution say much the same thing.

Lately, it appears, even Sesame Street has joined this chorus, observing Gay Pride Month by tweeting a rainbow flag-style lineup of its characters together with assurances that “Sesame Street is proud to support families of all shapes, sizes, and colors.” This, I take it, is a message the show now aims to communicate to its preschool audience.

Writing of the disastrous fallacy that underlies the endorsement of tyrannical sex, G.K. Chesterton calls happy talk about sex “being free like any other sense [and] the body being beautiful like any tree or flower…either a description of the Garden of Eden or a piece of thoroughly bad psychology.”

Pretty clearly we aren’t living in Eden now. Guess what that leaves.

About Russell Shaw 141 Articles
Russell Shaw was secretary for public affairs of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops/United States Catholic Conference from 1969 to 1987. He is the author of 20 books, including Nothing to Hide and the highly acclaimed American Church: The Remarkable Rise, Meteoric Fall, and Uncertain Future of Catholicism in America.

3 Comments

  1. Everything well said. There are different rationale for practicing chastity. It can be done in the exercise of evil as godlike. Even “Lucretius the advocate of pleasure wrote, ‘Such is the power of reason to overcome inborn vices that nothing prevents our living a life worthy of the gods’ in Proem 3.321-22” (Assent to Truth, Fr Peter Morello, PhD). Often the Christian practices chastity in a form of military discipline. Often the willed discipline of the chaste crumbles with temptation. The priest has a life saving mission regarding chastity. Often it is the military kind inculcated in the seminary. In tomorrow’s Gospel 14th Sunday Christ hints at something infinitely better. “Father what you have hidden from the learned you revealed to little ones” (Mt 11). Purity and humility are not simply learned they are spiritual gifts. Purity is among the more beautiful of all such gifts. It is motivated by imparted knowledge, spoken of within. Spiritual light. Humility the essence of “little ones” is manifest of an understanding of the Beauty of God, and a deep love. It is that love that priests are called to manifest to the world by their chastity. And where we have failed so miserably.

  2. What saddens me most is that the Sally Kohns of this world are doomed by their own choice. It does not matter what they think or feel. God makes the rules. Follow tem or pay the penalty.

  3. James Martin could be called Reverend, I suppose. Because of his false teachng, he does not deserve the title Father.

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Chastity vs. Tyrannical Sex - Catholic Daily
  2. Chastity vs. Tyrannical Sex - Catholic Crossing

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*