
Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Oct 29, 2025 / 14:59 pm (CNA).
Catholics who do not gather for anti-enforcement rallies organized by high-ranking Catholic prelates are a “silent majority,” according to conservative Catholic immigration experts.
As the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement efforts continue to intensify, Catholics across the country have committed to observe days of prayer and public witness for migrants through efforts such as the One Church One Family initiative spearheaded by the western Jesuits. However, according to some conservative Catholic immigration experts, the number of Catholics who are opting out of such vigils are “a silent majority.”
The initiative calls on dioceses, parishes, schools, religious communities, and other Catholic institutions to host and promote “public actions that lift up the dignity of migrants,” such as “a vigil in front of a detention center, a prayer service at a place where migrants were publicly detained, or a rosary accompanying people who are going to immigration court hearings.”
“I think that there are a large number of American Catholics who are supportive of what the president is doing with respect to immigration,” Center for Immigration Studies Resident Fellow in Law and Policy Andrew Arthur told CNA. “I think he received a majority of Catholic votes in the last election, depending on which poll you look at.”
Immigration enforcement, he pointed out, acted as a major touchstone of President Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign. That Trump did not lean more heavily on this key issue in the 2020 campaign was also considered “one of the key failings” of his second White House attempt.
While Catholics who oppose the Trump administration’s enforcement efforts have been forthright in their advocacy for migrants, organizing vigils, Eucharistic processions, and protests, Arthur observed that the demographic of Catholics who support the administration are “not a monolith” and do not organize demonstrations in the same way.
“I don’t really know that there’s a huge Catholic enforcement group that I could point to,” he said in terms of open advocacy for enforcement. “But that’s more or less to be expected. In my mind, it’s the silent majority in this country.”
“One of the things that we see is that the Catholic Church, anecdotally, that we see that the Catholic Church, that especially younger Catholics are more conservative, and therefore, more in line with law enforcement, generally, and immigration enforcement, in particular,” he continued. “But there’s no reason to form a group to support what the administration is actually doing.”
Regarding the concerns posed by many groups, including the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Arthur insisted that there is “nothing that Donald Trump or ICE or [border czar] Tom Homan, another good Catholic, are doing that is contrary to the laws that Congress has written.” Despite the widespread critical narrative, Arthur denied there being anything particularly exceptional or specific to the Trump administration’s approach to enforcement.

“I have been involved in immigration and enforcement for 33 years and served under four different presidents, beginning with George H.W. Bush,” he said. “There’s nothing about immigration enforcement today [that’s different from enforcement] under H.W., Clinton, George W. Bush, or Barack Obama.”
‘This is what the law requires’
“This is what the law requires. This is what the agents are doing,” he continued, adding: “I think really the only exceptional part is the response that they’re receiving for it.”
Addressing concerns surrounding enforcement from a Catholic perspective, former U.S. Acting Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Ken Cuccinelli told CNA: “I am aware of the two basic points contained in the paragraph in the Catholic catechism on immigration: 1) Wealthier nations should be generous with their immigration policies; and 2) Migrants should respect the laws and customs of the nation to which they are emigrating.”
“I believe America is historically the most generous nation on Earth when it comes to inviting in people from all over the world, so we meet the first Catholic expectation,” he continued, adding: “However, an illegal alien by definition does not meet the second expectation found in the catechism, and thus the need on the part of America to enforce the law at a large scale.”
Cuccinelli emphasized the need for America’s immigration system to work for Americans first as well as the economic pitfalls for poor working-class Americans of allowing large-scale “low-skill” illegal immigration.
In the end, Cuccinelli, who also previously served as director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, told CNA he hopes the Trump administration’s efforts to demonstrate its commitment to the rule of law will prompt a return to “gradually move back to a legal immigration regime soon.”
The director of Franciscan University of Steubenville’s Center for Criminal Justice, Law, and Ethics, Charles Nemeth, also weighed in on the subject from a Catholic perspective, telling CNA: “If this be about justice, it is better to adopt the Aristotelian-Thomistic view that justice is about what is ‘due’ — nothing more and nothing less. Illegals commence their journey already in a faulted state — for they have jumped the line and disregarded our laws and traditions.”
In order for a society to be just, he said, it must look to the common good of the nation-state first rather than “the individualized needs or demands of those lacking a legal right to assimilate without the adherence to the rules and regulations that border entry calls for.”
Nemeth stated that the Biden administration’s “open-door policy” subverted the rights of U.S. citizens by permitting mass migration, which he said resulted in “a dramatic rise in crime and social unrest and made a comedy of the rule of law.” He further cited undocumented migrants’ access to benefits such as health care, food stamps, and education “while our own citizens are being crushed by the costs of the same services.”
“It is one thing to display compassion,” referencing Catholics who protest the administration’s enforcement efforts, “but quite another to undermine the social fabric of a society that allows special rules for special categories of inhabitants.”
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.



Not only among Catholics, but I suspect there is also a silent majority, or at least a hefty minority, of folks within the liberal cities who are pleased with much of the Administration’s efforts. They daren’t say so just like they keep quiet about the Administration’s efforts against crime, smiling inside all the time for the greater safety of their streets. I recall during the last time the Olympics were held in L.A. an elderly black lady being interviewed expressing how happy she was being able to walk safely in her neighborhood because of the National Guard troops who had been deployed.
People who protest the National Guard’s protection are more often those who don’t have to live in dangerous neighborhoods.
Where were the Jesuits when the Biden administration was subverting immigration law?
We have always vetted immigrants and turned away those with criminal intent. Pres. Trump is trying to obey and enforce this law. Potential immigrants who are attempting to break away from criminal organizations and intend to study and work in the USA should be welcomed. Whenever people protest the President’s stand, they need to remember those who have been murdered or teens who have been forced to join criminal gangs against their wishes in order to ensure their family’s safety. Gov. Pritzker of Illinois is allowing the poorer neighborhoods in Chicago to be ruled bu criminal mobs and gangs-shame on him trying to pass his immigration policies off as “compassion.”
To put this in context: looking around at the various rallies and demonstrations going on across the country, there are as yet no indications that a broad groundswell of public opposition to ongoing immigration enforcement has been building, despite the amount of energy invested by immigration rights advocates, their supporters and friendly media outlets. The larger protests are occurring where one would expect: in states with a relatively higher percentage of undocumented immigrants such as California and Texas, or in cities with some form of “sanctuary” policies such as Chicago, New York, Boston and Washington, DC, or in spots like Portland and Seattle where protesting seems to be a way of life. Even in those places, the overall turnout isn’t enough to suggest that most Americans are interested enough to get involved.
The exiatence of a “silent majority” of Catholics who don’t attend anti-enforcement rallies organized by bishops looks similar what’s going on elsewhere in the country. Whether this is because they actively support the Administration’s immigration enforcement efforts, or because they have mixed feelings, it’s hard to say because they’re being … silent. Either way, the practical result is the same.
It is not the law which is out of line; it is the manner in which ICE “enforces” the law. One also might wonder if this so called “silent majority” honestly believes
Trump when he said he supports right to life0, which is patently untrue by his violation of international law which he abuses at will.
.
We are not bound by international law when it comes to immigration. The United States is a sovereign nation, and we decide who comes into the country and who does not. Our government has the right, the power, and the responsibility to protect American citizens. If that requires mass deportation, so be it. That’s what 50% of the population voted for.
What President Trump believes in his heart is only known to him and his Creator but we can judge what he has accomplished. For better or worse. Mostly for better I think.
Illegal immigration & Roe v. Wade were political footballs that both parties had no incentive to solve. They were perfect vehicles to use for elections but they were never fixed. Trump blew that ruse out of the water.
Deportation can be debated, but humane treatment of illegal immigrants should not be debated.
Tell that to Mexico or the Vatican.
From Catholic News Agency:
“Vatican cracks down on illegal entry into its territory”
Catholic News Agency
By Almudena Martínez-Bordiú
ACI Prensa Staff, Jan 15, 2025 / 06:00 am
“Mexico Increases Detentions of Illegal Immigrants by 200%”
Newsweek
Dan Gooding, Politics Reporter
Jul 29, 2024 at 04:54 PM EDT
Published
Jul 29, 2024 at 04:54 PM EDT
updated
Jul 29, 2024 at 05:16 PM EDT
“2) Migrants should respect the laws and customs of the nation to which they are emigrating…
“However, an illegal alien by definition does not meet the second expectation found in the catechism…”
Why don’t our bishops (and pope) know this? It appears average American Catholics know more Catechism than our shepherds.
I used AI (Grok) to answer this question:
“how much money has Catholic Charities received for immigrant resettlement from the federal government since 2005”
Here are the really important parts:
“Based on aggregated data from federal spending trackers, congressional reports, and nonprofit disclosures, Catholic Charities agencies (including USCCB/MRS pass-throughs) have received approximately $4.5 billion to $5.5 billion in federal grants specifically for immigrant and refugee services from FY2005 to FY2024. This estimate focuses on HHS/ORR, DOS/PRM, and DHS/FEMA programs tied to resettlement and migrant aid; it excludes general welfare grants (e.g., Head Start) that may indirectly benefit immigrants.”
“Financial Model: 50–60% of Catholic Charities’ budget is government-funded overall, but migrant programs are nearly 100% federal. Nonprofits must match funds privately and report outcomes (e.g., no “profit”—audits show costs exceed reimbursements).”
1 Timothy 6:10
Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition
10 For the desire of money is the root of all evils; which some coveting have erred from the faith, and have entangled themselves in many sorrows.