
Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jul 10, 2020 / 04:00 pm (CNA).- The Holy See is facing a perfect storm of a massive income shortfall, months of financial scandal, and a looming international banking inspection. As it prepares to weather the second half of 2020, a range of measures have been taken to shore up its finances and reputation. But will they be enough, or could they end up making matters even more complicated?
According to an apparently leaked internal memo published on Monday, all curial departments of the Vatican have been asked to move all their cash deposits to the Holy See’s central bank. The move signals the depths of the current liquidity crisis facing the Vatican, and raises a number of questions about its ability to mitigate it.
On July 7, Vatican journalist Marco Tosatti published the text of a letter supposedly sent to the heads of all curial dicasteries on May 8. Fr. Juan A. Guerrero, S.J., prefect of the Secretariat for the Economy, said in the letter that the decision was taken after a May 4 meeting, led by Pope Francis, to respond to “this particularly negative economic juncture.”
According to the text of the letter, every Vatican department has been asked to move all their external cash deposits to APSA, which functions as the Holy See treasury, sovereign wealth manager, and administers payroll and operating expenses for Vatican City.
CNA asked the Holy See to confirm or comment on the leaked letter but received no response.
The instruction to move all curial funds to APSA is a dramatic step, exceeding previous attempts at financial centralization under Guerrero’s predecessor, Cardinal George Pell. It points to an acute cash crunch for the Holy See, and raises the possibility that it may already be struggling to meet daily operating expenses, including payroll.
In May, Guerrero said that in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, the Vatican is forecasting a reduction in income between 30%-80% for the next fiscal year. While dismissing suggestions that this could lead to a default by the Holy See, Guerrero did say “that doesn’t mean that we are not naming the crisis for what it is. We’re certainly facing difficult years.”
Despite the loss of income, some Vatican departments maintain large investment and asset portfolios, most notably the Secretariat of State and the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples (Propaganda Fide).
But while moving all cash reserves and deposits held at external banks to APSA could provide a short-term liquidity bridge for the Holy See, it could also create fresh regulatory headaches for the Vatican, and will likely be difficult to achieve.
As CNA has previously reported, the Secretariat of State has maintained large cash balances with several external banks, including in Switzerland. However, transferring the balance of those funds could prove a far from straightforward process.
As reported previously, secretariat funds on deposit were used as security against a $200 million line of credit extended by two banks, Credit Suisse and BSI. The loaned funds were used, in part, to fund the secretariat’s controversial investment in a London building at 60 Sloane Avenue, which has led to the suspension of several curia officials and the arrest of Italian businessman Gianluigi Torzi.
In recent months, Swiss financial authorities have confirmed that several bank accounts, with balances totalling tens of millions of euros, have been frozen as part of an ongoing investigation into the London deal, led by Vatican prosecutors, making them likely hard to transfer.
It is also not clear if the arrangement of using cash deposits as collateral to secure loans to fund investments remains an ongoing practice for the secretariat with other banks. If it does, transferring those deposits to APSA could trigger the banks to call in their loans, adding a credit crunch to a cash shortage for the Vatican.
The text of the leaked letter from Guerrero appears to acknowledge some potential difficulties for different curial departments in complying with his “request,” noting that “where it is necessary to maintain a deposit with IOR or other banks for operational needs, I am kindly asking you to communicate this to this Secretariat [for the Economy] as soon as possible.”
Even if the Secretariat for the Economy is able to have all curial cash moved to APSA without serious financial penalties or complications, and even if this is sufficient to provide for the Holy See’s short-term liquidity needs, the move could still create other unexpected difficulties for the Vatican.
In September, Moneyval, the Council of Europe’s anti-money laundering watchdog, is set to conduct a two-week onsite inspection of the Holy See and Vatican City – the first since 2012.
The president of the Vatican’s Financial Information Authority, Carmelo Barbagallo has described the inspection as “especially important.” “Its outcome may determine how the jurisdiction [of the Vatican] is perceived by the financial community,” he said on July 3.
Moneyval is expected to arrive with its own list of concerns and questions following months of reporting on Vatican financial scandals. A key item on its agenda is likely to be the role of APSA.
Following the last onsite inspection in 2012, APSA agreed to stop providing services to individuals or taking part in commercial transactions, with these functions being transferred to the Institute for Religious Works (IOR), often referred to as the Vatican Bank, which maintains accounts for Vatican employees, individuals and religious groups. APSA was to be limited to administering the sovereign assets of the Holy See, meeting payroll and operational costs, and functioning as the national reserve bank of the Vatican.
In exchange for agreeing to step back from commercial activity, APSA was exempted from annual inspections by the Vatican’s Financial Intelligence Authority (AIF), whose efforts are in turn assessed by Moneyval.
In 2014, Pope Francis issued new norms, transferring oversight and control of APSA’s remaining investment functions to the Prefecture for the Economy, then headed by Cardinal George Pell.
The AIF’s 2015 annual report concluded that since it is no longer an “entity that carries out financial activities on a professional basis,” “APSA stopped being a part of AIF’s jurisdiction at the end of 2015.”
The 2015 AIF report which exempted APSA from further scrutiny said that “If APSA were to carry out financial activities on a professional basis, it would fall again under the jurisdiction of AIF which… must publish and update the list of subjects who must comply with the requirements set forth in [relevant law].”
But last year, Bishop Nunzio Galantino, head of APSA, acknowledged that it had loaned 50 million euros to finance the purchase of an Italian hospital, the Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata (IDI), in 2015, even though APSA is prohibited from making loans that finance commercial transactions.
APSA was forced to write off 30 million of the 50 million euro loan, wiping out APSA’s profits for the 2018 financial year.
The acknowledgement by Galantino that APSA was in 2015 engaged in prohibited lending activity will likely have attracted the attention of European financial watchdogs, who will want to discuss it in September.
In 2016, Pope Francis partially reversed some of the 2014 reforms, returning control of its investment activity to APSA from the Prefecture for the Economy.
That APSA is engaged in financial activity that requires oversight was underlined when, in June this year, Pope Francis moved the office of the Vatican’s financial records database from APSA back under the management of the Secretariat for the Economy — a move explicitly made to emphasise the need for external oversight.
When Moneyval arrive in September, they are likely to push for a renewed look at the role of APSA and its exemption from AIF and Moneyval’s vigilance – all the more so if it becomes the home for all curial assets.
Some Vatican departments, most notably the Secretariat of State, remain engaged in commercial investments as part of their ongoing financial activities. If, as Guerrero’s May 8 letter indicates, all, or even most, liquid curial assets are now being banked with APSA, it will raise serious questions about how those commercial ventures are being maintained, and if APSA can still credibly claim to play no part in commercial activity.
2020 has become an incredibly high-stakes year for the Vatican, on the line is its ability to continue daily operations and remain a respectable member of the financial community.
Returning to financial health and international credibility are, in many ways, tied together for the Vatican. But after years of regulatory chaos and dubious financial conduct, it remains to be seen if 2020 is a crisis year that makes those efforts come good at last – or finally breaks the bank.
[…]
To the Attention of the Pontiff Leo XIV, and the Vatican Bureaucratic Establishment, and the USCCB NGO:
It appears that you are recommending sleep-walking instead of standing up and speaking up like Christian people.
Recommendation: read this essay about the demonic violence stalking inside the Trojan Horse of your LGBTQ submission:
https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/gender-ideology-and-violence-cultural-confusion-and-the-spiritual-battle
Also, the Pontiff Leo XIV, and the Vatican Bureaucratic Establishment, and the “Re-Paganized-Jesuit-Cult,” and the USCCB NGO, are corporately responsible for inviting this demonic desecration of St. Peter’s Basilica in your re-paganized “Jubilee”:
https://x.com/LepantoInst/status/1964356537163370601
Martyrs are those who WILLINGLY sacrifice their lives. Those children murdered by that sexually confused psychotic are victims of a crime but not martyrs. Sometimes I think that it’s our Catholic Church that’s gone insane (and woke).
The Holy Innocents didn’t willingly sacrifice their lives.
I totally agree!! I am Catholic. If some nut sees me going to Mass everyday and HATES Catholics decides to shoot me in the back as I walk home, what virtue of mine is involved? Answer: NONE. If that person stopped me and threatened my life with a gun unless I renounced my faith and I refused: then maybe a martyr. And it does greatly concern me that the Church makes these kinds of statements rather liberally that diminish the power of courage based on true faith that give us all role models to live by.
As an addend: I am not positive but have reason to believe, based upon their respective funeral services, those two children who died were not Catholic. I think one was Lutheran and the other a different faith. That does not diminish in any way the tragedy of their deaths.
Absolutely! We, as Americans, should pray fervently for those children in Minnesota who were murdered in Odium Fidei.
By definition, they are truly martyrs and their innocent souls are in Heaven.
Left almost speechless I can say this: Sentimentality occupying the place of reason abandoned does not cut the mustard. We saw this boldly exhibited during the last pontificate and it appears it has now become the pharmaceutical of choice.
We require a blistering intervention.
What do the Vatican experts say about trying to prevent this type killing?
I’m certainly no expert on transgender issues or violent crimes, but I think it would be wise before drawing conclusions about mental instability and demonic influence leading to violent murderous acts by people who think they are transgender, to compare the actual percentage of trans people who plan and commit violent murderous acts with the actual percentage of non-trans people who plan and commit violent murderous acts.
And for that matter, we need to know the percentage of trans people who have never committed a violent murderous act and would be horrified at the thought of committing such an act.
I wouldn’t bet my farm on this, but I’m willing to guess that the PERCENTAGE of trans people with NO emotional or mental impairments who commit murderous acts would be similar to the PERCENTAGE of people who are NOT trans and have NO mental or emotional impairment who commit murderous acts. Perhaps the crime is committed as a result demonic influence, or perhaps it is just rage that lurks beneath the surface in straight and in LGBTQ+ people, as well as straight people.
Of course, there is also the question of whether transgenderism occurs strictly because of demonic influence–are there studies and stats about this? From what I have read, many transexuals were treated by a parent (often a single mother) as the opposite sex that they were born as. E.g. a single mother really wanted a girl, but she gave birth to a boy and decided from his birth that this child is really a girl and raises the child as a girl rather than a boy.
If anyone has a reliable authority who has published studies and statistics, I would be pleased to see a posting or a link to the studies. Thank you.
What percentage of people who believe they’re in the wrong body have no psychological or emotional issues? I’d be willing to bet my little farm that it’s 0.0%.
I think you are defending the indefensible here. People who think they are the opposite sex are psychologically disturbed individuals. Their degree of pathology varies somewhat, but the thinking and behavior are pathological nonetheless. At this point, it’s better to assume that transgender people are potentially dangerous than to err on the side of understanding.