Denver, Colo., Jan 30, 2019 / 04:05 am (CNA).- Pope John Paul II was born Karol Wojtyla, a man from a small town in Poland who lost all of his immediate family – mom, older brother, an infant sister, and father – by the time he was 20 years old. Shortly thereafter, he vowed a life of celibacy as a Catholic priest. And yet, Wojtyla would go on to be remembered as “Pope of the Family.”
25 years ago next week, on Feb. 2, 1994, Pope John Paul II penned his “Letter to Families,” the subject of which was spurred by the United Nations’ declaration that 1994 would be the “Year of the Family.”
At the time, U.S. divorce rates were higher – about 4.6 per 1,000 people, compared with 2.9 in 2017. But marriage rates were also higher – 9.1 compared with 6.9 for those same years. Legalized same-sex marriage was still considered a taboo political idea, and would remain so for more than a decade. And Bruce Jenner still went by Bruce Jenner.
But even though it was written 25 years ago, many Catholics in family life ministries believe that the Church is only beginning to see the fruits of John Paul II’s message to families.
Although he was a celibate priest, Wojtyla became very close to a circle of young people whom he pastored while serving as chaplain to university students in Krakow. As they married and had children, Fr. Wojtyla offered spiritual and pastoral guidance to their families that would inform his work well into his years as Pope John Paul II.
“He was able to support these young families, to help them live the faith at a time when Communist society was really trying to undermine the family,” said Jared Staudt, who is the director of formation for the Archdiocese of Denver, where he also leads Building Family Culture retreats for families.
When the Communist Party ruled Poland, family’s work and school schedules were arranged in such a way that they spent as little time together as possible. The state, and not the family, was, according to the government, the ultimate good and end of society.
“So he was in this battle for family life very directly in Communist Poland,” he said of Wojtyla.
Much of what Wojtyla came to know about the sanctity and importance of marriage and family life can be found in his 1994 “Letter to Families.”
Man, woman and child – the family as vocation
John Paul II wrote prolifically on the family, but this letter is one of his more personal and concise works detailing much of his thought on marriage and family.
He was known for elevating the idea of the vocation of marriage and family life to a level that had not yet been articulated in the Catholic Church.
“John Paul literally started a revolution when it comes to the Catholic Church and family,” said Steve Bollman, founder of family ministry Paradisus Dei.
“What John Paul did is he truly identified the family as the pathway to holiness,” Bollman said. “In this letter, it’s the family that’s placed at the heart of the great struggle between good and evil, between life and death, between love and all that’s opposed to love.”
In his letter, John Paul II wrote that men and women, particularly in their roles as fathers and mothers in the family, are key to building up a “civilization of love,” in which families are able to give and receive love at individual and societal levels.
“If the first ‘way of the Church’ is the family, it should also be said that the civilization of love is also the ‘way of the Church’, which journeys through the world and summons families to this way; it summons also other social, national and international institutions, because of families and through families. The family in fact depends for several reasons on the civilization of love, and finds therein the reasons for its existence as family. And at the same time the family is the centre and the heart of the civilization of love,” John Paul II wrote (LTF 13).
Bollman said that by telling families that they were at the heart of the Church, it called them to holiness in a way that hadn’t yet been articulated.
“The vast majority of people become holy as a husband and father and wife and mother, not in spite of that,” Bollman said. John Paul II’s teachings on the family are at the foundation of Bollman’s work at Paradisus Dei, which includes a couple’s ministry, and That Man is You, a ministry for men that particularly focuses on their roles as husbands and fathers.
“Our tagline is, “Helping families discover the superabundance of God.” That’s what we are is we’re all about family and finding God within the family,” he said.
The family in crisis
Staudt called John Paul II’s letter “prophetic”, because it addresses not only the crucial importance of the family’s place in society, but some of the key ways it is under attack.
And if attacks on the family were urgent in 1994, they are all the more so today, Staudt said.
“John Paul’s famous line from the letter: ‘The history of mankind, the history of salvation, passes by way of the family,’ is actually chilling at this point,” Staudt noted, “because what we’re seeing is that we don’t have hope for the future, we’re not investing for the future of society or for the Church. We’re just living for the present moment for our own selfish desires. So I think John Paul was already recognizing that the foundation of society itself is already in jeopardy, if people are not getting married, if they’re not having kids, they’re saying no to the future.”
According to Pew Research, the marriage rate in the United States is currently hovering at around 50 percent, meaning half of U.S. adults aged 18 and older are married, a steep decline compared to the peak rate of 72 percent in 1960. The fertility rate is also at a 30-year low in the United States, and sits below replacement levels. As of 2014, less than half of children were living in a traditional nuclear home with their married mother and father.
By many measures, marriage and family life today are in crisis, in ways that are perhaps even more pronounced than when John Paul II wrote this letter.
“I think the ‘crisis of concepts’ that John Paul II speaks of is an enormous challenge for the family today,” Sr. John Mary, S.V., of the Sisters of Life, told CNA.
“Who can deny that our age is one marked by a great crisis, which appears above all as a profound ‘crisis of truth?’” John Paul II wrote. “A crisis of truth means, in the first place, a crisis of concepts. Do the words ‘love’, ‘freedom’, ‘sincere gift’, and even ‘person’ and ‘rights of the person’, really convey their essential meaning?” This crisis now seems to be even more profound than when the Pope first wrote these words, Sr. John Mary, S.V., a Sister of Life, told CNA.
“Even more so today than when the Letter to Families was written, modern culture does not recognize the truth of who the human person is, what we are made for, what constitutes a family, what freedom and human rights are,” she said. “So to truly live Christian family life becomes more and more radically countercultural. John Paul II addresses this in the letter by proposing the anthropology that corrects this crisis of concepts and allows for a civilization of love to grow by way of marriage and family,” she noted.
Another major challenge faced by families is the “radical individualism” present in current culture, Sr. John Mary said, which is something else John Paul II addressed in the letter.
According to John Paul II, radical individualism is “based on a faulty notion of freedom and proposes personalism as the antidote,” Sr. John Mary said. “The family is the first place where love is given and received. But if parents do not model authentic, self-giving love to their children, families become groups of persons pursuing their own selfish ends,” she said.
The ‘antidote’: John Paul II’s cure for a sick society
Though John Paul II’s descriptions of these crises and the current state of affairs of marriage and family in the world paint a dark picture, John Paul also provides for families and the Church a way out.
Bill Donaghy is a senior lecturer and content specialist with the Theology of the Body Institute. The mission of the Institute is to educate and train men and women to understand, live, and promote John Paul II’s teachings in his Theology of the Body.
Donaghy told CNA that not only does he consider John Paul II’s Letter to Families the blueprint to how to live a holy life personally as a husband and father, he also considers it the “antidote” to everything that goes against a “civilization of love.”
“Without a doubt in my mind, in the providence of God Who could foresee today’s crisis in marriage and the family, the attempt to redefine marriage and the explosion of gender ideologies that detach our identity from our humanity, St. John Paul II’s thought is the antidote, the cure, the clear truth of who we are and how we are to live as human persons made by Love,” he said.
“I think the vision presented in this letter is actually more relevant now than it was 25 years ago,” he said. “It contains the secret for our joy, the mystical meaning of marriage, the way home for the prodigal sons and daughters who’ve tried everything else to bring us joy and failed to find it.”
For himself, Donaghy said building the “civilization of love” starts in his own home – by treating his wife with love and respect, by spending time with and listening to his children, by modeling sacrificial love. At the parish level, he said the Church must help families by creating space for “real human interaction, conversation, and formation.”
“Again, the ‘Letter to Families’ is a goldmine of a teaching, a school of love for humanity. But we’ve got to make time and space for it to enter into the everyday dynamics of our own family,” he said.
Staudt too told CNA that the words and teachings of Pope John Paul II on the family have deeply inspired his work in family ministry.
“It really is through John Paul’s teachings, the letter and his other teachings…that I’ve discerned that the way to build Christian culture is through family life,” Staudt, who is also the father of 6, told CNA.
For the Building Family Culture retreats that he leads, Staudt said that he focuses on teaching families how to pray, the importance of which is heavily emphasized by John Paul II in his letter.
“Prayer must become the dominant element of the Year of the Family in the Church: prayer by the family, prayer for the family, and prayer with the family,” John Paul II wrote. “Prayer increases the strength and spiritual unity of the family, helping the family to partake of God’s own ‘strength.’”
“I think we take that for granted, that families know how to pray, and I don’t think they do. So I think that’s the foundation, that’s the core, and John Paul does talk a lot about that,” he said. After prayer, he also focuses on how to build a family culture, which includes doing things that form children’s imagination in positive and beautiful ways.
Staudt said he hopes that more in family ministry “wake up” to the urgency of helping families become what John Paul II has called them to be.
“I don’t think enough people have woken up to the urgency in supporting family life and really making that a priority in their parishes, their dioceses, in catechesis, in evangelization,” he said.
“John Paul I think is truly prophetic in pointing us to the fundamental realities of man, woman, human love, family life as crucial for the Church and society at this time, that these are the key issues that we need to face.”
Sr. John Mary and the Sisters of Life say they help build a “civilization of love” through the women they help in crisis pregnancies, the women they counsel after abortions, or the young people who are early on in their journey of faith.
Sr. John May said that because John Paul II was speaking about universal truths of the human person, his words will continue to be relevant for families and the Church throughout time. “John Paul’s Letter to Families explores universal truths: the goodness of the human person, the dignity of marriage, and the very real challenges facing families today,” she said. “Marriage and family are God’s plan to satisfy the universal longings of the human heart, so speaking of them is always timely.”
“We are all called to do something great with our life and our love,” she added. “We are made for love and communion with God and others. John Paul II reminds us of this lofty call, and encourages us that true love is possible.”
[…]
Yes, mother had worked at the school and signed off on the name change.
Where’s Dad?
Please, Cleo, you’re not in HER shoes.
Please “Jaques.” Don’t defend the indefensible.
As an alternative, my sense is that the option for silence might best be exercised by yourself.
One does not have to be “in her shoes” to know that the mother’s actions were misguided and stupid at best, evil at worst. If you love your child, you do NOT “affirm” him in an illness, physical or mental. The way you speak about moral issues makes me hope that your title of “Br. Jaques” is just a silly self-designation, such as “charismatic” Catholics often give themselves.
The mother was obviously morally weak, in her shoes or not. But why would you dismiss the question of “Where is the Father?” Or should the whole of culture be feminine?
Br. Jacques, I hear you. Some parents have been emotionally blackmailed and told to choose between a dead son or a “trans daughter “.
Of course the best plan is to resist that. But we can’t know what the parents have gone through.
Hopefully the tide will continue to turn back to the truth and away from this terrible confusion.
I agree with both comments. I don’t want to judge the parents (mother) though I do judge society normalising such deep issues. But if your son wants to become a girl, is interested in guns and surely is showing signs of confusion, and likely taking medications, do you not seek help urgently? Nobody has mentioned Dad yet.
the signs in the home must have been ignored?
There is some information on the internet that it was Dad, not mom, who pushed for the gender change.
Apparently no father in the picture here.
And most likely abusive psychological and possibly medical practices by adults monetizing this young man’s mental disorders.
Could be that in the mind of the Minnesota shooter, he is “proving” the “real battle” going on for the “gender”-related politics.
Where his true “warrior persona” would overrides his “dying statements”. If so -which then is called lying and criminal deception.
Using falsified “self-sacrifice” with “credible re-explanation” to “authenticate” and “establish” a lie.
https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2025/08/26/trumps-hhs-gives-states-60-days-to-remove-gender-ideology-in-school-material/
https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2025/08/25/three-bills-undermining-parental-rights-moving-forward-in-california/
It would be best to prevent the shooting. Each team of ushers should include at least one with some police or military experience. Ushers should include at least one with this qualification and carrying a weapon.
why has our country come to this?
so the entire perimeter must be guarded, to stop shootings by cowards through the windows, in order to worship the God who commanded, “Thou shalt not kill?”
I went to Wedn school mass for 8 years and we never had any ushers, on the inside or outside.
He did predict this though, in his brief life on earth.
You are correct. It only makes sense to provide protections for worshipers who are defenseless against mentally disturbed or evil people.
But Patrick, this individual shot through a window outside. I may be wrong about this, but I thought the ushers were not outside–they were in all likelihood inside the nave, perhaps even at the back of the nave. And it was a school mass, so it’s possible that the “ushers” were older boys, certainly not able to disarm a full-grown man/woman with three guns and some kind of psychological disorder. I suppose there could have been lawncare or maintenance men (perhaps hired by the parish and not associated with the parish in any way) outdoors, but they are probably instructed not to run their mowers or do anything “noisy” during the school mass.
The kids (many of them very young children), teachers, and any other Mass attendees were sitting ducks. Thankfully most of them were able to take shelter under the pews and eventually make their way to a safe place in the church building. So sad about the two little ones who were killed–this is unimaginable to those of us with children or grandchildren.
I’m not sure that anything could have been done to stop the shooter, unless, like I said, some big burly maintenance people or perhaps a passing police person would have seen him and tackled him outside, obviously at the risk of their own lives.
As long as the American psycho-babblists follow the Dutch Protocol (below) we can expect more of the same depravity now and forever. One may reasonably suspect that Father James Martin would also blame the Traditional Church for not accommodating the LGBTQI community.
“Evert explained that doctors in the United States primarily follow the “Dutch protocol,” which is to “affirm” a person’s self-asserted transgender identity and then provide minors with puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and eventually transgender surgeries.”
“One may reasonably suspect that Father James Martin would also blame the Traditional Church for not accommodating the LGBTQI community.”
AFCz, would accommodating the LTBTQI community have prevented this? The LGBTQI community is generally pretty peaceable and generally are the victims of violent crime rather than the perpetrators. And although they are saddened by not being accommodated, often they CAN find Catholic parishes that will welcome them even if the parish doesn’t affirm their sexual lifestyle (just like a parish won’t affirm sins that other parishioners commit). If they can’t find a Catholic parish, there are certainly plenty of ELCA Lutheran church that will welcome with rainbow banners and open arms, and will affirm their “choice.”
JMO, but I think it’s not the gender or the sexuality that prompted this person to shoot innocent children–it was his/her mental/emotional illness that was in all likelihood attributed (possibly incorrectly) to gender dysphoria instead of addressing the likelihood that the person also suffered from depression, manic-depressive syndrome, or some other psychological/mental/emotional illness that eventually led them to develop a violent mindset with no conscience. Eventually they are compelled by their condition to kill to try to deal with their suffering and pain by killing. There may also have been some demonic influence if the perpetrator had done any dabbling in the psychic world and practices.
We don’t really know. And considering the short-staffing that the medical community is experiencing, along with the expense of getting medical and psychological intervention (generally not covered well by any public aid or even by regular healthcare insurance), it’s likely that there are more people in the U.S. suffering from untreated or misdiagnosed conditions that require medical/psychiatric intervention and care and may lead to erratic or violent behavior.
It’s just all so sad. God help us all!
I transitioned and lived ten years as a man. It was ten years of deepening misery and pain. Accommodating the transgender agenda will not help. It is a predatory movement based in lies. The only thing that saved me and got me through the hell of detransition was Jesus Christ and the sacraments of the Catholic Church.
Jenny: Thank you and thank God that someone on these pages has the moral courage and integrity of mind to speak truthfully about the lies which permeate this culture. Conspiring with lies can NEVER be an act of someone who says he or she is follower of Jesus Christ.
suicide rate is higher, is my understanding- and this person used the innocent to commit a grandiose suicide
it seems that espc in a smaller household the signs of disturbance would have been quite evident – that’s where the help or intervention should have started; is there a father in the picture?
We need to love children who are confused about their gender.
By love, I mean giving them the truth. God has created us either male or female and that is an ontological reality that can never be changed.
How can these mixed up young people ever trust anyone when those closest to them, their parents, family members, teachers, doctors, therapists, and even some clergy members affirm them in a lie? Deep down inside we all know who God created us to be.
The pain, anger, insecurity, disaffection and distrust that comes from being lied to by those who should be caring for our physical and mental well-being will inevitably lead to some form of acting out and this is one horrific example of that.
Thank you, Anne Marie for speaking truth to the lies that permeate the discussion surrounding this tragedy.
Any kid should be held harmless against potential mistakes until they are 18 and out of the house. Of course, now the parents can keep them on the insurance even if they are out of the house and not in school until 25.