
Siena, Italy, Dec 26, 2018 / 05:02 am (CNA/EWTN News).- When St. Catherine of Siena was alive in 14th century in what is now Italy, it looked like it was the end of the world.
The Bubonic plague was sweeping through Europe in waves, which would ultimately wipe out 60 percent of the population. The Papal States were divided and at war. Rich churchmen were buying their positions; bishops were making sure their family members would succeed them. The pope had been living in France for 70 years, and though he would return to Rome, the Western Schism happened shortly after, with three claimants to the See of Peter.
“She lived in really terrible times,” Fr. Thomas McDermott, O.P., a St. Catherine of Siena scholar, told CNA. “And people really did think it was the end of the world.”
The state of the world, and the Church today, is different, though in some ways no less troubled. The new wave of sex abuse scandals and their alleged cover-ups have rocked anew the Church throughout the world.
When St. Catherine talked about the Church, she often referred to it as the Body of Christ, in the tradition of St. Paul, McDermott noted.
“She says the face of the Church is a beautiful face, but we’re pelting it with filth,” he said. “It has a beautiful face, that’s the divine side of the Church, but we human beings are pelting it; we’re disfiguring the body of Christ through our sins.”
While the current abuse crisis and related scandals have left many lay Catholics wondering how to respond, some Catholics have suggested looking to the saints – like Catherine of Siena – for guidance.
Who was Catherine?
Catherine was born March 25, 1347, the 25th child born to middle-class parents in Siena; about half of her siblings did not survive childhood.
At a young age, she became very devout, and resisted her parents when they attempted to have her marry the husband of one of her sisters who had died. Instead, she chose to fast and cut off her hair to make herself less desirable. She would ultimately vow her virginity to Christ, and experienced a mystical marriage to him around the age of 21.
Instead of entering a convent, however, Catherine chose to live a life of prayer and penance at home as a tertiary, or third order, Dominican. She spent several years in near-seclusion, in a cell-like room under the steps in her parents’ house, spending her days in dialogue with Christ.
After several years of this at-home novitiate of sorts, while in her mid-20s, she heard Christ telling her to lead a more public life.
“He said now you have to go out and share the fruits of your contemplation with others,” McDermott said. “That’s very Dominican, it’s from the Summa of St. Thomas Aquinas.”
Catherine obeyed, and rejoined her family in their daily activities. She also began to serve the poor, and soon became renowned for her charitable works. She gathered a following of young men and women – many of them from rich families of high social status – because they enjoyed her warm personality and her holiness.
Catherine goes public – and gets political
Once she stepped back into a more public life, she became more connected and in tune with the happenings in the Church.
At the time, Gregory XI was living in Avignon and was at war with the Republic of Florence. He placed it under interdict; essentially the equivalent of excommunicating a city – they were cut off from receiving the sacraments, among other sanctions.
Through her life of prayer and her consultation with her spiritual directors, Catherine began corresponding with papal representatives and the pope himself, attempting to broker peace in Florence and advocating for reform where she saw corruption.
“The papal nuncio to Florence in Catherine’s time is grossly hated by the powerful families in Florence, and he’s hated because the powerful families feel that they’ve been mistreated by the Pope,” said Catherine Pakaluk, an associate professor of economics at Catholic University of America and a devotee of St. Catherine.
“She’s writing to the nuncios, she’s writing to the pope, and she’s trying to prevent this internal Catholic war between these parts of the Papal States,” she said. “And this is before the Great Schism when things get really bad.”
Tempers and tensions were so high that the papal nuncio of Florence was eventually skinned alive in the streets.
“So when we think about things today and how shocking and horrifying (they are), you know, things were pretty bad then,” Pakaluk noted. “The nature of the particular crimes is different, but the tensions were really high and these folks were quite violent.”
Catherine was drawn into the Church politics of her time not because of a misplaced sense of ambition, McDermott said, but because she loved the Church as she loved God.
“It wasn’t her motive to be involved in the politics of the Church, but what was best for everyone and for the church led her into politics,” he said. “But it’s not like she was interested in politics itself.”
As part of her attempts at solving the problems of the Church, Catherine joined the call of many other Catholics of the time for the Pope to return to Rome.
After some correspondence, Catherine set out on foot with her followers to go meet with the pope in person.
“It was a remarkable thing for Catherine who was a homebody to take off on foot for France with her disciples, but she was prepared to do anything for the Church because the Church was the Body of Christ,” McDermott said.
After scores of people pleading with the pope to return to Rome between 1309 and 1377, St. Catherine seemed to prove most persuasive.
During her visit, Catherine referenced parts of the pope’s dream, about which he had told no one.
“It was astounding to him (that she knew about the dream) and he took that as a clear sign from God that he was speaking to him through this woman,” McDermott said. So after decades of exile, within a few weeks of Catherine’s visit, the pope packed up his things and headed back to Rome.
“She’s a great example of a laywoman who had strong convictions about the Church and was not timid about expressing them,” said Dr. Karen Scott, an associate professor of Catholic Studies and History at DePaul University in Chicago.
“It was a very different situation from today, so it would be a mistake to think that it’s an automatic equivalent” to the problems of the current Church, Scott told CNA.
“She was living a long time ago and it was a different time and a different Church and different historical set of circumstances…but she was aware of all sorts of problems with the clergy and she believed they ought to be reformed.”
The legend of the opinionated laywoman
What Catherine excelled at in her correspondence with the pope and other clergy was her ability to balance her no-punches-pulled critiques with her profound respect for the Church and the papacy, Scott said.
“There’s a beautiful balance between clear thinking and the ability to see the flaws…but at the same time to be enormously respectful of the Church and the papacy in particular and to base all of this on her deep spiritual life, a life of deep prayer,” Scott said.
“She’s a laywoman who had strong opinions and views on (Church matters) and took action, and amazingly they paid attention,” Scott added. Amazingly, because she was an uneducated lay woman from a modest background who wasn’t particularly well-known.
“They listened to her because what she was saying was so obviously right and sincere and coming out of her prayer and the Gospel,” Scott said.
In total, Catherine wrote at least 381 letters in her lifetime. Three years before her death, she also began dictating “Il Libro” (“The Book”), a collection of her spiritual teachings and conversations with God that became known as “The Dialogue”.
A significant portion of her Dialogue, chapters 110-134, gives insight into her thoughts on the Church reforms needed at the time. Catherine relayed that the “Eternal Father” (how she frequently refers to God the Father) had told her that the biggest problem facing the secular priests of her time was money, while the biggest problem facing priests in religious orders was homosexuality.
Her frank critiques were considered so indelicate that they were excised from many of the English translations of her book, McDermott said.
“She was writing this in the 1300s, she believes it was dictated to her by the Eternal Father, and she’s always a direct hitter, she doesn’t hold anything back,” McDermott said.
But while her dialogues contain punchy critiques of the clergy, she also urged respect for them at the same time, as they are “Christs” on earth who bring Jesus to the world through the Eucharist.
“You should love them (priests) therefore by reason of the virtue and dignity of the Sacrament, and by reason of that very virtue and dignity you should hate the defects of those who live miserably in sin, but not on that account appoint yourselves their judges, which I forbid, because they are My Christs, and you ought to love and reverence the authority which I have given them,” the Eternal Father told Catherine, as recalled in her Dialogue.
While Catherine was successful at bringing the papacy back to Rome and brokering peace between Florence and the Eternal City, the period known as the Great Schism, or the Western Schism, would begin just two years before her death.
“It wasn’t crystal clear who the real pope was,” McDermott said, noting that even some saints who are now canonized had sided with opposing claimants at the time. “So that must have also seemed like the end of the world.”
“St. Catherine was totally horrified,” Scott said, “because for her, Church unity was really essential.”
During this time, French cardinals had elected a leader as the Pope, and later on, the Council of Pisa also elected a claimant. St. Catherine sided with the claimant residing in Rome, Urban VI, and moved there in the last few years of her life to advocate for him and offer intense prayer and penance for the Church.
When she died in 1380, a result of illness brought on by her extreme penances, the western Church was still in schism, and would remain that way until the conclusion of the Council of Constance in 1418.
“Some historians, I think specifically less faithful ones or who don’t have a life of faith…will say well Catherine really failed, because her goal was to bring the Pope back to Rome to heal the divisions in the Church, but how could she have succeeded if the greatest schism of the Western Church occurs after she dies?” Pakalu said.
“I don’t know that’s quite the right view. We never know the hypothetical of history, we never know what would have happened without Catherine’s influence, and she does at least initially bring the Holy Father back to Rome before she died and that was pretty important,” she said.
“My guess is that the Church was able to survive the Great Schism because she got certain things lined up before she died.”
Catherine’s lessons for Catholics today
“What would she say today? I think that’s a dangerous question,” Scott said, “because we can’t say how she would relate to the current issues and complex questions, except that she would know very well what the moral stance is, that bishops and priests and lay people should all follow.”
Catherine would set the highest of standards for honesty and integrity and pastoral concern for the laity, Scott said, as well as the highest standards “for avoiding schism and being close to the papacy.”
“Beyond that I think she would advise people to take the time to pray and discern and not have knee-jerk reactions to things,” she added.
Pakaluk said that she thinks there are three lessons to be learned from Catherine’s life and example, with the first being that any activist role in Church politics must be rooted in deep prayer and love for the Church.
“I wouldn’t say don’t get involved until you’re as holy as Catherine … but to do activism or public ministry without that deep commitment to prayer would be completely absurd and would not be faithful to her life or her example,” she said.
The second lesson, she said, would be to take the long view of history. The Church has survived hard times and scandal before, and she can survive them again.
“I am horrified at outraged at what I’m seeing and hearing about” regarding the current scandals, Pakaluk said.
“But I’m not personally disturbed, my faith isn’t challenged, because I’m so familiar with (ages) in the Church’s past, particularly and especially the one that Catherine lived through, in which there was so much corruption and so much disappointment on the part of the faithful with respect to the hierarchy and some members of the clergy,” she said.
“So it doesn’t disturb me because I think well, why would it be different? Why would we think we’re better? Why do we think we’re completely immune to some of the things that have occurred in the past?”
The third thing Catholics can learn from St. Catherine is that it is possible to be a saint even in the most trying times in the Church, Pakaluk said.
“She’s there in Heaven, she ran the race, she made it,” she said. “We can look at her not only like ‘we can do it too’, but she’s our older sister, and we can follow her and ask her to intercede for us.”
McDermott said that Catholics should be heartened by St. Catherine’s witness because even while she prolifically wrote about the problems of the Church, she never once hinted that she was thinking about leaving.
“She would’ve said don’t leave the Church, this is the human, sinful side of the Church that is being reflected. And the good of the church – stay and purify it,” he said.
“Our love for Christ and the Church – the two are inseparable – is shown in hard times when it doesn’t feel very good to be a Catholic, that we keep on walking with Christ and the Church.”
This article was originally published on CNA Sept. 16, 2018.
[…]
We read: “The Bavarian Diocese of Augsburg provided a substantive critique of the German handout, with Bishop Bertram Meier identifying several points where the guidance conflicts with Vatican teaching.”
Of course, the so-called “Vatican teaching” struck many as flawed in itself. But, whatever. It’s good news to hear that the five solid dioceses are no longer standing alone, with the twenty-two remainders now split 11-11.
So, where is Cardinal Kasper in all of this? He has chided Germania from more-or-less breaking with the universal Church, but is he not the one who also lit the match to the haystack with his two-hour ramblings introducing the first session of the synod on the family in 2015? The luminary Kasper, only to be corrected at the beginning of the second session by Cardinal Erdo of Hungary, who raised eyebrows by simply stating the obvious: “There are absolutely no grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even remotely analogous to God’s plan for marriage and family.”
About the so-called blessings, whether spontaneous or now scripted, the below-the-belt Cardinal Kasper had no time for below-the-equator African dissenters: (https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2014/10/dont-listen-to-the-africans-says-catholic-cardinal). (With a later apology.) So, a footnote to the above article—in addition to the German dioceses now dissenting from a memo on German letterhead, non-amnesiacs also recall dissent from Fiducia Supplicans, itself, from: all of continental Africa, Hungary, Poland, Peru, the Netherlands, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, parts of France, Spain and Argentina, and numerous individuals as well as the Coptic Church and the patriarch of Bulgaria (who expressed “shock”). Cardinal Muller’s earlier remarks are found here: https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2024/02/does-fiducia-supplicans-affirm-heresy
SUMMARY: The German Luther was initially right when he declined to give absolution to those in the confessional who refused to repent and, instead, hid behind fig-leaf certificates awarding fraudulent “indulgences.”
This “debate” about The Deposit Of Faith is only occurring due to the fact that Vatican II, by refusing to affirm The Charitable Anathema, Instituted By Jesus The Christ, for The Salvation Of Souls , and out of a false ideology, lacking in Charity, and thus void of authentic Life-affirming and Life-Sustaining Salvational Love, that was permitted to subsist within The One Body of Christ, creating a counterfeit, fraudulent magisterium that in denying The Word Of Perfect Divine Eternal Love Incarnate, is anti-Christ, anti Filioque, and anti Papacy, existing in direct conflict with Christ’s True Magisterium, making it appear as if it Christ’s Church is no longer One, Holy, Catholic, And Apostolic Church, In The Unity Of The Holy Ghost, The Spirit Of Perfect Divine Eternal Love Between The Father And His Only Begotten Son, Who Proceeds From Both The Father And His Only Begotten Son. The question is, why are the Faithful not demanding that the counterfeit magisterium that is attempting to subsist within The One Body Of Christ, be anathema when the Faithful know through both Faith and reason, you can only have a Great Apostasy from The True Church Of Christ, and Christ, Himself, warned us that this day would come?
Who’s “debate,” and maybe you can diagram that first sentence?
Notice the effort of the bishops to obfuscate instead of simply following Scripture:
Romans 1:26-27
New International Version
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
1 Corinthians 6:9-11
New International Version
9 Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men[a]
10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.
The legacy of Bergoglio continues.
(Sigh.)
Evil. Error. Confusion. The normalization of sin.
Even though Bergoglio has departed, the Church remains under assault by the Dark Vatican and its minions.
Pope Leo, please move decisively to set things right.
We must stop crucifying our poor, suffering Jesus!
Pope Leo needs to retract Fuducia Supplicans, clarify Church teaching on Amoris Laetitia,reinstate the Latin Mass…
Francis was a disaster. The German Church needs correction.
Let’s face facts – unpleasant as they are to talk about. The Church in Germany (as is the case for the Church in America and elsewhere) is divided between those clergy who are homosexual and support the homosexual agenda and those who are not homosexual. It is divided between those who accept the order of creation as God designed it and those who reject God’s design. The Church is divided between those who recognize sin for what it is and those who do not. The Church in Germany and elsewhere is divided between those who sow confusion and those who prefer clarity. Everyone gets to decide where they fall whether or not they admit it.
Sfiducia Supplicans is heteropraxy. As such, it leads Catholics away from union with God to promote sinful unions with each other.
Why would most German Bishops want this? To be sure, all the usual Protestant reasons: peer pressure, pleasure, popularity, etc.
One reason less discussed for this apostasy is greed. Germans who check the box to declare themselves Catholics pay taxes to the Church. Roughly 75% of those folk agree with these fraudulent “blessings.” Together, German Catholics pay over 5 billion euro in taxes every year to the Church. Lord knows this money piles up and gives inordinate power to those, like Cardinal Marx and his friends, who control it. Some studies think the total assets of the German Catholic Church is 265 billion euro. Most diocese have more money than the Vatican. God knows, none of this is fully transparent.
Pray and stay Catholic. Jesus Christ is Lord.
Good to see that Our Bishop here in Augsburg Diocese is finally speaking out against the way the German Bishops are leading us!
And what does it mean “an important step toward a Church that is oriented to people’s life realities and respects love in all its expressions”?, particularly: “love in all its expressions”?!. We forgot Augustine: disordered love is the essence of sin. When we seek ultimate happiness (frui-fruitio) in a created thing, like money, power, or another person, we are loving it in a way that it wasn’t meant to be loved.
“… an important step toward a Church that is oriented to people’s life realities and respects love in all its expressions.” This statement is not even clever enough to count as deceitful. It is a blatant invitation to engage in sinful behavior.
Some of those expressions of love are still criminally prosecuted. Even in Germany.
“Love” has its boundaries.
One has to wonder if the authors of Fiducia Supplicans weren’t some of the very people Pope Francis was aiming his supposed “faux pas” repeatedly saying there is “too much faggotry” within the Vatican at. Clearly they suffer from a scheming mindset to so clearly state the Christ’s clear teaching to us only to then intentionally labor with their words to restrict the Church’s freedom to bring God’s blessings through our liturgical life (the “Work of the [God’s] People”). They do this by legal lingo slight of hand. FS’s Intro II.8. does this with the words, “Blessings are among the most widespread and evolving sacramentals” hint, hint. Then, “Indeed, they lead us to grasp God’s presence (small “p” because we are not sure He really is Present???) in ALL the events of life…” again, hint, hint. Then in Intro II.9. “From a STRICTLY liturgical point of view, a blessing requires that what is blessed be conformed to God’s will, as expressed in the teachings of the Church.” Only to then (after two more buffering paragraphs for camouflage sake) state in Intro II.12. “One must also avoid the risk of REDUCING THE MEANING OF BLESSINGS to this point of view alone…” But for those awake enough to see the lie of our enemy the Divider (Diabolos)/False Accuser (Satan) worked in here, it is precisely this artificial framing of the Church’s liturgical life under terms of pharisaic legal restrictiveness that is the slight of hand, for this is an utterly false framing! Oh Lord Jesus Christ our Good Shepherd, have mercy and bring humbling repentance to the hearts, minds and lives of all such “wolves in shepherds clothing” who would make themselves the servants of the dragon against Your Church in these ways!!!
Is there a possibility that the pro-gay-blessing German clergy/bishops could break away (schism?) from the Roman Catholic Church and establish a “new” type of Catholic Church in Germany? It does sound like the “gay rights crowd” of Catholics is in the minority–is this correct? Or do they outnumber the traditional Catholics, if not in population, perhaps in funds (from various “stars” and celebrities)?
From what I understand, Germany has a history of tolerance for sexual behaviors that are generally considered “sinful” by both Catholic and Protestant churches (as well as by Muslims). After WWI, there were entire blocks of the big cities that were filled with nightclubs catering to various non-straight sexual appetites. (The music Cabaret makes this clear, although I’m not sure how much of that is true to real-life.) And even though Adolf Hitler condemned homosexuality and sent many homosexuals to concentration camps, he tolerated it for his staff and military leaders.
Is this “legacy” making a comeback in Germany?
This is the war to decapitate the Body of Christ.
“Eminence” Marx, (like his American counterparts of the “Francis-Legacy-cult”) is an office-holder of “The Revolution of the Janitors.”
Per this essay:
https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/revolt-of-the-janitors-on-the-detroit-massacre
They are fit to be confronted and opposed and fought.
And the he obfuscating bishops and the Vatican not only ignore scripture (see my citation of Scripture above) but also great Christian thinkers like St. Augustine:
“Those sins which are against nature, like those of the men of Sodom, are in all times and places to be detested and punished. Even if all nations committed such sins, they should all alike be held guilty by God’s law” (Confessions 3.8).
As for the homosexuality that the Catholic Church in Germany endorses, their open borders policy with regard to those worship an islamic god will take care of that problem. The solution will not be a pretty one.