Prevention Park in Houston was at one time the largest Planned Parenthood administrative and medical facility in the United States. / Credit: Hourick, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Houston, Texas, Jul 28, 2025 / 17:03 pm (CNA).
Planned Parenthood has announced the closure of two of its six clinics in the Houston area, including its Prevention Park location, which was known as the largest abortion facility in the Western Hemisphere until the state’s near-total abortion ban in 2022.
Texas Right to Life President Dr. John Seago in an interview with CNA called the Prevention Park location’s closure an “unmitigated victory for life.”
At its peak, this center aborted 10,000 babies a year, up until 24 weeks of pregnancy, according to Shawn Carney, founder and CEO of the pro-life group 40 Days for Life, whose headquarters in Bryan, Texas, are located in a former abortion clinic near Texas A&M University.
“There just hasn’t been a more exciting time to be pro-life,” Carney told CNA, saying the clinic’s closure is one of “the greatest victories” in the history of the pro-life movement.
Seago called the 78,000-square-foot structure, which he said resembles a Central American pyramid where human sacrifices took place, a “symbol of Planned Parenthood’s height of power and influence.”
Carney said volunteers would get “overwhelmed” and “depressed” when they saw how big the abortion clinic was, sometimes feeling like “all hope was lost.”
“If you go from that moment to seeing the building closing, it is unbelievable,” he said.
Located alongside the busy Gulf Freeway in Houston’s East End, a Hispanic neighborhood near the University of Houston, which has 50,000 students, the Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast’s Prevention Park location also houses the Gulf Coast administrative offices.
“The thousands of pro-lifers that have prayed outside of it” over the years “are celebrating,” Carney said.
“For so long the Church has been taught its teachings were archaic,” he said, but these closures show that the culture is finally waking up to “the teachings of natural law.”
The latest closure comes after years of funding cuts by the Texas Legislature, which slashed funding for Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers in 2011, leading to 82 clinic closures statewide, and barred Planned Parenthood from its Medicaid program in 2021 after a legal battle.
In 2019, the Legislature passed Senate Bill 22 prohibiting local governments from contracting with Planned Parenthood for any services, including non-abortion care.
The Trump administration’s recent signature legislative victory, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, includes a provision that ends Medicaid payments for one year to abortion providers like Planned Parenthood. A federal judge blocked the provision on July 28, however, after issuing a partial preliminary injunction last week.
Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast President and CEO Melaney Linton said in a statement to the Houston Chronicle that “having to reduce [Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast’s] staffing and future footprint in Houston is heartbreaking, infuriating, and the direct result of these sustained political attacks.”
Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, which has been operating in the Houston area for more than 90 years, operates six clinics in Greater Houston and two in Louisiana. It will close its Prevention Park and Southwest clinics on Sept. 30. The four remaining Houston clinics will be acquired by affiliate Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas.
Once the four remaining clinics in Houston are acquired, Planned Parenthood Greater Texas will operate 22 clinics in the state. Seven other clinics in the San Antonio area are operated by Planned Parenthood South Texas.
The clinics rely on donor support now that so much of their funding has been cut, according to a spokesperson for the Gulf Coast affiliate.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Kathleen Anderson holds a photo of the woman whose heart was donated and transplanted into her. Anderson still keeps in contact with the woman’s family. / Credit: Isabel Cacho/Angelus News
Los Angeles, Calif., Jul 13, 2024 / 08:00 am (CNA).
For… […]
Dainelys Soto, Genesis Contreras, and Daniel Soto, who arrived from Venezuela after crossing the U.S. border from Mexico, wait for dinner at a hotel provided by the Annunciation House on Sept. 22, 2022 in El Paso, Texas. / Credit: Joe Raedle/Getty Images
CNA Staff, Sep 9, 2024 / 06:00 am (CNA).
Long a champion of immigrants, particularly those fleeing war-torn countries and impoverished regions, Pope Francis last month delivered some of the clearest words in his papacy yet in support of migrants — and in rebuke of those who turn away from them.
“It must be said clearly: There are those who work systematically and with every means possible to repel migrants,” the pope said during a weekly Angelus address. “And this, when done with awareness and responsibility, is a grave sin.”
“In the time of satellites and drones, there are migrant men, women, and children that no one must see,” the pope said. “They hide them. Only God sees them and hears their cry. This is a cruelty of our civilization.”
The pope has regularly spoken out in favor of immigrants. In June he called on the faithful to “unite in prayer for all those who have had to leave their land in search of dignified living conditions.” The Holy Father has called the protection of migrants a “moral imperative.” He has argued that migrants “[must] be received” and dealt with humanely.
Migrants aboard an inflatable vessel in the Mediterranean Sea approach the guided-missile destroyer USS Carney in 2013. Carney provided food and water to the migrants aboard the vessel before coordinating with a nearby merchant vessel to take them to safety. Credit: Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa/U.S. 6th Fleet, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
The Catholic Church has long been an advocate and protector of immigrants. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) notes on its website that “a rich body of Church teaching, including papal encyclicals, bishops’ statements, and pastoral letters, has consistently reinforced our moral obligation to treat the stranger as we would treat Christ himself.”
The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that prosperous nations “are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin.”
Popes throughout the years, meanwhile, have expressed sentiments on immigration similar to Francis’. Pope Pius XII in 1952, for instance, described the Holy Family’s flight into Egypt as “the archetype of every refugee family.”
The Church, Pius XII said, “has been especially careful to provide all possible spiritual care for pilgrims, aliens, exiles, and migrants of every kind.”
Meanwhile, “devout associations” throughout the centuries have spearheaded “innumerable hospices and hospitals” in part for immigrants, Pius XII said.
Implications and applications of Church teaching
Chad Pecknold, an associate professor of systematic theology at The Catholic University of America, noted that the catechism “teaches that nations have the right to borders and self-definition, so there is no sense in which Catholic teaching supports the progressive goal of ‘open borders.’”
“There is a ‘duty of care’ which is owed to those fleeing from danger,” he told CNA, “but citizenship is not owed to anyone who can make it across a national border, and illegal entry or asylum cannot be taken as a debt of citizenship.”
Paul Hunker, an immigration attorney who previously served as chief counsel of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Dallas, agreed.
“States have to have responsibility for their own communities, they have to look out for them,” he told CNA. “So immigration can be regulated so as to not harm the common good.”
Still, Hunker noted, Catholic advocates are not wrong in responding to immigration crises — like the ongoing irregular influx through the U.S. southern border — with aid and assistance.
Paul Hunker, an immigration attorney and former chief counsel of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Dallas, says Catholic advocates are not wrong in responding to immigration crises — like the ongoing irregular influx through the U.S. southern border — with aid and assistance. Credit: Photo courtesy of Paul Hunker
Many Catholic organizations offer shelter, food, and legal assistance to men, women, and children who cross into the country illegally; such groups have been overwhelmed in recent years with the crush of arriving migrants at the country’s southern border.
“It’s the responsibility of the federal government to take care of the border,” he said. “When the government has created a crisis at the U.S. border, Catholic dioceses are going to want to help people.”
“I completely support what the Catholic organizations are doing in Mexico and the United States to assist people who are there,” Hunker said. “The people responding are not responsible for these crises.”
Latest crisis and legal challenge
Not everyone feels similarly. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched an investigation of multiple Catholic nonprofits that serve illegal immigrants in the state. Paxton alleges that through the services it provides to migrants, El Paso-based Annunciation House has been facilitating illegal immigration and human trafficking.
A lawyer for the group called the allegations “utter nonsense,” though attorney Jerome Wesevich acknowledged that the nonprofit “serves undocumented persons as an expression of the Catholic faith and Jesus’ command to love one another, no exceptions.”
There are considerable numbers of Church teachings that underscore the need for a charitable response to immigrants. In his 1963 encyclical Pacem in Terris, Pope John XXIII argued that man “has the right to freedom of movement and of residence within the confines of his own state,” and further that “when there are just reasons in favor of it, he must be permitted to emigrate to other countries and take up residence there.”
In the encyclical Caritas in Veritate, meanwhile, Pope Benedict XVI in 2009 acknowledged that migration poses “dramatic challenges” for nations but that migrants “cannot be considered as a commodity or a mere workforce.”
“Every migrant is a human person who, as such, possesses fundamental, inalienable rights that must be respected by everyone and in every circumstance,” the late pope wrote.
Edward Feser, a professor of philosophy at Pasadena City College in California, noted that the Church “teaches that nations should be welcoming to immigrants, that they should be sensitive to the hardships that lead them to emigrate, that they ought not to scapegoat them for domestic problems, and so on.”
Catholic teaching does not advocate an ‘open borders’ policy
Yet Catholic teaching does not advocate an “open borders” policy, Feser said. He emphasized that the catechism says countries should accept immigrants “to the extent they are able,” and further that countries “may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various juridical conditions.”
There “is nothing per se in conflict with Catholic teaching when citizens and politicians call on the federal government to enforce its immigration laws,” Feser said. “On the contrary, the catechism backs them up on this.”
In addition, it is “perfectly legitimate,” Feser argued, for governments to consider both economic and cultural concerns when setting immigration policy. It is also “legitimate to deport those who enter a country illegally,” he said.
Still, he acknowledged, a country can issue exceptions to valid immigration laws when the moral situation demands it.
“Of course, there can be individual cases where a nation should forgo its right to deport those who enter it illegally, and cases where the manner in which deportations occur is associated with moral hazards, such as when doing so would break up families or return an immigrant to dangerous conditions back in his home country,” he said.
“Governments should take account of this when formulating and enforcing policy,” he said.
The tension between responding charitably to immigrants and ensuring a secure border was perhaps put most succinctly in 1986 by the late Father Theodore Hesburgh, who served as chairman of the U.S. Select Commission for Immigration and Refugee Policy that was created by the U.S. Congress in the early 1980s.
“It is not enough to sympathize with the aspirations and plight of illegal aliens. We must also consider the consequences of not controlling our borders,” said the late Father Theodore Hesburgh, who served as chairman of the U.S. Select Commission for Immigration and Refugee Policy that was created by the U.S. Congress in the early 1980s. Credit: Photo courtesy of University of Notre Dame
Writing several years after the commission, Hesburgh explained: “It is not enough to sympathize with the aspirations and plight of illegal aliens. We must also consider the consequences of not controlling our borders.”
“What about the aspirations of Americans who must compete for jobs and whose wages and work standards are depressed by the presence of large numbers of illegal aliens?” the legendary late president of the University of Notre Dame reflected. “What about aliens who are victimized by unscrupulous employers and who die in the desert at the hands of smugglers?”
“The nation needn’t wait until we are faced with a choice between immigration chaos and closing the borders,” Hesburgh stated nearly 40 years ago.
Pope Leo waves to the crowds in St. Peter’s Square on Sept. 6, 2025. / Credit: Vatican Media
CNA Staff, Sep 12, 2025 / 14:56 pm (CNA).
A new report from a Pew Research Center survey finds that 8 out of 10 American Catholics view Pope Leo XIV fa… […]
6 Comments
PP saved millions of womens lives w cancer prevention screening, but was able to convince “moral high roaders” that babies were being murdered in their clinics. I hope your readers are very aware, they helped contribute to the death of so many innocent women…
Supporting and protecting life is not being a “moral high roader,” it’s called having a functioning conscience. And people have all kinds of options available to get cancer screenings. They don’t need PP for those services.
Our public health clinics do cancer screenings. I don’t see any advantage to doing that at a PP clinic. Honestly you can do Pap smears at home & mail them off to a lab. It shouldn’t require PP.
Hormonal contraceptives can increase the risk of cervical cancer by lowering women’s immune systems. PP has promoted sexual activity & made it riskier at the same time.
PP saved millions of womens lives w cancer prevention screening, but was able to convince “moral high roaders” that babies were being murdered in their clinics. I hope your readers are very aware, they helped contribute to the death of so many innocent women…
PP murdered over 10,000 children a year at this location. God the Truth Knows. God Is. Praise God for this victory.
John 8:44, Joshua 6.
Supporting and protecting life is not being a “moral high roader,” it’s called having a functioning conscience. And people have all kinds of options available to get cancer screenings. They don’t need PP for those services.
Thank you, Athanasius. Well spoken.
Our public health clinics do cancer screenings. I don’t see any advantage to doing that at a PP clinic. Honestly you can do Pap smears at home & mail them off to a lab. It shouldn’t require PP.
Hormonal contraceptives can increase the risk of cervical cancer by lowering women’s immune systems. PP has promoted sexual activity & made it riskier at the same time.
Praise God for this good news.