
Washington D.C., Apr 26, 2018 / 10:45 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Religious freedom conditions worsened across the globe in the past year, according to the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom’s 2018 report, released April 25.
Violations against religious freedom were particularly acute under authoritarian regimes in the Eastern Hemisphere. With the exception of Cuba, all of the 28 countries USCIRF designated as the worst perpetrators in 2017 lie east of the prime meridian.
The worst abuses against religious freedom included genocide, enslavement, rape, imprisonment, forced displacement, forced conversions, property destruction, and bans on religious education of children.
The commission recommended that 16 countries be recognized by the State Department as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC), a label that identifies foreign governments that engage in or tolerate “systemic, ongoing, and egregious” religious freedom violations. Receiving this designation from the State Department opens the door to consequences including trade and funding sanctions.
These 16 are the same countries that USCIRF recommended last year with the State Department going on to recognize 10 as CPCs in December 2017: Burma, China, Eritrea, Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.
However, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom urges that religious freedom violations in Pakistan, Russia, Syria, Nigeria, Vietnam, and the Central African Republic were so severe that these countries also merit CPC designation.
Of these six unrecognized countries, USCIRF Chair Daniel Mark is particularly concerned about the state of religious freedom in Pakistan.
“What we have said for many years is that Pakistan is the worst country in the world that’s not designated for CPC. Pakistan is a world leader in imprisonment and convictions, prosecutions for blasphemy and apostasy, and those sorts of things,” Mark told CNA.
According to the report, approximately 40 people sentenced under blasphemy laws are awaiting the death penalty or serving life sentences, including Asia Bibi, a Christian mother and field laborer.
In December 2017, Islamic State affiliated suicide bombers attacked a church in Quetta, Pakistan killing nine people.
The upcoming national elections in July 2018 have exacerbated religious tensions in the country.
“Conditions in Pakistan are not just bad at the level of law, where for example, Amadis are out in the Constitution for second-class citizenship, but also at the level of civil society where a culture of impunity has grown,” continued Mark, who explained that vigante mobs have been attacking people on the basis of blasphemy accusations.
In lieu of CPC designation, Pakistan was placed on a “Special Watch List” by the State Department in December 2017. This list is a new category created by the 2016 amendments to the International Religious Freedom Act.
“Matters concerning Pakistan are very sensitive on account of the fact that they are a partner of ours in combating terrorism around the world in the war in Afghanistan and so on. But, given the rise of extremism in Pakistan…we really do think that pressure should be kept up, notwithstanding the cooperation that our two countries need,” said Mark.
The USCIRF chairman told CNA that he is concerned that both Russia and China intensified repression of religious freedom over the course of 2017.
“Russia, which we recommended for designation for the very first time last year, continued to deteriorate. The repression in some of the post-Soviet Central Asian states have followed Russia’s model, sadly,” said Mark.
The report notes that Russia is the only country to have expanded its repressive policies to a neighboring territory by means of military invasion. Crimean Tatar Muslims are being kidnapped, tortured, and imprisoned in Russian-occupied Ukraine.
“Russia is such a big player on the world stage. It is really important that the message be sent clearly,” said Mark referring to religious freedom.
The report also mentioned religious persecution in China, including persecution of Catholics, noting that 2017 marked 60 years since the creation of the state-run Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association.
In 2017, China increased government control over its recognized religions as a part of President Xi Jinping’s campaign to “manipulate all aspects of faith into a socialist mold infused with ‘Chinese characteristics.’”
Two regions of China with significant ethnic and religious minority populations, Xinjiang and Tibet, “increasingly resemble police states,” the report said.
“Monks and nuns who refuse to denounce the Dalai Lama or pledge loyalty to Beijing have been expelled from their monasteries, imprisoned, and tortured.”
The report also cites mounting revelations of the Chinese authorities torturing other prisoners of conscience and human rights defenders to force confessions and compel individuals to renounce their faith.
In its 2018 report, USCIRF also recognized 12 additional countries with a Tier 2 status of less severe or systemic religious freedom violations: Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Cuba, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Laos, Malaysia, and Turkey.
USCIRF recommends in the report that the U.S. government prioritize efforts to advocate for the release of prisoners of conscience. Chairman Daniel Mark pointed to the recent trip of Ambassador-at-large for International Religious Freedom Sam Brownback to Turkey on behalf of imprisoned Christian pastor Andrew Brunson as a good example.
Mark also highlighted that there have been some improvements in international religious freedom efforts during the past year.
“The pushback against ISIS in Iraq and recapturing all or almost all of the territory from them has been absolutely critical in saving lives. And another thing that gets much less noticed is international cooperation. It was great to see that on January 1st Denmark opened a new office with an ambassador representative covering this issue and we hope to see more countries follow,” he said.
The Islamic State was one of the non-state actors that USCIRF report recommended to be designated as an Entity of Particular Concern, along with the Taliban in Afghanistan, and al-Shabaab in Somalia. The Frank R. Wolf International Religious Freedom Act passed in December 2016 requires the U.S. government to also identify these non-state actors as Entities of Particular Concern or EPCs.
[…]
Harris was speaking at churches during her campaign – how was this compliant?
Dream City Church, Phoenix, 180 Church Detroit: Trump on campaign!!! What’s good for the goose is good for the gander!
Black protestant churches have been entertaining Democrat politicians running for office for almost a hundred years and no one in government ever did a damn thing about it. Who’s kidding whom? Democrats make up their own rules.
It might be more accurate to say that the IRS gag rule has now been lifted for white, conservative/traditional churches. Black churches and progressive churches have been overtly political with no consequences for decades.
But what about those who FAIL to endorse?
So it was never a statutory restriction but a regulatory interpretation? Happy if it is, but then it says a lot about the Catholic Church’s toeing the line all these decades to remain in the good graces of auditors. (Maybe the Catholic press will also discover its “voice” on matters political?)
I doubt the timidity of priests and bishops has much to do with the IRS. I hope I’m wrong, but I think that was just an excuse, and the real reason has always been a desire for that “friendship with the world” (James 4:4) that is part of the “spirit of Vatican II”.
Johnson was very aggresive; probably the tone he set stuck around
The practical effect of this as far as Catholic Church is concerned, for the time being, will likely be minimal. In Ohio a couple of few ago, the abortion legalization referendums on the ballot were often hardly brought up at all from the pulpit. That was certainly the case at my parish, staffed by two youngish and moderately conservative priests. When they mentioned it all, the comments were brief and vague. Once called it a “difficult” matter. This happened despite the fact that these issues were not subject at all to the rules regulating political speech at churches since they didn’t involve candidates for office. In other words, speaking openly on the issues would not have jeopardized the Church’s exempt status and many priests still declined to speak about them.
If anything, the wrong people will feel even more emboldened to inject their ill-considered SJW views into their homilies and petitions. We’ll probably hear more on migration, climate change, capital punishment, racism and all the rest. Meanwhile, most of the conservatives will remain reticent and timid.
I think you’re right. Bear in mind, though, that the problem with putting your faith in princes is not fixed by putting it in different princes.
By my count there are things that are not talked about in sermons: Abortion, the importance of going to confession and the Rosary. The change in the IRS interpretation only effect the first of these. What has prevented the preaching of the last two.
You can add the reality of hell to your list. It is also the most inexcusable omision.