Pope tells politicians that AI should serve human beings, not replace them 

 

The pope told the political leaders that “natural law, which is universally valid apart from and above other more debatable beliefs, constitutes the compass by which to take our bearings in legislating and acting.” / Credit: Vatican Media

Vatican City, Jun 21, 2025 / 09:30 am (CNA).

Pope Leo urged political leaders from around the world to promote the common good, warning especially of the threat to human dignity from artificial intelligence (AI).

AI “will certainly be of great help to society, provided that its employment does not undermine the identity and dignity of the human person and his or her fundamental freedoms,” the pope said on June 21 to legislators from 68 countries gathered at the Vatican for the Jubilee of Governments.

“It must not be forgotten that artificial intelligence functions as a tool for the good of human beings, not to diminish them, not to replace them,” Leo said, speaking in English to the international audience.

The pope has quickly made the challenge of artificial intelligence a signature issue of his pontificate, highlighting it at a meeting with the College of Cardinals two days after his election last month.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, pictured here greeting Pope Leo XIV, was among the leaders from 68 countries gathered at the Vatican for the Jubilee of Governments. Credit: Vatican Media
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, pictured here greeting Pope Leo XIV, was among the leaders from 68 countries gathered at the Vatican for the Jubilee of Governments. Credit: Vatican Media

In his speech to political leaders on Saturday, Leo also urged them to promote the common good in other ways, including by “working to overcome the unacceptable disproportion between the immense wealth concentrated in the hands of a few and the world’s poor.” The pope decried such inequality as a leading cause of war.

Pope Leo stressed the importance of religious freedom and encouraged political leaders to follow the example of the 16th-century St. Thomas More as a “martyr for freedom and for the primacy of conscience.” More was executed for refusing to recognize King Henry VIII as head of the Church in England instead of the pope.

Leo also recommended the ethical tradition of natural law, whose roots in classical antiquity predate Christianity, as “a shared point of reference in political activity” and “an element that unites everyone” regardless of religious belief.

Natural law arguments have played a prominent role in several recent legal and political debates, over issues including abortion, euthanasia, religious freedom, same-sex marriage and transgender policies.

The pope told the political leaders that “natural law, which is universally valid apart from and above other more debatable beliefs, constitutes the compass by which to take our bearings in legislating and acting, particularly on the delicate and pressing ethical issues that, today more than in the past, regard personal life and privacy.”


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 14643 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

3 Comments

  1. A high-octane potential and threat, ambivalent AI…yes, but “the signature issue?” Let’s hope not.

    Instead, the ancient heresy of “monism” is a broader and much more likely candidate… Monism: the failure to distinguish the Creator GOD from his CREATION. God, not as the infinitely “Other” but as only the highest level of cosmic stuff.

    So, yes, to the papal message about the inborn and universal Natural Law—and as including our personal openness to a personal God who is “other than ourselves.” (The 19th-century Luddites were also ignored when they complained only that automatic textile spindles—technocracy—should not replace human hands.)

    Today’s data worshipers—now including the prophets/profits of AI—are only walking in step with some guy named Einstein, who also put us on the ambivalent path toward atom bombs. And, who pontificated that the human brain is only an openness toward the profound complexity of stuff, but not toward a higher (?) and personal God, as in step with each other and the Natural Law—and with the personal Self-disclosure (!) of God in the historic and historical Incarnation:

    Einstein: “The main source of the present-day conflicts between the spheres of religion and of science lies in the concept of a personal God [….] In their struggle for the ethical good [only this?], teachers of religion must have the stature to give up the doctrine of a personal God [!], that is, to give up that source of fear and hope which in the past placed such vast power in the hands of priests. In their labors they will have to avail themselves of those forces [!] which are capable of cultivating the Good, the True, and the Beautiful in humanity itself [….] After religious teachers accomplish the refining process indicated they will surely recognize with joy that true religion [monism?] has been ennobled and made more profound by scientific knowledge” (Albert Einstein, “Science and Religion” [1939], in “Out of My Later Years,” Philosophical Library, 1950).

    SUMMARY: (Monism! + computers) = AI.

  2. Humbly serving fellow humans during their brief tenure appears to be their goal and ambition. Scoring an own goal or a self goal is not their forte. Politicians are wise human beings. They will certainly not work against themselves, against their loved ones, and against other fellow mortals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*