
Vatican City, Oct 3, 2017 / 03:09 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- In the keynote speech at a conference on protecting children in the digital world, Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin said child safety is one of the most urgent issues of modern times, and stressed that children on the global “peripheries” shouldn’t be forgotten.
In his Oct. 3 speech, Parolin noted that technological and cultural change “is particularly fast in many countries in which social and economic progress are still very limited and unbalanced.”
Thousands of children are now growing up in the digital world in vastly underdeveloped nations, he said, which means their parents and educators “will no longer be culturally equipped to accompany them and help them grow in this world, while their governments often don’t know where to begin in protecting them.”
“We are also responsible for these children, and the businesses that promote and push the development of the digital world are also responsible for them,” he said.
Given the international and interdisciplinary approach of the conference, Parolin stressed that the participants themselves “must take responsibility for those peripheries of the world of which Pope Francis continually speaks.”
The peripheries, he said, are in geographical areas of great economic poverty, but which “are also found within rich societies, where there is considerable human and spiritual poverty, loneliness and a loss of the meaning of life.”
“It is no coincidence that it is precisely minors from these peripheries that are the preferred object of global networks of exploitation and organized violence online.”
He pointed specifically to several crimes against children: trafficking, forced conscription of child soldiers, slave labor, prostitution, drugs, all of which are compounded by inadequate education, hunger and poverty.
In each of these cases, “the horrible reality of sexual abuse is practically always present, as a common aspect and consequence of a multifaceted and widespread violence,” he said, noting that sexual abuse entirely disregards “respect not only for the body, but even more so for the soul, for the profound vulnerability and dignity of every child,” regardless of nationality.
Quoting Pope Francis, Parolin said “we need the courage” to guard children from “the new Herods of our time, who devour the innocence of our children” through various forms of slavery and exploitation.
Parolin spoke on the opening night of a four-day conference on protecting children in a digitally connected and global society. Titled “Child Dignity in the Digital World,” the conference is being held in Rome Oct. 3-6 and is organized by the Pontifical Gregorian University’s Center for Child Protection (CCP).
Participants in the congress include social scientists, civic leaders, and religious representatives from around the world. Topics include prevention of abuse, pornography, the responsibility of internet providers and the media, and ethical governance.
Notable presenters representing the global “peripheries” will be Cardinal John Njue, Archbishop of Nairobi in Kenya, and Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle, Archbishop of Manila in the Philippines, who will address the issue of protecting minors from the perspectives of Africa and Asia respectively.
Parolin’s focus on social peripheries echo remarks from Fr. Hans Zollner SJ, president of the CCP and a member of Pope Francis’ commission for protecting minors.
In a briefing with journalists Oct. 2, the day before the conference began, Zollner said the issues of child abuse and protection, widely spoken about in Western nations, are also of major concern for developing nations.
He said the problem “is everywhere and the risks are everywhere,” he said. “It is not a Western problem, although in many parts of the world, 75% of countries in this world, issues of child sexual abuse have not reached the level of discussion in Anglo and Western- European countries.”
On the opening night of the conference, the panel of speakers was preceded by a powerful video in which minors who have been abused either online or in person shared their stories, detailing instances of online bullying, body-shaming, sexual exploitation and pornography addiction.
The stories depicted included a 17-year-old girl who committed suicide after explicit videos of her, taken by a boyfriend, were posted online. Other stories were that of a young Filipino boy who fell victim to a sex-trafficking ring, and that of a 10-year-old boy who, despite feeling shame, became addicted to pornography.
In his opening remarks, Zollner said that “stories such as these are why were are gathered here.”
“We have listened to stories of victims, and now we are here to talk about hope,” he said, explaining that he has “conflicting emotions” about the conference. While he has a “somber feeling” due to the topic of discussion, the priest said he also has a “hopeful feeling” when he looks at the faces present in the audience and the various areas they represent.
Referring to the stories shared in the video, Zollner asked “how can we stop these terror attacks on the heart of the child?”
One thing is certain in the process, he said, which is that “there is not one single medicine that will fix it all.” Rather, “it is a combination of threads that weave this safety net,” and the threads are people.
According to statistics given by the panel of speakers, in Europe alone there are currently some 30,000 websites that portray children being sexually abused.
Several experts reported that in 2013 alone, 18 million children were sexually abused, amounting to roughly 30 percent of Europe’s children. Numbers given by Interpol for 2016 show that at least 5 children fall victim to sexual abuse online per day.
In his speech, Parolin also emphasized the need to form networks, reiterating concern that the sexual abuse of minors is “an immensely vast and widespread phenomenon.”
Over the past few decades, the reality of child sexual abuse within the Church has become more apparent, as “very serious facts have emerged,” he said. Parolin explained that as facts emerged, the Church became aware of the damage done to victims, and the need to provide “a new culture of child protection” which “effectively guarantees their growth in safe and secure environments.”
“This is a commitment that requires deep human attention, competence and consistency,” he said, adding that the efforts made must continue to “expand and deepen” with clarity and firm commitment.
Attention is necessary, he said, “so that the dignity and rights of minors are protected and defended with much more attention and effectiveness that has been done in the past.”
He noted that “the scourge of offenses against the dignity of minors” now “spreads and aligns itself within the new parameters of the digital world.”
“This plague meanders and infiltrates along a labyrinth of paths and through deep, hidden layers of reality,” he said, stressing that the digital world is not “a separate part of the world,” but an integral part “of a unique reality of the world.”
With old challenges manifesting themselves in new ways, the culture of protecting minors “must be sufficiently able to address today’s problems.”
New energies must be channeled toward a shared commitment “to overcome the sense of disorientation and powerlessness when faced with such a markedly difficult challenge, and to help us to intervene creatively,” he said.
Furthermore, “we must work to regain control of the development of the digital world, so that it may be at the service of the dignity of minors, and thus of the whole human race of tomorrow,” he said. “For the minors of today are the entirety of tomorrow’s human race.”
While research and understanding problems are important, Parolin called for a “far-seeing, courageous endeavor” on the part of all participants, and appealed for “the cooperation of every person in a position of responsibility” in all countries and sectors of society.
Parolin said that in this regard, special attention ought to be paid to the “moral and religious” aspects of the life and development of the human person.
“The minors of whom we speak and whose dignity we wish to defend and promote are human
persons, and the value of each of them is unique and unrepeatable,” he said, adding that each of them “must be taken seriously and protected in this ever more digitalized world, so that they may be able to fulfill the purpose of their life, their destiny, their coming into the world.”
Scripture itself says we are created in the “image and likeness” of God, he said, and in the New Testament it tells of how the Son of God came to the world as “a vulnerable child, and in needy circumstances, assuming both the fragility and the hope for a future that are intrinsic to an infant.”
“To disparage infancy and to abuse children is for the Christian, therefore, not only a crime, but also – as Pope Francis has stated – sacrilege, a profanation of that which is sacred, of the presence of God in every human being.”
While the driving forces behind global technical and economic development might seem “unstoppable” and are likely driven by both economic and political interests, Parolin stressed that “we must not allow ourselves to be dominated by” these interests.
“The power of sexual desire that dwells in the depth of the human mind and heart is great and wonderful when it advances the path of humanity,” he said, but can also be “corrupted and perverted,” becoming “a source of suffering and unspeakable abuse.”
Sexual desire must be “elevated and directed,” he said, adding that “the sense of moral responsibility in the sight of humanity and in the sight of God, the reflection on the correct use of freedom in the building and orientation of a new world and in learning how to live in it, are thus absolutely necessary and fundamental for our common future.”
He closed his speech calling the defense of children in the digital world “one of today’s most important and urgent issues” for humanity.”
Parolin voiced his hope that with the “living sense of the beauty and the mystery of human persons, of the greatness of their vocation to life, and thus of the duty to protect them in their dignity and their growth” in mind, this perspective would “inspire your work and bear concrete and effective fruit.”
[…]
We read: “The cardinal said that as an Augustinian, Pope Leo has ‘a solid foundation in the tradition and spirituality of St. Augustine’.” From St. Augustine–as with individuals and now with parts of the Church itself, the double life:
“…it is no monstrous thing partly to will a thing and partly not to will it, but a sickness of the mind [!]. Although it is supported by truth, it does not wholly rise up, since it is heavily encumbered by habit. Therefore there are two wills, since one of them is not complete, and what is lacking in one of them is present in the other” (Confessions, Bk. 8, Ch. 9:21).
Deeper than the misnomers of “left”and “right.”
The use of the terms “left” and “right”, while sometimes used as political terms cannot be used when the reference point is the fact that God, The Most Holy And Undivided Blessed Trinity, In The Unity Of The Holy Ghost, The Perfect Divine Eternal Love Between The Father And His Only Begotten Son, Who Proceeds From Both The Father And His Only Begotten Son, Is The Author Of Love, Of Life, And Of Marriage. To deny that The Blessed Trinity Is The Author Of Love, Of Life, And Of Marriage, is apostasy.
Christ’s Teaching on the Sanctity of all human life from the moment of conception to the moment of death, and the Sanctity of the marital act within The Sacrament of Holy Matrimony, and thus sexual morality, is not up for debate.
Perfect Divine Eternal Love does not divide, it multiplies, as in The Miracle Of The Loaves and Fishes.
We read: “The cardinal said that as an Augustinian, Pope Leo has ‘a solid foundation in the tradition and spirituality of St. Augustine’.”
From St. Augustine, about the double life and individuals and now parts of the Church as a whole, both:
“…it is no monstrous thing partly to will a thing and partly not to will it, but a sickness of the mind [!]. Although it is supported by truth, it does not wholly rise up, since it is heavily encumbered by habit. Therefore there are two wills, since one of them is not complete, and what is lacking in one of them is present in the other” (Confessions, Bk. 8, Ch. 9:21).
Deeper than the political misnomers of “left” or “right.”
Years ago, in 1995, we attended a Mass in London. It was in English but very bland. Like a grade school play. We then attended a Mass in Germany. It was in Latin or German and we could understand the clarity of the complete Mass. I had been raised in USA serving as an Alter Boy in the Latin Mass, so I understood it and enjoyed it. I think I would still prefer the Latin Mass.
My neighbor attended a friend’s Catholic funeral a few years ago, along with several of the deceased’s local friends. One of them, who was raised Catholic, turned to the my neighbor on the way out and remarked, “That is not the Catholic church that I grew up in.”
When you ‘water down the brand,’ you give people an excuse to jump ship, further evidence that the Eucharist is irrelevant to many.
Patrick, unfortunately with all the Bergoglian bishops now in office, the closest anyone can get to the Extraordinary Form of the Mass would be any Mass said by the Ordinariate Rite. It’s said “ad orientem”, prayed respectfully and prayerfully as if offering an unbloody re-presentation of Christ’s Holy Sacrifice on the Cross (which the Mass is).
DR;
You give the impression that it is virtually impossible to find a TLM.
I disagree – Google ‘Latin Mass’ and take it from there. It might be difficult to reach it but the sacrifice is well worth it. Here in Maine I have met people at the Latin Mass in Lewiston who make a round trip of up to 200 or more miles to reach the Mass and they don’t mind it at all – it can be done and, as I have already said – the sacrifice is well worth it.
My dear Diogenes, don’t broad-brush these bishops; many are very good men who were picked by our Pope Leo!
“These issues have divided the Church because, at a certain point, it became unclear what is right.” That point would be the moment one denies God, The Most Holy And Undivided Blessed Trinity , In The Unity Of The Holy Ghost, Is The Author Of Love, Of Life, And Of Marriage, ipso fact separating oneself from Christ and His One, Holy, Catholic, And Apostolic Church and becoming a part of The Great Apostasy.
The Truth is the truth, it is neither left nor right. Let’s stick with the Truth.
I would like to hope for great things from this new Pontificate: crystal clarity in teaching doctrine; bold proclamation of the centrality of Christ, the Redeemer; settling doubts on “synodality”, the synod of bishops, and the fundamental role of the hierarchy established by Christ, etc.
But there remains a nagging doubt that Pope Leo will be sufficiently brave enough to resist the radical leftest juggernaut that has been in control of the Vatican, the Church and Church policy for the past dozen years.
Lord have mercy!
I think I get why Cardinal Goh was on some papabile lists.
One to watch, I’d say.
God, The Ordered Communion Of Perfect Complementary Divine Eternal Love, The Most Holy Blessed Trinity, In The Unity Of The Holy Ghost, Is The Truth Of Perfect Divine Eternal Love. Love, which is always rightly ordered to the inherent personal and relational Dignity of the persons existing in a relationship of Love, is devoid of every form of lust. Let no one deceive you, the end goal of the modernist, the atheist materialistic overpopulation alarmist globalist, is the objectification of the human person.
Pope Benedict XVI warned us :
“When the freedom to be creative becomes the freedom to create oneself, then necessarily the Maker himself is denied and ultimately man too is stripped of his dignity as a creature of God, as the image of God at the core of his being. The defence of the family is about man himself. And it becomes clear that when God is denied, human dignity also disappears. Whoever defends God is defending man.” – Pope Benedict’s Christmas Address 2012
There will not be clarity in Christ’s One, Holy, Catholic , and Apostolic Church until the counterfeit church is charitably anathema by a True Vicar of Christ , and those Faithful Bishops who affirm The Unity Of The Holy Ghost , and thus the fact that “it is not possible to have Sacramental Communion without Ecclesiastical Communion”, due to The Unity Of The Holy Ghost ; For It Is Through Christ, With Christ, And In Christ, Oh God Almighty Father, In The Unity Of The Holy Ghost (Filioque), The Perfect Divine Eternal Love Between The Father And His Only Begotten Son, Who Proceeds From Both The Father And His Only Son, In The Ordered Communion Of Perfect Divine Eternal Love, That Is The Most Holy And Undivided Blessed Trinity.
19 They went out from us, but they were not of us. For if they had been of us, they would no doubt have remained with us; but that they may be manifest, that they are not all of us.
20 But you have the unction from the Holy One, and know all things.
Read full chapter
“Behold your Mother.” – Christ On The Cross
https://catholicism.org/heavens-icon.html
A Bridge that denies The Unity Of The Holy Ghost, The Perfect Divine Eternal Love Between The Father And His Only Begotten Son, Who Proceeds From Both The Father And His Only Begotten Son, is a bridge to Apostasy.
Prayers that Pope Leo XIV, is a True Vicar of Christ, validly elected by the minority of Cardinals who remain in communion with The Body of Christ, and thus Christ’s One, Holy, Catholic , And Apostolic Church, who desire to Render onto God what belongs to God, and thus whose competence it is to elect a True Vicar of Christ, will restore the Papacy by a charitable anathema of the counterfeit church with its counterfeit magisterium, who are attempting to cause chaos and confusion , which is not of The Holy Ghost, by attempting to subsist within The Body of Christ while creating a god in their own image, a god who, by denying The Unity Of The Holy Ghost, denies The Divinity of The Most Holy Blessed Trinity, Father, Son, And Holy Ghost.
“Penance, Penance, Penance.”
https://catholicism.org/heavens-icon.html
“If we are not clear about what the Church teaches, it is very difficult to work together in unity…. there has been an internal division on certain issues such as marriage, LGBTQ+ rights, and transgender rights. These issues have divided the Church because, at a certain point, it became unclear what is right.”
I strongly disagree!
It has always been clear what is right in Catholic theology regarding “certain issues such as marriage, LGBTQ+ rights and transgender rights.” The problem is not that we don’t know what is right. The problem is that there are those in high places within the Church who do not want to accept what is right. They want to spread doubt and confusion in moral theology in order to gain acceptance for their sinful practices.