Catholic groups voice opposition to proposed SNAP, Medicaid cuts in budget bill

 

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, May 16, 2025 / 12:34 pm (CNA).

Budget initiatives backed by several Republican lawmakers to cut federal funding for Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) for the next fiscal year are facing opposition from prominent Catholic organizations.

For Medicaid, the proposal would add work requirements for able-bodied adults under the age of 65 if they do not have young children as dependents. It would also shift some Medicaid costs to states if they offer benefits to immigrants who are in the country illegally.

The proposed SNAP reforms would shift some costs to states and raise the work requirement age from 54 to 64. It would also implement stricter verifications to ensure money is not given to immigrants who are in the country illegally.

These initiatives could potentially save the federal government more than $100 billion annually but could also cause millions of people to lose SNAP and Medicaid benefits.

Although much of the Republican majority in the House of Representatives has voiced support for these changes, Democratic members of Congress have strongly opposed them.

Catholic groups opposing Medicaid changes

Opposition to the plans has also come from two major Catholic groups: Catholic Charities USA (CCUSA) and the Catholic Health Association (CHA).

CCUSA, along with many of its local affiliates, has urged Americans to reach out to members of Congress to oppose reforms that could reduce Medicaid coverage.

“Any changes to the current Medicaid program risk reducing access to essential health care and behavioral health services for individuals with nowhere else to turn,” reads a CCUSA advocacy page on its website.

“Medicaid cuts would disproportionately impact people living in rural communities and small towns, the very communities that already have lower incomes, fewer opportunities for employment, and less access to social services,” it adds.

Luz Tavarez, the vice president of government affairs for CCUSA, told CNA that the organization does not want people to be put in situations in which they have to choose between “health care and their rent” or “food and their rent,” adding: “We really have serious concerns about these potential cuts.”

“There are some concerns with some of the additional burdens with becoming eligible and remaining eligible,” she said, contending that keeping up with the paperwork to demonstrate eligibility could be difficult for people who are busy raising children or trying to juggle work and school.

Tavarez said CCUSA has met with both Republican and Democratic members of Congress to voice their concerns with potential cuts. She said they have mostly had positive feedback: “They too are concerned with these potential cuts.”

CHA President and CEO Sister Mary Haddad said in a statement that her organization is “deeply concerned” with the proposal, saying it is “threatening access to care for millions of Americans — particularly those in underserved areas where our member systems work every single day to provide quality, compassionate care.”

“Congress has a moral obligation to consider the harm that such disastrous cuts would have on America’s health safety net and the impacts this proposal would have for America’s most vulnerable communities,” Haddad said.

“Moreover, the cascading effects of lost coverage, including higher costs and greater strain on the system, will impact nearly all Americans — not just those who rely on Medicaid.”

Catholic Charities’ concerns about SNAP

On its advocacy page, CCUSA warns that the changes to SNAP would remove money “from vital food programs.”

“The text expands SNAP paperwork requirements for workers between 54 and 64 forcing them to jump through more bureaucratic red tape to receive food supplements,” it adds. “The bill dramatically shifts costs to the states by requiring states to increase administrative costs from 50% to 75% along with a new requirement for states to cover 5%-25% of SNAP benefit costs.”

Tavarez told CNA that many people CCUSA serves are already “making tough choices” when it comes to food, sometimes not being able to afford the most nutritious food or splitting one meal between several family members.

“These are anti-poverty programs,” Tavarez added. ”It’s not about giving people handouts.”

“If we have people losing health coverage and losing the ability to buy food, we’re going to be in a very difficult [situation],” she said.

If fewer people have access to SNAP benefits, Tavarez cautioned, “then they’re going to rely on our food pantries more and our pantries are already at capacity.” In such a situation, she said CCUSA is still “going to continue to do whatever we can,” adding: “It’s a Gospel mandate for us.”

Republicans allege ‘fearmongering’

Some Republican lawmakers who support the changes have accused opponents, particularly Democrats, of “fearmongering” and misrepresenting the proposed reforms.

Rep. Brett Guthrie, the chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, said in a statement that Democrats are operating a “campaign to scare Americans without any of the details” in reference to the Medicaid reforms.

“This bill refocuses Medicaid on mothers, children, people with disabilities, and the elderly — not illegal immigrants and capable adults who choose not to work,” he said. “It is reckless that my colleagues on the other side of the aisle claimed an artificially high number in alleged coverage loss just so they can fearmonger and score political points.”

Similarly, on the proposed SNAP reforms, House Agriculture Committee Chair Glenn Thompson said in a statement that SNAP “has drifted from a bridge to support American households in need to a permanent destination riddled with bureaucratic inefficiencies, misplaced incentives, and limited accountability.”

“[The plan] restores the program’s original intent, offering a temporary helping hand while encouraging work, cracking down on loopholes exploited by states, and protecting taxpayer dollars,” he added.

In an interview with “EWTN News Nightly” earlier this week, Global Premier Benefits CEO Tony Holland said he believes “the whole goal is to make [programs] more efficient.”

“Those that are able-bodied [and not working] should not receive benefits,” he said. “Those benefits should go to those that need the benefits the most.”