Pope Francis greets pilgrims from his wheelchair during the Saturday jubilee audience in the Vatican’s audience hall on Jan. 11, 2025. / Credit: Vatican Media
Madrid, Spain, Jan 14, 2025 / 07:00 am (CNA).
“Hope,” the autobiography of Pope Francis, hit the shelves of Italian bookstores Tuesday and will be on sale starting Jan. 16 in more than 100 countries.
The book marks the first time a pope has provided a first-person narration of the episodes that have marked his entire life, in this case from his childhood in Argentina in a family of Italian immigrants to becoming the successor of St. Peter.
Published by Random House in its 320-page English edition, the book is the result of six years of work and was written with the collaboration of journalist Carlo Musso, who helped the Holy Father tell his story.
In addition to his memoirs, in the book the pope takes up issues such as war and peace, immigration, the environmental crisis, social policy, sexuality, and the future of the Catholic Church. All of this under the rubric of hope, a theme that is also being highlighted during the 2025 Jubilee.
In a recent interview, Pope Francis said the book was originally planned to be published following his death. “But since I’m not dying (he laughs), they’re afraid that it will lose relevance and they decided to do it now,” the Holy Father explained last December in a conversation with Argentine journalist Bernarda Llorente.
The pontiff, according to the excerpts released by the publishing house, begins his memoirs with an episode that marked his destiny: the sinking of the transatlantic ship Princesa Mafalda, known as the “Italian Titanic.”
His grandparents, together with his father, Mario, bought tickets to sail on the ship that left Genoa on Oct. 11, 1927, bound for Buenos Aires. However, they ultimately didn’t board the vessel because they were unable to sell their belongings in time. “That’s why I am here now; you can’t imagine how many times I have thanked Divine Providence for it,” the pontiff recounts in his autobiography.
He also brings up memories from his childhood at “531 Membrillar Street” in the Flores neighborhood of Buenos Aires, as well as the friendships he forged there, including with a prostitute known as “La Parota,” who decided to change her life and leave the streets to care for the elderly.
‘Healthy irony’ as a medicine to counter narcissism
The Holy Father devotes a large amount of space in his autobiography to reflecting on the value of a sense of humor to deal with sadness and “healthy irony” as a medicine to counter narcissism.
“Irony is medicine, not only to elevate and enlighten others but also for oneself, because self-irony is a powerful tool to overcome the temptation of narcissism. Narcissists continually look in the mirror, they get all primped up, they observe themselves over and over again, but the best advice in front of a mirror is always to laugh at oneself. It will do us good,” the pope comments in the book.
Throughout its pages, the reader will even find some jokes told by the pope himself. The Italian newspaper Avvenire gave a preview of one of them:
“And they also told me one that concerns me directly, that of Pope Francis in America. It goes more or less like this: As soon as he lands at the New York airport for his apostolic trip to the United States, Pope Francis finds an enormous limousine waiting for him. He is a little embarrassed by all that pomp, but then he thinks that he hasn’t driven in ages, and never a car like that, and in short he says to himself: Well, when will I get another chance? He looks at the limousine and asks the driver: ‘Would you let me try it?’ And the driver: ‘Look, I’m really sorry, Your Holiness, but I just can’t do it, you know the procedures, the protocols…’
“But you know how they say the pope is when he gets something into his head; in short he insists and insists, until the guy gives in. Pope Francis then gets behind the wheel on one of those major streets and … gets a taste for it, starts to press on the accelerator: going 50, 80, 120… Until a siren is heard and a police car pulls up alongside him and stops him.
“A young policeman approaches the tinted window, the slightly intimidated pope rolls it down and the man turns pale. ‘Excuse me a minute,’ he says, and goes back to his car to call the station. ‘Chief… I think I have a problem.’ And the chief says, ‘What problem?’ ‘Well, I stopped a car for speeding… but there’s a really important guy in it.’ ‘How important? Is he the mayor?’ ‘No, chief, more than the mayor…’ ‘And who is more than the mayor? The governor?’ ‘No, more…’ ‘But is he the president?’ ‘More, I think…’ ‘And who could possibly be more important than the president?’ ‘Look, chief, I don’t know exactly who he is, but I’ll just tell you that the pope is his chauffeur!’”
This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Vatican City, Mar 23, 2021 / 12:00 pm (CNA).- Pope Francis chose a scouting group from central Italy and kids from a Roman parish to prepare the meditations for this year’s Good Friday Stations of the Cross at the Vatican.
Pope Francis speaks at the Angelus address on March 20, 2022. / Vatican Media
Vatican City, Sep 11, 2022 / 07:30 am (CNA).
Pope Francis honored an Italian missionary sister who was killed by Islamist terrorists in Mozambique, in his Angelus add… […]
Pope Benedict XVI announced his intention to resign the papacy during a meeting of cardinals Feb. 11, 2013. The surprise announcement, which he made in Latin, took place in the Hall of the Consistory in the Vatican’s apostolic palace. / Vatican Media
Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jan 2, 2023 / 06:00 am (CNA).
On Feb. 11, 2013, before a gathering of cardinals who had come to the Vatican expecting to hear the announcement of upcoming canonizations, Pope Benedict XVI dropped a bombshell.
After a few announcements about Church business at the conclusion of the meeting, the pope took out two sheets of paper and read a prepared statement in Latin.
“I have convoked you to this Consistory, not only for the three canonizations, but also to communicate to you a decision of great importance for the life of the Church. After having repeatedly examined my conscience before God, I have come to the certainty that my strengths, due to an advanced age, are no longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry,” the then 85-year-old pontiff told the gathering of the Catholic Church’s highest-ranking clergymen.
Because he spoke in Latin, the language used for official Vatican proclamations, reporters present did not at first realize that the pope had just stepped down.
‘Total surprise, total shock’
The assembled cardinals, on the other hand, who knew their Latin, reacted with stunned silence.
American Cardinal James Stafford later told CNA that the pope’s statement was received with “total surprise, total shock.”
“A cardinal who was sitting next to me said, ‘Did he resign?’ I said, ‘Yes, that’s what he did. He resigned.’ And we just all stood at our places.”
Cardinals react to Pope Benedict XVI’s announcement of his intention to resign the papacy Feb. 11, 2013. The surprise announcement, which Benedict made in Latin, took place in the Hall of the Consistory in the Vatican’s apostolic palace. Vatican Media
Nigeria’s Cardinal Francis Arinze, who was present that morning, said the announcement was a “surprise, like thunder that gives no notice that it’s coming,” reported The Catholic Telegraph.
In renouncing the papacy, Benedict became only the second pope in almost 600 years to voluntarily step down. In 1294, Pietro da Morrone, an elderly hermit, was crowned Pope Celestine V, but finding the demands of the job too much for him, he resigned after only five months.
In 1415, Pope Gregory XII also resigned, but under very different circumstances — he stepped down in order to end a crisis within the Church known as the Great Western Schism.
Title, white clothes, and papal coat of arms
What happened next with Benedict XVI was no less surprising to those who expected him to live as a retired cardinal.
In his last official statement as pope, before a general audience on Feb. 27, 2013, Pope Benedict assured the tens of thousands of people gathered to hear him speak as pope for the last time that even though he was stepping back from official duties, he would remain, in essence, pope.
“The ‘always’ is also a ‘forever’ — there can no longer be a return to the private sphere. My decision to resign the active exercise of the ministry does not revoke this,” Benedict said.
“I do not return to private life, to a life of travel, meetings, receptions, conferences, and so on. I am not abandoning the cross, but remaining in a new way at the side of the crucified Lord,” he told the crowd.
A day earlier, on Feb. 26, 2013, the director of the Vatican Press Office, Father Federico Lombardi, had silenced speculation over what Benedict would be called and what he would wear. He would, Lombardi said, retain the trappings of the papacy — most significantly, his title and dress.
“He will still be called His Holiness Benedict XVI,” Lombardi said. “But he will also be called Pope Emeritus or Roman Pontiff Emeritus.”
Lombardi said Benedict would continue to wear a white cassock but without the mozzetta, the short cape that covers the shoulders. The pope’s fisherman’s ring would be replaced by a ring from his time as cardinal. The red shoes would go as well, Lombardi said, and be replaced by a pair of brown ones.
“The city of León is known for beautiful shoes, and very comfortable shoes. And when the pope was asked what he wanted to wear he said, ‘I want the shoes from León in Mexico,’” Lombardi said at the press conference.
On May 2, the cardinal who designed Benedict’s coat of arms in 2005 told CNA that he had written the pope emeritus suggesting that his coat of arms would need to be redesigned to reflect his new status. Cardinal Andrea Cordero Lanza di Montezemolo proposed making the keys of St. Peter smaller and less prominent.
“That shows that he had a historic possession but not a current jurisdiction,” said the cardinal at the time.
Benedict, however, it seems, politely declined a new coat of arms. La Stampa reported the following year that the Vatican Publishing House’s manual of ecclesiastical heraldry in the Catholic Church contained the following note:
“Expressing deep appreciation and heartfelt gratitude to the author for the interesting study sent to him, [Benedict] made it known that he prefers not to adopt an expressive heraldic emblem of the new situation created with his renouncing of the Petrine Ministry.”
By his decision to continue to dress in white like the pope, retain the title of pope, and keep the coat of arms of his papacy, Benedict revealed that in giving up the “active exercise of the ministry,” he was not forsaking the role of pope altogether.
Pope Francis and Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI pray together at the papal residence in Castel Gandolfo March 23, 2013, their first meeting after Francis’ election. Vatican Media
An expanded Petrine ministry
In his 2013 announcement, Benedict clearly expressed his intention to step aside, even determining the date and time of his official departure. Nonetheless, his decision to keep the title of pope and maintain the ceremonial protocol that goes along with the papacy led some to speculate whether there were not actually “two popes.”
Benedict’s personal secretary and closest confidante, Archbishop Georg Gänswein, sought to clear up any confusion in 2016.
In a speech at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome on May 20, 2016, Gänswein said that Pope Francis and Benedict are not two popes “in competition” with one another but represent one “expanded” Petrine office with “an active member” and a “contemplative.”
Parsing Benedict’s speech, Gänswein explained that in stepping down, Benedict was not giving up his ministry.
“The key word in that statement is ‘munus petrinum,’ translated — as happens most of the time — with ‘Petrine ministry.’ And yet, ‘munus,’ in Latin, has a multiplicity of meanings: It can mean service, duty, guide, or gift, even prodigy. Before and after his resignation, Benedict understood and understands his task as participation in such a ‘Petrine ministry [munus],’” Gänswein said.
“He left the papal throne and yet, with the step he took on Feb. 11, 2013, he has not abandoned this ministry,” Gänswein explained, saying the latter scenario was something “quite impossible after his irrevocable acceptance of the office in April 2005.”
Benedict himself later made clear in an interview with his biographer Peter Seewald that he saw himself as continuing in his ministry. He said that a pope who steps down is like a father whose role changes, but always remains a father.
“Of course a father does not stop being father, but he is relieved of concrete responsibility. He remains a father in a deep, inward sense, in a particular relationship which has responsibility, but not with day-to-day tasks as such. It was also this way for bishops,” Benedict said.
“I think it is also clear that the pope is no superman and his mere existence is not sufficient to conduct his role, rather he likewise exercises a function.
“If he steps down, he remains in an inner sense within the responsibility he took on, but not in the function. In this respect one comes to understand that the office of the pope has lost none of its greatness, even if the humanity of the office is perhaps becoming more clearly evident,” Benedict said.
Benedict’s decision “not to abandon his ministry” inspired a cottage industry of conspiracy theories, with some questioning whether the pope emeritus truly stepped down because of his age and frailty.
George Weigel, author of the definitive biography of St. John Paul II, “Witness to Hope,” dismissed such speculation in an interview with CNA.
“I have no reason to think that there was anything more to Pope Benedict’s resignation than what he said was its cause: his conviction that he no longer had the strength, physical and intellectual, to give the Church what it needed from a pope,” he said.
“Everything else written about this is sheer speculation. Let’s take Benedict at his word,” Weigel said.
A life of prayer
In retiring to live in the Mater Ecclesiae Monastery in the Vatican Gardens, Benedict did not completely withdraw from the world. He attended public events in his new capacity as pope emeritus, received visitors, and pursued a life of fruitful study, writing, and prayer.
Pope Francis visits Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI at the Mater Ecclesiae monastery in Vatican City to exchange Christmas greetings Dec. 23, 2013. Vatican Media
Matthew Bunson, Catholic historian, author, and executive editor of EWTN News, told CNA that Benedict was determined not to exercise authority in his new role.
“He really embraced what it means to be pope emeritus, and refrained from making public comments, to instead live a life of prayer and reflection,” Bunson said.
“Benedict really was on retreat, and in prayer,” he said, “and that means we have his prayer for us as a Church.”
While becoming increasingly frail, Benedict continued to celebrate Mass daily with the other residents of the monastery and was known to enjoy spending time in the Vatican Gardens praying his daily rosary.
In the fall of 2021, more than eight years after Benedict stepped down, his private secretary, Gänswein, told Domradio in Cologne, Germany, that Benedict was “stable in his frailty.”
He described the pope emeritus as very weak physically but still clear in mind. Gänswein said he had not lost his “typical Bavarian humor.”
The meaning of Benedict’s renunciation for future popes
In 2013, after Benedict announced that he would step down as pope, Father Gianfranco Ghirlanda, a Jesuit theologian and canonist chosen by Pope Francis to be a cardinal, wrote an essay on what should happen when a pope steps down.
In the article, published in Civiltà Cattolica, Ghirlanda suggested the retiring Benedict take the title bishop emeritus of Rome.
“It is evident that the pope who has resigned is no longer pope; therefore he no longer has any power in the Church and cannot interfere in any government affair. One may wonder what title Benedict XVI will retain. We think that he should be given the title of bishop emeritus of Rome, like any other diocesan bishop who ceases,” he said.
In December 2021, at a congress on papal resignations, Ghirlanda took up the theme again.
“Having two people with the title of ‘pope,’ even if one added ’emeritus,’ it cannot be said that this might not generate confusion in public opinion,” he said.
To make clear that the pope who resigns is no longer pope, he said, he should perhaps be called “former Roman pontiff” or “former supreme pontiff.”
Pope Francis in July 2022 told reporters that if he were to retire from the papacy he would do things differently from his predecessor.
“The first experience went very well,” Pope Francis said, because Benedict XVI “is a holy and discreet man.”
In the future, however, “it would be better to define things or explain them better,” the pontiff added.
“I am the bishop of Rome. In that case I would be the bishop emeritus of Rome,” he said, and then suggested he would live in St. John Lateran Palace rather than at the Vatican.
I’ve heard that joke before, but it involved Tom Clemens who was at that point QB at Notre Dame and his coach Ara Parseghian, who had taken over the driving from Clemens.
Well, it’s narcissism of the nth degree when a pope writes and publishes his autobiographical memoir before he dies. That the pope tells an overwrought silly tale, a type of ‘joke,’ shows he knows nothing of irony.
The fact that he repeats his Orwellian claims that Catholics who are Catholic are ideologues and Synodalists of the spirit of the age stand in resistance to ideology demonstrates, yet again, that he knows nothing of irony, not even during reflections on his life.
I haven’t read the autobiography but from these reports that are recounting things from the book, Pope Francis is making the claim once again that what he is doing is “continuing” the work and direction of Benedict. It comes out more clearly in the review in CRUX in the link, written by “Crux Staff”.
Invariably for the time being we are left with segregated bits of information that appear to say there is reflected a cogent, coherent dynamic and integrity that apparently are explaining a good irony without mirrors and a bad narcissism with mirrors. Among the items, “Homosexuality is not a crime.”
The reason given for homosexuality not adding up to crime is that “God loves the homosexual the way he is”. As a result of this -so it seems to point- homosexuality can’t be criminalized and it took a Pope to figure it out only in the 21st Century.
Then presumably as a result of that, homosexual “civil union” really “should be legalized”. Also as a result of this -as the discussion seems to impart,- it shows up an objectional “psychological condition” with a “concealing of mental imbalance” in those objecting clerics who “wear lace”.
Homosexuality is not temptation and narcissisms?
Presumably abortion can remain as a crime but it is not obvious if that would be because abortion is not a “personal human fact” or because God does not love you as you are when you are in with an abortion. The Pope will have to develop that? Synodally? “It is the people who are blessed not the relationships”, he explains.
From what I can tell this article in CRUX was edited and shortened. The part about Bergoglio flooring his schoolmate and the fellow losing consciousness when his head hit the floor. This ties in with “flat-footed”? If I am not mistaken about that being edited here, it could be Crux Staff thought better to leave that for the book!
Escriva had hit a fellow seminarian and Bergoglio came along to change the Opus Dei statutes ironies?
“Love me as you are” is a prayer put out in 1973 by Marian Eucharistic Centre (CEM) with an Impirmatur from Archb. Hugo Poletti Feb. 11 1973 and a blessing from Cardinal Ursi same year. It was the 25th anniversary of CEM’s activity under the care of the Central Secretariat. I feel Pope Francis is spoiling this.
The prayer is offered in the booklet in the name of M. Lebrun “E.M.T.” It ends by saying “Whatever should befall wait not to be holy in order to abandon thyself to love; or thou wouldst love me never.” Whereas information was not reaching Benedict and was stumped off coming from him, Pope Francis is relying too much only on what he gets reported to him and then sending forth a lot that has no application or is disjointed.
On top of that the type on “criticisms” Pope Francis broadcasts are already long known to have first emanated from the Lodge and makes sense to lodge boys. Why is he endorsing and propelling that?
The Holy Father’s falls and his failing health do not augur well in the midst of distorted stories he gives via hyper-concepts and alter-perception. The problems Benedict was having were not due/are not due to people wearing lace or being too traditional and the resolution to those problems is not found in “legalizing homosexual civil union”.
Assigning what is not love the descriptor “Hope” would be a form of high dissimulation. There are people around and under the Pope who will be wanting to “make legacy stick” and will want to insist that these discrepancies are reality and a match with Revelation.
The Holy Father seems to forget that there are other people who genuinely pray for him and have to do so in duty not merely out of love. This duty is informed in hope and informs hope where lies and lying and sarcasm and cynicism etc. can not abide; where in fact those malformations themselves avoid inclusion and seek out their own exclusivity self-definition.
The alleged faults the Pope is pointing out in particular stereotyped groups and the layered ironies that catch his attentions do not justify what else is being offered – no advantage in made for ANYONE by his “not selling ice cream”.
I’ve heard that joke before, but it involved Tom Clemens who was at that point QB at Notre Dame and his coach Ara Parseghian, who had taken over the driving from Clemens.
Not an act of humility when someone writes an autobiography.
Well, it’s narcissism of the nth degree when a pope writes and publishes his autobiographical memoir before he dies. That the pope tells an overwrought silly tale, a type of ‘joke,’ shows he knows nothing of irony.
I hope that God will teach him.
The fact that he repeats his Orwellian claims that Catholics who are Catholic are ideologues and Synodalists of the spirit of the age stand in resistance to ideology demonstrates, yet again, that he knows nothing of irony, not even during reflections on his life.
I haven’t read the autobiography but from these reports that are recounting things from the book, Pope Francis is making the claim once again that what he is doing is “continuing” the work and direction of Benedict. It comes out more clearly in the review in CRUX in the link, written by “Crux Staff”.
Invariably for the time being we are left with segregated bits of information that appear to say there is reflected a cogent, coherent dynamic and integrity that apparently are explaining a good irony without mirrors and a bad narcissism with mirrors. Among the items, “Homosexuality is not a crime.”
The reason given for homosexuality not adding up to crime is that “God loves the homosexual the way he is”. As a result of this -so it seems to point- homosexuality can’t be criminalized and it took a Pope to figure it out only in the 21st Century.
Then presumably as a result of that, homosexual “civil union” really “should be legalized”. Also as a result of this -as the discussion seems to impart,- it shows up an objectional “psychological condition” with a “concealing of mental imbalance” in those objecting clerics who “wear lace”.
Homosexuality is not temptation and narcissisms?
Presumably abortion can remain as a crime but it is not obvious if that would be because abortion is not a “personal human fact” or because God does not love you as you are when you are in with an abortion. The Pope will have to develop that? Synodally? “It is the people who are blessed not the relationships”, he explains.
From what I can tell this article in CRUX was edited and shortened. The part about Bergoglio flooring his schoolmate and the fellow losing consciousness when his head hit the floor. This ties in with “flat-footed”? If I am not mistaken about that being edited here, it could be Crux Staff thought better to leave that for the book!
Escriva had hit a fellow seminarian and Bergoglio came along to change the Opus Dei statutes ironies?
“Love me as you are” is a prayer put out in 1973 by Marian Eucharistic Centre (CEM) with an Impirmatur from Archb. Hugo Poletti Feb. 11 1973 and a blessing from Cardinal Ursi same year. It was the 25th anniversary of CEM’s activity under the care of the Central Secretariat. I feel Pope Francis is spoiling this.
The prayer is offered in the booklet in the name of M. Lebrun “E.M.T.” It ends by saying “Whatever should befall wait not to be holy in order to abandon thyself to love; or thou wouldst love me never.” Whereas information was not reaching Benedict and was stumped off coming from him, Pope Francis is relying too much only on what he gets reported to him and then sending forth a lot that has no application or is disjointed.
On top of that the type on “criticisms” Pope Francis broadcasts are already long known to have first emanated from the Lodge and makes sense to lodge boys. Why is he endorsing and propelling that?
https://cruxnow.com/vatican/2025/01/autobiography-by-pope-francis-tells-about-his-growing-age
The Holy Father’s falls and his failing health do not augur well in the midst of distorted stories he gives via hyper-concepts and alter-perception. The problems Benedict was having were not due/are not due to people wearing lace or being too traditional and the resolution to those problems is not found in “legalizing homosexual civil union”.
Assigning what is not love the descriptor “Hope” would be a form of high dissimulation. There are people around and under the Pope who will be wanting to “make legacy stick” and will want to insist that these discrepancies are reality and a match with Revelation.
The Holy Father seems to forget that there are other people who genuinely pray for him and have to do so in duty not merely out of love. This duty is informed in hope and informs hope where lies and lying and sarcasm and cynicism etc. can not abide; where in fact those malformations themselves avoid inclusion and seek out their own exclusivity self-definition.
The alleged faults the Pope is pointing out in particular stereotyped groups and the layered ironies that catch his attentions do not justify what else is being offered – no advantage in made for ANYONE by his “not selling ice cream”.
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/261591/vatican-pope-francis-suffers-bruised-arm-from-fall
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-arm-in-sling-after-second-fall-in-2-months/