The Dispatch: More from CWR...

Fighting slavery like a saint: The story of St. Peter Claver, SJ

His most effective weapon in confronting slavery did not require priestly ordination or access to the internet. It was his Christlike compassion.

Detail of an engraving by J. Vitta (after P. Gagliardi) of Saint Peter Claver. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)

How is it possible for someone to condone the enslavement of other human beings? How could anyone justify or tolerate slavery?

While twenty-first century Westerners may find it unthinkable, many cultures throughout history have accepted slavery—that is, the practice of a person being owned by someone else and forced to work for that person—as an institution.

What else could an army in the ancient world do with the soldiers they had defeated? Enslaving them was more profitable than executing them and less dangerous than letting them go free. In cultures without bankruptcy laws, selling oneself or one’s children into slavery was often the only way to pay off debts. Tribes from Africa and the Americas sometimes kidnapped and enslaved members of other tribes to demonstrate their superior strength. Many cultures have also permitted slavery for a much more practical reason: profit.

Racial slavery in North America, for example, arose out of the colonists’ desire to make themselves more profitable to the British Crown. Some of the labor-intensive crops planted in the New World required a lot of cheap labor, and the cheaper the better. By the time of the Civil War, Southern states had become so financially dependent on enslaved labor that they were willing to fight and die rather than give it up.

Something similar had happened a few centuries earlier in the Spanish-controlled regions of the New World. When the Spaniards founded the city of Cartagena (in modern Colombia) in 1533, their profit motive was gold. They needed a lot of it to pay off their war debts. The conquistadores tried enslaving the native Americans to work in their gold mines, but the natives couldn’t handle the difficult conditions. That’s why they decided to import people from Africa to work as slaves in the mines.

Young Saint Peter Claver (1581-1654) had no idea that most of his life’s work would involve caring for African slaves. He was just the son of a Spanish farmer who was intelligent enough to study at the University of Barcelona and was accepted into the Jesuit order. Peter was somewhat timid by nature, and he was probably astonished when his community’s doorkeeper, of all people, prophesied that he would be sent to evangelize in South America. Of course, the future saint Alphonsus Rodriguez (d. 1617) was no ordinary doorkeeper. But when the prediction came true and Peter’s superiors decided to send him to Colombia, he obeyed.

Although a third or sometimes even half of the Africans died while traveling to South America, slave traders could still make a profit from the survivors. Driven by their desire for that profit, the slavers and the rest of society ignored the many condemnations of the slave trade made by popes, as well as by individual priests and bishops.

With frightening regularity, a thousand African slaves arrived in Cartagena each month. These men, women, and children had been chained together and cooped up in the ship’s hold, had endured a long sea voyage in stifling heat, and were living in the stench of blood, refuse, and other human beings. It is not surprising that some Africans immediately jumped into the sea when they got off the boat, drowning themselves to end their suffering. They had been separated from their families, were confused about their new surroundings, and spoke many different dialects, none of which were Spanish.

When Peter arrived in Colombia, he had not yet been ordained. He was first sent to a poor, under-staffed Jesuit community to complete his studies, and there he humbly accepted the lowest duties in the house. He even tried to convince his superiors to let him remain a religious brother, but they simply ordered him to accept ordination as a priest.

Peter was first assigned to assist the priest he was replacing, Father Alfonso de Sandoval. Sandoval admitted that he was completely overcome every time a slave ship arrived. The sights, sounds, and smells of hundreds of screaming, crying, disoriented, hungry, sick, and dying people were overwhelming. But not for Peter, whose heart filled with joy as he saw so many people in need of material, emotional, and spiritual aid. He immediately and famously declared himself a “slave” of these slaves.

During the decades that Peter cared for the Africans who arrived in Colombia, he learned African dialects so he could speak with them, and he found translators to communicate with those speaking dialects that he could not speak. He brought them food and gifts, sometimes taking a small boat to an arriving ship to greet the Africans even before they disembarked. As Peter distributed gifts to those he served, he told his assistants, “We must speak to them with our hands, before we try to speak to them with our lips.”1 He cared for the sick, sought out those in prison, and comforted the dying. In brief, he tirelessly showed them the love of Jesus Christ by his presence and won their hearts through his kindness.

Of course, as a priest, he also evangelized them. With the help of his translators, whom he trained as catechists, he taught them about God and explained how much God loved them. Peter baptized babies and the dying, as well as those he was able to formally instruct about the Catholic faith. Through his preaching of the Good News, he offered the hope found in Jesus Christ to thousands of hopeless people—300,000 by his own count.

The slavers hated him, and local leaders caused him endless trouble and humiliations. Some wealthy women publicly whined about the indignity of having to attend Mass in the same church with their slaves. When these women complained about being forced to use the same confessional, Fr. Claver very humbly disarmed them by saying, “My confessional was never meant for ladies of quality. It is too narrow for their gowns. It is only suited to poor… women.”2

Peter Claver could not and did not end slavery in Colombia. From a political perspective, he did not even try. Abolition only occurred through a gradual process, involving decrees, rebellions, and an insurrection, officially ending in 1851, fourteen years before abolition occurred in the United States.

Unfortunately, slavery is still alive and well in our own time, although in different forms. A forced labor camp in a communist country is an obvious example. Slavery is common in many countries today in the Middle East. Human trafficking is a widespread form of slavery found even in Western countries. Human trafficking is a vile but not surprising result of the Sexual Revolution, which promotes and encourages the uncontrolled sexual desires of adults. While we can certainly hope that none of the 32,000 unaccompanied minors who have disappeared in our country between 2019 and 2023 are being trafficked for work or sex, it is more likely that at least some are.

What can we learn from Saint Peter Claver about how to fight slavery? Peter recognized that, as a priest, God was calling him to pour himself out to meet the spiritual and material needs of slaves. We may not be called to the same level of heroic sacrifice for this one issue, but we should at least be aware of the warning signs that indicate that a person is being trafficked, particularly if we regularly interact with children or teens. We can also seek out resources inside and outside the Church to be better educated and equipped about this form of modern slavery.

Peter’s most effective weapon in confronting slavery, however, does not require priestly ordination or access to the internet. It was his Christlike compassion. He fought the evils of slavery simply by treating every human being as a child of God and letting his Christlike example gradually work in the hearts and consciences of those around him.

After all, it is only when we allow our hearts to grow hardened that we prefer our own financial comfort over the rights of other human beings. Then we allow evils like slavery to become cultural institutions. We can win the battle to end slavery—and other cultural ills, such as abortion—by beginning all our efforts with the compassion of Jesus Christ, just like Saint Peter Claver.

Endnotes:

1 Arnold Lunn, A Saint in the Slave Trade: Peter Claver (1581-1654) (Manchester, New Hampshire: Sophia Institute Press, 2021), 104.

2 Ibid, 110.


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Dawn Beutner 110 Articles
Dawn Beutner is the author of The Leaven of the Saints: Bringing Christ into a Fallen World (Ignatius Press, 2023), and Saints: Becoming an Image of Christ Every Day of the Year also from Ignatius Press. She blogs at dawnbeutner.com.

8 Comments

  1. But note: St. Peter ministered to the physical and spiritual needs of the enslaved. He was no less involved in evangelizing them as he was in feeding them. Three hundred years later we remember him for good reason.

  2. A graphic portrayal of the horrors of slavery, the ship transport account. Slavery a cultural institution before Christ, during his institution of the Church, and long after. It wasn’t until the African slave trade became an industry for slavers that national consciences were aroused the Church much earlier among missionary priests and bishops.
    Insofar as slavery today the issue that evolved from it is today’s human trafficking which Ms Beutner adroitly attacks. That slavery is most inhuman and usually ends with death by substance overuse or a million cuts. Children are especially the most vulnerable countless little lives swallowed up at the southern border exploited by cartels purchased and violated until death in America. All under the vacant eyes of this Administration and the pious eyes of our bishops who adamantly defend the open border that the Administration maintains to gain votes.
    That leaves space for internet missionary priests. Those of us who have served in the African missions and those who are committed to their parish. I’m confidant a bishop or two reads CWR and gets the drift of what most of us have to say about the border crisis and child trafficking, and the imputed moral responsibility for those who defend open borders and illegal migration despite what His Holiness says in calling those who willfully oppose migration serious sinners.

  3. I tend to reject the concept that there was a “racial’ necessity to slavery. The issue was never about a specific race, but exclusively about cheap labor. In the Americas there were cases of white men being enslaved – they were enslaved not due to race, but due to being a case of cheap slavery. The slavery of black people was not a case of race, but of being cheaply purchased and used for a myriad of purposes.
    The continent of Africa was rife with slavery from the Muslim slave traders of northern Africa to the three kingdoms of middle and south Africa whose entire economies were built on slavery – specifically blacks owning blacks for slave labor.
    Slavery has been found on every populated continent since time began. It has never been about race; racial activists choose to make it about race to achieve their own activist objectives.

    • Exactly so. There was no intrinsic connection between race and slavery throughout history. Here are a few random examples. In the 17th C, rebel Englishmen were sentenced to slavery in the sugar islands, the worse of all places to be a slave in the New World. There were more white Europeans enslaved in Muslim North Africa than enslaved black Africans brought to the U.S. The busiest slave traders in early medieval Europe were the Vikings who sold white captives to white masters. Perhaps 20% of the population of the Roman Empire were slaves, from every color and ethnic group in their known world. A major difference between Roman slaves and those in the antebellum South is that the former had a better chance of manumission and integration into free society.

      I’m reasonably certain that almost all of us with roots in Europe and the Middle East had had slave ancestors somewhere, some time. (It wasn’t quite slavery, but I can document that some of my German forebears were serfs of the Abbey of Schwartzach.)

  4. If you all cared about ending slavery you would push back on modern day wage slavery and the notion that one must “earn” a living. The whole concept of “earning a living” is a Satanic evil that too many within the church push and promote under the lie that it is one’s “purpose”. If your purpose in life is toiling away day after day so some lazy person can reap the fruit of your labor you are lost and never had a “purpose” to begin with. No one asked to be born. None of us asked to be here at all, so this notion that we must work to “earn” our living and to find “purpose” is a whole lot of malarky.

    Reject wage slavery. Reject work. Reject the sin of doing something for someone else in exchange for “payment”

  5. Evangelization and conversion are ongoing and never-ending opportunities. Slavery needs to be banished from the face of the earth. Slave owners and their victims need to be evangelized. St. Peter Claver – Pray for us.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Weekly pastor’s post (September 8 – 14) | Father Maurer's blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*