In his new book, “A Short History of the Roman Mass” (Ignatius Press, Sept 2024), Father Michael Lang, a priest of the Oratory of St. Philip Neri and professor of theology, offers a detailed and accessible overview of the historical development of the Mass from its origins to the present day.
In an interview with ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner, Lang, who is from London, shared his motivations for writing the book and the importance of the liturgy in the life of the Catholic Church.
“I am certainly passionate about liturgy; it is my main research interest,” said Lang, who holds a doctorate in theology from the University of Oxford and is a former consultant to the Holy See. He also explained that his passion for liturgy has been a constant driving force in his academic and pastoral life.
This interest led him to explore in depth the history of Christian worship, moving away from his initial studies in patristics to focus on the Roman rite of the Mass.
“This book is really the abbreviated and more popular version of a larger monograph I published in 2022 on the history of the stable core of the rite, beginning with the origins of the Eucharist and ending at the Council of Trent in the 16th century,” he said.
The priest emphasized that the basic structure of the Mass and its evolution over time are key elements in his work: “I focus on the basic structure of the Mass. I answer [the questions], ‘Why is the structure of the Mass the way it is? How did it develop? How did the pieces come together?’”
Continuity of today’s Mass with Jesus at the Last Supper
Through his research, Lang seeks to show how, despite historical and cultural transformations, “the essential continuity … takes us back to the time of the apostles and to Jesus at the Last Supper.”
Asked about the relevance of this topic today, Lang stressed that “the liturgy of worship is really at the heart of what the Church does: It is the worship of God from which everything else flows.”
“As Vatican II so rightly said, especially the Eucharist, the Mass, is the most important act of worship and the most important of the sacraments.”
He also said that understanding historical development is crucial to full participation in the liturgy.
“History is very important to our understanding of the faith. We believe that God revealed himself in history… and the history of the Church is important to us,” Lang explained.
According to the priest, this historical awareness also “helps you enter into the prayers of the Mass, it helps you to make these prayers your own, to make them part of your own spiritual life.”
The aim of the book, according to the author, is to provide Catholics with a tool that will enable them to better understand the liturgy and, consequently, to participate more consciously in it.
“I hope that my little book will help readers to have an idea of this and that it will make their participation in the Mass more fruitful,” Lang concluded.
This story was first published by ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. It has been translated and adapted by CNA.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Pope Benedict XVI announced his intention to resign the papacy during a meeting of cardinals Feb. 11, 2013. The surprise announcement, which he made in Latin, took place in the Hall of the Consistory in the Vatican’s apostolic palace. / Vatican Media
Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Jan 2, 2023 / 06:00 am (CNA).
On Feb. 11, 2013, before a gathering of cardinals who had come to the Vatican expecting to hear the announcement of upcoming canonizations, Pope Benedict XVI dropped a bombshell.
After a few announcements about Church business at the conclusion of the meeting, the pope took out two sheets of paper and read a prepared statement in Latin.
“I have convoked you to this Consistory, not only for the three canonizations, but also to communicate to you a decision of great importance for the life of the Church. After having repeatedly examined my conscience before God, I have come to the certainty that my strengths, due to an advanced age, are no longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry,” the then 85-year-old pontiff told the gathering of the Catholic Church’s highest-ranking clergymen.
Because he spoke in Latin, the language used for official Vatican proclamations, reporters present did not at first realize that the pope had just stepped down.
‘Total surprise, total shock’
The assembled cardinals, on the other hand, who knew their Latin, reacted with stunned silence.
American Cardinal James Stafford later told CNA that the pope’s statement was received with “total surprise, total shock.”
“A cardinal who was sitting next to me said, ‘Did he resign?’ I said, ‘Yes, that’s what he did. He resigned.’ And we just all stood at our places.”
Cardinals react to Pope Benedict XVI’s announcement of his intention to resign the papacy Feb. 11, 2013. The surprise announcement, which Benedict made in Latin, took place in the Hall of the Consistory in the Vatican’s apostolic palace. Vatican Media
Nigeria’s Cardinal Francis Arinze, who was present that morning, said the announcement was a “surprise, like thunder that gives no notice that it’s coming,” reported The Catholic Telegraph.
In renouncing the papacy, Benedict became only the second pope in almost 600 years to voluntarily step down. In 1294, Pietro da Morrone, an elderly hermit, was crowned Pope Celestine V, but finding the demands of the job too much for him, he resigned after only five months.
In 1415, Pope Gregory XII also resigned, but under very different circumstances — he stepped down in order to end a crisis within the Church known as the Great Western Schism.
Title, white clothes, and papal coat of arms
What happened next with Benedict XVI was no less surprising to those who expected him to live as a retired cardinal.
In his last official statement as pope, before a general audience on Feb. 27, 2013, Pope Benedict assured the tens of thousands of people gathered to hear him speak as pope for the last time that even though he was stepping back from official duties, he would remain, in essence, pope.
“The ‘always’ is also a ‘forever’ — there can no longer be a return to the private sphere. My decision to resign the active exercise of the ministry does not revoke this,” Benedict said.
“I do not return to private life, to a life of travel, meetings, receptions, conferences, and so on. I am not abandoning the cross, but remaining in a new way at the side of the crucified Lord,” he told the crowd.
A day earlier, on Feb. 26, 2013, the director of the Vatican Press Office, Father Federico Lombardi, had silenced speculation over what Benedict would be called and what he would wear. He would, Lombardi said, retain the trappings of the papacy — most significantly, his title and dress.
“He will still be called His Holiness Benedict XVI,” Lombardi said. “But he will also be called Pope Emeritus or Roman Pontiff Emeritus.”
Lombardi said Benedict would continue to wear a white cassock but without the mozzetta, the short cape that covers the shoulders. The pope’s fisherman’s ring would be replaced by a ring from his time as cardinal. The red shoes would go as well, Lombardi said, and be replaced by a pair of brown ones.
“The city of León is known for beautiful shoes, and very comfortable shoes. And when the pope was asked what he wanted to wear he said, ‘I want the shoes from León in Mexico,’” Lombardi said at the press conference.
On May 2, the cardinal who designed Benedict’s coat of arms in 2005 told CNA that he had written the pope emeritus suggesting that his coat of arms would need to be redesigned to reflect his new status. Cardinal Andrea Cordero Lanza di Montezemolo proposed making the keys of St. Peter smaller and less prominent.
“That shows that he had a historic possession but not a current jurisdiction,” said the cardinal at the time.
Benedict, however, it seems, politely declined a new coat of arms. La Stampa reported the following year that the Vatican Publishing House’s manual of ecclesiastical heraldry in the Catholic Church contained the following note:
“Expressing deep appreciation and heartfelt gratitude to the author for the interesting study sent to him, [Benedict] made it known that he prefers not to adopt an expressive heraldic emblem of the new situation created with his renouncing of the Petrine Ministry.”
By his decision to continue to dress in white like the pope, retain the title of pope, and keep the coat of arms of his papacy, Benedict revealed that in giving up the “active exercise of the ministry,” he was not forsaking the role of pope altogether.
Pope Francis and Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI pray together at the papal residence in Castel Gandolfo March 23, 2013, their first meeting after Francis’ election. Vatican Media
An expanded Petrine ministry
In his 2013 announcement, Benedict clearly expressed his intention to step aside, even determining the date and time of his official departure. Nonetheless, his decision to keep the title of pope and maintain the ceremonial protocol that goes along with the papacy led some to speculate whether there were not actually “two popes.”
Benedict’s personal secretary and closest confidante, Archbishop Georg Gänswein, sought to clear up any confusion in 2016.
In a speech at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome on May 20, 2016, Gänswein said that Pope Francis and Benedict are not two popes “in competition” with one another but represent one “expanded” Petrine office with “an active member” and a “contemplative.”
Parsing Benedict’s speech, Gänswein explained that in stepping down, Benedict was not giving up his ministry.
“The key word in that statement is ‘munus petrinum,’ translated — as happens most of the time — with ‘Petrine ministry.’ And yet, ‘munus,’ in Latin, has a multiplicity of meanings: It can mean service, duty, guide, or gift, even prodigy. Before and after his resignation, Benedict understood and understands his task as participation in such a ‘Petrine ministry [munus],’” Gänswein said.
“He left the papal throne and yet, with the step he took on Feb. 11, 2013, he has not abandoned this ministry,” Gänswein explained, saying the latter scenario was something “quite impossible after his irrevocable acceptance of the office in April 2005.”
Benedict himself later made clear in an interview with his biographer Peter Seewald that he saw himself as continuing in his ministry. He said that a pope who steps down is like a father whose role changes, but always remains a father.
“Of course a father does not stop being father, but he is relieved of concrete responsibility. He remains a father in a deep, inward sense, in a particular relationship which has responsibility, but not with day-to-day tasks as such. It was also this way for bishops,” Benedict said.
“I think it is also clear that the pope is no superman and his mere existence is not sufficient to conduct his role, rather he likewise exercises a function.
“If he steps down, he remains in an inner sense within the responsibility he took on, but not in the function. In this respect one comes to understand that the office of the pope has lost none of its greatness, even if the humanity of the office is perhaps becoming more clearly evident,” Benedict said.
Benedict’s decision “not to abandon his ministry” inspired a cottage industry of conspiracy theories, with some questioning whether the pope emeritus truly stepped down because of his age and frailty.
George Weigel, author of the definitive biography of St. John Paul II, “Witness to Hope,” dismissed such speculation in an interview with CNA.
“I have no reason to think that there was anything more to Pope Benedict’s resignation than what he said was its cause: his conviction that he no longer had the strength, physical and intellectual, to give the Church what it needed from a pope,” he said.
“Everything else written about this is sheer speculation. Let’s take Benedict at his word,” Weigel said.
A life of prayer
In retiring to live in the Mater Ecclesiae Monastery in the Vatican Gardens, Benedict did not completely withdraw from the world. He attended public events in his new capacity as pope emeritus, received visitors, and pursued a life of fruitful study, writing, and prayer.
Pope Francis visits Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI at the Mater Ecclesiae monastery in Vatican City to exchange Christmas greetings Dec. 23, 2013. Vatican Media
Matthew Bunson, Catholic historian, author, and executive editor of EWTN News, told CNA that Benedict was determined not to exercise authority in his new role.
“He really embraced what it means to be pope emeritus, and refrained from making public comments, to instead live a life of prayer and reflection,” Bunson said.
“Benedict really was on retreat, and in prayer,” he said, “and that means we have his prayer for us as a Church.”
While becoming increasingly frail, Benedict continued to celebrate Mass daily with the other residents of the monastery and was known to enjoy spending time in the Vatican Gardens praying his daily rosary.
In the fall of 2021, more than eight years after Benedict stepped down, his private secretary, Gänswein, told Domradio in Cologne, Germany, that Benedict was “stable in his frailty.”
He described the pope emeritus as very weak physically but still clear in mind. Gänswein said he had not lost his “typical Bavarian humor.”
The meaning of Benedict’s renunciation for future popes
In 2013, after Benedict announced that he would step down as pope, Father Gianfranco Ghirlanda, a Jesuit theologian and canonist chosen by Pope Francis to be a cardinal, wrote an essay on what should happen when a pope steps down.
In the article, published in Civiltà Cattolica, Ghirlanda suggested the retiring Benedict take the title bishop emeritus of Rome.
“It is evident that the pope who has resigned is no longer pope; therefore he no longer has any power in the Church and cannot interfere in any government affair. One may wonder what title Benedict XVI will retain. We think that he should be given the title of bishop emeritus of Rome, like any other diocesan bishop who ceases,” he said.
In December 2021, at a congress on papal resignations, Ghirlanda took up the theme again.
“Having two people with the title of ‘pope,’ even if one added ’emeritus,’ it cannot be said that this might not generate confusion in public opinion,” he said.
To make clear that the pope who resigns is no longer pope, he said, he should perhaps be called “former Roman pontiff” or “former supreme pontiff.”
Pope Francis in July 2022 told reporters that if he were to retire from the papacy he would do things differently from his predecessor.
“The first experience went very well,” Pope Francis said, because Benedict XVI “is a holy and discreet man.”
In the future, however, “it would be better to define things or explain them better,” the pontiff added.
“I am the bishop of Rome. In that case I would be the bishop emeritus of Rome,” he said, and then suggested he would live in St. John Lateran Palace rather than at the Vatican.
A group of young people left Troyes, France, and will be cycling an average of 56 miles a day, until they reach Celorico de Basto, to participate in the Days in the Dioceses. / Credit: Photo courtesy of Comité Organizador Arciprestal – Celorico … […]
9 Comments
Ever sincere & serious Catholic is marked by their passion for and absorbtion in Holy Mass; yet general knowledge of the origins of this uniquely important liturgy & the significance of its key components is rare. This book can help us to develop beyond the typical instinctive love of a routine, repetitive, religious ritual to a far deeper, participatory involvement of our heart and mind and soul.
As the author of this short review, Diego López Marina, says Fr Michael Lang’s book provides Catholics: “with a tool that will enable them to better understand the liturgy and, consequently, to participate more consciously in it.”
As a lay Catholic with qualifications & wide experience in Christian theology I’m in awe of the perfection of the liturgy of Holy Mass. In every healthy congregation we begin with a sincere, trinitarian welcome to each other. We then acknowledge that none of us can approach God’s Holiness except by confessing our sins and confidently assuring one another of God’s mercy for all who are truly repentant.
Then, being newly shriven, we are confident to approach The Throne with loud exclamations of God’s Glory; recalling that Christians began singing ‘Gloria in Excelsis Deo’ before 128 AD. That brings us to the place where we can feast on the soul food of God’s Word: Epistles read and Psalms sung to prepare the way for The Good News of God Himself, welcomed by our cry of: “Glory to You, O Lord!”
Reverently marking our minds, lips, and hearts with the Cross of Jesus Christ – we’re proclaiming – “We believe – We will tell others – We will forever love Christ’s Word”. How precious it is to listen to the Apostles’ account of Jesus’ teachings & life of miracles that confront the world with Eternal Truth, in texts that have come to us from the very start of Christian community, still fresh & vibrant today. “Praise to You, Lord Jesus Christ!”
The earliest known creed – the old Roman – dates back to about 110 AD and we join together in loudly procliming our unchanging Catholic Christian faith in its descendant Nicene or Apostles Creed. This is all a grand and meaningful preparation for our approaching the table of The Lord as shriven, praising, worshipful, Gospel informed, orthodox believing Catholics.
How wonderful: Catholics have been singing ‘The Sanctus’ from before 96 AD.
Jesus, our King, calls us to His table to feed on His Holy Body and drink His Precious Blood, so that we can have LIFE in Him and He can LIVE in us. Oneness with Christ is our guarantee of eternal life with God & all those who love God (the whole point of our faith & of The Catholic Church).
We pray out loud ‘The Our Father’ – given us by Jesus Christ, to express His Peace to all our sisters & brothers. Since every Catholic who has ever lived is incorporate in the One Savior, we are given a very potent reason to persevere in loving & serving each other. This is the love that will demonstrate to the world that Jesus Christ is truly The Son of God, given to save us (see, e.g., John 17:23)
As a passionate human: incorporation in this amazing love is highly addictive. As a highly trained academic: the logic of the liturgy of Holy Mass is mightily convincing.
Hopefully the book reviewed will draw clergy & lay together to contemplate the unique wonders we celebrate together in every Holy Mass.
Yes, we read: “How wonderful: Catholics have been singing ‘The Sanctus’ from before 96 AD.”
AND, regarding the threefold “Sanctus” at the beginning every Mass, then near the end we have the culminating Doxology, immediately prior to our sacramental incorporation into Communion: “Through [!] Him, and with Him [!!], and in Him [!!!], O God, almighty Father, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, all glory and honor is yours, forever and ever. Amen.”
Surely, St. Augustine was onto something when he saw from Christ: “You will not change me into yourself, as you change food into your flesh, but you will be changed into me [!]” (Confessions, Bk. 7, Ch. 10). It is “IN” Him that, at each Mass, we join Christ to ultimately give honor and glory to the Father.
So, about Synodality vs/plus (?) Eucharistic Adoration, it’s almost as if, in some neglected sense, “time is [NOT] greater than space.”
Yes, dear Peter D. Beaulieu:
“It is ‘IN’ Him that, at each Mass, we join Christ to ultimately give honor and glory to the Father.”
After who-knows how many millenia of humanity’s futile religiosities, Jesus Our LORD gives us the one & only Way to come confidently into Father GOD’s Awesome Presence.
With two massive consequences, we hope & pray:
1) that at Holy Mass every person will overflow with overwhelming gratitude;
2) that each of us will be whole-hearted to lovingly lead others to The Way.
The logic of this liturgy enacts the most profound reality in (& far above) our cosmos (independently of the authenticity of the celebrant & their assistants).
Understanding Christ’s provision, no proper Catholic will ever hang their head.
Seeking to hear & lovingly follow King Jesus Christ; blessing from marty
Thank you for that Dr. Rice. The reality of the words of institution of our Lord believed is where I found the freedom that Jesus promises those who continue in His Word – knowing the truth and the truth setting us free. Indeed, this body has been given for us – this blood has been shed for us – for the remission of sins.
I wanted to ask you if you know when Roman Catholic theology began teaching that only venial sins are forgiven here in the Eucharist? Whenever that took place, I suppose Mary was sought after 53 times in a singular prayer session to intercede for the one praying at their point of death.
If you don’t have faith in what Jesus is testifying to us in the Eucharist by giving the Father’s children the very body and blood Mary already provided us through her completed intercession, we remain in bondage to unbelief and sin; we are not free, if we don’t believe Christ’s body and blood have been given to us in the Eucharist – for the remission of sins. Just what does the Roman Catholic person who prays the Rosary want Mary to do at the time of their death that Jesus giving of His body and blood has not already completed?
Dear Jeff Lahman, I’m sure you are right, for in John 6:53-59 Jesus assures us of the necessity for true believers to eat His flesh and drink His blood. That is a challenging but foundational part of Christ’s salvific ministry to humankind.
Saint Paul, in 1 Corinthians 11:23-29, shows us that – from the very start – believers in Jesus Christ gathered together to do that. This scripture also reveals that – from the very start – some received the Sacred Body & Precious Blood of Christ worthily, whilst others received in an unworthy state.
As you observe, at Holy Mass today, those not shriven of serious sin cannot depend on The Penetential Rite for forgiveness. They should have accessed sacramental penance, in a spirit of true repentance & firm resolve to reform & make restitution where possible, PRIOR TO receiving Holy Communion at Holy Mass.
Thus: unshriven Catholic murders, adulterers, robbers, etc., etc. and those with forbiden allegiances to mafia, freemasonry, satanism, witchcraft, etc., etc. are committing sacrilege by insisting on receiving Holy Communion.
Sadly, no Australian archbishop, bishop, or priest, that I’m aware of, is game to preach this eternal truth. They just permit the unshriven to commit sacrilege without warning them of the serious consequences for their eternal souls.
Paul taught the Corinthian church that: to do this is sinning against the Body & Blood of The LORD; bringing them under GOD’s judgement.
Perhaps this is one reason why we see judgment so clearly impacting The Church?
I love Fr. Lang’s works, especially “Turning Towards the Lord,” but I must say George Weigel’s lead endorsement on Amazon had me reaching for my liturgical revolver. Whatever the value of his insights on other aspects of the Church, on the liturgy Mr. Weigel is to be avoided.
Ever sincere & serious Catholic is marked by their passion for and absorbtion in Holy Mass; yet general knowledge of the origins of this uniquely important liturgy & the significance of its key components is rare. This book can help us to develop beyond the typical instinctive love of a routine, repetitive, religious ritual to a far deeper, participatory involvement of our heart and mind and soul.
As the author of this short review, Diego López Marina, says Fr Michael Lang’s book provides Catholics: “with a tool that will enable them to better understand the liturgy and, consequently, to participate more consciously in it.”
As a lay Catholic with qualifications & wide experience in Christian theology I’m in awe of the perfection of the liturgy of Holy Mass. In every healthy congregation we begin with a sincere, trinitarian welcome to each other. We then acknowledge that none of us can approach God’s Holiness except by confessing our sins and confidently assuring one another of God’s mercy for all who are truly repentant.
Then, being newly shriven, we are confident to approach The Throne with loud exclamations of God’s Glory; recalling that Christians began singing ‘Gloria in Excelsis Deo’ before 128 AD. That brings us to the place where we can feast on the soul food of God’s Word: Epistles read and Psalms sung to prepare the way for The Good News of God Himself, welcomed by our cry of: “Glory to You, O Lord!”
Reverently marking our minds, lips, and hearts with the Cross of Jesus Christ – we’re proclaiming – “We believe – We will tell others – We will forever love Christ’s Word”. How precious it is to listen to the Apostles’ account of Jesus’ teachings & life of miracles that confront the world with Eternal Truth, in texts that have come to us from the very start of Christian community, still fresh & vibrant today. “Praise to You, Lord Jesus Christ!”
The earliest known creed – the old Roman – dates back to about 110 AD and we join together in loudly procliming our unchanging Catholic Christian faith in its descendant Nicene or Apostles Creed. This is all a grand and meaningful preparation for our approaching the table of The Lord as shriven, praising, worshipful, Gospel informed, orthodox believing Catholics.
How wonderful: Catholics have been singing ‘The Sanctus’ from before 96 AD.
Jesus, our King, calls us to His table to feed on His Holy Body and drink His Precious Blood, so that we can have LIFE in Him and He can LIVE in us. Oneness with Christ is our guarantee of eternal life with God & all those who love God (the whole point of our faith & of The Catholic Church).
We pray out loud ‘The Our Father’ – given us by Jesus Christ, to express His Peace to all our sisters & brothers. Since every Catholic who has ever lived is incorporate in the One Savior, we are given a very potent reason to persevere in loving & serving each other. This is the love that will demonstrate to the world that Jesus Christ is truly The Son of God, given to save us (see, e.g., John 17:23)
As a passionate human: incorporation in this amazing love is highly addictive. As a highly trained academic: the logic of the liturgy of Holy Mass is mightily convincing.
Hopefully the book reviewed will draw clergy & lay together to contemplate the unique wonders we celebrate together in every Holy Mass.
Yes, we read: “How wonderful: Catholics have been singing ‘The Sanctus’ from before 96 AD.”
AND, regarding the threefold “Sanctus” at the beginning every Mass, then near the end we have the culminating Doxology, immediately prior to our sacramental incorporation into Communion: “Through [!] Him, and with Him [!!], and in Him [!!!], O God, almighty Father, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, all glory and honor is yours, forever and ever. Amen.”
Surely, St. Augustine was onto something when he saw from Christ: “You will not change me into yourself, as you change food into your flesh, but you will be changed into me [!]” (Confessions, Bk. 7, Ch. 10). It is “IN” Him that, at each Mass, we join Christ to ultimately give honor and glory to the Father.
So, about Synodality vs/plus (?) Eucharistic Adoration, it’s almost as if, in some neglected sense, “time is [NOT] greater than space.”
Yes, dear Peter D. Beaulieu:
“It is ‘IN’ Him that, at each Mass, we join Christ to ultimately give honor and glory to the Father.”
After who-knows how many millenia of humanity’s futile religiosities, Jesus Our LORD gives us the one & only Way to come confidently into Father GOD’s Awesome Presence.
With two massive consequences, we hope & pray:
1) that at Holy Mass every person will overflow with overwhelming gratitude;
2) that each of us will be whole-hearted to lovingly lead others to The Way.
The logic of this liturgy enacts the most profound reality in (& far above) our cosmos (independently of the authenticity of the celebrant & their assistants).
Understanding Christ’s provision, no proper Catholic will ever hang their head.
Seeking to hear & lovingly follow King Jesus Christ; blessing from marty
Thank you for that Dr. Rice. The reality of the words of institution of our Lord believed is where I found the freedom that Jesus promises those who continue in His Word – knowing the truth and the truth setting us free. Indeed, this body has been given for us – this blood has been shed for us – for the remission of sins.
I wanted to ask you if you know when Roman Catholic theology began teaching that only venial sins are forgiven here in the Eucharist? Whenever that took place, I suppose Mary was sought after 53 times in a singular prayer session to intercede for the one praying at their point of death.
If you don’t have faith in what Jesus is testifying to us in the Eucharist by giving the Father’s children the very body and blood Mary already provided us through her completed intercession, we remain in bondage to unbelief and sin; we are not free, if we don’t believe Christ’s body and blood have been given to us in the Eucharist – for the remission of sins. Just what does the Roman Catholic person who prays the Rosary want Mary to do at the time of their death that Jesus giving of His body and blood has not already completed?
Dear Jeff Lahman, I’m sure you are right, for in John 6:53-59 Jesus assures us of the necessity for true believers to eat His flesh and drink His blood. That is a challenging but foundational part of Christ’s salvific ministry to humankind.
Saint Paul, in 1 Corinthians 11:23-29, shows us that – from the very start – believers in Jesus Christ gathered together to do that. This scripture also reveals that – from the very start – some received the Sacred Body & Precious Blood of Christ worthily, whilst others received in an unworthy state.
As you observe, at Holy Mass today, those not shriven of serious sin cannot depend on The Penetential Rite for forgiveness. They should have accessed sacramental penance, in a spirit of true repentance & firm resolve to reform & make restitution where possible, PRIOR TO receiving Holy Communion at Holy Mass.
Thus: unshriven Catholic murders, adulterers, robbers, etc., etc. and those with forbiden allegiances to mafia, freemasonry, satanism, witchcraft, etc., etc. are committing sacrilege by insisting on receiving Holy Communion.
Sadly, no Australian archbishop, bishop, or priest, that I’m aware of, is game to preach this eternal truth. They just permit the unshriven to commit sacrilege without warning them of the serious consequences for their eternal souls.
Paul taught the Corinthian church that: to do this is sinning against the Body & Blood of The LORD; bringing them under GOD’s judgement.
Perhaps this is one reason why we see judgment so clearly impacting The Church?
Dr. Rice, Thank you, again!
I love Fr. Lang’s works, especially “Turning Towards the Lord,” but I must say George Weigel’s lead endorsement on Amazon had me reaching for my liturgical revolver. Whatever the value of his insights on other aspects of the Church, on the liturgy Mr. Weigel is to be avoided.
At 63 pages, this is pretty superficial. I guess it depends on what you want.
I’d go with Adrian Fortescue’s “The Mass:A Study of the Roman Liturgy.”
Oh I’m sorry. I looked at the wrong book with the same title. I still recommend Fortescue’s book, but Fr. Lang’s book seems like a worthy read.