
Vatican City, Apr 20, 2017 / 03:06 am (CNA/EWTN News).- During his trip to Portugal for the centenary of the Fatima Marian apparitions next month, Pope Francis will canonize visionaries Francisco and Jacinta Marto, making them the youngest non-martyrs to ever be declared saints.
The children will be canonized during Pope Francis’ May 13 Mass in Fatima. The decision for the date was made during a April 20 consistory of cardinals, which also voted on the dates of four other canonizations, in addition to that of Francisco and Jacinta, that will take place this year.
Some martyrs who will soon be saints are diocesan priests Andrea de Soveral and Ambrogio Francesco Ferro, and layman Matteo Moreira, killed in hatred of the faith in Brazil in 1645; and three teenagers – Cristóbal, Antonio, and Juan – killed in hatred of the faith in Mexico in 1529, who will be canonized October 15.
Bl. Angelo da Acri, a Capuchin priest who died in October 1739, and Faustino Míguez, a Piarist priest who founded the Calasanziano Institute of the Daughters of the Divine Shepherd, will also be canonized October 15.
Cardinal Jose Saraiva Martins, the Prefect Emeritus of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, is the man who was largely responsible for advancing the visionaries’ cause, paving the way for them to become the first canonized children who were not martyred.
Previously, the Portuguese cardinal told CNA, children were not beatified, due to the belief “that children didn’t yet have the ability to practice Christian heroic virtue like adults.”
But that all changed when the cause for Francisco and Jacinta Marto arrived on his desk.
Francisco, 11, and Jacinta, 10, became the youngest non-martyr children in the history of the Church to be beatified when on May 13, 2000, the 83rd anniversary of the first apparition of Our Lady at Fatima, Pope John Paul II proclaimed them “Blessed,” officially showing that young children can become Saints.
The brother and sister, who tended to their family’s sheep with their cousin Lucia Santo in the fields of Fatima, Portugal, witnessed the apparitions of Mary now commonly known as Our Lady of Fatima.
During the first apparition, which took place May 13, 1917, Our Lady asked the three children to pray the Rosary and make sacrifices for the conversion of sinners. The children did this and were known to pray often, giving their lunch to beggars and going without food themselves. They offered up their sacrifices and even refrained from drinking water on hot days.
When Francisco and Jacinta became seriously ill with the Spanish flu in October 1918, Mary appeared to them and said she would to take them to heaven soon.
Bed-ridden, Francisco requested and received his first Communion. The following day, Francisco died, April 4, 1919. Jacinta suffered a long illness and was eventually transferred to a Lisbon hospital, where she underwent an operation for an abscess in her chest. However, her health did not improve and she died Feb. 20, 1920.
Francisco and Jacinta “practiced Christian virtue in a heroic way,” Cardinal Martins said, explaining that among other things, one of the most obvious moments in which this virtue was apparent for him was when the three shepherd children were arrested and intimidated by their mayor on August 13, 1917.
Government stability in Portugal was rocky following the revolution and coup d’état that led to the overthrow of the monarchy and subsequent establishment of the First Portuguese Republic in 1910.
A new liberal constitution separating Church and state was drafted under the influence of Freemasonry, which sought to omit the faith – which for many was the backbone of Portuguese culture and society – from public life.
It was in this context that, after catching wind of the Virgin Mary’s appearance to Francisco, Jacinta and Lucia, district Mayor Artur de Oliveira Santos had the children arrested on the day Mary was to appear to them, and threatened to boil them in hot oil unless they would confess to inventing the apparitions.
At one point in the conversation at the jailhouse, Jacinta was taken out of the room, leaving Francisco and Lucia alone. The two were told that Jacinta had been burned with hot oil, and that if they didn’t lie, the same would happen to them.
However, instead of caving to the pressure, the children said: “you can do whatever you want, but we cannot tell a lie. Do whatever you want to us, burn us with oil, but we cannot tell a lie.”
“This was the virtue of these children,” Cardinal Martins said, noting that to accept death rather than tell a lie is “more heroic than many adults.”
“There’s a lot to say on the heroicness of children,” he said, adding that “because of this I brought their cause forward.”
Cardinal Martins was also the one to bring Lucia’s cause to the Vatican following her death in 2005. The visionary had spent the remainder of her life after the apparitions as a Carmelite nun.
Typically the must be a five-year waiting period after a person dies before their cause can be brought forward. However, after only three years Martins ask that the remaining two be dismissed, and his request was granted.
Although the diocesan phase of the cause has already been finished, Cardinal Martins – who knew the visionary personally – said Lucia’s process will take much longer than that of Francisco and Jacinta not only due to her long life, but also because of the vast number of letters and other material from her writings and correspondence that needs to be examined.
The cardinal, who will be present in Fatima with the Pope during his May 12-13 visit for the centenary of the apparitions, said he views the occasion as the conclusion of a process that began with him changing a norm regarding the view of children “and their heroic virtue.”
This process is important, he said, because it means there could be other children who practiced heroic virtue that can now be canonized, so “it’s certainly something important.”
“It needs to be seen that (children) are truly capable of practicing heroic virtue,” not only in Fatima, but “in the Christian life,” he said.
Although canonizations, apart from a few exceptions, are typically held in Rome, it was only recently that beatifications began to be held outside of Rome, in the local Church which promoted the new Blessed’s cause.
This change was made by Cardinal Martins in September 2005, after receiving the approval of Benedict XVI.
In the past, a beatification Mass in Rome would be presided over by the Cardinal-Prefect of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints during the morning, with the Pope coming down to the basilica to pray to the new Blessed in the afternoon. Cardinal Martins said he decided to change this because the beatification and the canonization “are two different realities.”
“While the canonizations had a more universal dimension of the Church, the beatifications have a more local dimension, where they (the Blessed) came from,” he said, noting that this is reflected even in the words spoken during the rites for each Mass.
“Because of this, I made a distinction: the beatification in their (the Blessed’s) own church, in their diocese, and the canonizations in Rome.”
The result was “a fantastic revolution,” he said, explaining that while maybe 2-3,000 people would participate in the beatification ceremonies in Rome, hundreds of thousands started to come for the local beatification Masses of new Blessed in their home dioceses.
The cardinal said that “it’s beautiful” to see people – many times including friends and family members of new Blessed – join in honoring their countryman, asking for their intercession, and seeking to follow their example.
He believes the custom will remain like this, adding that it is beautiful particularly from the standpoint of evangelization.
“The new Blessed says to their brothers, many of whom they knew, ‘I am one of you, one like you, so you must follow my path and live the Gospel in depth’,” the cardinal said, explaining that this is “a formidable act of evangelization, and with everyone happy about the new Blessed, they’ll immediately do what they say!”
Cardinal Martins said the decision was also prompted by the emphasis placed on local Churches during the Second Vatican Council.
“I thought, one of the most effective ways to highlight the importance of local Churches is to conduct in the local diocese the beatification of one of their sons,” he said.
[…]
Very revealing.
What a racket this whole thing has been from the start.
Lord, grant me patience but hurry.
I feel that if we all in the Catholic Church focus on Jesus Christ and His teachings we will better prepared to meet HIM in the end.
Synodity will pull our focus from HIM and focus on politics of the church organization.
Just saying
Would we expect less from this Vatican?
We read today on X Cardinal Paglia’s attempt to provide positive spin to the Olympic sacrilege. We read today read today at another Catholic website unwilling to publish my comment “…synodality, a novel theological concept…”
Just these two occurrences are indicative of serious ecclesial derangement.
Synodality is project to eviscerate Roman Catholicism of its core substance while retaining the brand, the perks and whatever is left of its cultural influence. Stroll back in time and see if any faithful bishop or layman anticipated this “development” in 1965. Only the closeted Marxists.
This project termed “synodality” is not a theological concept in actuality. It is a political movement masked in an Orthodox practice mutilated in order to provide some sort of apostolic cover to a boldly disingenuous enterprise.
The results of a deleted poll are an accurate snapshot of the “sensus fidelium” which required erasure if the project were to retain any credence. The actual “sensus fidelium” undermines the foundation of this masquerade. The stats reporting weekly Mass attendance and the absence of belief in the real presence of Jesus Christ in the Holy Eucharist are a poll, are the real “sensum fidei” which cannot be ignored or erased. A sizable portion, the majority of the baptized, don’t believe. Structural alternations in the administration of the Church are meaningless and impotent for the salvation of souls. The energy given to synodalism had best be diverted to actual accurate catechesis of youth and the evangelization of adults.
Synodalism is a disingenuous afront to the faithful, and above all to our Lord, Jesus Christ.
We read: “This project termed ‘synodality’ is not a theological concept in actuality. It is a political movement masked in an Orthodox practice mutilated in order to provide some sort of apostolic cover to a boldly disingenuous enterprise.”
Yes, rather than a concept like a real synod, instead cross-dressed as a “style.” As in corporate boardroom proceduralism–or the style–of just moving things along. With Marshall McLuhan, the “medium [process] IS the message [or concept].”
Peter – Who said: “This project termed ‘synodality’ is not a theological concept in actuality. It is a political movement masked in an Orthodox practice mutilated in order to provide some sort of apostolic cover to a boldly disingenuous enterprise.”
Thanks!
Right. I see it now, in James’ comment.
It is clearly the Freemasonic Entreprise to liquidate the Catholic Church, erecting a Superlodge in its place which can be subsumed into the system.
Right. Weinandy at The Catholic Thing sees sins against the Holy Spirit among the Paris Olympian revelers at the Herodian-style Last Supper masquerade. The lie and the farce of Synodality, as you say, does likewise affront the goodness of God. May he have mercy on us.
Pardon me, but I can’t help compare the Vatican Synod Office to Nazi Germany’s Ministry of Propaganda and Public Enlightenment. Unfortunately for the Synod Office truth can be troublesome. Folks aren’t enlightened.
But thanks to Catholic Faith Technologies, a Kansas based management resource for parishes the Synod has a scapegoat, the scurrilous bad boy US Catholic Church. Business is business and so we carry on. As expected the Synod recommendations will be going forward to be implemented in parishes.
God bless you Father for making a bold and necessary comparison. Strong language is needed to try and shake up someone at the Vatican. Among my prayers is that I wish someone, with the opportunity, would only read the riot act to Francis at a one on one meeting.
Edward, if you recall, Capuchin theologian Fr Thomas Weinandy wrote the equivalent of a riot act letter to Pope Francis that was ignored, and resulted in his dismissal from his position as theologian consultant to the USCCB. We may have reached the point when someone might personally determine to confront him as you say.
Catherine of Siena traveled to Avignon to personally convince Pope Gregory XI [born in France] to return the papacy to Rome [apparently he had made a personal vow to return the papacy to Rome that Catherine was aware of, and she reminded him]. She castigated him and questioned his manhood. She eventually succeeded in convincing him. A similarly impassioned woman [we men seem to defer more easily to women. With all due propriety I might add there are a couple of gals that write on this site that would qualify] might have more success than a cardinal or bishop. Although I personally doubt anyone will succeed in convincing Francis from changing his agenda.
This is almost, but not quite – funny.
Surprising? No.
The current Vatican crew proves once again that bad news is no news…all about marketing, spin and Francis ever since they butchered the Vatican danged good reference site and turned it into a marketing machine for Francis.
Perhaps someone with more knowledge would be able to answer my question–is the internet, specifically social media, something that people in Africa (outside of the big cities), Asia (especially China, which is Communist), the Middle East, and South America (outside of the big cities) have easy access to? It sounds like the supporters of synodality thought the survey sounded like “North America”–well, of course it does, since even toddlers in the U.S. have social media accounts and it makes sense that the majority of the surveys were filled out by Americans and other countries with a huge online presence by the people! But is the rest of the world as “online” as those of us in the U.S.? (Disclosure–other than online forums like this one, I am not involved with any social media.) I honestly do not know the answer to this question–for all I know, every African, even those living in a primitive setting, uses social media. Thank you to anyone who can answer my questioN!
Internet censorship in China (do this search)
our major adversaries do not have freedom of the press and unfortunately, we’re headed that way as well due to suppression
“Everyone, everyone, everyone.”
Except for 88.1 percent of the faithful.
Figures.
Every leftist is motivated by envisioning himself as possessing greater levels of “compassion” not only of others, but of the whole of prior history. Their conceit will not allow them to even contemplate that there is no compassion without suffering with the suffering, everyone among the suffering. Were they to do so, they might reexamine their pretenses.
Not surprised, in this age or”relative truth” even the Church resorts to selective truth. Not that polls should be used at all. The Church is NOT a democracy and should not be governed by majority assent.
James, you’re obviously not in favor of Synodolatry then, eh?
Contemptuous Vatican bureaucrats.
This year marks the 80th anniversary of Mises’ epic tome Bureaucracy.
From the introduction:
“The terms bureaucrat, bureaucratic, and bureaucracy are clearly invectives. Nobody calls himself a bureaucrat or his own methods of management bureaucratic. These words are always applied with an opprobrious connotation. They always imply a disparaging criticism of persons, institutions, or procedures. Nobody doubts that bureaucracy is thoroughly bad and that it should not exist in a perfect world.”
However, Catholic Faith Technologies Vice President Jonathan Lewis offered a different take on the online poll, arguing that the results said more about respondents than synodality.
“Based on the top comments and poll results, this post reiterates the reality of North American resistance to synodality compared with the global Church,” Lewis said on X.
It’s always great to hear from one of my superiors.
Do share any data you have on synodality’s popularity around the world, Mr. Lewis.
It sounds like they can’t handle the truth.
What is astounding is that 12% actually buy into synodality. That’s 1 poor Catholic in ten who still have not understood the difference between Catholicism and Bergoglio’s Cancel-Culture.
The conversion of the faithful will always be based on clarifying our path to Jesus Chrit. It does not come by turning from Tradition or established doctrine. The SonS is not present an opportunity for greater holiness or faithfulness. It is something else.
Now the entire Church can get the message of the venomous disrespect that this pontificate has held for Catholics who are Catholic for eleven years.
Anti-Synodaling of the common man must be suppressed for sake of a Synodaling Church.
Synodal-ai-EEE-whooo!
Who?
Not me, say we Catholics in the pews.
I guess the proponents of a “Listening Church” only really mean listening to opinions that reinforce their predetermined biases.
In a way, an honest synod would be a good thing, a prelates only synod, as they’re meant to be. But it would have to be honest, non-cowards only. A synod of prelates united in telling Francis what damage he has done to Catholic witness, and it must stop!
Like Terrence said, I also laughed with the 88.1. % at the idiocy of synodality- but the error of grave sins in heterodoxy is too appalling.
For “Yodeler” Brineyman herein, thx for the “lol”:
“Don’t-know-who” a while ago on this CWR stream shared/coined the definition of “SIN-NOD”- but “it fits”!!
Apparently, the Pope doesn’t understand that like Hell, the internet is forever.
Somehow I don’t think that the comment section was mistakenly deleted.
How ANTI-synodal of them.
I first heard “SIN-NOD” from Raymond Arroyo on EWTN’s World Over Live, many years ago well before COVID-19.
It sure is proving a NOD in the direction of SIN.
Hey there it also proves EWTN is cutting edge and up to mark to Mother Angelica’s honour and the Church’s -against all the naysayers.
We had “synodalism” introduced in our Archdiocese late 1990’s and the lodge boys who got invited would say they had to go “sigh nod” and fulfill their duty.
Ride Posse!
‘ “They repeat very often that it’s a pastoral direction. And so they say, we want to avoid the confusion, though they said many things, which only made bigger confusion,” Cardinal Zen noted. ‘
https://www.ncregister.com/cna/cardinal-zen-discusses-his-new-book-for-lent-and-concerns-for-the-church
I am accused of not following the “Hermeneutics of continuity” when criticizing the “Fiducia supplicans”!?
https://oldyosef.hkdavc.com/?p=2043