Nebraska Facebook abortion case: Court documents reveal grisly details

Katie Yoder   By Katie Yoder for CNA

 

null / Thanatip S/Shutterstock.

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Aug 19, 2022 / 17:00 pm (CNA).

A Nebraska abortion case relying on private Facebook messages as evidence began as an investigation into concerns that a teenager gave birth prematurely to a stillborn child, according to court documents.

The case initially sparked a backlash from abortion supporters against Facebook amid growing concerns about tech privacy. Court documents suggest there is more to the story.

A 17-year-old from Norfolk, Nebraska, was nearly 30 weeks pregnant when, she said, she gave birth to a stillborn baby earlier this year, according to documents filed in Madison County Court. Those documents reveal that the teenager and her mother buried the baby before telling multiple people that they needed to dig up the body to burn it.

Then police came across Facebook messages that suggested the baby’s death was intentional.

Norfolk Police Detective Ben McBride obtained a search warrant for the messages of the daughter and her mother, Jessica Burgess, on somewhat of a hunch: He said that he saw the teenager check her Facebook Messenger account to confirm with him the exact date that she lost her baby (April 22, 2022). With the warrant in hand, McBride then said he secured messages between the two discussing certain pills.

“Hey we can get The show on the road the stuff came in,” the mother wrote on April 20, according to police. “1 pill stops the hormones and [t]hen you gotta wait 24 HR 2 take the other.”

The daughter responded by saying that she can’t wait to get the “thing” out of her body and by confirming their next steps, McBride wrote in court documents.

“Remember we burn the evidence,” the daughter typed, according to police. “Once everything is out.”

Her mother responded with a simple “Yep.”

Chemical abortion, or abortion by pill, is approved for use only up to 10 weeks of pregnancy by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA first approved mifepristone, which is paired with another drug called misoprostol, for earlier abortions in 2000. The second pill can be taken 24-48 hours after the first.

Court documents say the evidence demonstrates that the mother obtained a “drug or other substance named ‘Pregnot’” from an online source for the purpose of ending the unborn baby’s life. The Pregnot tablet contains mifepristone and is used for abortion.

According to McBride, a friend of the teenager confirmed to the County Attorney’s Office that she was present when the daughter consumed the first pill. According to medical records cited by police, the teenager was nearly 30 weeks pregnant, or past the point of viability.

Nebraska law bans most abortions after 20 weeks.

While the case fed into abortion activists’ growing concerns about tech privacy following the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide, in June, the incident happened two months earlier, in April.

According to police, the daughter gave birth in a bathtub or shower in the early morning hours. The records say that she and her mother placed the baby’s remains in a bag and, placed the bag into a box in a cargo van.

The baby’s remains were moved three times to different locations, according to McBride in court documents. Those same documents say that a man who helped bury the baby’s remains said that the mother and daughter attempted to burn the baby’s body before burying it.

After exhuming a body from the spot where the mother and daughter said they buried the baby’s remains, on April 29, McBride said the body they found “appeared to have thermal injuries.”

An April 30 autopsy on that body said the exact cause of death was unknown and that the findings were consistent with the baby being stillborn. Still, McBride noted that placement of the baby’s body in the plastic bag raised the possibility of suffocation.

Only Jessica Burgess is charged with abortion-related felonies: performing an abortion without a medical license, and performing or attempting to perform an abortion on an unborn child 20 weeks after conception.

Both women face charges of mishandling human remains (felony), concealing a death (misdemeanor), and providing false information (misdemeanor).

A a not-guilty plea was made on the mother’s behalf, while the daughter pleaded not guilty.

The Catholic response

Paige Brown, the communications and outreach specialist at the Nebraska Catholic Conference, called the known details of the case “particularly tragic and disturbing.”

She focused on holding the provider of the abortion pills accountable.

“Since abortion-inducing drugs are not FDA-approved after ten weeks, and the mailing of these drugs in Nebraska is illegal, we must learn who provided these dangerous drugs,” she told CNA. “It’s clear: abortion providers are willing to break the law, risk preborn lives, and risk the lives of vulnerable women for profit.”

Senior fellows with The Catholic Association (TCA), an organization dedicated to defending religious liberty, life, and the Church in the public square, also weighed in on the case.

“This tragedy illustrates what 50 years of an abortion dependent culture has wrought,” Maureen Ferguson, a senior fellow for TCA, told CNA.

She addressed how Catholics should respond.

“This story cries to out to us as Catholics to give of our time, talent, and treasure to help build a culture of life,” she said, before encouraging Catholics to get involved with the U.S. bishops’ pro-life parish-based ministry, Walking With Moms in Need.

Another fellow, Dr. Grazie Pozo Christie, spoke about the implications of abortion by pill in response to the “tragic case.”

“Today’s back alley abortion is the do-it-yourself chemical version, far away from medical oversight,” she told CNA. “Abortions performed in the second and third trimesters using this method are dangerous for the mother. Also, they produce a tiny corpse that will be disposed of in an undignified manner as happened in this case.”

She called the case a “tragedy for our whole culture, not just for this sad family.”


If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!

Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.


About Catholic News Agency 5476 Articles
Catholic News Agency (www.catholicnewsagency.com)

1 Comment

  1. I have seldom see a story of such disturbing callousness, emotional hardness, and lack of moral compass. As I woman myself, I offer the sound advice that women who do not wish to become pregnant might consider not jumping into bed with someone. Abortions by the way are almost always done at the behest of a SINGLE woman. Society has gone far downhill when a woman imagines she has the “right” to terminate the life of a healthy baby at will for convenience sake. Be it known that if you are unable to parent a baby, there are tens of thousands of willing adoptive parents in the US. “Who will take care of all of these babies?”, a criticism leveled at pro-lifers, is a bogus argument. I know because I am an adoptive mother.There are not enough babies available for adoption in the US which is why many go out of the country to do so. The “choice” for women is relatively simple. Make a decision to act with responsibility ( and morality) in your sexual habits. Or face a possible surgical procedure, emotional turmoil, and live with the reality of having taken a hand to kill an innocent child.

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Nebraska Facebook abortion case: Court documents reveal grisly details | Passionists Missionaries Kenya, Vice Province of St. Charles Lwanga, Fathers & Brothers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All comments posted at Catholic World Report are moderated. While vigorous debate is welcome and encouraged, please note that in the interest of maintaining a civilized and helpful level of discussion, comments containing obscene language or personal attacks—or those that are deemed by the editors to be needlessly combative or inflammatory—will not be published. Thank you.


*